When doing an incremental send, if we find a new/modified/deleted extent,
reference or xattr without having previously processed the corresponding
inode item we end up exexuting a BUG_ON(). This is because whenever an
extent, xattr or reference is added, modified or deleted, we always expect
to have the corresponding inode item updated. However there are situations
where this will not happen due to transient -ENOMEM or -ENOSPC errors when
doing delayed inode updates.
For example, when punching holes we can succeed in deleting and modifying
(shrinking) extents but later fail to do the delayed inode update. So after
such failure we close our transaction handle and right after a snapshot of
the fs/subvol tree can be made and used later for a send operation. The
same thing can happen during truncate, link, unlink, and xattr related
operations.
So instead of executing a BUG_ON, make send return an -EIO error and print
an informative error message do dmesg/syslog.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
The caller of send_utimes() is supposed to be sure that the inode number
it passes to this function does actually exists in the send snapshot.
However due to logic/algorithm bugs (such as the one fixed by the patch
titled "Btrfs: send, fix invalid leaf accesses due to incorrect utimes
operations"), this might not be the case and when that happens it makes
send_utimes() access use an unrelated leaf item as the target inode item
or access beyond a leaf's boundaries (when the leaf is full and
path->slots[0] matches the number of items in the leaf).
So if the call to btrfs_search_slot() done by send_utimes() does not find
the inode item, just make sure send_utimes() returns -ENOENT and does not
silently accesses unrelated leaf items or does invalid leaf accesses, also
allowing us to easialy and deterministically catch such algorithmic/logic
bugs.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
During an incremental send, if we have delayed rename operations for inodes
that were children of directories which were removed in the send snapshot,
we can end up accessing incorrect items in a leaf or accessing beyond the
last item of the leaf due to issuing utimes operations for the removed
inodes. Consider the following example:
Parent snapshot:
. (ino 256)
|--- a/ (ino 257)
| |--- c/ (ino 262)
|
|--- b/ (ino 258)
| |--- d/ (ino 263)
|
|--- del/ (ino 261)
|--- x/ (ino 259)
|--- y/ (ino 260)
Send snapshot:
. (ino 256)
|--- a/ (ino 257)
|
|--- b/ (ino 258)
|
|--- c/ (ino 262)
| |--- y/ (ino 260)
|
|--- d/ (ino 263)
|--- x/ (ino 259)
1) When processing inodes 259 and 260, we end up delaying their rename
operations because their parents, inodes 263 and 262 respectively, were
not yet processed and therefore not yet renamed;
2) When processing inode 262, its rename operation is issued and right
after the rename operation for inode 260 is issued. However right after
issuing the rename operation for inode 260, at send.c:apply_dir_move(),
we issue utimes operations for all current and past parents of inode
260. This means we try to send a utimes operation for its old parent,
inode 261 (deleted in the send snapshot), which does not cause any
immediate and deterministic failure, because when the target inode is
not found in the send snapshot, the send.c:send_utimes() function
ignores it and uses the leaf region pointed to by path->slots[0],
which can be any unrelated item (belonging to other inode) or it can
be a region outside the leaf boundaries, if the leaf is full and
path->slots[0] matches the number of items in the leaf. So we end
up either successfully sending a utimes operation, which is fine
and irrelevant because the old parent (inode 261) will end up being
deleted later, or we end up doing an invalid memory access tha
crashes the kernel.
So fix this by making apply_dir_move() issue utimes operations only for
parents that still exist in the send snapshot. In a separate patch we
will make send_utimes() return an error (-ENOENT) if the given inode
does not exists in the send snapshot.
Signed-off-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
[Rewrote change log to be more detailed and better organized]
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Under certain situations, when doing an incremental send, we can end up
not freeing orphan_dir_info structures as soon as they are no longer
needed. Instead we end up freeing them only after finishing the send
stream, which causes a warning to be emitted:
[282735.229200] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[282735.229968] WARNING: CPU: 9 PID: 10588 at fs/btrfs/send.c:6298 btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe2f/0xe51 [btrfs]
[282735.231282] Modules linked in: btrfs crc32c_generic xor raid6_pq acpi_cpufreq tpm_tis ppdev tpm parport_pc psmouse parport sg pcspkr i2c_piix4 i2c_core evdev processor serio_raw button loop autofs4 ext4 crc16 jbd2 mbcache sr_mod cdrom sd_mod ata_generic virtio_scsi ata_piix libata virtio_pci virtio_ring virtio e1000 scsi_mod floppy [last unloaded: btrfs]
[282735.237130] CPU: 9 PID: 10588 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G W 4.6.0-rc7-btrfs-next-31+ #1
[282735.239309] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS by qemu-project.org 04/01/2014
[282735.240160] 0000000000000000 ffff880224273ca8 ffffffff8126b42c 0000000000000000
[282735.240160] 0000000000000000 ffff880224273ce8 ffffffff81052b14 0000189a24273ac8
[282735.240160] ffff8802210c9800 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000
[282735.240160] Call Trace:
[282735.240160] [<ffffffff8126b42c>] dump_stack+0x67/0x90
[282735.240160] [<ffffffff81052b14>] __warn+0xc2/0xdd
[282735.240160] [<ffffffff81052beb>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x1f
[282735.240160] [<ffffffffa03c99d5>] btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe2f/0xe51 [btrfs]
[282735.240160] [<ffffffffa0398358>] btrfs_ioctl+0x14f/0x1f81 [btrfs]
[282735.240160] [<ffffffff8108e456>] ? arch_local_irq_save+0x9/0xc
[282735.240160] [<ffffffff8118da05>] vfs_ioctl+0x18/0x34
[282735.240160] [<ffffffff8118e00c>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x550/0x5be
[282735.240160] [<ffffffff81196f0c>] ? __fget+0x6b/0x77
[282735.240160] [<ffffffff81196fa1>] ? __fget_light+0x62/0x71
[282735.240160] [<ffffffff8118e0d1>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x79
[282735.240160] [<ffffffff8149e025>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xa8
[282735.240160] [<ffffffff81100c6b>] ? time_hardirqs_off+0x9/0x14
[282735.240160] [<ffffffff8108e87d>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x1f/0xaa
[282735.256343] ---[ end trace a4539270c8056f93 ]---
Consider the following example:
Parent snapshot:
. (ino 256)
|--- a/ (ino 257)
| |--- c/ (ino 260)
|
|--- del/ (ino 259)
|--- tmp/ (ino 258)
|--- x/ (ino 261)
|--- y/ (ino 262)
Send snapshot:
. (ino 256)
|--- a/ (ino 257)
| |--- x/ (ino 261)
| |--- y/ (ino 262)
|
|--- c/ (ino 260)
|--- tmp/ (ino 258)
1) When processing inode 258, we end up delaying its rename operation
because it has an ancestor (in the send snapshot) that has a higher
inode number (inode 260) which was also renamed in the send snapshot,
therefore we delay the rename of inode 258 so that it happens after
inode 260 is renamed;
2) When processing inode 259, we end up delaying its deletion (rmdir
operation) because it has a child inode (258) that has its rename
operation delayed. At this point we allocate an orphan_dir_info
structure and tag inode 258 so that we later attempt to see if we
can delete (rmdir) inode 259 once inode 258 is renamed;
3) When we process inode 260, after renaming it we finally do the rename
operation for inode 258. Once we issue the rename operation for inode
258 we notice that this inode was tagged so that we attempt to see
if at this point we can delete (rmdir) inode 259. But at this point
we can not still delete inode 259 because it has 2 children, inodes
261 and 262, that were not yet processed and therefore not yet
moved (renamed) away from inode 259. We end up not freeing the
orphan_dir_info structure allocated in step 2;
4) We process inodes 261 and 262, and once we move/rename inode 262
we issue the rmdir operation for inode 260;
5) We finish the send stream and notice that red black tree that
contains orphan_dir_info structures is not empty, so we emit
a warning and then free any orphan_dir_structures left.
