This reverts commit 97ee4d20ee.
Following change is adding more complexity to bpf_get_func_ip
helper for kprobe_multi programs, which can't be inlined easily.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220321070113.1449167-2-jolsa@kernel.org
Currently, local storage memory can only be allocated atomically
(GFP_ATOMIC). This restriction is too strict for sleepable bpf
programs.
In this patch, the verifier detects whether the program is sleepable,
and passes the corresponding GFP_KERNEL or GFP_ATOMIC flag as a
5th argument to bpf_task/sk/inode_storage_get. This flag will propagate
down to the local storage functions that allocate memory.
Please note that bpf_task/sk/inode_storage_update_elem functions are
invoked by userspace applications through syscalls. Preemption is
disabled before bpf_task/sk/inode_storage_update_elem is called, which
means they will always have to allocate memory atomically.
Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220318045553.3091807-2-joannekoong@fb.com
It is the bpf_jit_harden counterpart to commit 60b58afc96 ("bpf: fix
net.core.bpf_jit_enable race"). bpf_jit_harden will be tested twice
for each subprog if there are subprogs in bpf program and constant
blinding may increase the length of program, so when running
"./test_progs -t subprogs" and toggling bpf_jit_harden between 0 and 2,
jit_subprogs may fail because constant blinding increases the length
of subprog instructions during extra passs.
So cache the value of bpf_jit_blinding_enabled() during program
allocation, and use the cached value during constant blinding, subprog
JITing and args tracking of tail call.
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220309123321.2400262-4-houtao1@huawei.com
Use offsetofend() instead of offsetof() + sizeof() to simplify
MIN_BPF_LINEINFO_SIZE macro definition.
Signed-off-by: Yuntao Wang <ytcoode@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Acked-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220310161518.534544-1-ytcoode@gmail.com
Instead of determining buf_info string in the caller of check_buffer_access(),
we can determine whether the register type is read-only through
type_is_rdonly_mem() helper inside check_buffer_access() and construct
buf_info, making the code slightly cleaner.
Signed-off-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/YiWYLnAkEZXBP/gH@syu-laptop
With the introduction of the btf_type_tag "percpu", we can add a
MEM_PERCPU to identify those pointers that point to percpu memory.
The ability of differetiating percpu pointers from regular memory
pointers have two benefits:
1. It forbids unexpected use of percpu pointers, such as direct loads.
In kernel, there are special functions used for accessing percpu
memory. Directly loading percpu memory is meaningless. We already
have BPF helpers like bpf_per_cpu_ptr() and bpf_this_cpu_ptr() that
wrap the kernel percpu functions. So we can now convert percpu
pointers into regular pointers in a safe way.
2. Previously, bpf_per_cpu_ptr() and bpf_this_cpu_ptr() only work on
PTR_TO_PERCPU_BTF_ID, a special reg_type which describes static
percpu variables in kernel (we rely on pahole to encode them into
vmlinux BTF). Now, since we can identify __percpu tagged pointers,
we can also identify dynamically allocated percpu memory as well.
It means we can use bpf_xxx_cpu_ptr() on dynamic percpu memory.
This would be very convenient when accessing fields like
"cgroup->rstat_cpu".
Signed-off-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220304191657.981240-4-haoluo@google.com
With the introduction of MEM_USER in
commit c6f1bfe89a ("bpf: reject program if a __user tagged memory accessed in kernel way")
PTR_TO_BTF_ID can be combined with a MEM_USER tag. Therefore, most
likely, when we compare reg_type against PTR_TO_BTF_ID, we want to use
the reg's base_type. Previously the check in check_mem_access() wants
to say: if the reg is BTF_ID but not NULL, the execution flow falls
into the 'then' branch. But now a reg of (BTF_ID | MEM_USER), which
should go into the 'then' branch, goes into the 'else'.
The end results before and after this patch are the same: regs tagged
with MEM_USER get rejected, but not in a way we intended. So fix the
condition, the error message now is correct.
