forked from Minki/linux
l2tp: Fix locking in l2tp_ip.c
Both l2tp_ip_connect() and l2tp_ip_sendmsg() must take the socket lock. They both modify socket state non-atomically, and in particular l2tp_ip_sendmsg() increments socket private counters without using atomic operations. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
da905bd1d5
commit
2f16270f41
@ -311,6 +311,8 @@ static int l2tp_ip_connect(struct sock *sk, struct sockaddr *uaddr, int addr_len
|
||||
if (lsa->l2tp_family != AF_INET)
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
|
||||
lock_sock(sk);
|
||||
|
||||
sk_dst_reset(sk);
|
||||
|
||||
oif = sk->sk_bound_dev_if;
|
||||
@ -356,6 +358,7 @@ static int l2tp_ip_connect(struct sock *sk, struct sockaddr *uaddr, int addr_len
|
||||
|
||||
rc = 0;
|
||||
out:
|
||||
release_sock(sk);
|
||||
return rc;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -420,18 +423,23 @@ static int l2tp_ip_sendmsg(struct kiocb *iocb, struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *m
|
||||
int connected = 0;
|
||||
__be32 daddr;
|
||||
|
||||
lock_sock(sk);
|
||||
|
||||
rc = -ENOTCONN;
|
||||
if (sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD))
|
||||
return -ENOTCONN;
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Get and verify the address. */
|
||||
if (msg->msg_name) {
|
||||
struct sockaddr_l2tpip *lip = (struct sockaddr_l2tpip *) msg->msg_name;
|
||||
rc = -EINVAL;
|
||||
if (msg->msg_namelen < sizeof(*lip))
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
|
||||
if (lip->l2tp_family != AF_INET) {
|
||||
rc = -EAFNOSUPPORT;
|
||||
if (lip->l2tp_family != AF_UNSPEC)
|
||||
return -EAFNOSUPPORT;
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
daddr = lip->l2tp_addr.s_addr;
|
||||
@ -510,12 +518,15 @@ error:
|
||||
lsa->tx_errors++;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
out:
|
||||
release_sock(sk);
|
||||
return rc;
|
||||
|
||||
no_route:
|
||||
IP_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), IPSTATS_MIB_OUTNOROUTES);
|
||||
kfree_skb(skb);
|
||||
return -EHOSTUNREACH;
|
||||
rc = -EHOSTUNREACH;
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int l2tp_ip_recvmsg(struct kiocb *iocb, struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user