Minki/linux
1
0
Fork 1
mirror of https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git synced 2024-11-18 10:01:43 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
2066a36125
linux/Documentation/RCU/trace.txt
Paul E. McKenney 23b5c8fa01 rcu: Decrease memory-barrier usage based on semi-formal proof 
(Note: this was reverted, and is now being re-applied in pieces, with
this being the fifth and final piece.  See below for the reason that
it is now felt to be safe to re-apply this.)

Commit d09b62d fixed grace-period synchronization, but left some smp_mb()
invocations in rcu_process_callbacks() that are no longer needed, but
sheer paranoia prevented them from being removed.  This commit removes
them and provides a proof of correctness in their absence.  It also adds
a memory barrier to rcu_report_qs_rsp() immediately before the update to
rsp->completed in order to handle the theoretical possibility that the
compiler or CPU might move massive quantities of code into a lock-based
critical section.  This also proves that the sheer paranoia was not
entirely unjustified, at least from a theoretical point of view.

In addition, the old dyntick-idle synchronization depended on the fact
that grace periods were many milliseconds in duration, so that it could
be assumed that no dyntick-idle CPU could reorder a memory reference
across an entire grace period.  Unfortunately for this design, the
addition of expedited grace periods breaks this assumption, which has
the unfortunate side-effect of requiring atomic operations in the
functions that track dyntick-idle state for RCU.  (There is some hope
that the algorithms used in user-level RCU might be applied here, but
some work is required to handle the NMIs that user-space applications
can happily ignore.  For the short term, better safe than sorry.)

This proof assumes that neither compiler nor CPU will allow a lock
acquisition and release to be reordered, as doing so can result in
deadlock.  The proof is as follows:

1.	A given CPU declares a quiescent state under the protection of
	its leaf rcu_node's lock.

2.	If there is more than one level of rcu_node hierarchy, the
	last CPU to declare a quiescent state will also acquire the
	->lock of the next rcu_node up in the hierarchy,  but only
	after releasing the lower level's lock.  The acquisition of this
	lock clearly cannot occur prior to the acquisition of the leaf
	node's lock.

3.	Step 2 repeats until we reach the root rcu_node structure.
	Please note again that only one lock is held at a time through
	this process.  The acquisition of the root rcu_node's ->lock
	must occur after the release of that of the leaf rcu_node.

4.	At this point, we set the ->completed field in the rcu_state
	structure in rcu_report_qs_rsp().  However, if the rcu_node
	hierarchy contains only one rcu_node, then in theory the code
	preceding the quiescent state could leak into the critical
	section.  We therefore precede the update of ->completed with a
	memory barrier.  All CPUs will therefore agree that any updates
	preceding any report of a quiescent state will have happened
	before the update of ->completed.

5.	Regardless of whether a new grace period is needed, rcu_start_gp()
	will propagate the new value of ->completed to all of the leaf
	rcu_node structures, under the protection of each rcu_node's ->lock.
	If a new grace period is needed immediately, this propagation
	will occur in the same critical section that ->completed was
	set in, but courtesy of the memory barrier in #4 above, is still
	seen to follow any pre-quiescent-state activity.

6.	When a given CPU invokes __rcu_process_gp_end(), it becomes
	aware of the end of the old grace period and therefore makes
	any RCU callbacks that were waiting on that grace period eligible
	for invocation.

	If this CPU is the same one that detected the end of the grace
	period, and if there is but a single rcu_node in the hierarchy,
	we will still be in the single critical section.  In this case,
	the memory barrier in step #4 guarantees that all callbacks will
	be seen to execute after each CPU's quiescent state.

	On the other hand, if this is a different CPU, it will acquire
	the leaf rcu_node's ->lock, and will again be serialized after
	each CPU's quiescent state for the old grace period.

On the strength of this proof, this commit therefore removes the memory
barriers from rcu_process_callbacks() and adds one to rcu_report_qs_rsp().
The effect is to reduce the number of memory barriers by one and to
reduce the frequency of execution from about once per scheduling tick
per CPU to once per grace period.

This was reverted do to hangs found during testing by Yinghai Lu and
Ingo Molnar.  Frederic Weisbecker supplied Yinghai with tracing that
located the underlying problem, and Frederic also provided the fix.