Before (log from commit 696c390115):
$ ./test_progs -v -n 22/3
...
libbpf: prog 'test_user1': BPF program load failed: Permission denied
libbpf: prog 'test_user1': -- BEGIN PROG LOAD LOG --
R1 type=ctx expected=fp
0: R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0
; int BPF_PROG(test_user1, struct bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_1 *arg)
0: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 +0)
func 'bpf_testmod_test_btf_type_tag_user_1' arg0 has btf_id 136561 type STRUCT 'bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_1'
1: R1_w=user_ptr_bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_1(id=0,off=0,imm=0)
; g = arg->a;
1: (61) r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 +0)
R1 invalid mem access 'user_ptr_'
Now:
libbpf: prog 'test_user1': BPF program load failed: Permission denied
libbpf: prog 'test_user1': -- BEGIN PROG LOAD LOG --
R1 type=ctx expected=fp
0: R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0
; int BPF_PROG(test_user1, struct bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_1 *arg)
0: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 +0)
func 'bpf_testmod_test_btf_type_tag_user_1' arg0 has btf_id 104036 type STRUCT 'bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_1'
1: R1_w=user_ptr_bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_1(id=0,ref_obj_id=0,off=0,imm=0)
; g = arg->a;
1: (61) r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 +0)
R1 is ptr_bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_1 access user memory: off=0
Note the error message for the reason of rejection.
Fixes: c6f1bfe89a ("bpf: reject program if a __user tagged memory accessed in kernel way")
Signed-off-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220304191657.981240-2-haoluo@google.com
Let's ensure that the PTR_TO_BTF_ID reg being passed in to release BPF
helpers and kfuncs always has its offset set to 0. While not a real
problem now, there's a very real possibility this will become a problem
when more and more kfuncs are exposed, and more BPF helpers are added
which can release PTR_TO_BTF_ID.
Previous commits already protected against non-zero var_off. One of the
case we are concerned about now is when we have a type that can be
returned by e.g. an acquire kfunc:
struct foo {
int a;
int b;
struct bar b;
};
... and struct bar is also a type that can be returned by another
acquire kfunc.
Then, doing the following sequence:
struct foo *f = bpf_get_foo(); // acquire kfunc
if (!f)
return 0;
bpf_put_bar(&f->b); // release kfunc
... would work with the current code, since the btf_struct_ids_match
takes reg->off into account for matching pointer type with release kfunc
argument type, but would obviously be incorrect, and most likely lead to
a kernel crash. A test has been included later to prevent regressions in
this area.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220304224645.3677453-5-memxor@gmail.com
check_ptr_off_reg only allows fixed offset to be set for PTR_TO_BTF_ID,
where reg->off < 0 doesn't make sense. This would shift the pointer
backwards, and fails later in btf_struct_ids_match or btf_struct_walk
due to out of bounds access (since offset is interpreted as unsigned).
Improve the verifier by rejecting this case by using a better error
message for BPF helpers and kfunc, by putting a check inside the
check_func_arg_reg_off function.
Also, update existing verifier selftests to work with new error string.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220304224645.3677453-4-memxor@gmail.com
Lift the list of register types allowed for having fixed and variable
offsets when passed as helper function arguments into a common helper,
so that they can be reused for kfunc checks in later commits. Keeping a
common helper aids maintainability and allows us to follow the same
consistent rules across helpers and kfuncs. Also, convert check_func_arg
to use this function.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220304224645.3677453-2-memxor@gmail.com
In particular these include:
1) Remove output of inv for scalars in print_verifier_state
2) Replace inv with scalar in verifier error messages
3) Remove _value suffixes for umin/umax/s32_min/etc (except map_value)
4) Remove output of id=0
5) Remove output of ref_obj_id=0
Signed-off-by: Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220301222745.1667206-1-mykolal@fb.com
Now kfunc call uses s32 to represent the offset between the address of
kfunc and __bpf_call_base, but it doesn't check whether or not s32 will
be overflowed. The overflow is possible when kfunc is in module and the
offset between module and kernel is greater than 2GB. Take arm64 as an
example, before commit b2eed9b588 ("arm64/kernel: kaslr: reduce module
randomization range to 2 GB"), the offset between module symbol and
__bpf_call_base will in 4GB range due to KASLR and may overflow s32.
So add an extra checking to reject these invalid kfunc calls.
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220215065732.3179408-1-houtao1@huawei.com
Using prog->jited_len is simpler and more accurate than current
estimation (header + header->size).
Also, fix missing prog->jited_len with multi function program. This hasn't
been a real issue before this.