So fix this by freeing an orphan_dir_info structure once we try to
apply a pending rename operation if we can not delete yet the tagged
directory.
A test case for fstests follows soon.
Signed-off-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
[Modified changelog to be more detailed and easier to understand]
Under certain situations, an incremental send operation can contain
a rmdir operation that will make the receiving end fail when attempting
to execute it, because the target directory is not yet empty.
Consider the following example:
Parent snapshot:
. (ino 256)
|--- a/ (ino 257)
| |--- c/ (ino 260)
|
|--- del/ (ino 259)
|--- tmp/ (ino 258)
|--- x/ (ino 261)
Send snapshot:
. (ino 256)
|--- a/ (ino 257)
| |--- x/ (ino 261)
|
|--- c/ (ino 260)
|--- tmp/ (ino 258)
1) When processing inode 258, we delay its rename operation because inode
260 is its new parent in the send snapshot and it was not yet renamed
(since 260 > 258, that is, beyond the current progress);
2) When processing inode 259, we realize we can not yet send an rmdir
operation (against inode 259) because inode 258 was still not yet
renamed/moved away from inode 259. Therefore we update data structures
so that after inode 258 is renamed, we try again to see if we can
finally send an rmdir operation for inode 259;
3) When we process inode 260, we send a rename operation for it followed
by a rename operation for inode 258. Once we send the rename operation
for inode 258 we then check if we can finally issue an rmdir for its
previous parent, inode 259, by calling the can_rmdir() function with
a value of sctx->cur_ino + 1 (260 + 1 = 261) for its "progress"
argument. This makes can_rmdir() return true (value 1) because even
though there's still a child inode of inode 259 that was not yet
renamed/moved, which is inode 261, the given value of progress (261)
is not lower then 261 (that is, not lower than the inode number of
some child of inode 259). So we end up sending a rmdir operation for
inode 259 before its child inode 261 is processed and renamed.
So fix this by passing the correct progress value to the call to
can_rmdir() from within apply_dir_move() (where we issue delayed rename
operations), which should match stcx->cur_ino (the number of the inode
currently being processed) and not sctx->cur_ino + 1.
A test case for fstests follows soon.
Signed-off-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
[Rewrote change log to be more detailed, clear and well formatted]
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Example scenario:
Parent snapshot:
. (ino 277)
|---- tmp/ (ino 278)
|---- pre/ (ino 280)
| |---- wait_dir/ (ino 281)
|
|---- desc/ (ino 282)
|---- ance/ (ino 283)
| |---- below_ance/ (ino 279)
|
|---- other_dir/ (ino 284)
Send snapshot:
. (ino 277)
|---- tmp/ (ino 278)
|---- other_dir/ (ino 284)
|---- below_ance/ (ino 279)
| |---- pre/ (ino 280)
|
|---- wait_dir/ (ino 281)
|---- desc/ (ino 282)
|---- ance/ (ino 283)
While computing the send stream the following steps happen:
1) While processing inode 279 we end up delaying its rename operation
because its new parent in the send snapshot, inode 284, was not
yet processed and therefore not yet renamed;
2) Later when processing inode 280 we end up renaming it immediately to
"ance/below_once/pre" and not delay its rename operation because its
new parent (inode 279 in the send snapshot) has its rename operation
delayed and inode 280 is not an encestor of inode 279 (its parent in
the send snapshot) in the parent snapshot;
3) When processing inode 281 we end up delaying its rename operation
because its new parent in the send snapshot, inode 284, was not yet
processed and therefore not yet renamed;
4) When processing inode 282 we do not delay its rename operation because
its parent in the send snapshot, inode 281, already has its own rename
operation delayed and our current inode (282) is not an ancestor of
inode 281 in the parent snapshot. Therefore inode 282 is renamed to
"ance/below_ance/pre/wait_dir";
5) When processing inode 283 we realize that we can rename it because one
of its ancestors in the send snapshot, inode 281, has its rename
operation delayed and inode 283 is not an ancestor of inode 281 in the
parent snapshot. So a rename operation to rename inode 283 to
"ance/below_ance/pre/wait_dir/desc/ance" is issued. This path is
invalid due to a missing path building loop that was undetected by
the incremental send implementation, as inode 283 ends up getting
included twice in the path (once with its path in the parent snapshot).
Therefore its rename operation must wait before the ancestor inode 284
is renamed.
Fix this by not terminating the rename dependency checks when we find an
ancestor, in the send snapshot, that has its rename operation delayed. So
that we continue doing the same checks if the current inode is not an
ancestor, in the parent snapshot, of an ancestor in the send snapshot we
are processing in the loop.
The problem and reproducer were reported by Robbie Ko, as part of a patch
titled "Btrfs: incremental send, avoid ancestor rename to descendant".
However the fix was unnecessarily complicated and can be addressed with
much less code and effort.
Reported-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
The function path_loop() can return a negative integer, signaling an
error, 0 if there's no path loop and 1 if there's a path loop. We were
treating any non zero values as meaning that a path loop exists. Fix
this by explicitly checking for errors and gracefully return them to
user space.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
When doing an incremental send we can end up not moving directories that
have the same name. This happens when the same parent directory has
different child directories with the same name in the parent and send
snapshots.
