leandrof/linux
1
0
Fork 0
forked from Minki/linux
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

cpufreq: Use cpumask_copy instead of cpumask_or to copy a mask

Browse Source 
->related_cpus is empty at this point of time and copying ->cpus to it
or orring ->related_cpus with ->cpus would result in the same value. But
cpumask_copy makes it rather clear.

Reviewed-by: Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
Viresh Kumar 2015-10-15 21:35:21 +05:30 committed by Rafael J. Wysocki
parent 083701b13c
commit 0998a03a3a
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
View File

@ -1214,7 +1214,7 @@ static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu)
if (new_policy) {
/* related_cpus should at least include policy->cpus. */
cpumask_or(policy->related_cpus, policy->related_cpus, policy->cpus);
cpumask_copy(policy->related_cpus, policy->cpus);
/* Remember CPUs present at the policy creation time. */
cpumask_and(policy->real_cpus, policy->cpus, cpu_present_mask);
}