forked from Minki/linux
simplify cleanup_workqueue_thread()
cleanup_workqueue_thread() and cwq_should_stop() are overcomplicated. Convert the code to use kthread_should_stop/kthread_stop as was suggested by Gautham and Srivatsa. In particular this patch removes the (unlikely) busy-wait loop from the exit path, it was a temporary and ugly kludge (if not a bug). Note: the current code was designed to solve another old problem: work->func can't share locks with hotplug callbacks. I think this could be done, see http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=116905366428633 but this needs some more complications to preserve CPU affinity of cwq->thread during cpu_up(). A freezer-based hotplug looks more appealing. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: make it more tolerant of gcc borkenness] Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru> Cc: Zilvinas Valinskas <zilvinas@wilibox.com> Cc: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com> Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@in.ibm.com> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
3fcbc72965
commit
14441960e8
@ -47,7 +47,6 @@ struct cpu_workqueue_struct {
|
||||
|
||||
struct workqueue_struct *wq;
|
||||
struct task_struct *thread;
|
||||
int should_stop;
|
||||
|
||||
int run_depth; /* Detect run_workqueue() recursion depth */
|
||||
} ____cacheline_aligned;
|
||||
@ -71,7 +70,13 @@ static LIST_HEAD(workqueues);
|
||||
|
||||
static int singlethread_cpu __read_mostly;
|
||||
static cpumask_t cpu_singlethread_map __read_mostly;
|
||||
/* optimization, we could use cpu_possible_map */
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* _cpu_down() first removes CPU from cpu_online_map, then CPU_DEAD
|
||||
* flushes cwq->worklist. This means that flush_workqueue/wait_on_work
|
||||
* which comes in between can't use for_each_online_cpu(). We could
|
||||
* use cpu_possible_map, the cpumask below is more a documentation
|
||||
* than optimization.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static cpumask_t cpu_populated_map __read_mostly;
|
||||
|
||||
/* If it's single threaded, it isn't in the list of workqueues. */
|
||||
@ -272,24 +277,6 @@ static void run_workqueue(struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq)
|
||||
spin_unlock_irq(&cwq->lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* NOTE: the caller must not touch *cwq if this func returns true
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static int cwq_should_stop(struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int should_stop = cwq->should_stop;
|
||||
|
||||
if (unlikely(should_stop)) {
|
||||
spin_lock_irq(&cwq->lock);
|
||||
should_stop = cwq->should_stop && list_empty(&cwq->worklist);
|
||||
if (should_stop)
|
||||
cwq->thread = NULL;
|
||||
spin_unlock_irq(&cwq->lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return should_stop;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int worker_thread(void *__cwq)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq = __cwq;
|
||||
@ -302,14 +289,15 @@ static int worker_thread(void *__cwq)
|
||||
|
||||
for (;;) {
|
||||
prepare_to_wait(&cwq->more_work, &wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
|
||||
if (!freezing(current) && !cwq->should_stop
|
||||
&& list_empty(&cwq->worklist))
|
||||
if (!freezing(current) &&
|
||||
!kthread_should_stop() &&
|
||||
list_empty(&cwq->worklist))
|
||||
schedule();
|
||||
finish_wait(&cwq->more_work, &wait);
|
||||
|
||||
try_to_freeze();
|
||||
|
||||
if (cwq_should_stop(cwq))
|
||||
if (kthread_should_stop())
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
run_workqueue(cwq);
|
||||
@ -340,18 +328,21 @@ static void insert_wq_barrier(struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq,
|
||||
insert_work(cwq, &barr->work, tail);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void flush_cpu_workqueue(struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq)
|
||||
static int flush_cpu_workqueue(struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int active;
|
||||
|
||||
if (cwq->thread == current) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Probably keventd trying to flush its own queue. So simply run
|
||||
* it by hand rather than deadlocking.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
run_workqueue(cwq);
|
||||
active = 1;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
struct wq_barrier barr;
|
||||
int active = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
active = 0;
|
||||
spin_lock_irq(&cwq->lock);
|
||||
if (!list_empty(&cwq->worklist) || cwq->current_work != NULL) {
|
||||
insert_wq_barrier(cwq, &barr, 1);
|
||||
@ -362,6 +353,8 @@ static void flush_cpu_workqueue(struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq)
|
||||
if (active)
|
||||
wait_for_completion(&barr.done);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return active;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
@ -674,7 +667,6 @@ static int create_workqueue_thread(struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq, int cpu)
|
||||
return PTR_ERR(p);
|
||||
|
||||
cwq->thread = p;
|
||||
cwq->should_stop = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -740,29 +732,27 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__create_workqueue);
|
||||
|
||||
static void cleanup_workqueue_thread(struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq, int cpu)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct wq_barrier barr;
|
||||
int alive = 0;
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Our caller is either destroy_workqueue() or CPU_DEAD,
|
||||
* workqueue_mutex protects cwq->thread
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (cwq->thread == NULL)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock_irq(&cwq->lock);
|
||||
if (cwq->thread != NULL) {
|
||||
insert_wq_barrier(cwq, &barr, 1);
|
||||
cwq->should_stop = 1;
|
||||
alive = 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
spin_unlock_irq(&cwq->lock);
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If the caller is CPU_DEAD the single flush_cpu_workqueue()
|
||||
* is not enough, a concurrent flush_workqueue() can insert a
|
||||
* barrier after us.
|
||||
* When ->worklist becomes empty it is safe to exit because no
|
||||
* more work_structs can be queued on this cwq: flush_workqueue
|
||||
* checks list_empty(), and a "normal" queue_work() can't use
|
||||
* a dead CPU.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
while (flush_cpu_workqueue(cwq))
|
||||
;
|
||||
|
||||
if (alive) {
|
||||
wait_for_completion(&barr.done);
|
||||
|
||||
while (unlikely(cwq->thread != NULL))
|
||||
cpu_relax();
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Wait until cwq->thread unlocks cwq->lock,
|
||||
* it won't touch *cwq after that.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
smp_rmb();
|
||||
spin_unlock_wait(&cwq->lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
kthread_stop(cwq->thread);
|
||||
cwq->thread = NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user