Don't use create_proc_read_entry() as that is deprecated, but rather use
proc_create_data() and seq_file instead.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: David Schleef <ds@schleef.org>
cc: Ian Abbott <abbotti@mev.co.uk>
cc: Mori Hess <fmhess@users.sourceforge.net>
cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
cc: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>
cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Don't use create_proc_read_entry() as that is deprecated, but rather use
proc_create_data() and seq_file instead.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Marek Belisko <marek.belisko@gmail.com>
cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
cc: Ondrej Zary <linux@rainbow-software.org>
cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Don't use create_proc_read_entry() as that is deprecated, but rather use
proc_create_data() and seq_file instead. Whilst we're at it, reduce the
number of show functions where we can share them.
Question: Do any of the registers read by proc_get_registers() have side
effects upon reading? If so, locking will be required.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
cc: Maxim Mikityanskiy <maxtram95@gmail.com>
cc: YAMANE Toshiaki <yamanetoshi@gmail.com>
cc: Bill Pemberton <wfp5p@virginia.edu>
cc: Andrea Merello <andreamrl@tiscali.it>
cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Don't use create_proc_read_entry() as that is deprecated, but rather use
proc_create_data() and seq_file instead. Whilst we're at it, reduce the
number of show functions where we can share them.
Note: proc_get_stats_ap() should probably use seq_file iteration rather than
list_for_each_entry().
Further note: There appears to be a lot of locking missing in this file to
defend against concurrent access by the driver doing normal operations.
Notably, ieee->network_list traversal and RWCAM/RCAMO command/response access.
Further, do any of the registers read have side effects upon reading?
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Jerry Chuang <jerry-chuang@realtek.com>
cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Mark create_proc_read_entry deprecated. proc_create[_data]() should be used
instead.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
do add_timer() *before* unlocking dev->lock, or unpleasant things can
happen if misdn_del_timer() on another CPU finds the sucker, calls
del_timer_sync() (which does nothing, since we hadn't started the
timer yet) and frees it, just as we get around to add_timer()...
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
mark the victim with negative ->id if misdn_del_timer() finds it on
the list, have timer callback *not* move ones so marked to dev->expired
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
timer callback in timerdev.c both accesses struct mISDNtimer it's
called for *and* moves it to dev->expired. We need del_timer_sync(),
or we risk kfree() freeing it right under dev_expire_timer() *and*
dev->expired getting corrupted.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
mind you, I'm not sure WTF would anybody _need_ that miscdevice
at all - no IO is possible for it, opening it only pins the module
down and is seriously racy, at that.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
switch binfmts that use ->read() to that (and to kernel_read()
in several cases in binfmt_flat - sure, it's nommu, but still,
doing ->read() into kmalloc'ed buffer...)
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
* serialize the call of ->release() on per-pdeo mutex
* don't remove pdeo from per-pde list until we are through with it
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Switch huge if-statement in __proc_file_read() around. This then puts the
single line loop break immediately after the if-statement and allows us to
de-indent the huge comment and make it take fewer lines. The code following
the if-statement then follows naturally from the call to dp->read_proc().
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
misc device gets ->private_data pointing to struct miscdevice
on open(), so we can use that to get to per-device structure
instead of relying on file_operations being copied into it.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Remove device_open/close() functions as they don't really do anything and
remove Device_Open as it isn't counted atomically and the value isn't used.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Kill create_proc_entry() in favour of create_proc_read_entry(), proc_create()
and proc_create_data().
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
create_proc_entry() shouldn't be used. Rather proc_create_data() should be
used. The proc_write() function is only used by #if'd out code, so delete it
for now.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Don't use create_proc_entry() in nubus_proc_subdir(). The files created aren't
given any way to use them, so for the moment use create_proc_read_entry() with
a NULL accessor and generate a compile-time warning.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Adjust printk in create_proc_mconsole() to reflect it is now using
proc_create() not create_proc_mconsole().
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
