scsi: libfc: Issue PRLI after a PRLO has been received

When receiving a PRLO it just means that the operating parameters have
changed, it does _not_ mean that the port doesn't want to communicate
with us.  So instead of implicitly logging out we should be issueing a
PRLI to figure out the new operating parameters.  We can always recover
once PRLI fails.

Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Chad Dupuis <chad.dupuis@qlogic.com>
Tested-by: Chad Dupuis <chad.dupuis@qlogic.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
This commit is contained in:
Hannes Reinecke 2016-08-05 14:55:00 +02:00 committed by Martin K. Petersen
parent aceeffbb59
commit 166f310b62

View File

@ -1877,7 +1877,7 @@ static void fc_rport_recv_prlo_req(struct fc_rport_priv *rdata,
spp->spp_type_ext = rspp->spp_type_ext;
spp->spp_flags = FC_SPP_RESP_ACK;
fc_rport_enter_delete(rdata, RPORT_EV_LOGO);
fc_rport_enter_prli(rdata);
fc_fill_reply_hdr(fp, rx_fp, FC_RCTL_ELS_REP, 0);
lport->tt.frame_send(lport, fp);