If "mainmenu" is not specified, "Linux Kernel Configuration" is used
as a default prompt.
Given that Kconfig is used in other projects than Linux, let's use
a more generic prompt, "Main menu".
Suggested-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
As in the unit test, the error message for the recursive inclusion
looks like this:
Kconfig.inc1:4: recursive inclusion detected. Inclusion path:
current file : 'Kconfig.inc1'
included from: 'Kconfig.inc3:1'
included from: 'Kconfig.inc2:3'
included from: 'Kconfig.inc1:4'
The 'Kconfig.inc1:4' is duplicated in the first and last lines.
Also, the single quotes do not help readability.
Change the message like follows:
Recursive inclusion detected.
Inclusion path:
current file : Kconfig.inc1
included from: Kconfig.inc3:1
included from: Kconfig.inc2:3
included from: Kconfig.inc1:4
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
If recursive inclusion is detected, it should fail with error
messages. Test this.
This also tests the line numbers in the error message, fixed by
commit 5ae6fcc4bb ("kconfig: fix line number in recursive inclusion
error message").
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Reviewed-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Recursive dependency should be detected and warned. Test this.
This indirectly tests the line number increments.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Reviewed-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Commit 3b9a19e089 ("kconfig: loop as long as we changed some symbols
in randconfig") fixed randconfig where a choice contains a sub-choice.
Prior to that commit, the sub-choice values were not set.
I am not sure whether this is an intended feature or just something
people discovered works, but it is used in the real world;
drivers/usb/gadget/legacy/Kconfig is source'd in a choice context,
then creates a sub-choice in it.
For the test case in this commit, there are 3 possible results.
Case 1:
CONFIG_A=y
# CONFIG_B is not set
Case 2:
# CONFIG_A is not set
CONFIG_B=y
CONFIG_C=y
# CONFIG_D is not set
Case 3:
# CONFIG_A is not set
CONFIG_B=y
# CONFIG_C is not set
CONFIG_D=y
CONFIG_E=y
So, this test iterates several times, and checks if the result is
either of the three.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Reviewed-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Commit fbe98bb9ed ("kconfig: Fix defconfig when one choice menu
selects options that another choice menu depends on") fixed defconfig
when two choices interact (i.e. calculating the visibility of a choice
requires to calculate another choice).
The test code in that commit log was based on the real world example,
and complicated. So, I shrunk it down to the following:
defconfig.choice:
---8<---
CONFIG_CHOICE_VAL0=y
---8<---
---8<---
config MODULES
def_bool y
option modules
choice
prompt "Choice"
config CHOICE_VAL0
tristate "Choice 0"
config CHOICE_VAL1
tristate "Choice 1"
endchoice
choice
prompt "Another choice"
depends on CHOICE_VAL0
config DUMMY
bool "dummy"
endchoice
---8<---
Prior to commit fbe98bb9ed,
$ scripts/kconfig/conf --defconfig=defconfig.choice Kconfig.choice
resulted in:
CONFIG_MODULES=y
CONFIG_CHOICE_VAL0=m
# CONFIG_CHOICE_VAL1 is not set
CONFIG_DUMMY=y
where the expected result would be:
CONFIG_MODULES=y
CONFIG_CHOICE_VAL0=y
# CONFIG_CHOICE_VAL1 is not set
CONFIG_DUMMY=y
Roughly, this weird behavior happened like this:
Symbols are calculated a couple of times. First, all symbols are
calculated in conf_read(). The first 'choice' is evaluated to 'y'
due to the SYMBOL_DEF_USER flag, but sym_calc_choice() clears it
unless all of its choice values are explicitly set by the user.
conf_set_all_new_symbols() clears all SYMBOL_VALID flags. Then, only
choices are calculated. Here, the SYMBOL_DEF_USER for the first choice
has been forgotten, so it is evaluated to 'm'. set_all_choice_values()
sets SYMBOL_DEF_USER again to choice symbols.
When calculating the second choice, due to 'depends on CHOICE_VAL0',
it triggers the calculation of CHOICE_VAL0. As a result, SYMBOL_VALID
is set for CHOICE_VAL0.
Symbols except choices get the final chance of re-calculation in
conf_write(). In a normal case, CHOICE_VAL0 would be re-calculated,
then the first choice would be indirectly re-calculated with the
SYMBOL_DEF_USER which has been recalled by set_all_choice_values(),
which would be evaluated to 'y'. But, in this case, CHOICE_VAL0 has
already been marked as SYMBOL_VALID, so this re-calculation does not
happen. Then, =m from the conf_set_all_new_symbols() phase is written
out to the .config file.
Add a unit test for this naive case.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Reviewed-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
If tristate choice values depend on symbols set to 'm', they should be
hidden when the choice containing them is changed from 'm' to 'y'
(i.e. exclusive choice).
This issue was fixed by commit fa64e5f6a3 ("kconfig/symbol.c: handle
choice_values that depend on 'm' symbols").
Add a test case to avoid regression.
For the input in this unit test, there is a room for argument if
"# CONFIG_CHOICE1 is not set" should be written to the .config file.
After commit fa64e5f6a3, this line was written to the .config file.
With commit cb67ab2cd2 ("kconfig: do not write choice values when
their dependency becomes n"), it is not written now.
In this test, "# CONFIG_CHOICE1 is not set" is don't care.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Reviewed-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Commit cb67ab2cd2 ("kconfig: do not write choice values when their
dependency becomes n") fixed a problem where "# CONFIG_... is not set"
for choice values are wrongly written into the .config file when they
are once visible, then become invisible later.
Add a test for this naive case.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Reviewed-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
If new choice values are added with new dependency, and they become
visible during user configuration, oldconfig should recognize them
as (NEW), and ask the user for choice.
This issue was fixed by commit 5d09598d48 ("kconfig: fix new choices
being skipped upon config update").
This is a subtle corner case. Add a test case to avoid breakage.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Reviewed-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
If a symbols has dependency on the preceding symbol, the menu entry
should become the submenu of the preceding one, and displayed with
deeper indentation.
This is done by restructuring the menu tree in menu_finalize().
It is a bit complicated computation, so let's add a test case.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Reviewed-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
The calculation of 'choice' is a bit complicated part in Kconfig.
The behavior of 'y' choice is intuitive. If choice values are tristate,
the choice can be 'm' where each value can be enabled independently.
Also, if a choice is marked as 'optional', the whole choice can be
invisible.
Test basic functionality of choice.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Reviewed-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Many parts in Kconfig are so cryptic and need refactoring. However,
its complexity prevents us from moving forward. There are several
naive corner cases where it is difficult to notice breakage. If
those are covered by unit tests, we will be able to touch the code
with more confidence.
Here is a simple test framework based on pytest. The conftest.py
provides a fixture useful to run commands such as 'oldaskconfig' etc.
and to compare the resulted .config, stdout, stderr with expectations.
How to add test cases?
----------------------
For each test case, you should create a subdirectory under
scripts/kconfig/tests/ (so test cases are separated from each other).
Every test case directory should contain the following files:
- __init__.py: describes test functions
- Kconfig: the top level Kconfig file for the test
To do a useful job, test cases generally need additional data like
input .config and information about expected results.
How to run tests?
-----------------
You need python3 and pytest. Then, run "make testconfig". O= option
is supported. If V=1 is given, detailed logs captured during tests
are displayed.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Reviewed-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
