Once the MADV_FREE operation has succeeded, callers can expect they might
get zero-fill pages if accessing the memory again. Therefore it should be
safe to delete the hwpoison entry and swapin error entry. There is no
reason to kill the process if it has called MADV_FREE on the range.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220519125030.21486-4-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Suggested-by: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
This is observed by code review only but not any real report.
When we turn off swapping we could have lost the bits stored in the swap
ptes. The new rmap-exclusive bit is fine since that turned into a page
flag, but not for soft-dirty and uffd-wp. Add them.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220519125030.21486-3-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Suggested-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
Cc: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Patch series "A few fixup patches for mm", v4.
This series contains a few patches to avoid mapping random data if swap
read fails and fix lost swap bits in unuse_pte. Also we free hwpoison and
swapin error entry in madvise_free_pte_range and so on. More details can
be found in the respective changelogs.
This patch (of 5):
There is a bug in unuse_pte(): when swap page happens to be unreadable,
page filled with random data is mapped into user address space. In case
of error, a special swap entry indicating swap read fails is set to the
page table. So the swapcache page can be freed and the user won't end up
with a permanently mounted swap because a sector is bad. And if the page
is accessed later, the user process will be killed so that corrupted data
is never consumed. On the other hand, if the page is never accessed, the
user won't even notice it.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220519125030.21486-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220519125030.21486-2-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
The memory protection test setup and runtime is almost equal for
memory.low and memory.min cases.
It makes modification of the common parts prone to mistakes, since the
protections are similar not only in setup but also in principle, factor
the common part out.
Past exceptions between the tests:
- missing memory.min is fine (kept),
- test_memcg_low protected orphaned pagecache (adapted like
test_memcg_min and we keep the processes of protected memory running).
The evaluation in two tests is different (OOM of allocator vs low events
of protégés), this is kept different.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220518161859.21565-6-mkoutny@suse.com
Signed-off-by: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@suse.com>
Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
CC: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Cc: Richard Palethorpe <rpalethorpe@suse.de>
Cc: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
The reclaim is triggered by memory limit in a subtree, therefore the
testcase does not need configured protection against external reclaim.
Also, correct respective comments.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220518161859.21565-5-mkoutny@suse.com
Signed-off-by: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@suse.com>
Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Richard Palethorpe <rpalethorpe@suse.de>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
The numbers are not easy to derive in a closed form (certainly mere
protections ratios do not apply), therefore use a simulation to obtain
expected numbers.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220518161859.21565-4-mkoutny@suse.com
Signed-off-by: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@suse.com>
Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Richard Palethorpe <rpalethorpe@suse.de>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
This is effectively a revert of commit cdc69458a5 ("cgroup: account for
memory_recursiveprot in test_memcg_low()"). The case test_memcg_low will
fail with memory_recursiveprot until resolved in reclaim code.
However, this patch preserves the existing helpers and variables for later
uses.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220518161859.21565-3-mkoutny@suse.com
Signed-off-by: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Richard Palethorpe <rpalethorpe@suse.de>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Patch series "memcontrol selftests fixups", v2.
Flushing the patches to make memcontrol selftests check the events
behavior we had consensus about (test_memcg_low fails).
(test_memcg_reclaim, test_memcg_swap_max fail for me now but it's present
even before the refactoring.)
The two bigger changes are:
- adjustment of the protected values to make tests succeed with the given
tolerance,
- both test_memcg_low and test_memcg_min check protection of memory in
populated cgroups (actually as per Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
memory.min should not apply to empty cgroups, which is not the case
currently. Therefore I unified tests with the populated case in order to to
bring more broken tests).
This patch (of 5):
This fixes mis-applied changes from commit 72b1e03aa7 ("cgroup: account
for memory_localevents in test_memcg_oom_group_leaf_events()").
