forked from Minki/linux
[S390] fix dfp elf hwcap/facility bit detection
The old dfp detection wanted to check bit 43 (dfp high performance), but due to a wrong calculation always used to check bit 42. Additionally the "userspace expectation" is, that the dfp capability bit is set is if facility bit 42 (decimal floating point facility available) and bit 44 (perform floating point operation facility avail). The patch fixes the bit calculation and extends the check to work like: elf hw cap dfp bit = facility bits 42 (dfp) & 44 (pfpo) available Signed-off-by: Christian Ehrhardt <ehrhardt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
d0d3cdf4c2
commit
2ac3307f27
@ -713,13 +713,15 @@ static void __init setup_hwcaps(void)
|
||||
* How many facility words are stored depends on the number of
|
||||
* doublewords passed to the instruction. The additional facilites
|
||||
* are:
|
||||
* Bit 43: decimal floating point facility is installed
|
||||
* Bit 42: decimal floating point facility is installed
|
||||
* Bit 44: perform floating point operation facility is installed
|
||||
* translated to:
|
||||
* HWCAP_S390_DFP bit 6.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if ((elf_hwcap & (1UL << 2)) &&
|
||||
__stfle(&facility_list_extended, 1) > 0) {
|
||||
if (facility_list_extended & (1ULL << (64 - 43)))
|
||||
if ((facility_list_extended & (1ULL << (63 - 42)))
|
||||
&& (facility_list_extended & (1ULL << (63 - 44))))
|
||||
elf_hwcap |= 1UL << 6;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user