The underlying problem was that the HARDIRQ_ENTER() macro from
lib/locking-selftest.c invoked irq_enter(), which in turn invokes
rcu_irq_enter(), but HARDIRQ_EXIT() invoked __irq_exit(), which
does not invoke rcu_irq_exit().  This situation resulted in calls
to rcu_irq_enter() that were not balanced by the required calls to
rcu_irq_exit().  Therefore, after these locking selftests completed,
RCU's dyntick-idle nesting count was a large number (for example,
72), which caused RCU to to conclude that the affected CPU was not in
dyntick-idle mode when in fact it was.

RCU would therefore incorrectly wait for this dyntick-idle CPU, resulting
in hangs.

In contrast, with Frederic's patch, which replaces the irq_enter()
in HARDIRQ_ENTER() with an __irq_enter(), these tests don't ever call
either rcu_irq_enter() or rcu_irq_exit(), which works because the CPU
running the test is already marked as not being in dyntick-idle mode.
This means that the rcu_irq_enter() and rcu_irq_exit() calls and RCU
then has no problem working out which CPUs are in dyntick-idle mode and
which are not.

The reason that the imbalance was not noticed before the barrier patch
was applied is that the old implementation of rcu_enter_nohz() ignored
the nesting depth.  This could still result in delays, but much shorter
ones.  Whenever there was a delay, RCU would IPI the CPU with the
unbalanced nesting level, which would eventually result in rcu_enter_nohz()
being called, which in turn would force RCU to see that the CPU was in
dyntick-idle mode.

The reason that very few people noticed the problem is that the mismatched
irq_enter() vs. __irq_exit() occured only when the kernel was built with
CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCKING_API_SELFTESTS.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
2011-05-26 09:42:23 -07:00