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220518161859.21565-1-mkoutny@suse.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220518161859.21565-2-mkoutny@suse.com
Signed-off-by: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Richard Palethorpe <rpalethorpe@suse.de>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Think about the below scenario:
CPU1 CPU2
z3fold_page_migrate z3fold_map
z3fold_page_trylock
...
z3fold_page_unlock
/* slots still points to old zhdr*/
get_z3fold_header
get slots from handle
get old zhdr from slots
z3fold_page_trylock
return *old* zhdr
encode_handle(new_zhdr, FIRST|LAST|MIDDLE)
put_page(page) /* zhdr is freed! */
but zhdr is still used by caller!
z3fold_map can map freed z3fold page and lead to use-after-free bug. To
fix it, we add PAGE_MIGRATED to indicate z3fold page is migrated and soon
to be released. So get_z3fold_header won't return such page.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220429064051.61552-10-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Fixes: 1f862989b0 ("mm/z3fold.c: support page migration")
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@konsulko.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Think about the below scenario:
CPU1 CPU2
z3fold_reclaim_page z3fold_free
spin_lock(&pool->lock) get_z3fold_header -- hold page_lock
kref_get_unless_zero
kref_put--zhdr->refcount can be 1 now
!z3fold_page_trylock
kref_put -- zhdr->refcount is 0 now
release_z3fold_page
WARN_ON(!list_empty(&zhdr->buddy)); -- we're on buddy now!
spin_lock(&pool->lock); -- deadlock here!
z3fold_reclaim_page might race with z3fold_free and will lead to pool lock
deadlock and zhdr buddy non-empty warning. To fix this, defer getting the
refcount until page_lock is held just like what __z3fold_alloc does. Note
this has the side effect that we won't break the reclaim if we meet a soon
to be released z3fold page now.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220429064051.61552-9-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Fixes: dcf5aedb24 ("z3fold: stricter locking and more careful reclaim")
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@konsulko.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Think about the below race window:
CPU1 CPU2
z3fold_reclaim_page z3fold_free
test_and_set_bit PAGE_CLAIMED
failed to reclaim page
z3fold_page_lock(zhdr);
add back to the lru list;
z3fold_page_unlock(zhdr);
get_z3fold_header
page_claimed=test_and_set_bit PAGE_CLAIMED
clear_bit(PAGE_CLAIMED, &page->private);
if (!page_claimed) /* it's false true */
free_handle is not called
free_handle won't be called in this case. So z3fold_buddy_slots will leak.
Fix it by always clear PAGE_CLAIMED under z3fold page lock.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220429064051.61552-8-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@konsulko.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
When doing z3fold page reclaim or migration, the page is removed from
unbuddied list. If reclaim or migration succeeds, it's fine as page is
released. But in case it fails, the page is not put back into unbuddied
list now. The page will be leaked until next compaction work, reclaim or
migration is done.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220429064051.61552-7-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@konsulko.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Revert commit f1549cb5ab ("mm/z3fold.c: allow __GFP_HIGHMEM in
z3fold_alloc").
z3fold can't support GFP_HIGHMEM page now. page_address is used directly
at all places. Moreover, z3fold_header is on per cpu unbuddied list which
could be accessed anytime. So we should remove the support of GFP_HIGHMEM
allocation for z3fold.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220429064051.61552-6-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@konsulko.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
If trylock_page fails, the page won't be non-lru movable page. When this
page is freed via free_z3fold_page, it will trigger bug on PageMovable
check in __ClearPageMovable. Throw warning on failure of trylock_page to
guard against such rare case just as what zsmalloc does.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220429064051.61552-5-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@konsulko.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Currently if z3fold couldn't find an unbuddied page it would first try to
pull a page off the stale list. But this approach is problematic. If
init z3fold page fails later, the page should be freed via
free_z3fold_page to clean up the relevant resource instead of using
__free_page directly. And if page is successfully reused, it will BUG_ON
later in __SetPageMovable because it's already non-lru movable page, i.e.
