Use the global quiet variable everywhere so that all tools hide warnings
in quiet mode and update the documentation to reflect this.
'perf probe' claimed that errors are not printed in quiet mode but I
don't see this so remove it from the docs.
Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018094137.783081-3-james.clark@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
The compilation on s390 results in this error:
# make DEBUG=y bench/numa.o
...
bench/numa.c: In function ‘__bench_numa’:
bench/numa.c:1749:81: error: ‘%d’ directive output may be truncated
writing between 1 and 11 bytes into a region of size between
10 and 20 [-Werror=format-truncation=]
1749 | snprintf(tname, sizeof(tname), "process%d:thread%d", p, t);
^~
...
bench/numa.c:1749:64: note: directive argument in the range
[-2147483647, 2147483646]
...
#
The maximum length of the %d replacement is 11 characters because of the
negative sign. Therefore extend the array by two more characters.
Output after:
# make DEBUG=y bench/numa.o > /dev/null 2>&1; ll bench/numa.o
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 418320 May 19 09:11 bench/numa.o
#
Fixes: 3aff8ba0a4 ("perf bench numa: Avoid possible truncation when using snprintf()")
Suggested-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Sumanth Korikkar <sumanthk@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220520081158.2990006-1-tmricht@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
BUG_ON is a no-op if NDEBUG is defined, otherwise it is an assert.
Compiling with NDEBUG yields:
bench/numa.c: In function ‘bind_to_cpu’:
bench/numa.c:314:1: error: control reaches end of non-void function [-Werror=return-type]
314 | }
| ^
bench/numa.c: In function ‘bind_to_node’:
bench/numa.c:367:1: error: control reaches end of non-void function [-Werror=return-type]
367 | }
| ^
Add return statements to cover this case.
Reviewed-by: Athira Jajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Xing Zhengjun <zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220428202912.1056444-1-irogers@google.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
The 'perf bench numa' testcase fails on systems with more than 1K CPUs.
Testcase: perf bench numa mem -p 1 -t 3 -P 512 -s 100 -zZ0qcm --thp 1
Snippet of code:
<<>>
perf: bench/numa.c:302: bind_to_node: Assertion `!(ret)' failed.
Aborted (core dumped)
<<>>
bind_to_node() uses "sched_getaffinity" to save the original cpumask and
this call is returning EINVAL ((invalid argument).
This happens because the default mask size in glibc is 1024. To
overcome this 1024 CPUs mask size limitation of cpu_set_t, change the
mask size using the CPU_*_S macros ie, use CPU_ALLOC to allocate
cpumask, CPU_ALLOC_SIZE for size.
Apart from fixing this for "orig_mask", apply same logic to "mask" as
well which is used to setaffinity so that mask size is large enough to
represent number of possible CPU's in the system.
sched_getaffinity is used in one more place in perf numa bench. It is in
"bind_to_cpu" function. Apply the same logic there also. Though
currently no failure is reported from there, it is ideal to change
getaffinity to work with such system configurations having CPU's more
than default mask size supported by glibc.
Also fix "sched_setaffinity" to use mask size which is large enough to
represent number of possible CPU's in the system.
Fixed all places where "bind_cpumask" which is part of "struct
thread_data" is used such that bind_cpumask works in all configuration.
Reported-by: Disha Goel <disgoel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Athira Jajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Nageswara R Sastry <rnsastry@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220412164059.42654-3-atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Perf numa bench test fails with error:
Testcase:
./perf bench numa mem -p 2 -t 1 -P 1024 -C 0,8 -M 1,0 -s 20 -zZq --thp 1 --no-data_rand_walk
Failure snippet:
<<>>
Running 'numa/mem' benchmark:
# Running main, "perf bench numa numa-mem -p 2 -t 1 -P 1024 -C 0,8 -M 1,0 -s 20 -zZq --thp 1 --no-data_rand_walk"
perf: bench/numa.c:333: bind_to_cpumask: Assertion `!(ret)' failed.
<<>>
The Testcases uses CPU's 0 and 8. In function "parse_setup_cpu_list",
There is check to see if cpu number is greater than max cpu's possible
in the system ie via "if (bind_cpu_0 >= g->p.nr_cpus || bind_cpu_1 >=
g->p.nr_cpus) {".