For example, consider the following scenario:
Parent snapshot:
. (ino 256)
|---- d/ (ino 257)
| |--- p1/ (ino 258)
|
|---- p1/ (ino 259)
Send snapshot:
. (ino 256)
|--- d/ (ino 257)
|--- p1/ (ino 259)
|--- p1/ (ino 258)
The directory named "d" (inode 257) has in both snapshots an entry with
the name "p1" but it refers to different inodes in both snapshots (inode
258 in the parent snapshot and inode 259 in the send snapshot). When
attempting to move inode 258, the operation is delayed because its new
parent, inode 259, was not yet moved/renamed (as the stream is currently
processing inode 258). Then when processing inode 259, we also end up
delaying its move/rename operation so that it happens after inode 258 is
moved/renamed. This decision to delay the move/rename rename operation
of inode 259 is due to the fact that the new parent inode (257) still
has inode 258 as its child, which has the same name has inode 259. So
we end up with inode 258 move/rename operation waiting for inode's 259
move/rename operation, which in turn it waiting for inode's 258
move/rename. This results in ending the send stream without issuing
move/rename operations for inodes 258 and 259 and generating the
following warnings in syslog/dmesg:
[148402.979747] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[148402.980588] WARNING: CPU: 14 PID: 4117 at fs/btrfs/send.c:6177 btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe03/0xe51 [btrfs]
[148402.981928] Modules linked in: btrfs crc32c_generic xor raid6_pq acpi_cpufreq tpm_tis ppdev tpm parport_pc psmouse parport sg pcspkr i2c_piix4 i2c_core evdev processor serio_raw button loop autofs4 ext4 crc16 jbd2 mbcache sr_mod cdrom sd_mod ata_generic virtio_scsi ata_piix libata virtio_pci virtio_ring virtio e1000 scsi_mod floppy [last unloaded: btrfs]
[148402.986999] CPU: 14 PID: 4117 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G W 4.6.0-rc7-btrfs-next-31+ #1
[148402.988136] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS by qemu-project.org 04/01/2014
[148402.988136] 0000000000000000 ffff88022139fca8 ffffffff8126b42c 0000000000000000
[148402.988136] 0000000000000000 ffff88022139fce8 ffffffff81052b14 000018212139fac8
[148402.988136] ffff88022b0db400 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000
[148402.988136] Call Trace:
[148402.988136] [<ffffffff8126b42c>] dump_stack+0x67/0x90
[148402.988136] [<ffffffff81052b14>] __warn+0xc2/0xdd
[148402.988136] [<ffffffff81052beb>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x1f
[148402.988136] [<ffffffffa04bc831>] btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe03/0xe51 [btrfs]
[148402.988136] [<ffffffffa048b358>] btrfs_ioctl+0x14f/0x1f81 [btrfs]
[148402.988136] [<ffffffff8108e456>] ? arch_local_irq_save+0x9/0xc
[148402.988136] [<ffffffff8108eb51>] ? __lock_is_held+0x3c/0x57
[148402.988136] [<ffffffff8118da05>] vfs_ioctl+0x18/0x34
[148402.988136] [<ffffffff8118e00c>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x550/0x5be
[148402.988136] [<ffffffff81196f0c>] ? __fget+0x6b/0x77
[148402.988136] [<ffffffff81196fa1>] ? __fget_light+0x62/0x71
[148402.988136] [<ffffffff8118e0d1>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x79
[148402.988136] [<ffffffff8149e025>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xa8
[148402.988136] [<ffffffff8108e89d>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x3f/0xaa
[148403.011373] ---[ end trace a4539270c8056f8b ]---
[148403.012296] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[148403.013071] WARNING: CPU: 14 PID: 4117 at fs/btrfs/send.c:6194 btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe19/0xe51 [btrfs]
[148403.014447] Modules linked in: btrfs crc32c_generic xor raid6_pq acpi_cpufreq tpm_tis ppdev tpm parport_pc psmouse parport sg pcspkr i2c_piix4 i2c_core evdev processor serio_raw button loop autofs4 ext4 crc16 jbd2 mbcache sr_mod cdrom sd_mod ata_generic virtio_scsi ata_piix libata virtio_pci virtio_ring virtio e1000 scsi_mod floppy [last unloaded: btrfs]
[148403.019708] CPU: 14 PID: 4117 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G W 4.6.0-rc7-btrfs-next-31+ #1
[148403.020104] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS by qemu-project.org 04/01/2014
[148403.020104] 0000000000000000 ffff88022139fca8 ffffffff8126b42c 0000000000000000
[148403.020104] 0000000000000000 ffff88022139fce8 ffffffff81052b14 000018322139fac8
[148403.020104] ffff88022b0db400 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000
[148403.020104] Call Trace:
[148403.020104] [<ffffffff8126b42c>] dump_stack+0x67/0x90
[148403.020104] [<ffffffff81052b14>] __warn+0xc2/0xdd
[148403.020104] [<ffffffff81052beb>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x1f
[148403.020104] [<ffffffffa04bc847>] btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe19/0xe51 [btrfs]
[148403.020104] [<ffffffffa048b358>] btrfs_ioctl+0x14f/0x1f81 [btrfs]
[148403.020104] [<ffffffff8108e456>] ? arch_local_irq_save+0x9/0xc
[148403.020104] [<ffffffff8108eb51>] ? __lock_is_held+0x3c/0x57
[148403.020104] [<ffffffff8118da05>] vfs_ioctl+0x18/0x34
[148403.020104] [<ffffffff8118e00c>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x550/0x5be
[148403.020104] [<ffffffff81196f0c>] ? __fget+0x6b/0x77
[148403.020104] [<ffffffff81196fa1>] ? __fget_light+0x62/0x71
[148403.020104] [<ffffffff8118e0d1>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x79
[148403.020104] [<ffffffff8149e025>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xa8
[148403.020104] [<ffffffff8108e89d>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x3f/0xaa
[148403.038981] ---[ end trace a4539270c8056f8c ]---
There's another issue caused by similar (but more complex) changes in the
directory hierarchy that makes move/rename operations fail, described with
the following example:
Parent snapshot:
.
|---- a/ (ino 262)
| |---- c/ (ino 268)
|
|---- d/ (ino 263)
|---- ance/ (ino 267)
|---- e/ (ino 264)
|---- f/ (ino 265)
|---- ance/ (ino 266)
Send snapshot:
.
|---- a/ (ino 262)
|---- c/ (ino 268)
| |---- ance/ (ino 267)
|
|---- d/ (ino 263)
| |---- ance/ (ino 266)
|
|---- f/ (ino 265)
|---- e/ (ino 264)
When the inode 265 is processed, the path for inode 267 is computed, which
at that time corresponds to "d/ance", and it's stored in the names cache.
Later on when processing inode 266, we end up orphanizing (renaming to a
name matching the pattern o<ino>-<gen>-<seq>) inode 267 because it has
the same name as inode 266 and it's currently a child of the new parent
directory (inode 263) for inode 266. After the orphanization and while we
are still processing inode 266, a rename operation for inode 266 is
generated. However the source path for that rename operation is incorrect
because it ends up using the old, pre-orphanization, name of inode 267.
The no longer valid name for inode 267 was previously cached when
processing inode 265 and it remains usable and considered valid until
the inode currently being processed has a number greater than 267.
This resulted in the receiving side failing with the following error:
ERROR: rename d/ance/ance -> d/ance failed: No such file or directory
So fix these issues by detecting such circular dependencies for rename
operations and by clearing the cached name of an inode once the inode
is orphanized.
A test case for fstests will follow soon.
Signed-off-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
[Rewrote change log to be more detailed and organized, and improved
comments]
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
The "sizeof(*arg->clone_sources) * arg->clone_sources_count" expression
can overflow. It causes several static checker warnings. It's all
under CAP_SYS_ADMIN so it's not that serious but lets silence the
warnings.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time
ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page
cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE.
