forked from Minki/linux
blk-mq: insert passthrough request into hctx->dispatch directly
For some reason, device may be in one situation which can't handle FS request, so STS_RESOURCE is always returned and the FS request will be added to hctx->dispatch. However passthrough request may be required at that time for fixing the problem. If passthrough request is added to scheduler queue, there isn't any chance for blk-mq to dispatch it given we prioritize requests in hctx->dispatch. Then the FS IO request may never be completed, and IO hang is caused. So passthrough request has to be added to hctx->dispatch directly for fixing the IO hang. Fix this issue by inserting passthrough request into hctx->dispatch directly together withing adding FS request to the tail of hctx->dispatch in blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(). Actually we add FS request to tail of hctx->dispatch at default, see blk_mq_request_bypass_insert(). Then it becomes consistent with original legacy IO request path, in which passthrough request is always added to q->queue_head. Cc: Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@oracle.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Cc: Ewan D. Milne <emilne@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
This commit is contained in:
parent
f8788d86ab
commit
01e99aeca3
@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ void blk_insert_flush(struct request *rq)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if ((policy & REQ_FSEQ_DATA) &&
|
||||
!(policy & (REQ_FSEQ_PREFLUSH | REQ_FSEQ_POSTFLUSH))) {
|
||||
blk_mq_request_bypass_insert(rq, false);
|
||||
blk_mq_request_bypass_insert(rq, false, false);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -361,13 +361,19 @@ static bool blk_mq_sched_bypass_insert(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
|
||||
bool has_sched,
|
||||
struct request *rq)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* dispatch flush rq directly */
|
||||
if (rq->rq_flags & RQF_FLUSH_SEQ) {
|
||||
spin_lock(&hctx->lock);
|
||||
list_add(&rq->queuelist, &hctx->dispatch);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&hctx->lock);
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* dispatch flush and passthrough rq directly
|
||||
*
|
||||
* passthrough request has to be added to hctx->dispatch directly.
|
||||
* For some reason, device may be in one situation which can't
|
||||
* handle FS request, so STS_RESOURCE is always returned and the
|
||||
* FS request will be added to hctx->dispatch. However passthrough
|
||||
* request may be required at that time for fixing the problem. If
|
||||
* passthrough request is added to scheduler queue, there isn't any
|
||||
* chance to dispatch it given we prioritize requests in hctx->dispatch.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if ((rq->rq_flags & RQF_FLUSH_SEQ) || blk_rq_is_passthrough(rq))
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (has_sched)
|
||||
rq->rq_flags |= RQF_SORTED;
|
||||
@ -391,8 +397,10 @@ void blk_mq_sched_insert_request(struct request *rq, bool at_head,
|
||||
|
||||
WARN_ON(e && (rq->tag != -1));
|
||||
|
||||
if (blk_mq_sched_bypass_insert(hctx, !!e, rq))
|
||||
if (blk_mq_sched_bypass_insert(hctx, !!e, rq)) {
|
||||
blk_mq_request_bypass_insert(rq, at_head, false);
|
||||
goto run;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (e && e->type->ops.insert_requests) {
|
||||
LIST_HEAD(list);
|
||||
|
@ -735,7 +735,7 @@ static void blk_mq_requeue_work(struct work_struct *work)
|
||||
* merge.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (rq->rq_flags & RQF_DONTPREP)
|
||||
blk_mq_request_bypass_insert(rq, false);
|
||||
blk_mq_request_bypass_insert(rq, false, false);
|
||||
else
|
||||
blk_mq_sched_insert_request(rq, true, false, false);
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -1286,7 +1286,7 @@ bool blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(struct request_queue *q, struct list_head *list,
|
||||
q->mq_ops->commit_rqs(hctx);
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock(&hctx->lock);
|
||||
list_splice_init(list, &hctx->dispatch);
|
||||
list_splice_tail_init(list, &hctx->dispatch);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&hctx->lock);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
@ -1677,12 +1677,16 @@ void __blk_mq_insert_request(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, struct request *rq,
|
||||
* Should only be used carefully, when the caller knows we want to
|
||||
* bypass a potential IO scheduler on the target device.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
void blk_mq_request_bypass_insert(struct request *rq, bool run_queue)
|
||||
void blk_mq_request_bypass_insert(struct request *rq, bool at_head,
|
||||
bool run_queue)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx = rq->mq_hctx;
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock(&hctx->lock);
|
||||
list_add_tail(&rq->queuelist, &hctx->dispatch);
|
||||
if (at_head)
|
||||
list_add(&rq->queuelist, &hctx->dispatch);
|
||||
else
|
||||
list_add_tail(&rq->queuelist, &hctx->dispatch);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&hctx->lock);
|
||||
|
||||
if (run_queue)
|
||||
@ -1849,7 +1853,7 @@ insert:
|
||||
if (bypass_insert)
|
||||
return BLK_STS_RESOURCE;
|
||||
|
||||
blk_mq_request_bypass_insert(rq, run_queue);
|
||||
blk_mq_request_bypass_insert(rq, false, run_queue);
|
||||
return BLK_STS_OK;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1876,7 +1880,7 @@ static void blk_mq_try_issue_directly(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
|
||||
|
||||
ret = __blk_mq_try_issue_directly(hctx, rq, cookie, false, true);
|
||||
if (ret == BLK_STS_RESOURCE || ret == BLK_STS_DEV_RESOURCE)
|
||||
blk_mq_request_bypass_insert(rq, true);
|
||||
blk_mq_request_bypass_insert(rq, false, true);
|
||||
else if (ret != BLK_STS_OK)
|
||||
blk_mq_end_request(rq, ret);
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1910,7 +1914,7 @@ void blk_mq_try_issue_list_directly(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
|
||||
if (ret != BLK_STS_OK) {
|
||||
if (ret == BLK_STS_RESOURCE ||
|
||||
ret == BLK_STS_DEV_RESOURCE) {
|
||||
blk_mq_request_bypass_insert(rq,
|
||||
blk_mq_request_bypass_insert(rq, false,
|
||||
list_empty(list));
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -66,7 +66,8 @@ int blk_mq_alloc_rqs(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set, struct blk_mq_tags *tags,
|
||||
*/
|
||||
void __blk_mq_insert_request(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, struct request *rq,
|
||||
bool at_head);
|
||||
void blk_mq_request_bypass_insert(struct request *rq, bool run_queue);
|
||||
void blk_mq_request_bypass_insert(struct request *rq, bool at_head,
|
||||
bool run_queue);
|
||||
void blk_mq_insert_requests(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, struct blk_mq_ctx *ctx,
|
||||
struct list_head *list);
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user