But it could happen that system has say 48 CPU's, but only number of
online CPU's is 0-7. Other CPU's are offlined. Since "g->p.nr_cpus" is
48, so function will go ahead and set bit for CPU 8 also in cpumask (
td->bind_cpumask).
bind_to_cpumask function is called to set affinity using
sched_setaffinity and the cpumask. Since the CPU8 is not present, set
affinity will fail here with EINVAL.
Fix this issue by adding a check to make sure that, CPU's provided in
the input argument values are online before proceeding further and skip
the test. For this, include new helper function "is_cpu_online" in
"tools/perf/util/header.c".
Since "BIT(x)" definition will get included from header.h, remove
that from bench/numa.c
Reported-by: Disha Goel <disgoel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Athira Jajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Disha Goel <disgoel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Nageswara R Sastry <rnsastry@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220412164059.42654-2-atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
In systems having higher node numbers available like node
255, perf numa bench will fail with SIGABORT.
<<>>
perf: bench/numa.c:1416: init: Assertion `!(g->p.nr_nodes > 64 || g->p.nr_nodes < 0)' failed.
Aborted (core dumped)
<<>>
Snippet from 'numactl -H' below on a powerpc system where the highest
node number available is 255:
available: 6 nodes (0,8,252-255)
node 0 cpus: <cpu-list>
node 0 size: 519587 MB
node 0 free: 516659 MB
node 8 cpus: <cpu-list>
node 8 size: 523607 MB
node 8 free: 486757 MB
node 252 cpus:
node 252 size: 0 MB
node 252 free: 0 MB
node 253 cpus:
node 253 size: 0 MB
node 253 free: 0 MB
node 254 cpus:
node 254 size: 0 MB
node 254 free: 0 MB
node 255 cpus:
node 255 size: 0 MB
node 255 free: 0 MB
node distances:
node 0 8 252 253 254 255
Note: <cpu-list> expands to actual cpu list in the original output.
These nodes 252-255 are to represent the memory on GPUs and are valid
nodes.
The perf numa bench init code has a condition check to see if the number
of NUMA nodes (nr_nodes) exceeds MAX_NR_NODES. The value of MAX_NR_NODES
defined in perf code is 64. And the 'nr_nodes' is the value from
numa_max_node() which represents the highest node number available in the
system. In some systems where we could have NUMA node 255, this condition
check fails and results in SIGABORT.
The numa benchmark uses static value of MAX_NR_NODES in the code to
represent size of two NUMA node arrays and node bitmask used for setting
memory policy. Patch adds a fix to dynamically allocate size for the
two arrays and bitmask value based on the node numbers available in the
system. With the fix, perf numa benchmark will work with node configuration
on any system and thus removes the static MAX_NR_NODES value.
Signed-off-by: Athira Jajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1614271802-1503-1-git-send-email-atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
In the function parse_nodes_opt(), the statement "return 0;" is dead
code, remove it.
Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <fanpeng@loongson.cn>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1597401894-27549-1-git-send-email-fanpeng@loongson.cn
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
It is currently assumed that each node contains at most nr_cpus/nr_nodes
CPUs and nodes' CPU ranges do not overlap.
That assumption is generally incorrect as there are archs where a CPU
number does not depend on to its node number.
This update removes the described assumption by simply calling
numa_node_to_cpus() interface and using the returned mask for binding
CPUs to nodes.
Also, variable types and names made consistent in functions using
cpumask.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Balamuruhan S <bala24@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Satheesh Rajendran <sathnaga@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200813113247.GA2014@oc3871087118.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Standard benchmark names let users know the tests specifics. For
example "2x1-bw-process" name tells that two processes one thread each
are run and the RAM bandwidth is measured.
Several benchmarks names do not correspond to their actual running
configuration. Fix that and also some whitespace and comment
inconsistencies.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/6b6f2084f132ee8e9203dc7c32f9deb209b87a68.1597004831.git.agordeev@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/d949f5f48e17fc816f3beecf8479f1b2480345e4.1597004831.git.agordeev@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Now that builtin.h isn't included by any other header, we can check
where it is really needed, i.e. we can remove it and be sure that it
isn't being obtained indirectly.
