mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-12-26 12:52:30 +00:00
7c0ade6c90
An innocent reader of the following x86 KVM code:
bool kvm_arch_can_inject_async_page_present(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
if (!(vcpu->arch.apf.msr_val & KVM_ASYNC_PF_ENABLED))
return true;
...
may get very confused: if APF mechanism is not enabled, why do we report
that we 'can inject async page present'? In reality, upon injection
kvm_arch_async_page_present() will check the same condition again and,
in case APF is disabled, will just drop the item. This is fine as the
guest which deliberately disabled APF doesn't expect to get any APF
notifications.
Rename kvm_arch_can_inject_async_page_present() to
kvm_arch_can_dequeue_async_page_present() to make it clear what we are
checking: if the item can be dequeued (meaning either injected or just
dropped).
On s390 kvm_arch_can_inject_async_page_present() always returns 'true' so
the rename doesn't matter much.
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200525144125.143875-4-vkuznets@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| kvm | ||
| lib | ||
| Makefile | ||