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220204185742.271030-5-song@kernel.org
BPF verifier supports direct memory access for BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING type
of bpf programs, e.g., a->b. If "a" is a pointer
pointing to kernel memory, bpf verifier will allow user to write
code in C like a->b and the verifier will translate it to a kernel
load properly. If "a" is a pointer to user memory, it is expected
that bpf developer should be bpf_probe_read_user() helper to
get the value a->b. Without utilizing BTF __user tagging information,
current verifier will assume that a->b is a kernel memory access
and this may generate incorrect result.
Now BTF contains __user information, it can check whether the
pointer points to a user memory or not. If it is, the verifier
can reject the program and force users to use bpf_probe_read_user()
helper explicitly.
In the future, we can easily extend btf_add_space for other
address space tagging, for example, rcu/percpu etc.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220127154606.654961-1-yhs@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Daniel Borkmann says:
====================
pull-request: bpf-next 2022-01-24
We've added 80 non-merge commits during the last 14 day(s) which contain
a total of 128 files changed, 4990 insertions(+), 895 deletions(-).
The main changes are:
1) Add XDP multi-buffer support and implement it for the mvneta driver,
from Lorenzo Bianconi, Eelco Chaudron and Toke Høiland-Jørgensen.
2) Add unstable conntrack lookup helpers for BPF by using the BPF kfunc
infra, from Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi.
3) Extend BPF cgroup programs to export custom ret value to userspace via
two helpers bpf_get_retval() and bpf_set_retval(), from YiFei Zhu.
4) Add support for AF_UNIX iterator batching, from Kuniyuki Iwashima.
5) Complete missing UAPI BPF helper description and change bpf_doc.py script
to enforce consistent & complete helper documentation, from Usama Arif.
6) Deprecate libbpf's legacy BPF map definitions and streamline XDP APIs to
follow tc-based APIs, from Andrii Nakryiko.
7) Support BPF_PROG_QUERY for BPF programs attached to sockmap, from Di Zhu.
8) Deprecate libbpf's bpf_map__def() API and replace users with proper getters
and setters, from Christy Lee.
9) Extend libbpf's btf__add_btf() with an additional hashmap for strings to
reduce overhead, from Kui-Feng Lee.
10) Fix bpftool and libbpf error handling related to libbpf's hashmap__new()
utility function, from Mauricio Vásquez.
11) Add support to BTF program names in bpftool's program dump, from Raman Shukhau.
12) Fix resolve_btfids build to pick up host flags, from Connor O'Brien.
* https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next: (80 commits)
selftests, bpf: Do not yet switch to new libbpf XDP APIs
selftests, xsk: Fix rx_full stats test
bpf: Fix flexible_array.cocci warnings
xdp: disable XDP_REDIRECT for xdp frags
bpf: selftests: add CPUMAP/DEVMAP selftests for xdp frags
bpf: selftests: introduce bpf_xdp_{load,store}_bytes selftest
net: xdp: introduce bpf_xdp_pointer utility routine
bpf: generalise tail call map compatibility check
libbpf: Add SEC name for xdp frags programs
bpf: selftests: update xdp_adjust_tail selftest to include xdp frags
bpf: test_run: add xdp_shared_info pointer in bpf_test_finish signature
bpf: introduce frags support to bpf_prog_test_run_xdp()
bpf: move user_size out of bpf_test_init
bpf: add frags support to xdp copy helpers
bpf: add frags support to the bpf_xdp_adjust_tail() API
bpf: introduce bpf_xdp_get_buff_len helper
net: mvneta: enable jumbo frames if the loaded XDP program support frags
bpf: introduce BPF_F_XDP_HAS_FRAGS flag in prog_flags loading the ebpf program
net: mvneta: add frags support to XDP_TX
xdp: add frags support to xdp_return_{buff/frame}
...
====================
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220124221235.18993-1-daniel@iogearbox.net
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
The bpf_ringbuf_submit() and bpf_ringbuf_discard() have ARG_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM
in their bpf_func_proto definition as their first argument, and thus both expect
the result from a prior bpf_ringbuf_reserve() call which has a return type of
RET_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM_OR_NULL.
While the non-NULL memory from bpf_ringbuf_reserve() can be passed to other
helpers, the two sinks (bpf_ringbuf_submit(), bpf_ringbuf_discard()) right now
only enforce a register type of PTR_TO_MEM.