618 lines
27 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Blame History

CONFIG_RCU_TRACE debugfs Files and Formats
The rcutree and rcutiny implementations of RCU provide debugfs trace
output that summarizes counters and state. This information is useful for
debugging RCU itself, and can sometimes also help to debug abuses of RCU.
The following sections describe the debugfs files and formats, first
for rcutree and next for rcutiny.
CONFIG_TREE_RCU and CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU debugfs Files and Formats
These implementations of RCU provides several debugfs files under the
top-level directory "rcu":
rcu/rcudata:
Displays fields in struct rcu_data.
rcu/rcudata.csv:
Comma-separated values spreadsheet version of rcudata.
rcu/rcugp:
Displays grace-period counters.
rcu/rcuhier:
Displays the struct rcu_node hierarchy.
rcu/rcu_pending:
Displays counts of the reasons rcu_pending() decided that RCU had
work to do.
rcu/rcutorture:
Displays rcutorture test progress.
rcu/rcuboost:
Displays RCU boosting statistics. Only present if
CONFIG_RCU_BOOST=y.
The output of "cat rcu/rcudata" looks as follows:
rcu_sched:
0 c=20972 g=20973 pq=1 pqc=20972 qp=0 dt=545/1/0 df=50 of=0 ri=0 ql=163 qs=NRW. kt=0/W/0 ktl=ebc3 b=10 ci=153737 co=0 ca=0
1 c=20972 g=20973 pq=1 pqc=20972 qp=0 dt=967/1/0 df=58 of=0 ri=0 ql=634 qs=NRW. kt=0/W/1 ktl=58c b=10 ci=191037 co=0 ca=0
2 c=20972 g=20973 pq=1 pqc=20972 qp=0 dt=1081/1/0 df=175 of=0 ri=0 ql=74 qs=N.W. kt=0/W/2 ktl=da94 b=10 ci=75991 co=0 ca=0
3 c=20942 g=20943 pq=1 pqc=20942 qp=1 dt=1846/0/0 df=404 of=0 ri=0 ql=0 qs=.... kt=0/W/3 ktl=d1cd b=10 ci=72261 co=0 ca=0
4 c=20972 g=20973 pq=1 pqc=20972 qp=0 dt=369/1/0 df=83 of=0 ri=0 ql=48 qs=N.W. kt=0/W/4 ktl=e0e7 b=10 ci=128365 co=0 ca=0
5 c=20972 g=20973 pq=1 pqc=20972 qp=0 dt=381/1/0 df=64 of=0 ri=0 ql=169 qs=NRW. kt=0/W/5 ktl=fb2f b=10 ci=164360 co=0 ca=0
6 c=20972 g=20973 pq=1 pqc=20972 qp=0 dt=1037/1/0 df=183 of=0 ri=0 ql=62 qs=N.W. kt=0/W/6 ktl=d2ad b=10 ci=65663 co=0 ca=0
7 c=20897 g=20897 pq=1 pqc=20896 qp=0 dt=1572/0/0 df=382 of=0 ri=0 ql=0 qs=.... kt=0/W/7 ktl=cf15 b=10 ci=75006 co=0 ca=0
rcu_bh:
0 c=1480 g=1480 pq=1 pqc=1479 qp=0 dt=545/1/0 df=6 of=0 ri=1 ql=0 qs=.... kt=0/W/0 ktl=ebc3 b=10 ci=0 co=0 ca=0
1 c=1480 g=1480 pq=1 pqc=1479 qp=0 dt=967/1/0 df=3 of=0 ri=1 ql=0 qs=.... kt=0/W/1 ktl=58c b=10 ci=151 co=0 ca=0
2 c=1480 g=1480 pq=1 pqc=1479 qp=0 dt=1081/1/0 df=6 of=0 ri=1 ql=0 qs=.... kt=0/W/2 ktl=da94 b=10 ci=0 co=0 ca=0
3 c=1480 g=1480 pq=1 pqc=1479 qp=0 dt=1846/0/0 df=8 of=0 ri=1 ql=0 qs=.... kt=0/W/3 ktl=d1cd b=10 ci=0 co=0 ca=0
4 c=1480 g=1480 pq=1 pqc=1479 qp=0 dt=369/1/0 df=6 of=0 ri=1 ql=0 qs=.... kt=0/W/4 ktl=e0e7 b=10 ci=0 co=0 ca=0
5 c=1480 g=1480 pq=1 pqc=1479 qp=0 dt=381/1/0 df=4 of=0 ri=1 ql=0 qs=.... kt=0/W/5 ktl=fb2f b=10 ci=0 co=0 ca=0
6 c=1480 g=1480 pq=1 pqc=1479 qp=0 dt=1037/1/0 df=6 of=0 ri=1 ql=0 qs=.... kt=0/W/6 ktl=d2ad b=10 ci=0 co=0 ca=0
7 c=1474 g=1474 pq=1 pqc=1473 qp=0 dt=1572/0/0 df=8 of=0 ri=1 ql=0 qs=.... kt=0/W/7 ktl=cf15 b=10 ci=0 co=0 ca=0
The first section lists the rcu_data structures for rcu_sched, the second
for rcu_bh. Note that CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU kernels will have an
additional section for rcu_preempt. Each section has one line per CPU,
or eight for this 8-CPU system. The fields are as follows:
o The number at the beginning of each line is the CPU number.
CPUs numbers followed by an exclamation mark are offline,
but have been online at least once since boot. There will be
no output for CPUs that have never been online, which can be
a good thing in the surprisingly common case where NR_CPUS is
substantially larger than the number of actual CPUs.
o "c" is the count of grace periods that this CPU believes have
completed. Offlined CPUs and CPUs in dynticks idle mode may
lag quite a ways behind, for example, CPU 6 under "rcu_sched"
above, which has been offline through not quite 40,000 RCU grace
periods. It is not unusual to see CPUs lagging by thousands of
grace periods.
o "g" is the count of grace periods that this CPU believes have
started. Again, offlined CPUs and CPUs in dynticks idle mode
may lag behind. If the "c" and "g" values are equal, this CPU
has already reported a quiescent state for the last RCU grace
period that it is aware of, otherwise, the CPU believes that it
owes RCU a quiescent state.
o "pq" indicates that this CPU has passed through a quiescent state
for the current grace period. It is possible for "pq" to be
"1" and "c" different than "g", which indicates that although