This promise never materialized. And unlikely will.
We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to
PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether
PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case,
especially on the border between fs and mm.
Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much
breakage to be doable.
Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are
not.
The changes are pretty straight-forward:
- <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN};
- page_cache_get() -> get_page();
- page_cache_release() -> put_page();
This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using
script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files.
I've called spatch for them manually.
The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to
PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later.
There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll
fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also
will be addressed with the separate patch.
virtual patch
@@
expression E;
@@
- E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
expression E;
@@
- E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT
+ PAGE_SHIFT
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SIZE
+ PAGE_SIZE
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_MASK
+ PAGE_MASK
@@
expression E;
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E)
+ PAGE_ALIGN(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_get(E)
+ get_page(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_release(E)
+ put_page(E)
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
So that its better organized.
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The send operation is not on the critical writeback path we don't need
to use GFP_NOFS for allocations. All error paths are handled and the
whole operation is restartable.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
When a symlink is successfully created it always has an inline extent
containing the source path. However if an error happens when creating
the symlink, we can leave in the subvolume's tree a symlink inode without
any such inline extent item - this happens if after btrfs_symlink() calls
btrfs_end_transaction() and before it calls the inode eviction handler
(through the final iput() call), the transaction gets committed and a
crash happens before the eviction handler gets called, or if a snapshot
of the subvolume is made before the eviction handler gets called. Sadly
we can't just avoid this by making btrfs_symlink() call
btrfs_end_transaction() after it calls the eviction handler, because the
later can commit the current transaction before it removes any items from
the subvolume tree (if it encounters ENOSPC errors while reserving space
for removing all the items).
So make send fail more gracefully, with an -EIO error, and print a
message to dmesg/syslog informing that there's an empty symlink inode,
so that the user can delete the empty symlink or do something else
about it.
Reported-by: Stephen R. van den Berg <srb@cuci.nl>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
This fixes a regression introduced by 37b8d27d between v4.1 and v4.2.
When a snapshot is received, its received_uuid is set to the original
uuid of the subvolume. When that snapshot is then resent to a third
filesystem, it's received_uuid is set to the second uuid
instead of the original one. The same was true for the parent_uuid.
This behaviour was partially changed in 37b8d27d, but in that patch
only the parent_uuid was taken from the real original,
not the uuid itself, causing the search for the parent to fail in
the case below.
This happens for example when trying to send a series of linked
snapshots (e.g. created by snapper) from the backup file system back
to the original one.
The following commands reproduce the issue in v4.2.1
(no error in 4.1.6)
# setup three test file systems
for i in 1 2 3; do
truncate -s 50M fs$i
mkfs.btrfs fs$i
mkdir $i
mount fs$i $i
done
echo "content" > 1/testfile
btrfs su snapshot -r 1/ 1/snap1
echo "changed content" > 1/testfile
btrfs su snapshot -r 1/ 1/snap2
# works fine:
btrfs send 1/snap1 | btrfs receive 2/
btrfs send -p 1/snap1 1/snap2 | btrfs receive 2/
# ERROR: could not find parent subvolume
btrfs send 2/snap1 | btrfs receive 3/
btrfs send -p 2/snap1 2/snap2 | btrfs receive 3/
Signed-off-by: Robin Ruede <rruede+git@gmail.com>
Fixes: 37b8d27de5 ("Btrfs: use received_uuid of parent during send")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.2+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Tested-by: Ed Tomlinson <edt@aei.ca>
If we have a file that shares an extent with other files, when processing
the extent item relative to a shared extent, we blindly issue a clone
operation that will target a length matching the length in the extent item
and uses as a source some other file the receiver already has and points
to the same extent. However that range in the other file might not
exclusively point only to the shared extent, and so using that length
will result in the receiver getting a file with different data from the
one in the send snapshot. This issue happened both for incremental and
full send operations.
So fix this by issuing clone operations with lengths that don't cover
regions of the source file that point to different extents (or have holes).
The following test case for fstests reproduces the problem.
seq=`basename $0`
seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq
echo "QA output created by $seq"
tmp=/tmp/$$
status=1 # failure is the default!
trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15
_cleanup()
{
rm -fr $send_files_dir
rm -f $tmp.*
}
# get standard environment, filters and checks
. ./common/rc
. ./common/filter
# real QA test starts here
_supported_fs btrfs
_supported_os Linux
_require_scratch
_need_to_be_root
_require_cp_reflink
_require_xfs_io_command "fpunch"
send_files_dir=$TEST_DIR/btrfs-test-$seq
rm -f $seqres.full
rm -fr $send_files_dir
mkdir $send_files_dir
_scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1
_scratch_mount
# Create our test file with a single 100K extent.
$XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -S 0xaa 0K 100K" \
$SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io
# Clone our file into a new file named bar.
cp --reflink=always $SCRATCH_MNT/foo $SCRATCH_MNT/bar
# Now overwrite parts of our foo file.
$XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite -S 0xbb 50K 10K" \
-c "pwrite -S 0xcc 90K 10K" \
-c "fpunch 70K 10k" \
$SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io
_run_btrfs_util_prog subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT \
$SCRATCH_MNT/snap
echo "File digests in the original filesystem:"
md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/foo | _filter_scratch
md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/bar | _filter_scratch
_run_btrfs_util_prog send $SCRATCH_MNT/snap -f $send_files_dir/1.snap
# Now recreate the filesystem by receiving the send stream and verify
# we get the same file contents that the original filesystem had.
_scratch_unmount
_scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1
_scratch_mount
_run_btrfs_util_prog receive $SCRATCH_MNT -f $send_files_dir/1.snap
# We expect the destination filesystem to have exactly the same file
# data as the original filesystem.
# The btrfs send implementation had a bug where it sent a clone
# operation from file foo into file bar covering the whole [0, 100K[
# range after creating and writing the file foo. This was incorrect
# because the file bar now included the updates done to file foo after
# we cloned foo to bar, breaking the COW nature of reflink copies
# (cloned extents).
echo "File digests in the new filesystem:"
md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/foo | _filter_scratch
md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/bar | _filter_scratch
status=0
exit
Another test case that reproduces the problem when we have compressed
extents:
seq=`basename $0`
seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq
echo "QA output created by $seq"
tmp=/tmp/$$
status=1 # failure is the default!
trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15
_cleanup()
{
rm -fr $send_files_dir
rm -f $tmp.*
}
# get standard environment, filters and checks
. ./common/rc
. ./common/filter
# real QA test starts here
_supported_fs btrfs
_supported_os Linux
_require_scratch
_need_to_be_root
_require_cp_reflink
send_files_dir=$TEST_DIR/btrfs-test-$seq
rm -f $seqres.full
rm -fr $send_files_dir
mkdir $send_files_dir
_scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1
_scratch_mount "-o compress"
# Create our file with an extent of 100K starting at file offset 0K.
$XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -S 0xaa 0K 100K" \
-c "fsync" \
$SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io
# Rewrite part of the previous extent (its first 40K) and write a new
# 100K extent starting at file offset 100K.
$XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite -S 0xbb 0K 40K" \
-c "pwrite -S 0xcc 100K 100K" \
$SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io
# Our file foo now has 3 file extent items in its metadata:
#
# 1) One covering the file range 0 to 40K;
# 2) One covering the file range 40K to 100K, which points to the first
# extent we wrote to the file and has a data offset field with value
# 40K (our file no longer uses the first 40K of data from that
# extent);
# 3) One covering the file range 100K to 200K.
# Now clone our file foo into file bar.
cp --reflink=always $SCRATCH_MNT/foo $SCRATCH_MNT/bar
# Create our snapshot for the send operation.
_run_btrfs_util_prog subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT \
$SCRATCH_MNT/snap
echo "File digests in the original filesystem:"
md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/foo | _filter_scratch
md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/bar | _filter_scratch
_run_btrfs_util_prog send $SCRATCH_MNT/snap -f $send_files_dir/1.snap
# Now recreate the filesystem by receiving the send stream and verify we
# get the same file contents that the original filesystem had.
# Btrfs send used to issue a clone operation from foo's range
# [80K, 140K[ to bar's range [40K, 100K[ when cloning the extent pointed
# to by foo's second file extent item, this was incorrect because of bad
# accounting of the file extent item's data offset field. The correct
# range to clone from should have been [40K, 100K[.
_scratch_unmount
_scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1
_scratch_mount "-o compress"
_run_btrfs_util_prog receive $SCRATCH_MNT -f $send_files_dir/1.snap
echo "File digests in the new filesystem:"
# Must match the digests we got in the original filesystem.
md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/foo | _filter_scratch
md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/bar | _filter_scratch
status=0
exit
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Convert the simple cases, not all functions provide a way to reach the
fs_info. Also skipped debugging messages (print-tree, integrity
checker and pr_debug) and messages that are printed from possibly
unfinished mount.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
When the inode given to did_overwrite_ref() matches the current progress
and has a reference that collides with the reference of other inode that
has the same number as the current progress, we were always telling our
caller that the inode's reference was overwritten, which is incorrect
because the other inode might be a new inode (different generation number)
in which case we must return false from did_overwrite_ref() so that its
callers don't use an orphanized path for the inode (as it will never be
orphanized, instead it will be unlinked and the new inode created later).
The following test case for fstests reproduces the issue:
seq=`basename $0`
seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq
echo "QA output created by $seq"
tmp=/tmp/$$
status=1 # failure is the default!
trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15
_cleanup()
{
rm -fr $send_files_dir
rm -f $tmp.*
}
# get standard environment, filters and checks
. ./common/rc
. ./common/filter
# real QA test starts here
_supported_fs btrfs
_supported_os Linux
_require_scratch
_need_to_be_root
send_files_dir=$TEST_DIR/btrfs-test-$seq
rm -f $seqres.full
rm -fr $send_files_dir
mkdir $send_files_dir
_scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1
_scratch_mount
# Create our test file with a single extent of 64K.
mkdir -p $SCRATCH_MNT/foo
$XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -S 0xaa 0 64K" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo/bar \
| _filter_xfs_io
_run_btrfs_util_prog subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT \
$SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1
_run_btrfs_util_prog subvolume snapshot $SCRATCH_MNT \
$SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2
echo "File digest before being replaced:"
md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1/foo/bar | _filter_scratch
# Remove the file and then create a new one in the same location with
# the same name but with different content. This new file ends up
# getting the same inode number as the previous one, because that inode
# number was the highest inode number used by the snapshot's root and
# therefore when attempting to find the a new inode number for the new
# file, we end up reusing the same inode number. This happens because
# currently btrfs uses the highest inode number summed by 1 for the
# first inode created once a snapshot's root is loaded (done at
# fs/btrfs/inode-map.c:btrfs_find_free_objectid in the linux kernel
# tree).
# Having these two different files in the snapshots with the same inode
# number (but different generation numbers) caused the btrfs send code
# to emit an incorrect path for the file when issuing an unlink
# operation because it failed to realize they were different files.
rm -f $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2/foo/bar
$XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -S 0xbb 0 96K" \
$SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2/foo/bar | _filter_xfs_io
_run_btrfs_util_prog subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2 \
$SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2_ro
_run_btrfs_util_prog send $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 -f $send_files_dir/1.snap
_run_btrfs_util_prog send -p $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 \
$SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2_ro -f $send_files_dir/2.snap
echo "File digest in the original filesystem after being replaced:"
md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2_ro/foo/bar | _filter_scratch
# Now recreate the filesystem by receiving both send streams and verify
# we get the same file contents that the original filesystem had.
_scratch_unmount
_scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1
_scratch_mount
_run_btrfs_util_prog receive -vv $SCRATCH_MNT -f $send_files_dir/1.snap
_run_btrfs_util_prog receive -vv $SCRATCH_MNT -f $send_files_dir/2.snap
echo "File digest in the new filesystem:"
# Must match the digest from the new file.
md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2_ro/foo/bar | _filter_scratch
status=0
exit
Reported-by: Martin Raiber <martin@urbackup.org>
Fixes: 8b191a6849 ("Btrfs: incremental send, check if orphanized dir inode needs delayed rename")
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Neil Horman pointed out a problem where if he did something like this
receive A
snap A B
change B
send -p A B
and then on another box do
recieve A
receive B
the receive B would fail because we use the UUID of A for the clone sources for
B. This makes sense most of the time because normally you are sending from the
original sources, not a received source. However when you use a recieved subvol
its UUID is going to be something completely different, so if you then try to
receive the diff on a different volume it won't find the UUID because the new A
will be something else. The only constant is the received uuid. So instead
check to see if we have received_uuid set on the root, and if so use that as the
clone source, as btrfs receive looks for matches either in received_uuid or
uuid. Thanks,
Reported-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Mills <hugo@carfax.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Marc reported a problem where the receiving end of an incremental send
was performing clone operations that failed with -EINVAL. This happened
because, unlike for uncompressed extents, we were not checking if the
source clone offset and length, after summing the data offset, falls
within the source file's boundaries.
So make sure we do such checks when attempting to issue clone operations
for compressed extents.