This can lead to potential type confusion since it would allow other PTR_TO_MEM
memory to be passed into the two sinks which did not come from bpf_ringbuf_reserve().
Add a new MEM_ALLOC composable type attribute for PTR_TO_MEM, and enforce that:
- bpf_ringbuf_reserve() returns NULL or PTR_TO_MEM | MEM_ALLOC
- bpf_ringbuf_submit() and bpf_ringbuf_discard() only take PTR_TO_MEM | MEM_ALLOC
but not plain PTR_TO_MEM arguments via ARG_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM
- however, other helpers might treat PTR_TO_MEM | MEM_ALLOC as plain PTR_TO_MEM
to populate the memory area when they use ARG_PTR_TO_{UNINIT_,}MEM in their
func proto description
Fixes: 457f44363a ("bpf: Implement BPF ring buffer and verifier support for it")
Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Both bpf_ringbuf_submit() and bpf_ringbuf_discard() have ARG_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM
in their bpf_func_proto definition as their first argument. They both expect
the result from a prior bpf_ringbuf_reserve() call which has a return type of
RET_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM_OR_NULL.
Meaning, after a NULL check in the code, the verifier will promote the register
type in the non-NULL branch to a PTR_TO_MEM and in the NULL branch to a known
zero scalar. Generally, pointer arithmetic on PTR_TO_MEM is allowed, so the
latter could have an offset.
The ARG_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM expects a PTR_TO_MEM register type. However, the non-
zero result from bpf_ringbuf_reserve() must be fed into either bpf_ringbuf_submit()
or bpf_ringbuf_discard() but with the original offset given it will then read
out the struct bpf_ringbuf_hdr mapping.
The verifier missed to enforce a zero offset, so that out of bounds access
can be triggered which could be used to escalate privileges if unprivileged
BPF was enabled (disabled by default in kernel).
Fixes: 457f44363a ("bpf: Implement BPF ring buffer and verifier support for it")
Reported-by: <tr3e.wang@gmail.com> (SecCoder Security Lab)
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Right now the assertion on check_ptr_off_reg() is only enforced for register
types PTR_TO_CTX (and open coded also for PTR_TO_BTF_ID), however, this is
insufficient since many other PTR_TO_* register types such as PTR_TO_FUNC do
not handle/expect register offsets when passed to helper functions.
Given this can slip-through easily when adding new types, make this an explicit
allow-list and reject all other current and future types by default if this is
encountered.
Also, extend check_ptr_off_reg() to handle PTR_TO_BTF_ID as well instead of
duplicating it. For PTR_TO_BTF_ID, reg->off is used for BTF to match expected
BTF ids if struct offset is used. This part still needs to be allowed, but the
dynamic off from the tnum must be rejected.
Fixes: 69c087ba62 ("bpf: Add bpf_for_each_map_elem() helper")
Fixes: eaa6bcb71e ("bpf: Introduce bpf_per_cpu_ptr()")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Similar as with other pointer types where we use ldimm64, clear the register
content to zero first, and then populate the PTR_TO_FUNC type and subprogno
number. Currently this is not done, and leads to reuse of stale register
tracking data.
Given for special ldimm64 cases we always clear the register offset, make it
common for all cases, so it won't be forgotten in future.
Fixes: 69c087ba62 ("bpf: Add bpf_for_each_map_elem() helper")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Generalize the check_ctx_reg() helper function into a more generic named one
so that it can be reused for other register types as well to check whether
their offset is non-zero. No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
This patch adds verifier support for PTR_TO_BTF_ID return type of kfunc
to be a reference, by reusing acquire_reference_state/release_reference
support for existing in-kernel bpf helpers.
We make use of the three kfunc types:
- BTF_KFUNC_TYPE_ACQUIRE
Return true if kfunc_btf_id is an acquire kfunc. This will
acquire_reference_state for the returned PTR_TO_BTF_ID (this is the
only allow return value). Note that acquire kfunc must always return a
PTR_TO_BTF_ID{_OR_NULL}, otherwise the program is rejected.
- BTF_KFUNC_TYPE_RELEASE
Return true if kfunc_btf_id is a release kfunc. This will release the
reference to the passed in PTR_TO_BTF_ID which has a reference state
(from earlier acquire kfunc).
