mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-15 00:21:59 +00:00
0685552f2c
Each text file under Documentation follows a different format. Some doesn't even have titles! Change its representation to follow the adopted standard, using ReST markups for it to be parseable by Sphinx: - Use the main title standard for this document; - replace _foo_ by **foo** for emphasis; - mark literal blocks as such. Acked-by: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
123 lines
5.1 KiB
Plaintext
123 lines
5.1 KiB
Plaintext
===========
|
|
ISA Drivers
|
|
===========
|
|
|
|
The following text is adapted from the commit message of the initial
|
|
commit of the ISA bus driver authored by Rene Herman.
|
|
|
|
During the recent "isa drivers using platform devices" discussion it was
|
|
pointed out that (ALSA) ISA drivers ran into the problem of not having
|
|
the option to fail driver load (device registration rather) upon not
|
|
finding their hardware due to a probe() error not being passed up
|
|
through the driver model. In the course of that, I suggested a separate
|
|
ISA bus might be best; Russell King agreed and suggested this bus could
|
|
use the .match() method for the actual device discovery.
|
|
|
|
The attached does this. For this old non (generically) discoverable ISA
|
|
hardware only the driver itself can do discovery so as a difference with
|
|
the platform_bus, this isa_bus also distributes match() up to the
|
|
driver.
|
|
|
|
As another difference: these devices only exist in the driver model due
|
|
to the driver creating them because it might want to drive them, meaning
|
|
that all device creation has been made internal as well.
|
|
|
|
The usage model this provides is nice, and has been acked from the ALSA
|
|
side by Takashi Iwai and Jaroslav Kysela. The ALSA driver module_init's
|
|
now (for oldisa-only drivers) become::
|
|
|
|
static int __init alsa_card_foo_init(void)
|
|
{
|
|
return isa_register_driver(&snd_foo_isa_driver, SNDRV_CARDS);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
static void __exit alsa_card_foo_exit(void)
|
|
{
|
|
isa_unregister_driver(&snd_foo_isa_driver);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Quite like the other bus models therefore. This removes a lot of
|
|
duplicated init code from the ALSA ISA drivers.
|
|
|
|
The passed in isa_driver struct is the regular driver struct embedding a
|
|
struct device_driver, the normal probe/remove/shutdown/suspend/resume
|
|
callbacks, and as indicated that .match callback.
|
|
|
|
The "SNDRV_CARDS" you see being passed in is a "unsigned int ndev"
|
|
parameter, indicating how many devices to create and call our methods
|
|
with.
|
|
|
|
The platform_driver callbacks are called with a platform_device param;
|
|
the isa_driver callbacks are being called with a ``struct device *dev,
|
|
unsigned int id`` pair directly -- with the device creation completely
|
|
internal to the bus it's much cleaner to not leak isa_dev's by passing
|
|
them in at all. The id is the only thing we ever want other then the
|
|
struct device anyways, and it makes for nicer code in the callbacks as
|
|
well.
|
|
|
|
With this additional .match() callback ISA drivers have all options. If
|
|
ALSA would want to keep the old non-load behaviour, it could stick all
|
|
of the old .probe in .match, which would only keep them registered after
|
|
everything was found to be present and accounted for. If it wanted the
|
|
behaviour of always loading as it inadvertently did for a bit after the
|
|
changeover to platform devices, it could just not provide a .match() and
|
|
do everything in .probe() as before.
|
|
|
|
If it, as Takashi Iwai already suggested earlier as a way of following
|
|
the model from saner buses more closely, wants to load when a later bind
|
|
could conceivably succeed, it could use .match() for the prerequisites
|
|
(such as checking the user wants the card enabled and that port/irq/dma
|
|
values have been passed in) and .probe() for everything else. This is
|
|
the nicest model.
|
|
|
|
To the code...
|
|
|
|
This exports only two functions; isa_{,un}register_driver().
|
|
|
|
isa_register_driver() register's the struct device_driver, and then
|
|
loops over the passed in ndev creating devices and registering them.
|
|
This causes the bus match method to be called for them, which is::
|
|
|
|
int isa_bus_match(struct device *dev, struct device_driver *driver)
|
|
{
|
|
struct isa_driver *isa_driver = to_isa_driver(driver);
|
|
|
|
if (dev->platform_data == isa_driver) {
|
|
if (!isa_driver->match ||
|
|
isa_driver->match(dev, to_isa_dev(dev)->id))
|
|
return 1;
|
|
dev->platform_data = NULL;
|
|
}
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
The first thing this does is check if this device is in fact one of this
|
|
driver's devices by seeing if the device's platform_data pointer is set
|
|
to this driver. Platform devices compare strings, but we don't need to
|
|
do that with everything being internal, so isa_register_driver() abuses
|
|
dev->platform_data as a isa_driver pointer which we can then check here.
|
|
I believe platform_data is available for this, but if rather not, moving
|
|
the isa_driver pointer to the private struct isa_dev is ofcourse fine as
|
|
well.
|
|
|
|
Then, if the the driver did not provide a .match, it matches. If it did,
|
|
the driver match() method is called to determine a match.
|
|
|
|
If it did **not** match, dev->platform_data is reset to indicate this to
|
|
isa_register_driver which can then unregister the device again.
|
|
|
|
If during all this, there's any error, or no devices matched at all
|
|
everything is backed out again and the error, or -ENODEV, is returned.
|
|
|
|
isa_unregister_driver() just unregisters the matched devices and the
|
|
driver itself.
|
|
|
|
module_isa_driver is a helper macro for ISA drivers which do not do
|
|
anything special in module init/exit. This eliminates a lot of
|
|
boilerplate code. Each module may only use this macro once, and calling
|
|
it replaces module_init and module_exit.
|
|
|
|
max_num_isa_dev is a macro to determine the maximum possible number of
|
|
ISA devices which may be registered in the I/O port address space given
|
|
the address extent of the ISA devices.
|