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-mn7jheex85iw9qo6tlv26hb2@git.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
With the movement of lots of stuff out of perf.h to other headers we
ended up not needing it in lots of places, remove it from those places.
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-c718m0sxxwp73lp9d8vpihb4@git.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Michael reported an issue with perf bench numa failing with binding to
cpu0 with '-0' option.
# perf bench numa mem -p 3 -t 1 -P 512 -s 100 -zZcm0 --thp 1 -M 1 -ddd
# Running 'numa/mem' benchmark:
# Running main, "perf bench numa numa-mem -p 3 -t 1 -P 512 -s 100 -zZcm0 --thp 1 -M 1 -ddd"
binding to node 0, mask: 0000000000000001 => -1
perf: bench/numa.c:356: bind_to_memnode: Assertion `!(ret)' failed.
Aborted (core dumped)
This happens when the cpu0 is not part of node0, which is the benchmark
assumption and we can see that's not the case for some powerpc servers.
Using correct node for cpu0 binding.
Reported-by: Michael Petlan <mpetlan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Satheesh Rajendran <sathnaga@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190801142642.28004-1-jolsa@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Eroding a bit more the tools/perf/util/util.h hodpodge header.
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-natazosyn9rwjka25tvcnyi0@git.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
While cross building perf to the ARC architecture on a fedora 30 host,
we were failing with:
CC /tmp/build/perf/bench/numa.o
bench/numa.c: In function ‘worker_thread’:
bench/numa.c:1261:12: error: ‘RUSAGE_THREAD’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘SIGEV_THREAD’?
getrusage(RUSAGE_THREAD, &rusage);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
SIGEV_THREAD
bench/numa.c:1261:12: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
[perfbuilder@60d5802468f6 perf]$ /arc_gnu_2019.03-rc1_prebuilt_uclibc_le_archs_linux_install/bin/arc-linux-gcc --version | head -1
arc-linux-gcc (ARCv2 ISA Linux uClibc toolchain 2019.03-rc1) 8.3.1 20190225
[perfbuilder@60d5802468f6 perf]$
Trying to reproduce a report by Vineet, I noticed that, with just
cross-built zlib and numactl libraries, I ended up with the above
failure.
So, since RUSAGE_THREAD is available as a define, check for that and
numactl libraries, I ended up with the above failure.
So, since RUSAGE_THREAD is available as a define in the system headers,
check if it is defined in the 'perf bench numa' sources and define it if
not.
Now it builds and I have to figure out if the problem reported by Vineet
only takes place if we have libelf or some other library available.
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-2wb4r1gir9xrevbpq7qp0amk@git.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
This replaces all open encodings in tools with NUMA_NO_NODE. Also
linux/numa.h is now needed for the perf build.
[sfr@canb.auug.org.au: fix for replace open encodings for NUMA_NO_NODE]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190108131141.730e9c4f@canb.auug.org.au
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1545127933-10711-3-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com> [drivers/infiniband]
Cc: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>
Cc: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> [ixgbe]
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> [mtip32xx]
Cc: Joseph Qi <jiangqi903@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> [powerpc]
Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org> [dmaengine.c]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Currently we can hit following assert when running numa bench:
$ perf bench numa mem -p 3 -t 1 -P 512 -s 100 -zZ0cm --thp 1
perf: bench/numa.c:1577: __bench_numa: Assertion `!(!(((wait_stat) & 0x7f) == 0))' failed.
The assertion is correct, because we hit the SIGFPE in following line:
Thread 2.2 "thread 0/0" received signal SIGFPE, Arithmetic exception.
[Switching to Thread 0x7fffd28c6700 (LWP 11750)]
0x000.. in worker_thread (__tdata=0x7.. ) at bench/numa.c:1257
1257 td->speed_gbs = bytes_done / (td->runtime_ns / NSEC_PER_SEC) / 1e9;
We don't check if the runtime is actually bigger than 1 second,
and thus this might end up with zero division within FPU.
Adding the check to prevent this.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180620094036.17278-1-jolsa@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
'R' means access the data via reads instead of writes, fix this typo.
Signed-off-by: Yisheng Xie <xieyisheng1@huawei.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1524644707-11030-1-git-send-email-xieyisheng1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Certain systems are designed to have sparse/discontiguous nodes. On
such systems, 'perf bench numa' hangs, shows wrong number of nodes and
shows values for non-existent nodes. Handle this by only taking nodes
that are exposed by kernel to userspace.
