forked from Minki/linux
kernel/kmod: fix use-after-free of the sub_info structure
Found this in the message log on a s390 system: BUG kmalloc-192 (Not tainted): Poison overwritten Disabling lock debugging due to kernel taint INFO: 0x00000000684761f4-0x00000000684761f7. First byte 0xff instead of 0x6b INFO: Allocated in call_usermodehelper_setup+0x70/0x128 age=71 cpu=2 pid=648 __slab_alloc.isra.47.constprop.56+0x5f6/0x658 kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x106/0x408 call_usermodehelper_setup+0x70/0x128 call_usermodehelper+0x62/0x90 cgroup_release_agent+0x178/0x1c0 process_one_work+0x36e/0x680 worker_thread+0x2f0/0x4f8 kthread+0x10a/0x120 kernel_thread_starter+0x6/0xc kernel_thread_starter+0x0/0xc INFO: Freed in call_usermodehelper_exec+0x110/0x1b8 age=71 cpu=2 pid=648 __slab_free+0x94/0x560 kfree+0x364/0x3e0 call_usermodehelper_exec+0x110/0x1b8 cgroup_release_agent+0x178/0x1c0 process_one_work+0x36e/0x680 worker_thread+0x2f0/0x4f8 kthread+0x10a/0x120 kernel_thread_starter+0x6/0xc kernel_thread_starter+0x0/0xc There is a use-after-free bug on the subprocess_info structure allocated by the user mode helper. In case do_execve() returns with an error ____call_usermodehelper() stores the error code to sub_info->retval, but sub_info can already have been freed. Regarding UMH_NO_WAIT, the sub_info structure can be freed by __call_usermodehelper() before the worker thread returns from do_execve(), allowing memory corruption when do_execve() failed after exec_mmap() is called. Regarding UMH_WAIT_EXEC, the call to umh_complete() allows call_usermodehelper_exec() to continue which then frees sub_info. To fix this race the code needs to make sure that the call to call_usermodehelper_freeinfo() is always done after the last store to sub_info->retval. Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
c8d523a4b0
commit
0baf2a4dbf
@ -196,12 +196,34 @@ int __request_module(bool wait, const char *fmt, ...)
|
||||
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__request_module);
|
||||
#endif /* CONFIG_MODULES */
|
||||
|
||||
static void call_usermodehelper_freeinfo(struct subprocess_info *info)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (info->cleanup)
|
||||
(*info->cleanup)(info);
|
||||
kfree(info);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void umh_complete(struct subprocess_info *sub_info)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct completion *comp = xchg(&sub_info->complete, NULL);
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* See call_usermodehelper_exec(). If xchg() returns NULL
|
||||
* we own sub_info, the UMH_KILLABLE caller has gone away
|
||||
* or the caller used UMH_NO_WAIT.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (comp)
|
||||
complete(comp);
|
||||
else
|
||||
call_usermodehelper_freeinfo(sub_info);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* This is the task which runs the usermode application
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static int ____call_usermodehelper(void *data)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct subprocess_info *sub_info = data;
|
||||
int wait = sub_info->wait & ~UMH_KILLABLE;
|
||||
struct cred *new;
|
||||
int retval;
|
||||
|
||||
@ -221,7 +243,7 @@ static int ____call_usermodehelper(void *data)
|
||||
retval = -ENOMEM;
|
||||
new = prepare_kernel_cred(current);
|
||||
if (!new)
|
||||
goto fail;
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock(&umh_sysctl_lock);
|
||||
new->cap_bset = cap_intersect(usermodehelper_bset, new->cap_bset);
|
||||
@ -233,7 +255,7 @@ static int ____call_usermodehelper(void *data)
|
||||
retval = sub_info->init(sub_info, new);
|
||||
if (retval) {
|
||||
abort_creds(new);
|
||||
goto fail;
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -242,12 +264,13 @@ static int ____call_usermodehelper(void *data)
|
||||
retval = do_execve(getname_kernel(sub_info->path),
|
||||
(const char __user *const __user *)sub_info->argv,
|
||||
(const char __user *const __user *)sub_info->envp);
|
||||
out:
|
||||
sub_info->retval = retval;
|
||||
/* wait_for_helper() will call umh_complete if UHM_WAIT_PROC. */
|
||||
if (wait != UMH_WAIT_PROC)
|
||||
umh_complete(sub_info);
|
||||
if (!retval)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Exec failed? */
|
||||
fail:
|
||||
sub_info->retval = retval;
|
||||
do_exit(0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -258,26 +281,6 @@ static int call_helper(void *data)
|
||||
return ____call_usermodehelper(data);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void call_usermodehelper_freeinfo(struct subprocess_info *info)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (info->cleanup)
|
||||
(*info->cleanup)(info);
|
||||
kfree(info);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void umh_complete(struct subprocess_info *sub_info)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct completion *comp = xchg(&sub_info->complete, NULL);
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* See call_usermodehelper_exec(). If xchg() returns NULL
|
||||
* we own sub_info, the UMH_KILLABLE caller has gone away.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (comp)
|
||||
complete(comp);
|
||||
else
|
||||
call_usermodehelper_freeinfo(sub_info);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Keventd can't block, but this (a child) can. */
|
||||
static int wait_for_helper(void *data)
|
||||
{
|
||||
@ -336,17 +339,7 @@ static void __call_usermodehelper(struct work_struct *work)
|
||||
kmod_thread_locker = NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
switch (wait) {
|
||||
case UMH_NO_WAIT:
|
||||
call_usermodehelper_freeinfo(sub_info);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
case UMH_WAIT_PROC:
|
||||
if (pid > 0)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
/* FALLTHROUGH */
|
||||
case UMH_WAIT_EXEC:
|
||||
if (pid < 0)
|
||||
if (pid < 0) {
|
||||
sub_info->retval = pid;
|
||||
umh_complete(sub_info);
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -588,7 +581,12 @@ int call_usermodehelper_exec(struct subprocess_info *sub_info, int wait)
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
sub_info->complete = &done;
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Set the completion pointer only if there is a waiter.
|
||||
* This makes it possible to use umh_complete to free
|
||||
* the data structure in case of UMH_NO_WAIT.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
sub_info->complete = (wait == UMH_NO_WAIT) ? NULL : &done;
|
||||
sub_info->wait = wait;
|
||||
|
||||
queue_work(khelper_wq, &sub_info->work);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user