leandrof/linux
1
0
Fork 0
forked from Minki/linux
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Btrfs: fix find_free_dev_extent() malfunction in case device tree has hole

Browse Source 
If device tree has hole, find_free_dev_extent() cannot find available
address properly.

The problem can be reproduce by following script.

    mntpath=/btrfs
    loopdev=/dev/loop0
    filepath=/home/forrest/image

    umount $mntpath
    losetup -d $loopdev
    truncate --size 100g $filepath
    losetup $loopdev $filepath
    mkfs.btrfs -f $loopdev
    mount $loopdev $mntpath

    # make device tree with one big hole
    for i in `seq 1 1 100`; do
        fallocate -l 1g $mntpath/$i
    done
    sync
    for i in `seq 1 1 95`; do
        rm $mntpath/$i
    done
    sync

    # wait cleaner thread remove unused block group
    sleep 300

    fallocate -l 1g $mntpath/aaa

    # failed to allocate new chunk
    fallocate -l 1g $mntpath/bbb

Above script will make device tree with one big hole, and can only allocate
just one chunk in a transaction, so failed to allocate new chunk for $mntpath/bbb

    item 8 key (1 DEV_EXTENT 2185232384) itemoff 15859 itemsize 48
        dev extent chunk_tree 3
        chunk objectid 256 chunk offset 106292051968 length 1073741824
    item 9 key (1 DEV_EXTENT 104190705664) itemoff 15811 itemsize 48
        dev extent chunk_tree 3
        chunk objectid 256 chunk offset 103108575232 length 1073741824

Signed-off-by: Forrest Liu <forrestl@synology.com>
Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
This commit is contained in:
Forrest Liu 2015-02-09 17:30:47 +08:00 committed by Chris Mason
parent e4c88f007b
commit 1b98450816
1 changed files with 11 additions and 4 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

15
fs/btrfs/volumes.c
View File

@ -1058,6 +1058,7 @@ static int contains_pending_extent(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
struct extent_map *em;
struct list_head *search_list = &trans->transaction->pending_chunks;
int ret = 0;
u64 physical_start = *start;
again:
list_for_each_entry(em, search_list, list) {
@ -1068,9 +1069,9 @@ again:
for (i = 0; i < map->num_stripes; i++) {
if (map->stripes[i].dev != device)
continue;
if (map->stripes[i].physical >= *start + len ||
if (map->stripes[i].physical >= physical_start + len ||
map->stripes[i].physical + em->orig_block_len <=
*start)
physical_start)
continue;
*start = map->stripes[i].physical +
em->orig_block_len;
@ -1193,8 +1194,14 @@ again:
*/
if (contains_pending_extent(trans, device,
&search_start,
hole_size))
hole_size = 0;
hole_size)) {
if (key.offset >= search_start) {
hole_size = key.offset - search_start;
} else {
WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
hole_size = 0;
}
}
if (hole_size > max_hole_size) {
max_hole_start = search_start;