forked from Minki/linux
UAS: Revert commit 3ae62a4209
("UAS: fix alignment of scatter/gather segments")
Commit3ae62a4209
("UAS: fix alignment of scatter/gather segments"), copying a similar commit for usb-storage, attempted to solve a problem involving scatter-gather I/O and USB/IP by setting the virt_boundary_mask for mass-storage devices. However, it now turns out that the analogous change in usb-storage interacted badly with commit09324d32d2
("block: force an unlimited segment size on queues with a virt boundary"), which was added later. A typical error message is: ehci-pci 0000:00:13.2: swiotlb buffer is full (sz: 327680 bytes), total 32768 (slots), used 97 (slots) There is no longer any reason to keep the virt_boundary_mask setting in the uas driver. It was needed in the first place only for handling devices with a block size smaller than the maxpacket size and where the host controller was not capable of fully general scatter-gather operation (that is, able to merge two SG segments into a single USB packet). But: High-speed or slower connections never use a bulk maxpacket value larger than 512; The SCSI layer does not handle block devices with a block size smaller than 512 bytes; All the host controllers capable of SuperSpeed operation can handle fully general SG; Since commitea44d19076
("usbip: Implement SG support to vhci-hcd and stub driver") was merged, the USB/IP driver can also handle SG. Therefore all supported device/controller combinations should be okay with no need for any special virt_boundary_mask. So in order to head off potential problems similar to those affecting usb-storage, this patch reverts commit3ae62a4209
. Signed-off-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> CC: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com> CC: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Fixes:3ae62a4209
("UAS: fix alignment of scatter/gather segments") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1910231132470.1878-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
9a97694961
commit
1186f86a71
@ -789,29 +789,9 @@ static int uas_slave_alloc(struct scsi_device *sdev)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct uas_dev_info *devinfo =
|
||||
(struct uas_dev_info *)sdev->host->hostdata;
|
||||
int maxp;
|
||||
|
||||
sdev->hostdata = devinfo;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We have two requirements here. We must satisfy the requirements
|
||||
* of the physical HC and the demands of the protocol, as we
|
||||
* definitely want no additional memory allocation in this path
|
||||
* ruling out using bounce buffers.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* For a transmission on USB to continue we must never send
|
||||
* a package that is smaller than maxpacket. Hence the length of each
|
||||
* scatterlist element except the last must be divisible by the
|
||||
* Bulk maxpacket value.
|
||||
* If the HC does not ensure that through SG,
|
||||
* the upper layer must do that. We must assume nothing
|
||||
* about the capabilities off the HC, so we use the most
|
||||
* pessimistic requirement.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
maxp = usb_maxpacket(devinfo->udev, devinfo->data_in_pipe, 0);
|
||||
blk_queue_virt_boundary(sdev->request_queue, maxp - 1);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* The protocol has no requirements on alignment in the strict sense.
|
||||
* Controllers may or may not have alignment restrictions.
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user