Problem reproducible with the following steps:
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb
$ mount -o compress /dev/sdb /mnt
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc
$ mount -o compress /dev/sdc /mnt2
# Create the file with a single extent of 128K. This creates a metadata file
# extent item with a data start offset of 0 and a logical length of 128K.
$ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xaa 64K 128K" -c "fsync" /mnt/foo
# Now rewrite the range 64K to 112K of our file. This will make the inode's
# metadata continue to point to the 128K extent we created before, but now
# with an extent item that points to the extent with a data start offset of
# 112K and a logical length of 16K.
# That metadata file extent item is associated with the logical file offset
# at 176K and covers the logical file range 176K to 192K.
$ xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xbb 64K 112K" -c "fsync" /mnt/foo
# Now rewrite the range 180K to 12K. This will make the inode's metadata
# continue to point the the 128K extent we created earlier, with a single
# extent item that points to it with a start offset of 112K and a logical
# length of 4K.
# That metadata file extent item is associated with the logical file offset
# at 176K and covers the logical file range 176K to 180K.
$ xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xcc 180K 12K" -c "fsync" /mnt/foo
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1
$ touch /mnt/bar
# Calls the btrfs clone ioctl.
$ ~/xfstests/src/cloner -s $((176 * 1024)) -d $((176 * 1024)) \
-l $((4 * 1024)) /mnt/foo /mnt/bar
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2
$ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 | btrfs receive /mnt2
At subvol /mnt/snap1
At subvol snap1
$ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 | btrfs receive /mnt2
At subvol /mnt/snap2
At snapshot snap2
ERROR: failed to clone extents to bar
Invalid argument
A test case for fstests follows soon.
Reported-by: Marc MERLIN <marc@merlins.org>
Tested-by: Marc MERLIN <marc@merlins.org>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Tested-by: Jan Alexander Steffens (heftig) <jan.steffens@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
If a directory inode is orphanized, because some inode previously
processed has a new name that collides with the old name of the current
inode, we need to check if it needs its rename operation delayed too,
as its ancestor-descendent relationship with some other inode might
have been reversed between the parent and send snapshots and therefore
its rename operation needs to happen after that other inode is renamed.
For example, for the following reproducer where this is needed (provided
by Robbie Ko):
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb
$ mount /dev/sdb /mnt
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc
$ mount /dev/sdc /mnt2
$ mkdir -p /mnt/data/n1/n2
$ mkdir /mnt/data/n4
$ mkdir -p /mnt/data/t6/t7
$ mkdir /mnt/data/t5
$ mkdir /mnt/data/t7
$ mkdir /mnt/data/n4/t2
$ mkdir /mnt/data/t4
$ mkdir /mnt/data/t3
$ mv /mnt/data/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t2
$ mv /mnt/data/t4 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7
$ mv /mnt/data/t5 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4
$ mv /mnt/data/t6 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5
$ mv /mnt/data/n1/n2 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6
$ mv /mnt/data/n1 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6
$ mv /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n2
$ mv /mnt/data/t3 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n2/t7
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1
$ mv /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n1 /mnt/data/n4
$ mv /mnt/data/n4/t2 /mnt/data/n4/n1
$ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n2 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2
$ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/n2/t7/t3 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2
$ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2
$ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t7/t4 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t6
$ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t7 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t3
$ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/n2/t7 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2
$ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 | btrfs receive /mnt2
$ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 | btrfs receive /mnt2
ERROR: send ioctl failed with -12: Cannot allocate memory
Where the parent snapshot directory hierarchy is the following:
. (ino 256)
|-- data/ (ino 257)
|-- n4/ (ino 260)
|-- t2/ (ino 265)
|-- t7/ (ino 264)
|-- t4/ (ino 266)
|-- t5/ (ino 263)
|-- t6/ (ino 261)
|-- n1/ (ino 258)
|-- n2/ (ino 259)
|-- t7/ (ino 262)
|-- t3/ (ino 267)
And the send snapshot's directory hierarchy is the following:
. (ino 256)
|-- data/ (ino 257)
|-- n4/ (ino 260)
|-- n1/ (ino 258)
|-- t2/ (ino 265)
|-- n2/ (ino 259)
|-- t3/ (ino 267)
| |-- t7 (ino 264)
|
|-- t6/ (ino 261)
| |-- t4/ (ino 266)
| |-- t5/ (ino 263)
|
|-- t7/ (ino 262)
While processing inode 262 we orphanize inode 264 and later attempt
to rename inode 264 to its new name/location, which resulted in building
an incorrect destination path string for the rename operation with the
value "data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n2/t7/t3/t7". This rename operation must
have been done only after inode 267 is processed and renamed, as the
ancestor-descendent relationship between inodes 264 and 267 was reversed
between both snapshots, because otherwise it results in an infinite loop
when building the path string for inode 264 when we are processing an
inode with a number larger than 264. That loop is the following:
start inode 264, send progress of 265 for example
parent of 264 -> 267
parent of 267 -> 262
parent of 262 -> 259
parent of 259 -> 261
parent of 261 -> 263
parent of 263 -> 266
parent of 266 -> 264
|--> back to first iteration while current path string length
is <= PATH_MAX, and fail with -ENOMEM otherwise
So fix this by making the check if we need to delay a directory rename
regardless of the current inode having been orphanized or not.
A test case for fstests follows soon.
Thanks to Robbie Ko for providing a reproducer for this problem.
Reported-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Even though we delay the rename of directories when they become
descendents of other directories that were also renamed in the send
root to prevent infinite path build loops, we were doing it in cases
where this was not needed and was actually harmful resulting in
infinite path build loops as we ended up with a circular dependency
of delayed directory renames.
Consider the following reproducer:
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb
$ mount /dev/sdb /mnt
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc
$ mount /dev/sdc /mnt2
$ mkdir /mnt/data
$ mkdir /mnt/data/n1
$ mkdir /mnt/data/n1/n2
$ mkdir /mnt/data/n4
$ mkdir /mnt/data/n1/n2/p1
$ mkdir /mnt/data/n1/n2/p1/p2
$ mkdir /mnt/data/t6
$ mkdir /mnt/data/t7
$ mkdir -p /mnt/data/t5/t7
$ mkdir /mnt/data/t2
$ mkdir /mnt/data/t4
$ mkdir -p /mnt/data/t1/t3
$ mkdir /mnt/data/p1
$ mv /mnt/data/t1 /mnt/data/p1
$ mkdir -p /mnt/data/p1/p2
$ mv /mnt/data/t4 /mnt/data/p1/p2/t1
$ mv /mnt/data/t5 /mnt/data/n4/t5
$ mv /mnt/data/n1/n2/p1/p2 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2
$ mv /mnt/data/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/t7
$ mv /mnt/data/t2 /mnt/data/n4/t1
$ mv /mnt/data/p1 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1
$ mv /mnt/data/n1/n2 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2
$ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/t1 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1
$ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t7
$ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/t1/t3 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t3
$ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/p1 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t7/p1
$ mv /mnt/data/t6 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t3/t5
$ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/t1 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t3/t1
$ mv /mnt/data/n1 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t7/p1/n1
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1
$ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t7/p1/t1
$ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1 /mnt/data/n4/
$ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2
$ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/t7/p1 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1
$ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/t3/t1 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/t1
$ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/t3 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/t1/t3
$ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2
$ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/t7
$ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2/p1
$ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/t1/t3/t5 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2/t5
$ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2/p1/t5
$ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2/p1/t5/p2 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2/p1/p2
$ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2/p1/p2/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t1/t7
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2
$ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 | btrfs receive /mnt2
$ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 | btrfs receive -vv /mnt2
ERROR: send ioctl failed with -12: Cannot allocate memory
This reproducer resulted in an infinite path build loop when building the
path for inode 266 because the following circular dependency of delayed
directory renames was created:
ino 272 <- ino 261 <- ino 259 <- ino 268 <- ino 267 <- ino 261
Where the notation "X <- Y" means the rename of inode X is delayed by the
rename of inode Y (X will be renamed after Y is renamed). This resulted
in an infinite path build loop of inode 266 because that inode has inode
261 as an ancestor in the send root and inode 261 is in the circular
dependency of delayed renames listed above.
