scsi: libfc: Issue PRLI after a PRLO has been received
When receiving a PRLO it just means that the operating parameters have changed, it does _not_ mean that the port doesn't want to communicate with us. So instead of implicitly logging out we should be issueing a PRLI to figure out the new operating parameters. We can always recover once PRLI fails. Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Chad Dupuis <chad.dupuis@qlogic.com> Tested-by: Chad Dupuis <chad.dupuis@qlogic.com> Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
aceeffbb59
commit
166f310b62
@ -1877,7 +1877,7 @@ static void fc_rport_recv_prlo_req(struct fc_rport_priv *rdata,
|
||||
spp->spp_type_ext = rspp->spp_type_ext;
|
||||
spp->spp_flags = FC_SPP_RESP_ACK;
|
||||
|
||||
fc_rport_enter_delete(rdata, RPORT_EV_LOGO);
|
||||
fc_rport_enter_prli(rdata);
|
||||
|
||||
fc_fill_reply_hdr(fp, rx_fp, FC_RCTL_ELS_REP, 0);
|
||||
lport->tt.frame_send(lport, fp);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user