forked from Minki/linux
svcrdma: Avoid Send Queue overflow
Sanity case: Catch the case where more Work Requests are being posted to the Send Queue than there are Send Queue Entries. This might happen if a client sends a chunk with more segments than there are SQEs for the transport. The server can't send that reply, so the transport will deadlock unless the client drops the RPC. Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
91a08eae79
commit
107c1d0a99
@ -232,6 +232,9 @@ static int svc_rdma_post_chunk_ctxt(struct svc_rdma_chunk_ctxt *cc)
|
||||
struct ib_cqe *cqe;
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
|
||||
if (cc->cc_sqecount > rdma->sc_sq_depth)
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
||||
first_wr = NULL;
|
||||
cqe = &cc->cc_cqe;
|
||||
list_for_each(tmp, &cc->cc_rwctxts) {
|
||||
@ -425,6 +428,7 @@ static int svc_rdma_send_xdr_pagelist(struct svc_rdma_write_info *info,
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Returns a non-negative number of bytes the chunk consumed, or
|
||||
* %-E2BIG if the payload was larger than the Write chunk,
|
||||
* %-EINVAL if client provided too many segments,
|
||||
* %-ENOMEM if rdma_rw context pool was exhausted,
|
||||
* %-ENOTCONN if posting failed (connection is lost),
|
||||
* %-EIO if rdma_rw initialization failed (DMA mapping, etc).
|
||||
@ -465,6 +469,7 @@ out_err:
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Returns a non-negative number of bytes the chunk consumed, or
|
||||
* %-E2BIG if the payload was larger than the Reply chunk,
|
||||
* %-EINVAL if client provided too many segments,
|
||||
* %-ENOMEM if rdma_rw context pool was exhausted,
|
||||
* %-ENOTCONN if posting failed (connection is lost),
|
||||
* %-EIO if rdma_rw initialization failed (DMA mapping, etc).
|
||||
|
@ -684,7 +684,7 @@ int svc_rdma_sendto(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
err2:
|
||||
if (ret != -E2BIG)
|
||||
if (ret != -E2BIG || ret != -EINVAL)
|
||||
goto err1;
|
||||
|
||||
ret = svc_rdma_post_recv(rdma, GFP_KERNEL);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user