Fix this by not delaying the rename of a directory inode if an ancestor of
the inode in the send root, which has a delayed rename operation, is not
also a descendent of the inode in the parent root.
Thanks to Robbie Ko for sending the reproducer example.
A test case for xfstests follows soon.
Reported-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
The logic to detect path loops when attempting to apply a pending
directory rename, introduced in commit
f959492fc1 (Btrfs: send, fix more issues related to directory renames)
is no longer needed, and the respective fstests test case for that commit,
btrfs/045, now passes without this code (as well as all the other test
cases for send/receive).
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
If a directory's reference ends up being orphanized, because the inode
currently being processed has a new path that matches that directory's
path, make sure we evict the name of the directory from the name cache.
This is because there might be descendent inodes (either directories or
regular files) that will be orphanized later too, and therefore the
orphan name of the ancestor must be used, otherwise we send issue rename
operations with a wrong path in the send stream.
Reproducer:
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb
$ mount /dev/sdb /mnt
$ mkdir -p /mnt/data/n1/n2/p1/p2
$ mkdir /mnt/data/n4
$ mkdir -p /mnt/data/p1/p2
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1
$ mv /mnt/data/p1/p2 /mnt/data
$ mv /mnt/data/n1/n2/p1/p2 /mnt/data/p1
$ mv /mnt/data/p2 /mnt/data/n1/n2/p1
$ mv /mnt/data/n1/n2 /mnt/data/p1
$ mv /mnt/data/p1 /mnt/data/n4
$ mv /mnt/data/n4/p1/n2/p1 /mnt/data
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2
$ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/1.send
$ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/2.send
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc
$ mount /dev/sdc /mnt2
$ btrfs receive /mnt2 -f /tmp/1.send
$ btrfs receive /mnt2 -f /tmp/2.send
ERROR: rename data/p1/p2 -> data/n4/p1/p2 failed. no such file or directory
Directories data/p1 (inode 263) and data/p1/p2 (inode 264) in the parent
snapshot are both orphanized during the incremental send, and as soon as
data/p1 is orphanized, we must make sure that when orphanizing data/p1/p2
we use a source path of o263-6-o/p2 for the rename operation instead of
the old path data/p1/p2 (the one before the orphanization of inode 263).
A test case for xfstests follows soon.
Reported-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
If the clone root was not readonly or the dead flag was set on it, we were
leaving without decrementing the root's send_progress counter (and before
we just incremented it). If a concurrent snapshot deletion was in progress
and ended up being aborted, it would be impossible to later attempt to
delete again the snapshot, since the root's send_in_progress counter could
never go back to 0.
We were also setting clone_sources_to_rollback to i + 1 too early - if we
bailed out because the clone root we got is not readonly or flagged as dead
we ended up later derreferencing a null pointer because we didn't assign
the clone root to sctx->clone_roots[i].root:
for (i = 0; sctx && i < clone_sources_to_rollback; i++)
btrfs_root_dec_send_in_progress(
sctx->clone_roots[i].root);
So just don't increment the send_in_progress counter if the root is readonly
or flagged as dead.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
After we locked the root's root item, a concurrent snapshot deletion
call might have set the dead flag on it. So check if the dead flag
is set and abort if it is, just like we do for the parent root.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
There's one more case where we can't issue a rename operation for a
directory as soon as we process it. We used to delay directory renames
only if they have some ancestor directory with a higher inode number
that got renamed too, but there's another case where we need to delay
the rename too - when a directory A is renamed to the old name of a
directory B but that directory B has its rename delayed because it
has now (in the send root) an ancestor with a higher inode number that
was renamed. If we don't delay the directory rename in this case, the
receiving end of the send stream will attempt to rename A to the old
name of B before B got renamed to its new name, which results in a
"directory not empty" error. So fix this by delaying directory renames
for this case too.
Steps to reproduce:
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb
$ mount /dev/sdb /mnt
$ mkdir /mnt/a
$ mkdir /mnt/b
$ mkdir /mnt/c
$ touch /mnt/a/file
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1
$ mv /mnt/c /mnt/x
$ mv /mnt/a /mnt/x/y
$ mv /mnt/b /mnt/a
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2
$ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/1.send
$ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/2.send
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc
$ mount /dev/sdc /mnt2
$ btrfs receive /mnt2 -f /tmp/1.send
$ btrfs receive /mnt2 -f /tmp/2.send
ERROR: rename b -> a failed. Directory not empty
A test case for xfstests follows soon.
Reported-by: Ames Cornish <ames@cornishes.net>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Move the logic from the snapshot creation ioctl into send. This avoids
doing the transaction commit if send isn't used, and ensures that if
a crash/reboot happens after the transaction commit that created the
snapshot and before the transaction commit that switched the commit
root, send will not get a commit root that differs from the main root
(that has orphan items).
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
If between two snapshots we rename an existing directory named X to Y and
make it a child (direct or not) of a new inode named X, we were delaying
the move/rename of the former directory unnecessarily, which would result
in attempting to rename the new directory from its orphan name to name X
prematurely.
Minimal reproducer:
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/vdd
$ mount /dev/vdd /mnt
$ mkdir -p /mnt/merlin/RC/OSD/Source
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/mysnap1
$ mkdir /mnt/OSD
$ mv /mnt/merlin/RC/OSD /mnt/OSD/OSD-Plane_788
$ mv /mnt/OSD /mnt/merlin/RC
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/mysnap2
$ btrfs send /mnt/mysnap1 -f /tmp/1.snap
$ btrfs send -p /mnt/mysnap1 /mnt/mysnap2 -f /tmp/2.snap
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/vdc
$ mount /dev/vdc /mnt2
$ btrfs receive /mnt2 -f /tmp/1.snap
$ btrfs receive /mnt2 -f /tmp/2.snap
The second receive (from an incremental send) failed with the following
error message: "rename o261-7-0 -> merlin/RC/OSD failed".
This is a regression introduced in the 3.16 kernel.
A test case for xfstests follows.
Reported-by: Marc Merlin <marc@merlins.org>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Maximum xattr size can be up to nearly the leaf size. For an fs with a
leaf size larger than the page size, using kmalloc requires allocating
multiple pages that are contiguous, which might not be possible if
there's heavy memory fragmentation. Therefore fallback to vmalloc if
we fail to allocate with kmalloc. Also start with a smaller buffer size,
since xattr values typically are smaller than a page.