The btf_check_func_arg_match returns the regno (of argument register,
hence > 0) if the kfunc is a release kfunc, and a proper referenced
PTR_TO_BTF_ID is being passed to it.
This is similar to how helper call check uses bpf_call_arg_meta to
store the ref_obj_id that is later used to release the reference.
Similar to in-kernel helper, we only allow passing one referenced
PTR_TO_BTF_ID as an argument. It can also be passed in to normal
kfunc, but in case of release kfunc there must always be one
PTR_TO_BTF_ID argument that is referenced.
- BTF_KFUNC_TYPE_RET_NULL
For kfunc returning PTR_TO_BTF_ID, tells if it can be NULL, hence
force caller to mark the pointer not null (using check) before
accessing it. Note that taking into account the case fixed by commit
93c230e3f5 ("bpf: Enforce id generation for all may-be-null register type")
we assign a non-zero id for mark_ptr_or_null_reg logic. Later, if more
return types are supported by kfunc, which have a _OR_NULL variant, it
might be better to move this id generation under a common
reg_type_may_be_null check, similar to the case in the commit.
Referenced PTR_TO_BTF_ID is currently only limited to kfunc, but can be
extended in the future to other BPF helpers as well. For now, we can
rely on the btf_struct_ids_match check to ensure we get the pointer to
the expected struct type. In the future, care needs to be taken to avoid
ambiguity for reference PTR_TO_BTF_ID passed to release function, in
case multiple candidates can release same BTF ID.
e.g. there might be two release kfuncs (or kfunc and helper):
foo(struct abc *p);
bar(struct abc *p);
... such that both release a PTR_TO_BTF_ID with btf_id of struct abc. In
this case we would need to track the acquire function corresponding to
the release function to avoid type confusion, and store this information
in the register state so that an incorrect program can be rejected. This
is not a problem right now, hence it is left as an exercise for the
future patch introducing such a case in the kernel.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220114163953.1455836-6-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
BPF helpers can associate two adjacent arguments together to pass memory
of certain size, using ARG_PTR_TO_MEM and ARG_CONST_SIZE arguments.
Since we don't use bpf_func_proto for kfunc, we need to leverage BTF to
implement similar support.
The ARG_CONST_SIZE processing for helpers is refactored into a common
check_mem_size_reg helper that is shared with kfunc as well. kfunc
ptr_to_mem support follows logic similar to global functions, where
verification is done as if pointer is not null, even when it may be
null.
This leads to a simple to follow rule for writing kfunc: always check
the argument pointer for NULL, except when it is PTR_TO_CTX. Also, the
PTR_TO_CTX case is also only safe when the helper expecting pointer to
program ctx is not exposed to other programs where same struct is not
ctx type. In that case, the type check will fall through to other cases
and would permit passing other types of pointers, possibly NULL at
runtime.
Currently, we require the size argument to be suffixed with "__sz" in
the parameter name. This information is then recorded in kernel BTF and
verified during function argument checking. In the future we can use BTF
tagging instead, and modify the kernel function definitions. This will
be a purely kernel-side change.
This allows us to have some form of backwards compatibility for
structures that are passed in to the kernel function with their size,
and allow variable length structures to be passed in if they are
accompanied by a size parameter.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220114163953.1455836-5-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Completely remove the old code for check_kfunc_call to help it work
with modules, and also the callback itself.
The previous commit adds infrastructure to register all sets and put
them in vmlinux or module BTF, and concatenates all related sets
organized by the hook and the type. Once populated, these sets remain
immutable for the lifetime of the struct btf.
Also, since we don't need the 'owner' module anywhere when doing
check_kfunc_call, drop the 'btf_modp' module parameter from
find_kfunc_desc_btf.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220114163953.1455836-4-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
env->scratched_stack_slots is a 64-bit value, we should use ULL
instead of UL literal values.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Christy Lee <christylee@fb.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220108005854.658596-1-christylee@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Commit bfc6bb74e4 ("bpf: Implement verifier support for validation of async callbacks.")
added support for BPF_FUNC_timer_set_callback to
the __check_func_call() function. The test in __check_func_call() is
flaweed because it can mis-interpret a regular BPF-to-BPF pseudo-call
as a BPF_FUNC_timer_set_callback callback call.