PAGE_MAPPING_MOVABLE is already set in page->mapping. In order to fix all
of these issues, we can simply remove the buggy use of stale list for
allocation because can_sleep should always be false and we never really
hit the reusing code path now.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220429064051.61552-4-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@konsulko.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
alloc_slots could fail to allocate memory under heavy memory pressure. So
we should check zhdr->slots against NULL to avoid future null pointer
dereferencing.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220429064051.61552-3-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Fixes: fc5488651c ("z3fold: simplify freeing slots")
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@konsulko.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Patch series "A few fixup patches for z3fold".
This series contains a few fixup patches to fix sheduling while atomic,
fix possible null pointer dereferencing, fix various race conditions and
so on. More details can be found in the respective changelogs.
This patch (of 9):
z3fold's page_lock is always held when calling alloc_slots. So gfp should
be GFP_ATOMIC to avoid "scheduling while atomic" bug.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220429064051.61552-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220429064051.61552-2-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Fixes: fc5488651c ("z3fold: simplify freeing slots")
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@konsulko.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
In isolate_single_pageblock(), free pages are checked without holding zone
lock, but they can go away in split_free_page() when zone lock is held.
Check the free page and its order again in split_free_page() when zone lock
is held. Recheck the page if the free page is gone under zone lock.
In addition, in split_free_page(), the free page was deleted from the page
list without changing free page accounting. Add the missing free page
accounting code.
Fix the type of order parameter in split_free_page().
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220525103621.987185e2ca0079f7b97b856d@linux-foundation.org/
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220526231531.2404977-2-zi.yan@sent.com
Fixes: b2c9e2fbba ("mm: make alloc_contig_range work at pageblock granularity")
Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Reported-by: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/c3932a6f-77fe-29f7-0c29-fe6b1c67ab7b@gmail.com/
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Qian Cai <quic_qiancai@quicinc.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Eric Ren <renzhengeek@gmail.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
start_isolate_page_range() first isolates the first and the last
pageblocks in the range and ensure pages across range boundaries are split
during isolation. But it missed the case when the range is <= a pageblock
and the first and the last pageblocks are the same one, so the second
isolate_single_pageblock() will always fail. To fix it, skip the
pageblock isolation in second isolate_single_pageblock().
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220526231531.2404977-1-zi.yan@sent.com
Fixes: 88ee134320 ("mm: fix a potential infinite loop in start_isolate_page_range()")
Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Reported-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/ac65adc0-a7e4-cdfe-a0d8-757195b86293@samsung.com/
Reported-by: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
Tested-by: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/8ca048ca8b547e0dd1c95387ee05c23d@walle.cc/
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com>
Cc: Eric Ren <renzhengeek@gmail.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Qian Cai <quic_qiancai@quicinc.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Use PAGE_ALIGNED macro instead of IS_ALIGNED and passing PAGE_SIZE.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220520021833.121405-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
The default "timeout" for one kselftest is 45 seconds, while some cases in
run_vmtests.sh require more time. This will cause testing timeout like:
not ok 4 selftests: vm: run_vmtests.sh # TIMEOUT 45 seconds
Therefore, add the "settings" file with timeout variable so users can set
the "timeout" value.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220521083825.319654-4-patrick.wang.shcn@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Patrick Wang <patrick.wang.shcn@gmail.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
The "test_hmm.sh" file used by run_vmtests.sh dose not be installed into
INSTALL_PATH. Thus run_vmtests.sh can not call it in INSTALL_PATH:
---------------------------
running ./test_hmm.sh smoke
---------------------------
./run_vmtests.sh: line 74: ./test_hmm.sh: No such file or directory
[FAIL]
-----------------------
Add "test_hmm.sh" to TEST_FILES so that it will be installed.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220521083825.319654-3-patrick.wang.shcn@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Patrick Wang <patrick.wang.shcn@gmail.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Patch series "selftests: vm: a few fixup patches".