the CPU has passed through a quiescent state, either (1) this
CPU has not yet reported that fact, (2) some other CPU has not
yet reported for this grace period, or (3) both.
o "pqc" indicates which grace period the last-observed quiescent
state for this CPU corresponds to. This is important for handling
the race between CPU 0 reporting an extended dynticks-idle
quiescent state for CPU 1 and CPU 1 suddenly waking up and
reporting its own quiescent state. If CPU 1 was the last CPU
for the current grace period, then the CPU that loses this race
will attempt to incorrectly mark CPU 1 as having checked in for
the next grace period!
o "qp" indicates that RCU still expects a quiescent state from
this CPU. Offlined CPUs and CPUs in dyntick idle mode might
well have qp=1, which is OK: RCU is still ignoring them.
o "dt" is the current value of the dyntick counter that is incremented
when entering or leaving dynticks idle state, either by the
scheduler or by irq. This number is even if the CPU is in
dyntick idle mode and odd otherwise. The number after the first
"/" is the interrupt nesting depth when in dyntick-idle state,
or one greater than the interrupt-nesting depth otherwise.
The number after the second "/" is the NMI nesting depth.
This field is displayed only for CONFIG_NO_HZ kernels.
o "df" is the number of times that some other CPU has forced a
quiescent state on behalf of this CPU due to this CPU being in
dynticks-idle state.
This field is displayed only for CONFIG_NO_HZ kernels.
o "of" is the number of times that some other CPU has forced a
quiescent state on behalf of this CPU due to this CPU being
offline. In a perfect world, this might never happen, but it
turns out that offlining and onlining a CPU can take several grace
periods, and so there is likely to be an extended period of time
when RCU believes that the CPU is online when it really is not.
Please note that erring in the other direction (RCU believing a
CPU is offline when it is really alive and kicking) is a fatal
error, so it makes sense to err conservatively.
o "ri" is the number of times that RCU has seen fit to send a
reschedule IPI to this CPU in order to get it to report a
quiescent state.
o "ql" is the number of RCU callbacks currently residing on
this CPU. This is the total number of callbacks, regardless
of what state they are in (new, waiting for grace period to
start, waiting for grace period to end, ready to invoke).
o "qs" gives an indication of the state of the callback queue
with four characters:
"N" Indicates that there are callbacks queued that are not
ready to be handled by the next grace period, and thus
will be handled by the grace period following the next
one.
"R" Indicates that there are callbacks queued that are
ready to be handled by the next grace period.
"W" Indicates that there are callbacks queued that are
waiting on the current grace period.
"D" Indicates that there are callbacks queued that have
already been handled by a prior grace period, and are
thus waiting to be invoked. Note that callbacks in
the process of being invoked are not counted here.
Callbacks in the process of being invoked are those
that have been removed from the rcu_data structures
queues by rcu_do_batch(), but which have not yet been
invoked.
If there are no callbacks in a given one of the above states,
the corresponding character is replaced by ".".
o "kt" is the per-CPU kernel-thread state. The digit preceding
the first slash is zero if there is no work pending and 1
otherwise. The character between the first pair of slashes is
as follows:
"S" The kernel thread is stopped, in other words, all
CPUs corresponding to this rcu_node structure are
offline.
"R" The kernel thread is running.
"W" The kernel thread is waiting because there is no work
for it to do.
"O" The kernel thread is waiting because it has been
forced off of its designated CPU or because its
->cpus_allowed mask permits it to run on other than
its designated CPU.
"Y" The kernel thread is yielding to avoid hogging CPU.
"?" Unknown value, indicates a bug.
The number after the final slash is the CPU that the kthread
is actually running on.
o "ktl" is the low-order 16 bits (in hexadecimal) of the count of
the number of times that this CPU's per-CPU kthread has gone
through its loop servicing invoke_rcu_cpu_kthread() requests.
o "b" is the batch limit for this CPU. If more than this number
of RCU callbacks is ready to invoke, then the remainder will
be deferred.
o "ci" is the number of RCU callbacks that have been invoked for