Signed-off-by: Satheesh Rajendran <sathnaga@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1edbcd353c009e109e93d78f2f46381930c340fe.1511368645.git.sathnaga@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Balamuruhan S <bala24@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which
makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license.
By default all files without license information are under the default
license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2.
Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0'
SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding
shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text.
This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and
Philippe Ombredanne.
How this work was done:
Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of
the use cases:
- file had no licensing information it it.
- file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it,
- file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information,
Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases
where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license
had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords.
The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to
a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the
output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX
tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne. Philippe prepared the
base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files.
The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files
assessed. Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner
results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s)
to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not
immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was:
- Files considered eligible had to be source code files.
- Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5
lines of source
- File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5
lines).
All documentation files were explicitly excluded.
The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license
identifiers to apply.
- when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was
considered to have no license information in it, and the top level
COPYING file license applied.
For non */uapi/* files that summary was:
SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|-------
GPL-2.0 11139
and resulted in the first patch in this series.
If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH
Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0". Results of that was:
SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|-------
GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 930
and resulted in the second patch in this series.
- if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one
of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if
any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in
it (per prior point). Results summary:
SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|------
GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 270
GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 169
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause) 21
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 17
LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 15
GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 14
((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 5
LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 4
LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note 3
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT) 3
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT) 1
and that resulted in the third patch in this series.
- when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became
the concluded license(s).
- when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a
license but the other didn't, or they both detected different
licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred.
- In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file
resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and
which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics).
- When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was
confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
- If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier,
the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later
in time.
In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the
spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the
source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation
by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from
FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners
disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights. The
Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so
they are related.
Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets
for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the
files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks
in about 15000 files.
In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have
copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the
correct identifier.
Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual
inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch
version early this week with:
- a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected
license ids and scores
- reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+
files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct
- reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license
was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied
SPDX license was correct
This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction. This
worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the
different types of files to be modified.
These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg. Thomas wrote a script to
parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the
format that the file expected. This script was further refined by Greg
based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to
distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different
comment types.) Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to
generate the patches.
Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Instead of defining __unused or redefining __maybe_unused.
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-4eleto5pih31jw1q4dypm9pf@git.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Needed to use the PRI[xu](32,64) formatting macros.
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-wkbho8kaw24q67dd11q0j39f@git.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
To pave the way for further cleanups where linux/kernel.h may stop being
included in some header.
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-qqxan6tfsl6qx3l0v3nwgjvk@git.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
We got it from the git sources but never used it for anything, with the
place where this would be somehow used remaining:
static int run_builtin(struct cmd_struct *p, int argc, const char **argv)
{
prefix = NULL;
if (p->option & RUN_SETUP)
prefix = NULL; /* setup_perf_directory(); */
Ditch it.
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-uw5swz05vol0qpr32c5lpvus@git.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Adding more commentary for -c/--show_convergence option, to explain how
the convergence is defined.
Before:
-c, --show_convergence
show convergence details
Now:
-c, --show_convergence
convergence is reached when each process \
(all its threads) is running on a single NUMA node.
Suggested--by: Jiri Hladky <jhladky@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: Jiri Hladky <jhladky@redhat.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1488732011-27384-1-git-send-email-jolsa@kernel.org
[ Rephrased a bit based on a IRC conversation with Jiri ]
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
When building with clang we get this error:
bench/numa.c:46:9: error: 'dprintf' macro redefined [-Werror,-Wmacro-redefined]
#define dprintf(x...) do { if (g && g->p.show_details >= 1) printf(x); } while (0)
^
/usr/include/bits/stdio2.h:145:12: note: previous definition is here
# define dprintf(fd, ...) \
^
CC /tmp/build/perf/tests/parse-no-sample-id-all.o
1 error generated.
So, make sure it is undefined before using that name.