This series contains three fixup patches for vm selftests. They are
independent. Please see the patches.
This patch (of 3):
Currently, ksm_tests operates "merge_across_nodes" with NUMA either
enabled or disabled. In a system with NUMA disabled, these operations
will fail and output a misleading report given "merge_across_nodes" does
not exist in sysfs:
----------------------------
running ./ksm_tests -M -p 10
----------------------------
f /sys/kernel/mm/ksm/merge_across_nodes
fopen: No such file or directory
Cannot save default tunables
[FAIL]
----------------------
So check numa_available() before those operations to skip them if NUMA is
disabled.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220521083825.319654-1-patrick.wang.shcn@gmail.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220521083825.319654-2-patrick.wang.shcn@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Patrick Wang <patrick.wang.shcn@gmail.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Spelling mistake (triple letters) in comment. Detected with the help of
Coccinelle.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220521111145.81697-80-Julia.Lawall@inria.fr
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Spelling mistake (triple letters) in comment. Detected with the help of
Coccinelle.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220521111145.81697-94-Julia.Lawall@inria.fr
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Introduce process_mrelease syscall sanity tests which include tests
which expect to fail:
- process_mrelease with invalid pidfd and flags inputs
- process_mrelease on a live process with no pending signals
and valid process_mrelease usage which is expected to succeed. Because
process_mrelease has to be used against a process with a pending SIGKILL,
it's possible that the process exits before process_mrelease gets called.
In such cases we retry the test with a victim that allocates twice more
memory up to 1GB. This would require the victim process to spend more
time during exit and process_mrelease has a better chance of catching the
process before it exits and succeeding.
On success the test reports the amount of memory the child had to allocate
for reaping to succeed. Sample output:
$ mrelease_test
Success reaping a child with 1MB of memory allocations
On failure the test reports the failure. Sample outputs:
$ mrelease_test
All process_mrelease attempts failed!
$ mrelease_test
process_mrelease: Invalid argument
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220518204316.13131-1-surenb@google.com
Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Acked-by: Christian Brauner (Microsoft) <brauner@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
This reverts commit 3a235693d3.
Its premise was that cgroup reclaim cares about freeing memory inside the
cgroup, and demotion just moves them around within the cgroup limit.
Hence, pages from toptier nodes should be reclaimed directly.
However, with NUMA balancing now doing tier promotions, demotion is part
of the page aging process. Global reclaim demotes the coldest toptier
pages to secondary memory, where their life continues and from which they
have a chance to get promoted back. Essentially, tiered memory systems
have an LRU order that spans multiple nodes.
When cgroup reclaims pages coming off the toptier directly, there can be
colder pages on lower tier nodes that were demoted by global reclaim.
This is an aging inversion, not unlike if cgroups were to reclaim directly
from the active lists while there are inactive pages.
Proactive reclaim is another factor. The goal of that it is to offload
colder pages from expensive RAM to cheaper storage. When lower tier
memory is available as an intermediate layer, we want offloading to take
advantage of it instead of bypassing to storage.
Revert the patch so that cgroups respect the LRU order spanning the memory
hierarchy.
Of note is a specific undercommit scenario, where all cgroup limits in the
system add up to <= available toptier memory. In that case, shuffling
pages out to lower tiers first to reclaim them from there is inefficient.
This is something could be optimized/short-circuited later on (although
care must be taken not to accidentally recreate the aging inversion).
Let's ensure correctness first.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220518190911.82400-1-hannes@cmpxchg.org
Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Reviewed-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Acked-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Acked-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
By printing information, we can friendly prompt the status change
information of kfence by dmesg and record by syslog.