this CPU. Note that ci+ql is the number of callbacks that have
been registered in absence of CPU-hotplug activity.
o "co" is the number of RCU callbacks that have been orphaned due to
this CPU going offline. These orphaned callbacks have been moved
to an arbitrarily chosen online CPU.
o "ca" is the number of RCU callbacks that have been adopted due to
other CPUs going offline. Note that ci+co-ca+ql is the number of
RCU callbacks registered on this CPU.
There is also an rcu/rcudata.csv file with the same information in
comma-separated-variable spreadsheet format.
The output of "cat rcu/rcugp" looks as follows:
rcu_sched: completed=33062 gpnum=33063
rcu_bh: completed=464 gpnum=464
Again, this output is for both "rcu_sched" and "rcu_bh". Note that
kernels built with CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU will have an additional
"rcu_preempt" line. The fields are taken from the rcu_state structure,
and are as follows:
o "completed" is the number of grace periods that have completed.
It is comparable to the "c" field from rcu/rcudata in that a
CPU whose "c" field matches the value of "completed" is aware
that the corresponding RCU grace period has completed.
o "gpnum" is the number of grace periods that have started. It is
comparable to the "g" field from rcu/rcudata in that a CPU
whose "g" field matches the value of "gpnum" is aware that the
corresponding RCU grace period has started.
If these two fields are equal (as they are for "rcu_bh" above),
then there is no grace period in progress, in other words, RCU
is idle. On the other hand, if the two fields differ (as they
do for "rcu_sched" above), then an RCU grace period is in progress.
The output of "cat rcu/rcuhier" looks as follows, with very long lines:
c=6902 g=6903 s=2 jfq=3 j=72c7 nfqs=13142/nfqsng=0(13142) fqlh=6
1/1 ..>. 0:127 ^0
3/3 ..>. 0:35 ^0 0/0 ..>. 36:71 ^1 0/0 ..>. 72:107 ^2 0/0 ..>. 108:127 ^3
3/3f ..>. 0:5 ^0 2/3 ..>. 6:11 ^1 0/0 ..>. 12:17 ^2 0/0 ..>. 18:23 ^3 0/0 ..>. 24:29 ^4 0/0 ..>. 30:35 ^5 0/0 ..>. 36:41 ^0 0/0 ..>. 42:47 ^1 0/0 ..>. 48:53 ^2 0/0 ..>. 54:59 ^3 0/0 ..>. 60:65 ^4 0/0 ..>. 66:71 ^5 0/0 ..>. 72:77 ^0 0/0 ..>. 78:83 ^1 0/0 ..>. 84:89 ^2 0/0 ..>. 90:95 ^3 0/0 ..>. 96:101 ^4 0/0 ..>. 102:107 ^5 0/0 ..>. 108:113 ^0 0/0 ..>. 114:119 ^1 0/0 ..>. 120:125 ^2 0/0 ..>. 126:127 ^3
rcu_bh:
c=-226 g=-226 s=1 jfq=-5701 j=72c7 nfqs=88/nfqsng=0(88) fqlh=0
0/1 ..>. 0:127 ^0
0/3 ..>. 0:35 ^0 0/0 ..>. 36:71 ^1 0/0 ..>. 72:107 ^2 0/0 ..>. 108:127 ^3
0/3f ..>. 0:5 ^0 0/3 ..>. 6:11 ^1 0/0 ..>. 12:17 ^2 0/0 ..>. 18:23 ^3 0/0 ..>. 24:29 ^4 0/0 ..>. 30:35 ^5 0/0 ..>. 36:41 ^0 0/0 ..>. 42:47 ^1 0/0 ..>. 48:53 ^2 0/0 ..>. 54:59 ^3 0/0 ..>. 60:65 ^4 0/0 ..>. 66:71 ^5 0/0 ..>. 72:77 ^0 0/0 ..>. 78:83 ^1 0/0 ..>. 84:89 ^2 0/0 ..>. 90:95 ^3 0/0 ..>. 96:101 ^4 0/0 ..>. 102:107 ^5 0/0 ..>. 108:113 ^0 0/0 ..>. 114:119 ^1 0/0 ..>. 120:125 ^2 0/0 ..>. 126:127 ^3
This is once again split into "rcu_sched" and "rcu_bh" portions,
and CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU kernels will again have an additional
"rcu_preempt" section. The fields are as follows:
o "c" is exactly the same as "completed" under rcu/rcugp.
o "g" is exactly the same as "gpnum" under rcu/rcugp.
o "s" is the "signaled" state that drives force_quiescent_state()'s
state machine.
o "jfq" is the number of jiffies remaining for this grace period
before force_quiescent_state() is invoked to help push things
along. Note that CPUs in dyntick-idle mode throughout the grace
period will not report on their own, but rather must be check by
some other CPU via force_quiescent_state().
o "j" is the low-order four hex digits of the jiffies counter.
Yes, Paul did run into a number of problems that turned out to
be due to the jiffies counter no longer counting. Why do you ask?
o "nfqs" is the number of calls to force_quiescent_state() since
boot.
o "nfqsng" is the number of useless calls to force_quiescent_state(),
where there wasn't actually a grace period active. This can
happen due to races. The number in parentheses is the difference
between "nfqs" and "nfqsng", or the number of times that
force_quiescent_state() actually did some real work.
o "fqlh" is the number of calls to force_quiescent_state() that
exited immediately (without even being counted in nfqs above)
due to contention on ->fqslock.
o Each element of the form "1/1 0:127 ^0" represents one struct
rcu_node. Each line represents one level of the hierarchy, from
root to leaves. It is best to think of the rcu_data structures
as forming yet another level after the leaves. Note that there
