forked from Minki/linux
ricoh_mmc: Handle newer models of Ricoh controllers
The latest generation of laptops are shipping with a newer model of Ricoh chip where the firewire controller is the primary PCI function but a cardbus controller is also present. The existing code assumes that if a cardbus controller is, present, then it must be the one to manipulate - but the real rule is that you manipulate PCI function 0. This patch adds an additional constraint that the target must be function 0. Signed-off-by: Philip Langdale <philipl@overt.org> Signed-off-by: Pierre Ossman <drzeus@drzeus.cx>
This commit is contained in:
parent
b30f8af335
commit
0527a60c2b
@ -11,9 +11,10 @@
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* This is a conceptually ridiculous driver, but it is required by the way
|
||||
* the Ricoh multi-function R5C832 works. This chip implements firewire
|
||||
* and four different memory card controllers. Two of those controllers are
|
||||
* an SDHCI controller and a proprietary MMC controller. The linux SDHCI
|
||||
* the Ricoh multi-function chips (R5CXXX) work. These chips implement
|
||||
* the four main memory card controllers (SD, MMC, MS, xD) and one or both
|
||||
* of cardbus or firewire. It happens that they implement SD and MMC
|
||||
* support as separate controllers (and PCI functions). The linux SDHCI
|
||||
* driver supports MMC cards but the chip detects MMC cards in hardware
|
||||
* and directs them to the MMC controller - so the SDHCI driver never sees
|
||||
* them. To get around this, we must disable the useless MMC controller.
|
||||
@ -21,8 +22,10 @@
|
||||
* a detection event occurs immediately, even if the MMC card is already
|
||||
* in the reader.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* The relevant registers live on the firewire function, so this is unavoidably
|
||||
* ugly. Such is life.
|
||||
* It seems to be the case that the relevant PCI registers to deactivate the
|
||||
* MMC controller live on PCI function 0, which might be the cardbus controller
|
||||
* or the firewire controller, depending on the particular chip in question. As
|
||||
* such, it makes what this driver has to do unavoidably ugly. Such is life.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
#include <linux/pci.h>
|
||||
@ -143,6 +146,7 @@ static int __devinit ricoh_mmc_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
|
||||
pci_get_device(PCI_VENDOR_ID_RICOH,
|
||||
PCI_DEVICE_ID_RICOH_RL5C476, fw_dev))) {
|
||||
if (PCI_SLOT(pdev->devfn) == PCI_SLOT(fw_dev->devfn) &&
|
||||
PCI_FUNC(fw_dev->devfn) == 0 &&
|
||||
pdev->bus == fw_dev->bus) {
|
||||
if (ricoh_mmc_disable(fw_dev) != 0)
|
||||
return -ENODEV;
|
||||
@ -160,6 +164,7 @@ static int __devinit ricoh_mmc_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
|
||||
(fw_dev = pci_get_device(PCI_VENDOR_ID_RICOH,
|
||||
PCI_DEVICE_ID_RICOH_R5C832, fw_dev))) {
|
||||
if (PCI_SLOT(pdev->devfn) == PCI_SLOT(fw_dev->devfn) &&
|
||||
PCI_FUNC(fw_dev->devfn) == 0 &&
|
||||
pdev->bus == fw_dev->bus) {
|
||||
if (ricoh_mmc_disable(fw_dev) != 0)
|
||||
return -ENODEV;
|
||||
@ -172,7 +177,7 @@ static int __devinit ricoh_mmc_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
|
||||
|
||||
if (!ctrlfound) {
|
||||
printk(KERN_WARNING DRIVER_NAME
|
||||
": Main firewire function not found. Cannot disable controller.\n");
|
||||
": Main Ricoh function not found. Cannot disable controller.\n");
|
||||
return -ENODEV;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user