Reported-by: Chris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Fix the following sparse warning:
fs/btrfs/send.c:518:51: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different address spaces)
fs/btrfs/send.c:518:51: expected char const [noderef] <asn:1>*<noident>
fs/btrfs/send.c:518:51: got char *
We can safely use (const char __user *) with set_fs(KERNEL_DS)
__force added to avoid sparse-all warning:
fs/btrfs/send.c:518:40: warning: cast adds address space to expression (<asn:1>)
Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be>
Reviewed-by: Zach Brown <zab@zabbo.net>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
We were limiting the sum of the xattr name and value lengths to PATH_MAX,
which is not correct, specially on filesystems created with btrfs-progs
v3.12 or higher, where the default leaf size is max(16384, PAGE_SIZE), or
systems with page sizes larger than 4096 bytes.
Xattrs have their own specific maximum name and value lengths, which depend
on the leaf size, therefore use these limits to be able to send xattrs with
sizes larger than PATH_MAX.
A test case for xfstests follows.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
If we are doing an incremental send and the base snapshot has a
directory with name X that doesn't exist anymore in the second
snapshot and a new subvolume/snapshot exists in the second snapshot
that has the same name as the directory (name X), the incremental
send would fail with -ENOENT error. This is because it attempts
to lookup for an inode with a number matching the objectid of a
root, which doesn't exist.
Steps to reproduce:
mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd
mount /dev/sdd /mnt
mkdir /mnt/testdir
btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/mysnap1
rmdir /mnt/testdir
btrfs subvolume create /mnt/testdir
btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/mysnap2
btrfs send -p /mnt/mysnap1 /mnt/mysnap2 -f /tmp/send.data
A test case for xfstests follows.
Reported-by: Robert White <rwhite@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
I've noticed an extra line after "use no compression", but search
revealed much more in messages of more critical levels and rare errors.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
This is a continuation of the previous changes titled:
Btrfs: fix incremental send's decision to delay a dir move/rename
Btrfs: part 2, fix incremental send's decision to delay a dir move/rename
There's a few more cases where a directory rename/move must be delayed which was
previously overlooked. If our immediate ancestor has a lower inode number than
ours and it doesn't have a delayed rename/move operation associated to it, it
doesn't mean there isn't any non-direct ancestor of our current inode that needs
to be renamed/moved before our current inode (i.e. with a higher inode number
than ours).
So we can't stop the search if our immediate ancestor has a lower inode number than
ours, we need to navigate the directory hierarchy upwards until we hit the root or:
1) find an ancestor with an higher inode number that was renamed/moved in the send
root too (or already has a pending rename/move registered);
2) find an ancestor that is a new directory (higher inode number than ours and
exists only in the send root).
Reproducer for case 1)
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd
$ mount /dev/sdd /mnt
$ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b
$ mkdir -p /mnt/a/c/d
$ mkdir /mnt/a/b/e
$ mkdir /mnt/a/c/d/f
$ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/c/d/2b
$ mkdir /mnt/a/x
$ mkdir /mnt/a/y
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1
$ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send
$ mv /mnt/a/x /mnt/a/y
$ mv /mnt/a/c/d/2b/e /mnt/a/c/d/2b/2e
$ mv /mnt/a/c/d /mnt/a/h/2d
$ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/h/2d/2b/2c
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2
$ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send
Simple reproducer for case 2)
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd
$ mount /dev/sdd /mnt
$ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b
$ mkdir /mnt/a/c
$ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/c/b2
$ mkdir /mnt/a/e
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1
$ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send
$ mv /mnt/a/c/b2 /mnt/a/e/b3
$ mkdir /mnt/a/e/b3/f
$ mkdir /mnt/a/h
$ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/e/b3/f/c2
$ mv /mnt/a/e /mnt/a/h/e2
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2
$ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send
Another simple reproducer for case 2)
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd
$ mount /dev/sdd /mnt
$ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b
$ mkdir /mnt/a/c
$ mkdir /mnt/a/b/d
$ mkdir /mnt/a/c/e
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1
$ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send
$ mkdir /mnt/a/b/d/f
$ mkdir /mnt/a/b/g
$ mv /mnt/a/c/e /mnt/a/b/g/e2
$ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/b/d/f/c2
$ mv /mnt/a/b/d/f /mnt/a/b/g/e2/f2
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2
$ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send
More complex reproducer for case 2)
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd
$ mount /dev/sdd /mnt
$ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b
$ mkdir -p /mnt/a/c/d
$ mkdir /mnt/a/b/e
$ mkdir /mnt/a/c/d/f
$ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/c/d/2b
$ mkdir /mnt/a/x
$ mkdir /mnt/a/y
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1
$ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send
$ mv /mnt/a/x /mnt/a/y
$ mv /mnt/a/c/d/2b/e /mnt/a/c/d/2b/2e
$ mv /mnt/a/c/d /mnt/a/h/2d
$ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/h/2d/2b/2c
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2
$ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send
For both cases the incremental send would enter an infinite loop when building
path strings.
While solving these cases, this change also re-implements the code to detect
when directory moves/renames should be delayed. Instead of dealing with several
specific cases separately, it's now more generic handling all cases with a simple
detection algorithm and if when applying a delayed move/rename there's a path loop
detected, it further delays the move/rename registering a new ancestor inode as
the dependency inode (so our rename happens after that ancestor is renamed).
Tests for these cases is being added to xfstests too.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
If we have directories with a pending move/rename operation, we must take into
account any orphan directories that got created before executing the pending
move/rename. Those orphan directories are directories with an inode number higher
then the current send progress and that don't exist in the parent snapshot, they
are created before current progress reaches their inode number, with a generated
name of the form oN-M-I and at the root of the filesystem tree, and later when
progress matches their inode number, moved/renamed to their final location.
Reproducer:
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd
$ mount /dev/sdd /mnt
$ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b/c/d
$ mkdir /mnt/a/b/e
$ mv /mnt/a/b/c /mnt/a/b/e/CC
$ mkdir /mnt/a/b/e/CC/d/f
$ mkdir /mnt/a/g
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1
$ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send
$ mkdir /mnt/a/g/h
$ mv /mnt/a/b/e /mnt/a/g/h/EE
$ mv /mnt/a/g/h/EE/CC/d /mnt/a/g/h/EE/DD
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2
$ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send
The second receive command failed with the following error:
ERROR: rename a/b/e/CC/d -> o264-7-0/EE/DD failed. No such file or directory
A test case for xfstests follows soon.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Regardless of whether the caller is interested or not in knowing the inode's
generation (dir_gen != NULL), get_first_ref always does a btree lookup to get
the inode item. Avoid this useless lookup if dir_gen parameter is NULL (which
is in some cases).
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
The patch "Btrfs: fix protection between send and root deletion"
(18f687d538) does not actually prevent to delete the snapshot
and just takes care during background cleaning, but this seems rather
user unfriendly, this patch implements the idea presented in
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg30813.html
- add an internal root_item flag to denote a dead root
- check if the send_in_progress is set and refuse to delete, otherwise
set the flag and proceed
- check the flag in send similar to the btrfs_root_readonly checks, for
all involved roots
The root lookup in send via btrfs_read_fs_root_no_name will check if the
root is really dead or not. If it is, ENOENT, aborted send. If it's
alive, it's protected by send_in_progress, send can continue.
CC: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
CC: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
