leandrof/linux
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

net: add annotation for sock_{lock,unlock}_fast

Browse Source 
The static checker is fooled by the non-static locking scheme
implemented by the mentioned helpers.
Let's make its life easier adding some unconditional annotation
so that the helpers are now interpreted as a plain spinlock from
sparse.

v1 -> v2:
 - add __releases() annotation to unlock_sock_fast()

Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/6ed7ae627d8271fb7f20e0a9c6750fbba1ac2635.1605634911.git.pabeni@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Paolo Abeni
2020-11-17 19:43:49 +01:00
committed by Jakub Kicinski
parent c3bc2adb05
commit 12f4bd8622
2 changed files with 9 additions and 4 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

10
include/net/sock.h
View File

@@ -1595,7 +1595,8 @@ void release_sock(struct sock *sk);
SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING)
#define bh_unlock_sock(__sk) spin_unlock(&((__sk)->sk_lock.slock))
bool lock_sock_fast(struct sock *sk);
bool lock_sock_fast(struct sock *sk) __acquires(&sk->sk_lock.slock);
/**
* unlock_sock_fast - complement of lock_sock_fast
* @sk: socket
@@ -1605,11 +1606,14 @@ bool lock_sock_fast(struct sock *sk);
* If slow mode is on, we call regular release_sock()
*/
static inline void unlock_sock_fast(struct sock *sk, bool slow)
__releases(&sk->sk_lock.slock)
{
if (slow)
if (slow) {
release_sock(sk);
else
__release(&sk->sk_lock.slock);
} else {
spin_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_lock.slock);
}
}
/* Used by processes to "lock" a socket state, so that