From 07b4a930fc44a537efecf73c1fd2b4937f64caaa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2020 14:37:26 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] rcu: Don't set nesting depth negative in
rcu_preempt_deferred_qs()
Now that RCU flavors have been consolidated, an RCU-preempt
rcu_read_unlock() in an interrupt or softirq handler cannot possibly
end the RCU read-side critical section. Consider the old vulnerability
involving rcu_preempt_deferred_qs() being invoked within such a handler
that interrupted an extended RCU read-side critical section, in which
a wakeup might be invoked with a scheduler lock held. Because
rcu_read_unlock_special() no longer does wakeups in such situations,
it is no longer necessary for rcu_preempt_deferred_qs() to set the
nesting level negative.
This commit therefore removes this recursion-protection code from
rcu_preempt_deferred_qs().
[ paulmck: Fix typo in commit log per Steve Rostedt. ]
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
---
kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 5 -----
1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
index ccad77639d80..263c766b9dc1 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
@@ -569,16 +569,11 @@ static bool rcu_preempt_need_deferred_qs(struct task_struct *t)
static void rcu_preempt_deferred_qs(struct task_struct *t)
{
unsigned long flags;
- bool couldrecurse = rcu_preempt_depth() >= 0;
if (!rcu_preempt_need_deferred_qs(t))
return;
- if (couldrecurse)
- rcu_preempt_depth_set(rcu_preempt_depth() - RCU_NEST_BIAS);
local_irq_save(flags);
rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_irqrestore(t, flags);
- if (couldrecurse)
- rcu_preempt_depth_set(rcu_preempt_depth() + RCU_NEST_BIAS);
}
/*