SU SDP scanline indication should be taken into account when checking
vblank length. In Bspec we have:
PSR2_CTL[ SU SDP scanline indication ] = 0: (TRANS_VBLANK Vertical Blank
End- TRANS_VBLANK Vertical Blank Start) > PSR2_CTL Block Count Number value
in lines
PSR2_CTL[ SU SDP scanline indication ] = 1: (TRANS_VBLANK Vertical Blank
End- TRANS_VBLANK Vertical Blank Start- 1) > PSR2_CTL Block Count Number
value in lines
Bspec: 49274
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240607134917.1327574-12-jouni.hogander@intel.com
We are about to add more complexity to vblank length check. It makes sense
to move it to separate function for sake of clarity.
v2: change name to wake_lines_fit_into_vblank
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240607134917.1327574-11-jouni.hogander@intel.com
Currently Panel Replay status printout is printing frame lock status. It
should print Panel Replay status instead. Panel Replay status register
field follows PSR status register field. Use existing PSR code for that.
Fixes: ef75c25e8f ("drm/i915/panelreplay: Debugfs support for panel replay")
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240607134917.1327574-10-jouni.hogander@intel.com
Early Transport is possible and in our HW mandatory on eDP Panel
Replay. Add parameter to intel_psr2_config_et_valid to differentiate
validity check for Panel Replay.
v2: fix intel_dp->psr_dpcd[0] check
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240607134917.1327574-9-jouni.hogander@intel.com
Current intel_psr_enable_sink is a mess due to partly reusing PSR bit
definitions for Panel Replay. Even thought PSR and Panel Replay enable
registers do have common bits they still have also different bits and same
bits with different meaning. For sake of clarity split enabling sink to PSR
and Panel Replay specific parts.
Also fix issue caused by using psr->panel_replay_enabled to early.
Fixes: 88ae6c65ec ("drm/i915/psr: Unify panel replay enable/disable sink")
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240607134917.1327574-7-jouni.hogander@intel.com
Panel Replay is not enabled if there are no active planes. Do not compare
it on pipe comparison. Otherwise we get pipe mismatch.
Fixes: ac9ef32732 ("drm/i915/psr: Panel replay has to be enabled before link training")
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240607134917.1327574-5-jouni.hogander@intel.com
We want to have own variables for fast wake lines and aux less wake
time. It might be needed to choose if we can enable Panel Replay Selective
Update or PSR2.
Also currently aux less wake time is overwritten by calculated fast wake
time.
v2:use aux less wake time in intel_alpm_lobf_compute_config
Fixes: da6a9836ac ("drm/i915/psr: Calculate aux less wake time")
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240607134917.1327574-2-jouni.hogander@intel.com
Compute Fixed Average Vtotal/CMRR with resepect to
userspace VRR enablement. Also calculate required
parameters in case of CMRR is enabled. During
intel_vrr_compute_config, CMRR is getting enabled
based on userspace has enabled Variable refresh mode
with VRR timing generator or not. Make CMRR as small subset of
FAVT mode, when Panel is running on Fixed refresh rate
and on VRR framework then only enable CMRR to match with
actual refresh rate.
--v2:
- Update is_cmrr_frac_required function return as bool, not int. [Jani]
- Use signed int math instead of unsigned in cmrr_get_vtotal2. [Jani]
- Fix typo and usage of camel case in cmrr_get_vtotal. [Jani]
- Use do_div in cmrr_get_vtotalwhile calculating cmrr_m. [ Jani]
- Simplify cmrr and vrr compute config in intel_vrr_compute_config. [Jani]
- Correct valiable name usage in is_cmrr_frac_required. [Ville]
--v3:
- Removing RFC tag.
--v4:
- Added edp check to address edp usecase for now. (ville)
- Updated is_cmrr_fraction_required to more simplified calculation.
- on longterm goal to be worked upon uapi as suggestion from ville.
--v5:
- Correct vtotal paramas accuracy and add 2 digit precision.
- Avoid using DIV_ROUND_UP and improve scanline precision.
--v6:
- Make CMRR a small subset of FAVT mode.
--v7:
- Update commit message to avoid confusion with Legacy VRR (Ankit).
- Add cmrr.enable in last, so remove from this patch.
--v8:
- Set cmrr.enable in current patch instead of separate patch (Ankit).
- Since vrr.enable and cmrr.enable are not mutually exclusive,
handle accordingly (Ankit).
- is_edp is not required inside is_cmrr_frac_required function (Ankit).
- Add video_mode_required flag for future enhancement.
- Correct cmrr_m/cmrr_n calculation.
