drm/i915: Make sure we respect n.max on VLV
We limit the maximum n divider value in order to make sure the PLL's reference inout is at least 19.2 MHz. I assume that is done to satisfy some hardware requirement. However we never check whether that calculated limit is below the maximum supoorted N divider value (7). In practice that is always true since we only support 100 MHz reference clock, but making the code safe against higher reference clocks seems like a reasoanble thing to do. Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
This commit is contained in:
parent
c1a9ae4388
commit
27e639bf02
@ -678,15 +678,16 @@ vlv_find_best_dpll(const intel_limit_t *limit, struct drm_crtc *crtc,
|
||||
intel_clock_t *best_clock)
|
||||
{
|
||||
intel_clock_t clock;
|
||||
u32 minupdate = 19200;
|
||||
unsigned int bestppm = 1000000;
|
||||
/* min update 19.2 MHz */
|
||||
int max_n = min(limit->n.max, refclk / 19200);
|
||||
|
||||
target *= 5; /* fast clock */
|
||||
|
||||
memset(best_clock, 0, sizeof(*best_clock));
|
||||
|
||||
/* based on hardware requirement, prefer smaller n to precision */
|
||||
for (clock.n = limit->n.min; clock.n <= ((refclk) / minupdate); clock.n++) {
|
||||
for (clock.n = limit->n.min; clock.n <= max_n; clock.n++) {
|
||||
for (clock.p1 = limit->p1.max; clock.p1 > limit->p1.min; clock.p1--) {
|
||||
for (clock.p2 = limit->p2.p2_fast; clock.p2 > 0;
|
||||
clock.p2 -= clock.p2 > 10 ? 2 : 1) {
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user