Also, set kfence_enabled to false only when needed.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220518073105.3160335-1-liu.yun@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Jackie Liu <liuyun01@kylinos.cn>
Co-developed-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Redefines __def_gfpflag_names array according to akpm@, willy@ and Joe
Perches recommendations.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/6f811e19-41c6-f3e8-fca6-23a19a62e313@openvz.org
Fixes: fe573327ff ("tracing: incorrect gfp_t conversion")
Signed-off-by: Vasily Averin <vvs@openvz.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
In isolate_single_pageblock() called by start_isolate_page_range(), there
are some pageblock isolation issues causing a potential infinite loop when
isolating a page range. This is reported by Qian Cai.
1. the pageblock was isolated by just changing pageblock migratetype
without checking unmovable pages. Calling set_migratetype_isolate() to
isolate pageblock properly.
2. an off-by-one error caused migrating pages unnecessarily, since the page
is not crossing pageblock boundary.
3. migrating a compound page across pageblock boundary then splitting the
free page later has a small race window that the free page might be
allocated again, so that the code will try again, causing an potential
infinite loop. Temporarily set the to-be-migrated page's pageblock to
MIGRATE_ISOLATE to prevent that and bail out early if no free page is
found after page migration.
An additional fix to split_free_page() aims to avoid crashing in
__free_one_page(). When the free page is split at the specified
split_pfn_offset, free_page_order should check both the first bit of
free_page_pfn and the last bit of split_pfn_offset and use the smaller
one. For example, if free_page_pfn=0x10000, split_pfn_offset=0xc000,
free_page_order should first be 0x8000 then 0x4000, instead of 0x4000 then
0x8000, which the original algorithm did.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: suppress min() warning]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220524194756.1698351-1-zi.yan@sent.com
Fixes: b2c9e2fbba ("mm: make alloc_contig_range work at pageblock granularity")
Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Reported-by: Qian Cai <quic_qiancai@quicinc.com>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Eric Ren <renzhengeek@gmail.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
I have been focusing on mm for the past two years. e.g. developing,
fixing bugs, reviewing related to HugeTLB system. I would like to help
Mike and other people working on HugeTLB by reviewing their work.
When I first introduced the vmemmmap reduction, I forgot to update
MAINTAINERS file. Let's update it as well. And rename "HUGETLB
FILESYSTEM" to "HUGETLB SUBSYSTEM" since some files are not only related
to filesystem but also memory management (the name of FILESYSTEM cannot
cover this area).
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220521074103.79468-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com
Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Acked-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Shmem swapoff makes no progress: the index to indices is not incremented.
But "ret" is no longer a return value, so use folio_batch_count() instead.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/c32bee8a-f0aa-245-f94e-24dd271924fa@google.com
Fixes: da08e9b793 ("mm/shmem: convert shmem_swapin_page() to shmem_swapin_folio()")
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Tested-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
If the first goto is taken, 'fd' is not opened yet (and is un-initialized).
So a direct return is safer.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/628312312eb40e0e39463a2c06415fde5295c716.1653229120.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr
Fixes: c1a31a2f7a ("cgroup: fix racy check in alloc_pagecache_max_30M() helper function")
Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Zefan Li <lizefan.x@bytedance.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
With gcc version 12.0.1 20220401 (Red Hat 12.0.1-0), building with
defconfig results in the following compilation error:
| CC mm/swapfile.o
| mm/swapfile.c: In function `setup_swap_info':
| mm/swapfile.c:2291:47: error: array subscript -1 is below array bounds
| of `struct plist_node[]' [-Werror=array-bounds]
| 2291 | p->avail_lists[i].prio = 1;
| | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~
| In file included from mm/swapfile.c:16:
| ./include/linux/swap.h:292:27: note: while referencing `avail_lists'
| 292 | struct plist_node avail_lists[]; /*
| | ^~~~~~~~~~~
This is due to the compiler detecting that the mask in
node_states[__state] could theoretically be zero, which would lead to
first_node() returning -1 through find_first_bit.