Consider the conditional in the code:
if (insn->code == (BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL) &&
insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_timer_set_callback) {
The BPF_FUNC_timer_set_callback has value 170. This means that if you
have a BPF program that contains a pseudo-call with an instruction delta
of 170, this conditional will be found to be true by the verifier, and
it will interpret the pseudo-call as a callback. This leads to a mess
with the verification of the program because it makes the wrong
assumptions about the nature of this call.
Solution: include an explicit check to ensure that insn->src_reg == 0.
This ensures that calls cannot be mis-interpreted as an async callback
call.
Fixes: bfc6bb74e4 ("bpf: Implement verifier support for validation of async callbacks.")
Signed-off-by: Kris Van Hees <kris.van.hees@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220105210150.GH1559@oracle.com
If we ever get to a point again where we convert a bogus looking <ptr>_or_null
typed register containing a non-zero fixed or variable offset, then lets not
reset these bounds to zero since they are not and also don't promote the register
to a <ptr> type, but instead leave it as <ptr>_or_null. Converting to a unknown
register could be an avenue as well, but then if we run into this case it would
allow to leak a kernel pointer this way.
Fixes: f1174f77b5 ("bpf/verifier: rework value tracking")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Alexei Starovoitov says:
====================
pull-request: bpf-next 2021-12-30
The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net-next* tree.
We've added 72 non-merge commits during the last 20 day(s) which contain
a total of 223 files changed, 3510 insertions(+), 1591 deletions(-).
The main changes are:
1) Automatic setrlimit in libbpf when bpf is memcg's in the kernel, from Andrii.
2) Beautify and de-verbose verifier logs, from Christy.
3) Composable verifier types, from Hao.
4) bpf_strncmp helper, from Hou.
5) bpf.h header dependency cleanup, from Jakub.
6) get_func_[arg|ret|arg_cnt] helpers, from Jiri.
7) Sleepable local storage, from KP.
8) Extend kfunc with PTR_TO_CTX, PTR_TO_MEM argument support, from Kumar.
====================
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Other maps like hashmaps are already available to sleepable programs.
Sleepable BPF programs run under trace RCU. Allow task, sk and inode
storage to be used from sleepable programs. This allows sleepable and
non-sleepable programs to provide shareable annotations on kernel
objects.
Sleepable programs run in trace RCU where as non-sleepable programs run
in a normal RCU critical section i.e. __bpf_prog_enter{_sleepable}
and __bpf_prog_exit{_sleepable}) (rcu_read_lock or rcu_read_lock_trace).
In order to make the local storage maps accessible to both sleepable
and non-sleepable programs, one needs to call both
call_rcu_tasks_trace and call_rcu to wait for both trace and classical
RCU grace periods to expire before freeing memory.
Paul's work on call_rcu_tasks_trace allows us to have per CPU queueing
for call_rcu_tasks_trace. This behaviour can be achieved by setting
rcupdate.rcu_task_enqueue_lim=<num_cpus> boot parameter.
In light of these new performance changes and to keep the local storage
code simple, avoid adding a new flag for sleepable maps / local storage
to select the RCU synchronization (trace / classical).
Also, update the dereferencing of the pointers to use
rcu_derference_check (with either the trace or normal RCU locks held)
with a common bpf_rcu_lock_held helper method.
Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211224152916.1550677-2-kpsingh@kernel.org
Some helper functions may modify its arguments, for example,
bpf_d_path, bpf_get_stack etc. Previously, their argument types
were marked as ARG_PTR_TO_MEM, which is compatible with read-only
mem types, such as PTR_TO_RDONLY_BUF. Therefore it's legitimate,
but technically incorrect, to modify a read-only memory by passing
it into one of such helper functions.
This patch tags the bpf_args compatible with immutable memory with
MEM_RDONLY flag. The arguments that don't have this flag will be
only compatible with mutable memory types, preventing the helper
from modifying a read-only memory. The bpf_args that have
MEM_RDONLY are compatible with both mutable memory and immutable
memory.