--v9:
- Move patch to last and set other bits before computing
cmrr.enable.(Ankit)
- Add TODO: for to address target refresh rate precision as future
enhancement.
Signed-off-by: Mitul Golani <mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240610072203.24956-10-mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com
Compute vrr vsync params in case of FAVT as well instead of
only to AVT mode of operation.
--v2:
- Remove redundant computation for vrr_vsync_start
and vrr_vsync_end(Ankit).
--v3:
- vrr.enable and cmrr.enable check together is not required as both
will be true at the same point in time. (Ankit)
- Replace vrr.enable flag to cmrr.enable, mistakenly added. (Ankit)
Signed-off-by: Mitul Golani <mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240610072203.24956-9-mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com
Compute params for Adaptive Sync SDP when Fixed Average Vtotal
mode is enabled.
--v2:
Since vrr.enable is set in case of cmrr also, handle accordingly(Ankit).
--v3:
- Since vrr.enable is set in case of cmrr also, handle
accordingly(Ankit).
- check cmrr.enable when CMRR flags are set during intel_dp_compute_as_sdp.
--v4:
- Use drm_mode_vrefresh instead of manual calculation (Ankit).
Signed-off-by: Mitul Golani <mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240610072203.24956-8-mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com
Add support of pack and unpack for target_rr_divider.
--v2:
- Set Target Refresh Rate Divider bit when related
AS SDP bit is set (Ankit).
--v3:
- target_rr_divider is bools so set accordingly (Ankit).
Signed-off-by: Mitul Golani <mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240610072203.24956-7-mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com
Add target_rr_divider to structure representing AS SDP.
It is valid only in FAVT mode, sink device ignores the bit in AVT
mode.
--v2:
- Update commit header and send patch to dri-devel.
Signed-off-by: Mitul Golani <mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>
Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240610072203.24956-6-mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com
Add/update trans_vrr_ctl flag when crtc_state->cmrr.enable
is set, With this commit setting the stage for subsequent
CMRR enablement.
--v2:
- Check pipe active state in cmrr enabling. [Jani]
- Remove usage of bitwise OR on booleans. [Jani]
- Revert unrelated changes. [Jani]
- Update intel_vrr_enable, vrr and cmrr enable conditions. [Jani]
- Simplify whole if-ladder in intel_vrr_enable. [Jani]
- Revert patch restructuring mistakes in intel_vrr_get_config. [Jani]
--v3:
- Check pipe active state in cmrr disabling.[Jani]
- Correct messed up condition in intel_vrr_enable. [Jani]
--v4:
- Removing RFC tag.
--v5:
- CMRR handling in co-existatnce of LRR and DRRS.
--v7:
- Rebase on top of AS SDP merge.
--v8:
- Remove cmrr_enabling/disabling and update commit message. (Ankit)
--v9:
- Revert removed line(Ankit).
Signed-off-by: Mitul Golani <mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240610072203.24956-5-mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com
Add register definitions for Transcoder Fixed Average
Vtotal mode/CMRR function, with the necessary bitfields.
Compute these registers when CMRR is enabled, extending
Adaptive refresh rate capabilities.
--v2:
- Use intel_de_read64_2x32 in intel_vrr_get_config. [Jani]
- Fix indent and order based on register offset. [Jani]
--v3:
- Removing RFC tag.
--v4:
- Update place holder for CMRR register definition. (Jani)
--v5:
- Add CMRR register definitions to a separate file intel_vrr_reg.h.
--v6:
- Fixed indentation. (Jani)
- Add dependency header intel_display_reg_defs.h. (Jani)
- Rename file name to intel_vrr_regs.h instead of reg.h (Jani)
--v7:
- Remove adding CMRR flag to vrr_ctl register during set_transcoder_timing,
as it is already being done during intel_vrr_enable. (Ankit)
Signed-off-by: Mitul Golani <mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240610072203.24956-4-mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com
Update the indentation for the VRR register definition and
its bits, and fix checkpatch issues to ensure smooth movement
of registers and bits.
--v2:
- Keep XELPD_VRR_CTL_VRR_GUARDBAND(x) to avoid readability (Ankit).
- Fix all indentation related VRR registers and bits instead of
checkpatch one.
Signed-off-by: Mitul Golani <mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240610072203.24956-2-mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com
The VBT spec does a very poor job of defining how the chromaticity
coordinates in block 46 are laid out. After double checking the
Windows implementation it turns out these more or less match the
EDID definition, where the 10bit values are split into 2bit + 8bit
chunks. Adjust our struct definition to reflect that.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240605134756.17099-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