I believe that the warning/error is legitimate. I first tried adding a
test to check that the node mask is not emtpy, since a similar test exists
in the case where MAX_NUMNODES == 1.
However, adding the if statement causes other warnings to appear in
for_each_cpu_node_but, because it introduces a dangling else ambiguity.
And unfortunately, GCC is not smart enough to detect that the added test
makes the case where (node) == -1 impossible, so it still complains with
the same message.
This is why I settled on replacing that with a harmless, but relatively
useless (node) >= 0 test. Based on the warning for the dangling else, I
also decided to fix the case where MAX_NUMNODES == 1 by moving the
condition inside the for loop. It will still only be tested once. This
ensures that the meaning of an else following for_each_node_mask or
derivatives would not silently have a different meaning depending on the
configuration.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220414150855.2407137-3-dinechin@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Christophe de Dinechin <christophe@dinechin.org>
Signed-off-by: Christophe de Dinechin <dinechin@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
We expect no warnings to be issued when we specify __GFP_NOWARN, but
currently in paths like alloc_pages() and kmalloc(), there are still some
warnings printed, fix it.
But for some warnings that report usage problems, we don't deal with them.
If such warnings are printed, then we should fix the usage problems.
Such as the following case:
WARN_ON_ONCE((gfp_flags & __GFP_NOFAIL) && (order > 1));
[zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com: v2]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220511061951.1114-1-zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220510113809.80626-1-zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com
Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Cc: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Currently, trace point mm_page_alloc_zone_locked() doesn't show correct
information.
First, when alloc_flag has ALLOC_HARDER/ALLOC_CMA, page can be allocated
from MIGRATE_HIGHATOMIC/MIGRATE_CMA. Nevertheless, tracepoint use
requested migration type not MIGRATE_HIGHATOMIC and MIGRATE_CMA.
Second, after commit 44042b4498 ("mm/page_alloc: allow high-order pages
to be stored on the per-cpu lists") percpu-list can store high order
pages. But trace point determine whether it is a refiil of percpu-list by
comparing requested order and 0.
To handle these problems, make mm_page_alloc_zone_locked() only be called
by __rmqueue_smallest with correct migration type. With a new argument
called percpu_refill, it can show roughly whether it is a refill of
percpu-list.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220512025307.57924-1-vvghjk1234@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Wonhyuk Yang <vvghjk1234@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Baik Song An <bsahn@etri.re.kr>
Cc: Hong Yeon Kim <kimhy@etri.re.kr>
Cc: Taeung Song <taeung@reallinux.co.kr>
Cc: <linuxgeek@linuxgeek.io>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
This patch fixes two issues:
1. Add __initdata attribute according to include/linux/init.h:
For initialized data:
You should insert __initdata between the variable name and equal
sign followed by value
2. Fix below error reported by checkpatch.pl:
ERROR: do not initialise statics to false
Special thanks to Muchun Song :)
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220516030039.1487005-1-bh1scw@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Fanjun Kong <bh1scw@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
The rmap locks(i_mmap_rwsem and anon_vma->root->rwsem) could be contended
under memory pressure if processes keep working on their vmas(e.g., fork,
mmap, munmap). It makes reclaim path stuck. In our real workload traces,
we see kswapd is waiting the lock for 300ms+(worst case, a sec) and it
makes other processes entering direct reclaim, which were also stuck on
the lock.
This patch makes lru aging path try_lock mode like shink_page_list so the
reclaim context will keep working with next lru pages without being stuck.
if it found the rmap lock contended, it rotates the page back to head of
lru in both active/inactive lrus to make them consistent behavior, which
is basic starting point rather than adding more heristic.
Since this patch introduces a new "contended" field as out-param along
with try_lock in-param in rmap_walk_control, it's not immutable any longer
if the try_lock is set so remove const keywords on rmap related functions.
Since rmap walking is already expensive operation, I doubt the const
would help sizable benefit( And we didn't have it until 5.17).
