forked from Minki/linux
kill-the-bkl/reiserfs: move the concurrent tree accesses checks per superblock
When do_balance() balances the tree, a trick is performed to provide the ability for other tree writers/readers to check whether do_balance() is executing concurrently (requires CONFIG_REISERFS_CHECK). This is done to protect concurrent accesses to the tree. The trick is the following: When do_balance is called, a unique global variable called cur_tb takes a pointer to the current tree to be rebalanced. Once do_balance finishes its work, cur_tb takes the NULL value. Then, concurrent tree readers/writers just have to check the value of cur_tb to ensure do_balance isn't executing concurrently. If it is, then it proves that schedule() occured on do_balance(), which then relaxed the bkl that protected the tree. Now that the bkl has be turned into a mutex, this check is still fine even though do_balance() becomes preemptible: the write lock will not be automatically released on schedule(), so the tree is still protected. But this is only fine if we have a single reiserfs mountpoint. Indeed, because the bkl is a global lock, it didn't allowed concurrent executions between a tree reader/writer in a mount point and a do_balance() on another tree from another mountpoint. So assuming all these readers/writers weren't supposed to be reentrant, the current check now sometimes detect false positives with the current per-superblock mutex which allows this reentrancy. This patch keeps the concurrent tree accesses check but moves it per superblock, so that only trees from a same mount point are checked to be not accessed concurrently. [ Impact: fix spurious panic while running several reiserfs mount-points ] Cc: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
c72e05756b
commit
08f14fc896
@ -21,14 +21,6 @@
|
||||
#include <linux/buffer_head.h>
|
||||
#include <linux/kernel.h>
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_REISERFS_CHECK
|
||||
|
||||
struct tree_balance *cur_tb = NULL; /* detects whether more than one
|
||||
copy of tb exists as a means
|
||||
of checking whether schedule
|
||||
is interrupting do_balance */
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
static inline void buffer_info_init_left(struct tree_balance *tb,
|
||||
struct buffer_info *bi)
|
||||
{
|
||||
@ -1840,11 +1832,12 @@ static int check_before_balancing(struct tree_balance *tb)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int retval = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
if (cur_tb) {
|
||||
if (REISERFS_SB(tb->tb_sb)->cur_tb) {
|
||||
reiserfs_panic(tb->tb_sb, "vs-12335", "suspect that schedule "
|
||||
"occurred based on cur_tb not being null at "
|
||||
"this point in code. do_balance cannot properly "
|
||||
"handle schedule occurring while it runs.");
|
||||
"handle concurrent tree accesses on a same "
|
||||
"mount point.");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* double check that buffers that we will modify are unlocked. (fix_nodes should already have
|
||||
@ -1986,7 +1979,7 @@ static inline void do_balance_starts(struct tree_balance *tb)
|
||||
"check");*/
|
||||
RFALSE(check_before_balancing(tb), "PAP-12340: locked buffers in TB");
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_REISERFS_CHECK
|
||||
cur_tb = tb;
|
||||
REISERFS_SB(tb->tb_sb)->cur_tb = tb;
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1996,7 +1989,7 @@ static inline void do_balance_completed(struct tree_balance *tb)
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_REISERFS_CHECK
|
||||
check_leaf_level(tb);
|
||||
check_internal_levels(tb);
|
||||
cur_tb = NULL;
|
||||
REISERFS_SB(tb->tb_sb)->cur_tb = NULL;
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
/* reiserfs_free_block is no longer schedule safe. So, we need to
|
||||
|
@ -563,9 +563,6 @@ static int get_num_ver(int mode, struct tree_balance *tb, int h,
|
||||
return needed_nodes;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_REISERFS_CHECK
|
||||
extern struct tree_balance *cur_tb;
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
/* Set parameters for balancing.
|
||||
* Performs write of results of analysis of balancing into structure tb,
|
||||
@ -2368,7 +2365,7 @@ int fix_nodes(int op_mode, struct tree_balance *tb,
|
||||
return REPEAT_SEARCH;
|
||||
}
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_REISERFS_CHECK
|
||||
if (cur_tb) {
|
||||
if (REISERFS_SB(tb->tb_sb)->cur_tb) {
|
||||
print_cur_tb("fix_nodes");
|
||||
reiserfs_panic(tb->tb_sb, "PAP-8305",
|
||||
"there is pending do_balance");
|
||||
|
@ -349,10 +349,6 @@ void reiserfs_debug(struct super_block *s, int level, const char *fmt, ...)
|
||||
|
||||
. */
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_REISERFS_CHECK
|
||||
extern struct tree_balance *cur_tb;
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
void __reiserfs_panic(struct super_block *sb, const char *id,
|
||||
const char *function, const char *fmt, ...)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
@ -222,9 +222,6 @@ static inline int bin_search(const void *key, /* Key to search for. */
|
||||
return ITEM_NOT_FOUND;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_REISERFS_CHECK
|
||||
extern struct tree_balance *cur_tb;
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
/* Minimal possible key. It is never in the tree. */
|
||||
const struct reiserfs_key MIN_KEY = { 0, 0, {{0, 0},} };
|
||||
@ -711,7 +708,7 @@ int search_by_key(struct super_block *sb, const struct cpu_key *key, /* Key to s
|
||||
!key_in_buffer(search_path, key, sb),
|
||||
"PAP-5130: key is not in the buffer");
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_REISERFS_CHECK
|
||||
if (cur_tb) {
|
||||
if (REISERFS_SB(sb)->cur_tb) {
|
||||
print_cur_tb("5140");
|
||||
reiserfs_panic(sb, "PAP-5140",
|
||||
"schedule occurred in do_balance!");
|
||||
|
@ -417,6 +417,17 @@ struct reiserfs_sb_info {
|
||||
char *s_qf_names[MAXQUOTAS];
|
||||
int s_jquota_fmt;
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_REISERFS_CHECK
|
||||
|
||||
struct tree_balance *cur_tb; /*
|
||||
* Detects whether more than one
|
||||
* copy of tb exists per superblock
|
||||
* as a means of checking whether
|
||||
* do_balance is executing concurrently
|
||||
* against another tree reader/writer
|
||||
* on a same mount point.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
/* Definitions of reiserfs on-disk properties: */
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user