might be either one, two, or three levels of rcu_node structures,
depending on the relationship between CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT and
CONFIG_NR_CPUS.
o The numbers separated by the "/" are the qsmask followed
by the qsmaskinit. The qsmask will have one bit
set for each entity in the next lower level that
has not yet checked in for the current grace period.
The qsmaskinit will have one bit for each entity that is
currently expected to check in during each grace period.
The value of qsmaskinit is assigned to that of qsmask
at the beginning of each grace period.
For example, for "rcu_sched", the qsmask of the first
entry of the lowest level is 0x14, meaning that we
are still waiting for CPUs 2 and 4 to check in for the
current grace period.
o The characters separated by the ">" indicate the state
of the blocked-tasks lists. A "G" preceding the ">"
indicates that at least one task blocked in an RCU
read-side critical section blocks the current grace
period, while a "E" preceding the ">" indicates that
at least one task blocked in an RCU read-side critical
section blocks the current expedited grace period.
A "T" character following the ">" indicates that at
least one task is blocked within an RCU read-side
critical section, regardless of whether any current
grace period (expedited or normal) is inconvenienced.
A "." character appears if the corresponding condition
does not hold, so that "..>." indicates that no tasks
are blocked. In contrast, "GE>T" indicates maximal
inconvenience from blocked tasks.
o The numbers separated by the ":" are the range of CPUs
served by this struct rcu_node. This can be helpful
in working out how the hierarchy is wired together.
For example, the first entry at the lowest level shows
"0:5", indicating that it covers CPUs 0 through 5.
o The number after the "^" indicates the bit in the
next higher level rcu_node structure that this
rcu_node structure corresponds to.
For example, the first entry at the lowest level shows
"^0", indicating that it corresponds to bit zero in
the first entry at the middle level.
The output of "cat rcu/rcu_pending" looks as follows:
rcu_sched:
0 np=255892 qsp=53936 rpq=85 cbr=0 cng=14417 gpc=10033 gps=24320 nf=6445 nn=146741
1 np=261224 qsp=54638 rpq=33 cbr=0 cng=25723 gpc=16310 gps=2849 nf=5912 nn=155792
2 np=237496 qsp=49664 rpq=23 cbr=0 cng=2762 gpc=45478 gps=1762 nf=1201 nn=136629
3 np=236249 qsp=48766 rpq=98 cbr=0 cng=286 gpc=48049 gps=1218 nf=207 nn=137723
4 np=221310 qsp=46850 rpq=7 cbr=0 cng=26 gpc=43161 gps=4634 nf=3529 nn=123110
5 np=237332 qsp=48449 rpq=9 cbr=0 cng=54 gpc=47920 gps=3252 nf=201 nn=137456
6 np=219995 qsp=46718 rpq=12 cbr=0 cng=50 gpc=42098 gps=6093 nf=4202 nn=120834
7 np=249893 qsp=49390 rpq=42 cbr=0 cng=72 gpc=38400 gps=17102 nf=41 nn=144888
rcu_bh:
0 np=146741 qsp=1419 rpq=6 cbr=0 cng=6 gpc=0 gps=0 nf=2 nn=145314
1 np=155792 qsp=12597 rpq=3 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=4 gps=8 nf=3 nn=143180
2 np=136629 qsp=18680 rpq=1 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=7 gps=6 nf=0 nn=117936
3 np=137723 qsp=2843 rpq=0 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=10 gps=7 nf=0 nn=134863
4 np=123110 qsp=12433 rpq=0 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=4 gps=2 nf=0 nn=110671
5 np=137456 qsp=4210 rpq=1 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=6 gps=5 nf=0 nn=133235
6 np=120834 qsp=9902 rpq=2 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=6 gps=3 nf=2 nn=110921
7 np=144888 qsp=26336 rpq=0 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=8 gps=2 nf=0 nn=118542
As always, this is once again split into "rcu_sched" and "rcu_bh"
portions, with CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU kernels having an additional
"rcu_preempt" section. The fields are as follows:
o "np" is the number of times that __rcu_pending() has been invoked
for the corresponding flavor of RCU.
o "qsp" is the number of times that the RCU was waiting for a
quiescent state from this CPU.
o "rpq" is the number of times that the CPU had passed through
a quiescent state, but not yet reported it to RCU.
o "cbr" is the number of times that this CPU had RCU callbacks
that had passed through a grace period, and were thus ready
to be invoked.
o "cng" is the number of times that this CPU needed another
grace period while RCU was idle.
o "gpc" is the number of times that an old grace period had
completed, but this CPU was not yet aware of it.
o "gps" is the number of times that a new grace period had started,