In a heavy app workload in Android, trace shows following statistics. It
almost removes rmap lock contention from reclaim path.
Martin Liu reported:
Before:
max_dur(ms) min_dur(ms) max-min(dur)ms avg_dur(ms) sum_dur(ms) count blocked_function
1632 0 1631 151.542173 31672 209 page_lock_anon_vma_read
601 0 601 145.544681 28817 198 rmap_walk_file
After:
max_dur(ms) min_dur(ms) max-min(dur)ms avg_dur(ms) sum_dur(ms) count blocked_function
NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 0.0 NaN
0 0 0 0.127645 1 12 rmap_walk_file
[minchan@kernel.org: add comment, per Matthew]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/YnNqeB5tUf6LZ57b@google.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220510215423.164547-1-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: John Dias <joaodias@google.com>
Cc: Tim Murray <timmurray@google.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>
Cc: Martin Liu <liumartin@google.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Applications can currently escape their cgroup memory containment when
zswap is enabled. This patch adds per-cgroup tracking and limiting of
zswap backend memory to rectify this.
The existing cgroup2 memory.stat file is extended to show zswap statistics
analogous to what's in meminfo and vmstat. Furthermore, two new control
files, memory.zswap.current and memory.zswap.max, are added to allow
tuning zswap usage on a per-workload basis. This is important since not
all workloads benefit from zswap equally; some even suffer compared to
disk swap when memory contents don't compress well. The optimal size of
the zswap pool, and the threshold for writeback, also depends on the size
of the workload's warm set.
The implementation doesn't use a traditional page_counter transaction.
zswap is unconventional as a memory consumer in that we only know the
amount of memory to charge once expensive compression has occurred. If
zwap is disabled or the limit is already exceeded we obviously don't want
to compress page upon page only to reject them all. Instead, the limit is
checked against current usage, then we compress and charge. This allows
some limit overrun, but not enough to matter in practice.
[hannes@cmpxchg.org: fix for CONFIG_SLOB builds]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/YnwD14zxYjUJPc2w@cmpxchg.org
[hannes@cmpxchg.org: opt out of cgroups v1]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/Yn6it9mBYFA+/lTb@cmpxchg.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220510152847.230957-7-hannes@cmpxchg.org
Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Currently it requires poking at debugfs to figure out the size and
population of the zswap cache on a host. There are no counters for reads
and writes against the cache. As a result, it's difficult to understand
zswap behavior on production systems.
Print zswap memory consumption and how many pages are zswapped out in
/proc/meminfo. Count zswapouts and zswapins in /proc/vmstat.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220510152847.230957-6-hannes@cmpxchg.org
Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
- CONFIG_ZRAM: Zram is a user-facing feature, whereas zsmalloc is
not. Don't make the user chase down a technical dependency like
that, just select it in automatically when zram is requested. The
CONFIG_CRYPTO dependency is redundant due to more specific deps.
- CONFIG_ZPOOL: This is not a user-facing feature. Hide the symbol and
have it selected in as needed.
- CONFIG_ZSWAP: Select CRYPTO instead of depend. Common pattern.
- Make the ZSWAP suboptions and their descriptions (compression,
allocation backend) a bit more straight-forward for the user.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220510152847.230957-5-hannes@cmpxchg.org
Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
There are several clusters of related config options spread throughout the
mostly flat MM submenu. Group them together and put specialization
options into further subdirectories to make the MM submenu a bit more
organized and easier to navigate.
[hannes@cmpxchg.org: fix kbuild warnings]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/YnvkSVivfnT57Vwh@cmpxchg.org
[hannes@cmpxchg.org: fix more kbuild warnings]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/Ynz8NusTdEGcCnJN@cmpxchg.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220510152847.230957-4-hannes@cmpxchg.org
Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
These are currently under General Setup. MM seems like a better fit.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220510152847.230957-3-hannes@cmpxchg.org
Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