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp>
Cc: Jakub Jelen <jjelen@redhat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-f654o2svtrutamvxt7igwz74@git.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Addressing this warning from gcc 7:
CC /tmp/build/perf/bench/numa.o
bench/numa.c: In function '__bench_numa':
bench/numa.c:1582:42: error: '%d' directive output may be truncated writing between 1 and 10 bytes into a region of size between 8 and 17 [-Werror=format-truncation=]
snprintf(tname, 32, "process%d:thread%d", p, t);
^~
bench/numa.c:1582:25: note: directive argument in the range [0, 2147483647]
snprintf(tname, 32, "process%d:thread%d", p, t);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from /usr/include/stdio.h:939:0,
from bench/../util/util.h:47,
from bench/../builtin.h:4,
from bench/numa.c:11:
/usr/include/bits/stdio2.h:64:10: note: '__builtin___snprintf_chk' output between 17 and 35 bytes into a destination of size 32
return __builtin___snprintf_chk (__s, __n, __USE_FORTIFY_LEVEL - 1,
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
__bos (__s), __fmt, __va_arg_pack ());
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Petr Holasek <pholasek@redhat.com>
Cc: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-twa37vsfqcie5gwpqwnjuuz9@git.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Following kernel practices, using linux/time64.h
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-7vnv15263y50qku76p4w5xk6@git.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Comparing bits and bytes in numa benchmark assertion
I hit the issue on two socket Power8 machine presenting its numa nodes
as 0,1,16,17 (according to numactl). Therefore I got error (and hang of
parent process):
perf: bench/numa.c:296: bind_to_memnode: Assertion `!(g->p.nr_nodes > (int)sizeof(nodemask))' failed.
This is obviously false positive. We can fit all the 18 nodes into
bitfield of 8 bytes (long on 64b architecture).
Signed-off-by: Jakub Jelen <jakuje@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jakub Jelen <jjelen@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: trivial@kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1458388687-24421-1-git-send-email-jakuje@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Move the subcommand-related files from perf to a new library named
libsubcmd.a.
Since we're moving files anyway, go ahead and rename 'exec_cmd.*' to
'exec-cmd.*' to be consistent with the naming of all the other files.
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/c0a838d4c878ab17fee50998811612b2281355c1.1450193761.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
We have three benchmarking subsystems that specify some sort of 'number
of loops' parameter - but all of them do it inconsistently:
numa: -l/--nr_loops
sched messaging: -l/--loops
mem memset/memcpy: -i/--iterations
Harmonize them to -l/--nr_loops by picking the numa variant - which is
also the most likely one to have existing scripting which we don't want
to break.
Plus improve the parameter help texts to indicate the default value for
the nr_loops variable to keep users from guessing ...
Also propagate the naming to internal variables.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1445241870-24854-13-git-send-email-mingo@kernel.org
[ Let the harmonisation reach the perf-bench man page as well ]
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
We really should move the sched_getcpu() to some more suitable place,
but this one-liner fixes this build problem on ancient distros like
RHEL5.
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Vinson Lee <vlee@twitter.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-5yqg4p11f9uii6yremz3r35v@git.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
In verbose mode perf bench numa shows also GB/s speed, system and user cpu
time for each particular thread. Using of getrusage() can provide much more
per process or per thread stats in future.
Signed-off-by: Petr Holasek <pholasek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1429198699-25039-3-git-send-email-pholasek@redhat.com
[ Rename 'usage' variable to not shadow util.h's usage() ]
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
This patch fixes the race in the beginning of benchmark run when some
threads hasn't got assigned curr_cpu yet so they don't occur in
nodes-of-process stats and benchmark concludes that all remaining
threads are converged already.
The race can be reproduced with small amount of threads and some bigger
amount of shared process memory, e.g. one process, two threads and 5GB
of process memory.
Signed-off-by: Petr Holasek <pholasek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1429198699-25039-4-git-send-email-pholasek@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Corrected description and fixed function of --quiet argument.
Signed-off-by: Petr Holasek <pholasek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1429198699-25039-2-git-send-email-pholasek@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Currently,
$ perf bench numa mem
errors out with usage information. To make this more user-friendly, let
us provide a minimum set of default values required for a test
run. As an added bonus,
$ perf bench all
now goes all the way to completion.
Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1395964219-22173-2-git-send-email-artagnon@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
If we call just:
perf bench numa mem
it will present the same output as:
perf bench numa mem -h
i.e. ask for instructions about what to run.
