* outputs can have names and be referenced with template replacements
the same as inputs.
* fix print_air.zig not decoding correctly.
* LLVM backend: use a table for template names for simplicity
* edwards25519: fix X coordinate of the base point
Reported by @OfekShochat -- Thanks!
* edwards25519: reduce public scalar when the top bit is set, not cleared
This is an optimization for the unexpected case of a scalar
larger than the field size.
Fixes#11563
* edwards25519: add a test implicit reduction of invalid scalars
Instead of doing heterogeneous comparison at comptime. This makes the
following test pass (as it already does for stage1):
```zig
test {
const x: f64 = 12.34;
expect(x == 12.34);
}
```
There is already behavior test coverage for this, however, other bugs in
`std.fmt.parseFloat` are masking the failures.
From a language specification perspective, this makes sense because it
makes comptime comparisons with comptime_float work the same way they
work with runtime comparisons.
Maybe after we have incremental compilation metadata serialization
and non-LLVM backends, it will make sense to switch this back. For now,
however, this makes successive `zig build` commands much faster.
Just like for Struct in 8238d4b335, in the
case of ErrorUnion struct we need to return a compound literal "(T){...}"
instead of just "{}", which is invalid code when used in e.g. a "return"
expression.
* Sema: Correctly determine whether array_cat lhs and rhs are single ptrs
Many-pointers are also not single-pointers and wouldn't be considered
here. This commit makes the conditions use the appropriately-named
isSinglePointer instead.
* Sema: Correctly obtain ArrayInfo for many-pointer concatenation
Many-pointers at comptime have a known size like slices and can be used
in array concatenation. This fixes a stage1 regression.
* test: Add comptime manyptr concatenation test
Co-authored-by: sin-ack <sin-ack@users.noreply.github.com>
Instead, just return ChildProcess directly. This structure does not
require a stable address, so we can put it on the stack just fine. If
someone wants it on the heap they should do.
const proc = try allocator.create(ChildProcess);
proc.* = ChildProcess.init(args, allocator);
18d6523888 regressed compiler-rt tests for
stage1 because it removed a workaround. I updated the comment to better
explain what exactly the workaround is so that it won't happen again.
This reverts commit 75c9936737, reversing
changes made to 7f13f5cd5f.
I don't think `runZigBuild` belongs in std.testing. We already have
`test/standalone/*` for this.
Additionally test names should explain what they are testing rather than
referencing GitHub issue numbers.
This reverts commit 7f13f5cd5f.
I'd like to review this one before it goes in. This is an awfully
specific API that I don't think belongs in std.testing. Also I don't
want any code snippets in doc strings. We have doctests for that.
To correctly handle multiple backends crossed with multiple targets,
we need to push all elements in separate allocated arrays rather
than operate on raw iterators. Hence, introduce `getConfigForKeyAlloc`.
