forked from Minki/linux
nfsd: allow fh_want_write to be called twice
A fuzzer recently triggered lockdep warnings about potential sb_writers deadlocks caused by fh_want_write(). Looks like we aren't careful to pair each fh_want_write() with an fh_drop_write(). It's not normally a problem since fh_put() will call fh_drop_write() for us. And was OK for NFSv3 where we'd do one operation that might call fh_want_write(), and then put the filehandle. But an NFSv4 protocol fuzzer can do weird things like call unlink twice in a compound, and then we get into trouble. I'm a little worried about this approach of just leaving everything to fh_put(). But I think there are probably a lot of fh_want_write()/fh_drop_write() imbalances so for now I think we need it to be more forgiving. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
e45d1a1835
commit
0b8f62625d
@ -120,8 +120,11 @@ void nfsd_put_raparams(struct file *file, struct raparms *ra);
|
||||
|
||||
static inline int fh_want_write(struct svc_fh *fh)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int ret = mnt_want_write(fh->fh_export->ex_path.mnt);
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
|
||||
if (fh->fh_want_write)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
ret = mnt_want_write(fh->fh_export->ex_path.mnt);
|
||||
if (!ret)
|
||||
fh->fh_want_write = true;
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user