While that is kinda ok, using 'run all tests' as the default, i.e.
making 'no parms' be equivalent to:
perf bench numa mem -a
Will allow:
perf bench numa all
to actually do what is asked: i.e. run all the 'bench' tests, instead of
responding to that by asking what to do.
That, in turn, allows:
perf bench all
to actually complete, for the same reasons.
And after that, the tests that come after that, and that at some point
hit a NULL deref, will run, allowing me to reproduce a recently reported
problem.
That when you have the needed numa libraries, which wasn't the case for
the reporter, making me a bit confused after trying to reproduce his
report.
So make no parms mean -a.
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Patrick Palka <patrick@parcs.ath.cx>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-x7h0ghx4pef4n0brywg21krk@git.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
bench/numa.c: In function 'worker_thread':
bench/numa.c:1123:20: error: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions [-Werror=sign-compare]
bench/numa.c:1171:6: error: format '%lx' expects argument of type 'long unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'u64' [-Werror=format]
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1382099356-4918-13-git-send-email-adrian.hunter@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Patch adds more subtle handling of -C and -N parameters in
parse_{cpu,node}_setup_list() functions when there isn't enough NUMA
nodes or CPUs present. Instead of assertion and terminating benchmark,
partial test is skipped with error message and perf will continue to the
next one.
Fixed problem can be easily reproduced on machine with only one NUMA
node:
# Running numa/mem benchmark...
# Running main, "perf bench numa mem -a"
...
# Running RAM-bw-remote, "perf bench numa mem -p 1 -t 1 -P 1024 -C 0 -M 1 -s
perf: bench/numa.c:622: parse_setup_node_list: Assertion `!(bind_node_0 < 0 ||
bind_node_0 >= g->p.nr_nodes)' failed.
Aborted
Signed-off-by: Petr Holasek <pholasek@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Petr Benas <pbenas@redhat.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1380821325-4017-1-git-send-email-pholasek@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Petr Benas <pbenas@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Add a suite of NUMA performance benchmarks.
The goal was simulate the behavior and access patterns of real NUMA
workloads, via a wide range of parameters, so this tool goes well
beyond simple bzero() measurements that most NUMA micro-benchmarks use:
- It processes the data and creates a chain of data dependencies,
like a real workload would. Neither the compiler, nor the
kernel (via KSM and other optimizations) nor the CPU can
eliminate parts of the workload.
- It randomizes the initial state and also randomizes the target
addresses of the processing - it's not a simple forward scan
of addresses.
- It provides flexible options to set process, thread and memory
relationship information: -G sets "global" memory shared between
all test processes, -P sets "process" memory shared by all
threads of a process and -T sets "thread" private memory.
- There's a NUMA convergence monitoring and convergence latency
measurement option via -c and -m.
- Micro-sleeps and synchronization can be injected to provoke lock
contention and scheduling, via the -u and -S options. This simulates
IO and contention.
- The -x option instructs the workload to 'perturb' itself artificially
every N seconds, by moving to the first and last CPU of the system
periodically. This way the stability of convergence equilibrium and
the number of steps taken for the scheduler to reach equilibrium again
can be measured.
- The amount of work can be specified via the -l loop count, and/or
via a -s seconds-timeout value.
- CPU and node memory binding options, to test hard binding scenarios.
THP can be turned on and off via madvise() calls.
- Live reporting of convergence progress in an 'at glance' output format.
Printing of convergence and deconvergence events.
The 'perf bench numa mem -a' option will start an array of about 30
individual tests that will each output such measurements:
# Running 5x5-bw-thread, "perf bench numa mem -p 5 -t 5 -P 512 -s 20 -zZ0q --thp 1"
5x5-bw-thread, 20.276, secs, runtime-max/thread
5x5-bw-thread, 20.004, secs, runtime-min/thread
5x5-bw-thread, 20.155, secs, runtime-avg/thread
5x5-bw-thread, 0.671, %, spread-runtime/thread
5x5-bw-thread, 21.153, GB, data/thread
5x5-bw-thread, 528.818, GB, data-total
5x5-bw-thread, 0.959, nsecs, runtime/byte/thread
5x5-bw-thread, 1.043, GB/sec, thread-speed
5x5-bw-thread, 26.081, GB/sec, total-speed
See the help text and the code for more details.
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