but this CPU was not yet aware of it.
o "nf" is the number of times that this CPU suspected that the
current grace period had run for too long, and thus needed to
be forced.
Please note that "forcing" consists of sending resched IPIs
to holdout CPUs. If that CPU really still is in an old RCU
read-side critical section, then we really do have to wait for it.
The assumption behing "forcing" is that the CPU is not still in
an old RCU read-side critical section, but has not yet responded
for some other reason.
o "nn" is the number of times that this CPU needed nothing. Alert
readers will note that the rcu "nn" number for a given CPU very
closely matches the rcu_bh "np" number for that same CPU. This
is due to short-circuit evaluation in rcu_pending().
The output of "cat rcu/rcutorture" looks as follows:
rcutorture test sequence: 0 (test in progress)
rcutorture update version number: 615
The first line shows the number of rcutorture tests that have completed
since boot. If a test is currently running, the "(test in progress)"
string will appear as shown above. The second line shows the number of
update cycles that the current test has started, or zero if there is
no test in progress.
The output of "cat rcu/rcuboost" looks as follows:
0:5 tasks=.... kt=W ntb=0 neb=0 nnb=0 j=2f95 bt=300f
balk: nt=0 egt=989 bt=0 nb=0 ny=0 nos=16
6:7 tasks=.... kt=W ntb=0 neb=0 nnb=0 j=2f95 bt=300f
balk: nt=0 egt=225 bt=0 nb=0 ny=0 nos=6
This information is output only for rcu_preempt. Each two-line entry
corresponds to a leaf rcu_node strcuture. The fields are as follows:
o "n:m" is the CPU-number range for the corresponding two-line
entry. In the sample output above, the first entry covers
CPUs zero through five and the second entry covers CPUs 6
and 7.
o "tasks=TNEB" gives the state of the various segments of the
rnp->blocked_tasks list:
"T" This indicates that there are some tasks that blocked
while running on one of the corresponding CPUs while
in an RCU read-side critical section.
"N" This indicates that some of the blocked tasks are preventing
the current normal (non-expedited) grace period from
completing.
"E" This indicates that some of the blocked tasks are preventing
the current expedited grace period from completing.
"B" This indicates that some of the blocked tasks are in
need of RCU priority boosting.
Each character is replaced with "." if the corresponding
condition does not hold.
o "kt" is the state of the RCU priority-boosting kernel
thread associated with the corresponding rcu_node structure.
The state can be one of the following:
"S" The kernel thread is stopped, in other words, all
CPUs corresponding to this rcu_node structure are
offline.
"R" The kernel thread is running.
"W" The kernel thread is waiting because there is no work
for it to do.
"Y" The kernel thread is yielding to avoid hogging CPU.
"?" Unknown value, indicates a bug.
o "ntb" is the number of tasks boosted.
o "neb" is the number of tasks boosted in order to complete an
expedited grace period.
o "nnb" is the number of tasks boosted in order to complete a
normal (non-expedited) grace period. When boosting a task
that was blocking both an expedited and a normal grace period,
it is counted against the expedited total above.
o "j" is the low-order 16 bits of the jiffies counter in
hexadecimal.
o "bt" is the low-order 16 bits of the value that the jiffies
counter will have when we next start boosting, assuming that
the current grace period does not end beforehand. This is
also in hexadecimal.
o "balk: nt" counts the number of times we didn't boost (in
other words, we balked) even though it was time to boost because
there were no blocked tasks to boost. This situation occurs
when there is one blocked task on one rcu_node structure and
none on some other rcu_node structure.
o "egt" counts the number of times we balked because although
there were blocked tasks, none of them were blocking the
current grace period, whether expedited or otherwise.
o "bt" counts the number of times we balked because boosting
had already been initiated for the current grace period.
o "nb" counts the number of times we balked because there
was at least one task blocking the current non-expedited grace
period that never had blocked. If it is already running, it
just won't help to boost its priority!
o "ny" counts the number of times we balked because it was
not yet time to start boosting.
o "nos" counts the number of times we balked for other
reasons, e.g., the grace period ended first.
CONFIG_TINY_RCU and CONFIG_TINY_PREEMPT_RCU debugfs Files and Formats
