forked from Minki/linux
bpf: Unify data extension operation of jited_ksyms and jited_linfo
We found that 32-bit environment can not print BPF line info due to a data inconsistency between jited_ksyms[0] and jited_linfo[0]. For example: jited_kyms[0] = 0xb800067c, jited_linfo[0] = 0xffffffffb800067c We know that both of them store BPF func address, but due to the different data extension operations when extended to u64, they may not be the same. We need to unify the data extension operations of them. Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAEf4BzZ-eDcdJZgJ+Np7Y=V-TVjDDvOMqPwzKjyWrh=i5juv4w@mail.gmail.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220530092815.1112406-2-pulehui@huawei.com
This commit is contained in:
parent
21f1481a8d
commit
2cd0085227
@ -4090,14 +4090,15 @@ static int bpf_prog_get_info_by_fd(struct file *file,
|
||||
info.nr_jited_line_info = 0;
|
||||
if (info.nr_jited_line_info && ulen) {
|
||||
if (bpf_dump_raw_ok(file->f_cred)) {
|
||||
unsigned long line_addr;
|
||||
__u64 __user *user_linfo;
|
||||
u32 i;
|
||||
|
||||
user_linfo = u64_to_user_ptr(info.jited_line_info);
|
||||
ulen = min_t(u32, info.nr_jited_line_info, ulen);
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < ulen; i++) {
|
||||
if (put_user((__u64)(long)prog->aux->jited_linfo[i],
|
||||
&user_linfo[i]))
|
||||
line_addr = (unsigned long)prog->aux->jited_linfo[i];
|
||||
if (put_user((__u64)line_addr, &user_linfo[i]))
|
||||
return -EFAULT;
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user