drivers/powercap/Makefile

# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
obj-$(CONFIG_DTPM) += dtpm.o
obj-$(CONFIG_DTPM_CPU) += dtpm_cpu.o
obj-$(CONFIG_DTPM_DEVFREQ) += dtpm_devfreq.o
obj-$(CONFIG_POWERCAP)	+= powercap_sys.o
obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_RAPL_CORE) += intel_rapl_common.o
obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_RAPL) += intel_rapl_msr.o
obj-$(CONFIG_IDLE_INJECT) += idle_inject.o
treewide: Add SPDX license identifier - Makefile/Kconfig Add SPDX license identifiers to all Make/Kconfig files which: - Have no license information of any form These files fall under the project license, GPL v2 only. The resulting SPDX license identifier is: GPL-2.0-only Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 2019-05-19 13:07:45 +01:00			`# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only`
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Add API for dynamic thermal power management On the embedded world, the complexity of the SoC leads to an increasing number of hotspots which need to be monitored and mitigated as a whole in order to prevent the temperature to go above the normative and legally stated 'skin temperature'. Another aspect is to sustain the performance for a given power budget, for example virtual reality where the user can feel dizziness if the GPU performance is capped while a big CPU is processing something else. Or reduce the battery charging because the dissipated power is too high compared with the power consumed by other devices. The userspace is the most adequate place to dynamically act on the different devices by limiting their power given an application profile: it has the knowledge of the platform. These userspace daemons are in charge of the Dynamic Thermal Power Management (DTPM). Nowadays, the dtpm daemons are abusing the thermal framework as they act on the cooling device state to force a specific and arbitrary state without taking care of the governor decisions. Given the closed loop of some governors that can confuse the logic or directly enter in a decision conflict. As the number of cooling device support is limited today to the CPU and the GPU, the dtpm daemons have little control on the power dissipation of the system. The out of tree solutions are hacking around here and there in the drivers, in the frameworks to have control on the devices. The common solution is to declare them as cooling devices. There is no unification of the power limitation unit, opaque states are used. This patch provides a way to create a hierarchy of constraints using the powercap framework. The devices which are registered as power limit-able devices are represented in this hierarchy as a tree. They are linked together with intermediate nodes which are just there to propagate the constraint to the children. The leaves of the tree are the real devices, the intermediate nodes are virtual, aggregating the children constraints and power characteristics. Each node have a weight on a 2^10 basis, in order to reflect the percentage of power distribution of the children's node. This percentage is used to dispatch the power limit to the children. The weight is computed against the max power of the siblings. This simple approach allows to do a fair distribution of the power limit. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> 2020-12-08 17:41:44 +01:00			`obj-$(CONFIG_DTPM) += dtpm.o`
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Add CPU energy model based support With the powercap dtpm controller, we are able to plug devices with power limitation features in the tree. The following patch introduces the CPU power limitation based on the energy model and the performance states. The power limitation is done at the performance domain level. If some CPUs are unplugged, the corresponding power will be subtracted from the performance domain total power. It is up to the platform to initialize the dtpm tree and add the CPU. Here is an example to create a simple tree with one root node called "pkg" and the CPU's performance domains. static int dtpm_register_pkg(struct dtpm_descr descr) { struct dtpm pkg; int ret; pkg = dtpm_alloc(NULL); if (!pkg) return -ENOMEM; ret = dtpm_register(descr->name, pkg, descr->parent); if (ret) return ret; return dtpm_register_cpu(pkg); } static struct dtpm_descr descr = { .name = "pkg", .init = dtpm_register_pkg, }; DTPM_DECLARE(descr); Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> 2020-12-08 17:41:45 +01:00			`obj-$(CONFIG_DTPM_CPU) += dtpm_cpu.o`
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Add dtpm devfreq with energy model support Currently the dtpm supports the CPUs via cpufreq and the energy model. This change provides the same for the device which supports devfreq. Each device supporting devfreq and having an energy model can be added to the hierarchy. The concept is the same as the cpufreq DTPM support: the QoS is used to aggregate the requests and the energy model gives the value of the instantaneous power consumption ponderated by the load of the device. Cc: Chanwoo Choi <cwchoi00@gmail.com> Cc: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Cc: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com> Cc: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220128163537.212248-5-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org 2022-01-28 17:35:36 +01:00			`obj-$(CONFIG_DTPM_DEVFREQ) += dtpm_devfreq.o`
PowerCap: Add class driver The power capping framework providing a consistent interface between the kernel and user space that allows power capping drivers to expose their settings to user space in a uniform way. The overall design of the framework is described in the documentation added by the previous patch in this series. Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> 2013-10-11 16:54:56 -07:00			`obj-$(CONFIG_POWERCAP) += powercap_sys.o`
intel_rapl: abstract RAPL common code Split intel_rapl.c to intel_rapl_common.c and intel_rapl_msr.c, where intel_rapl_common.c contains the common code that can be used by both MSR and MMIO interface. intel_rapl_msr.c contains the implementation of RAPL MSR interface. Reviewed-by: Pandruvada, Srinivas <srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com> Tested-by: Pandruvada, Srinivas <srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> 2019-07-10 21:44:30 +08:00			`obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_RAPL_CORE) += intel_rapl_common.o`
			`obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_RAPL) += intel_rapl_msr.o`
powercap / idle_inject: Add an idle injection framework Initially, the cpu_cooling device for ARM was changed by adding a new policy inserting idle cycles. The intel_powerclamp driver does a similar action. Instead of implementing idle injections privately in the cpu_cooling device, move the idle injection code in a dedicated framework and give the opportunity to other frameworks to make use of it. The framework relies on the smpboot kthreads which handles via its main loop the common code for hotplugging and [un]parking. This code was previously tested with the cpu cooling device and went through several iterations. It results now in split code and API exported in the header file. It was tested with the cpu cooling device with success. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> [ rjw: Rewrite of all comments ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> 2018-06-26 12:53:29 +02:00			`obj-$(CONFIG_IDLE_INJECT) += idle_inject.o`