These implementations of RCU provides a single debugfs file under the
top-level directory RCU, namely rcu/rcudata, which displays fields in
rcu_bh_ctrlblk, rcu_sched_ctrlblk and, for CONFIG_TINY_PREEMPT_RCU,
rcu_preempt_ctrlblk.
The output of "cat rcu/rcudata" is as follows:
rcu_preempt: qlen=24 gp=1097669 g197/p197/c197 tasks=...
ttb=. btg=no ntb=184 neb=0 nnb=183 j=01f7 bt=0274
normal balk: nt=1097669 gt=0 bt=371 b=0 ny=25073378 nos=0
exp balk: bt=0 nos=0
rcu_sched: qlen: 0
rcu_bh: qlen: 0
This is split into rcu_preempt, rcu_sched, and rcu_bh sections, with the
rcu_preempt section appearing only in CONFIG_TINY_PREEMPT_RCU builds.
The last three lines of the rcu_preempt section appear only in
CONFIG_RCU_BOOST kernel builds. The fields are as follows:
o "qlen" is the number of RCU callbacks currently waiting either
for an RCU grace period or waiting to be invoked. This is the
only field present for rcu_sched and rcu_bh, due to the
short-circuiting of grace period in those two cases.
o "gp" is the number of grace periods that have completed.
o "g197/p197/c197" displays the grace-period state, with the
"g" number being the number of grace periods that have started
(mod 256), the "p" number being the number of grace periods
that the CPU has responded to (also mod 256), and the "c"
number being the number of grace periods that have completed
(once again mode 256).
Why have both "gp" and "g"? Because the data flowing into
"gp" is only present in a CONFIG_RCU_TRACE kernel.
o "tasks" is a set of bits. The first bit is "T" if there are
currently tasks that have recently blocked within an RCU
read-side critical section, the second bit is "N" if any of the
aforementioned tasks are blocking the current RCU grace period,
and the third bit is "E" if any of the aforementioned tasks are
blocking the current expedited grace period. Each bit is "."
if the corresponding condition does not hold.
o "ttb" is a single bit. It is "B" if any of the blocked tasks
need to be priority boosted and "." otherwise.
o "btg" indicates whether boosting has been carried out during
the current grace period, with "exp" indicating that boosting
is in progress for an expedited grace period, "no" indicating
that boosting has not yet started for a normal grace period,
"begun" indicating that boosting has bebug for a normal grace
period, and "done" indicating that boosting has completed for
a normal grace period.
o "ntb" is the total number of tasks subjected to RCU priority boosting
periods since boot.
o "neb" is the number of expedited grace periods that have had
to resort to RCU priority boosting since boot.
o "nnb" is the number of normal grace periods that have had
to resort to RCU priority boosting since boot.
o "j" is the low-order 16 bits of the jiffies counter in hexadecimal.
o "bt" is the low-order 16 bits of the value that the jiffies counter
will have at the next time that boosting is scheduled to begin.
o In the line beginning with "normal balk", the fields are as follows:
o "nt" is the number of times that the system balked from
boosting because there were no blocked tasks to boost.
Note that the system will balk from boosting even if the
grace period is overdue when the currently running task
is looping within an RCU read-side critical section.
There is no point in boosting in this case, because
boosting a running task won't make it run any faster.
o "gt" is the number of times that the system balked
from boosting because, although there were blocked tasks,
none of them were preventing the current grace period
from completing.
o "bt" is the number of times that the system balked
from boosting because boosting was already in progress.
o "b" is the number of times that the system balked from
boosting because boosting had already completed for
the grace period in question.
o "ny" is the number of times that the system balked from
boosting because it was not yet time to start boosting
the grace period in question.
o "nos" is the number of times that the system balked from
boosting for inexplicable ("not otherwise specified")
reasons. This can actually happen due to races involving
increments of the jiffies counter.
o In the line beginning with "exp balk", the fields are as follows:
o "bt" is the number of times that the system balked from
boosting because there were no blocked tasks to boost.
o "nos" is the number of times that the system balked from
boosting for inexplicable ("not otherwise specified")
reasons.
Reference in New Issue View Git Blame Copy Permalink