Signed-off-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211217003152.48334-9-haoluo@google.com
Tag the return type of {per, this}_cpu_ptr with RDONLY_MEM. The
returned value of this pair of helpers is kernel object, which
can not be updated by bpf programs. Previously these two helpers
return PTR_OT_MEM for kernel objects of scalar type, which allows
one to directly modify the memory. Now with RDONLY_MEM tagging,
the verifier will reject programs that write into RDONLY_MEM.
Fixes: 63d9b80dcf ("bpf: Introducte bpf_this_cpu_ptr()")
Fixes: eaa6bcb71e ("bpf: Introduce bpf_per_cpu_ptr()")
Fixes: 4976b718c3 ("bpf: Introduce pseudo_btf_id")
Signed-off-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211217003152.48334-8-haoluo@google.com
This patch introduce a flag MEM_RDONLY to tag a reg value
pointing to read-only memory. It makes the following changes:
1. PTR_TO_RDWR_BUF -> PTR_TO_BUF
2. PTR_TO_RDONLY_BUF -> PTR_TO_BUF | MEM_RDONLY
Signed-off-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211217003152.48334-6-haoluo@google.com
We have introduced a new type to make bpf_reg composable, by
allocating bits in the type to represent flags.
One of the flags is PTR_MAYBE_NULL which indicates a pointer
may be NULL. This patch switches the qualified reg_types to
use this flag. The reg_types changed in this patch include:
1. PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL
2. PTR_TO_SOCKET_OR_NULL
3. PTR_TO_SOCK_COMMON_OR_NULL
4. PTR_TO_TCP_SOCK_OR_NULL
5. PTR_TO_BTF_ID_OR_NULL
6. PTR_TO_MEM_OR_NULL
7. PTR_TO_RDONLY_BUF_OR_NULL
8. PTR_TO_RDWR_BUF_OR_NULL
Signed-off-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211217003152.48334-5-haoluo@google.com
We have introduced a new type to make bpf_ret composable, by
reserving high bits to represent flags.
One of the flag is PTR_MAYBE_NULL, which indicates a pointer
may be NULL. When applying this flag to ret_types, it means
the returned value could be a NULL pointer. This patch
switches the qualified arg_types to use this flag.
The ret_types changed in this patch include:
1. RET_PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL
2. RET_PTR_TO_SOCKET_OR_NULL
3. RET_PTR_TO_TCP_SOCK_OR_NULL
4. RET_PTR_TO_SOCK_COMMON_OR_NULL
5. RET_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM_OR_NULL
6. RET_PTR_TO_MEM_OR_BTF_ID_OR_NULL
7. RET_PTR_TO_BTF_ID_OR_NULL
This patch doesn't eliminate the use of these names, instead
it makes them aliases to 'RET_PTR_TO_XXX | PTR_MAYBE_NULL'.
Signed-off-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211217003152.48334-4-haoluo@google.com
We have introduced a new type to make bpf_arg composable, by
reserving high bits of bpf_arg to represent flags of a type.
One of the flags is PTR_MAYBE_NULL which indicates a pointer
may be NULL. When applying this flag to an arg_type, it means
the arg can take NULL pointer. This patch switches the
qualified arg_types to use this flag. The arg_types changed
in this patch include:
1. ARG_PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL
2. ARG_PTR_TO_MEM_OR_NULL
3. ARG_PTR_TO_CTX_OR_NULL
4. ARG_PTR_TO_SOCKET_OR_NULL
5. ARG_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM_OR_NULL
6. ARG_PTR_TO_STACK_OR_NULL
This patch does not eliminate the use of these arg_types, instead
it makes them an alias to the 'ARG_XXX | PTR_MAYBE_NULL'.
Signed-off-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211217003152.48334-3-haoluo@google.com
Backtracking information is very verbose, don't print it in log
level 1 to improve readability.
Signed-off-by: Christy Lee <christylee@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211216213358.3374427-4-christylee@fb.com
We're about to break the cgroup-defs.h -> bpf-cgroup.h dependency,
make sure those who actually need more than the definition of
struct cgroup_bpf include bpf-cgroup.h explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211216025538.1649516-3-kuba@kernel.org
Make the bounds propagation in __reg_assign_32_into_64() slightly more
robust and readable by aligning it similarly as we did back in the
__reg_combine_64_into_32() counterpart. Meaning, only propagate or
pessimize them as a smin/smax pair.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
For the case where both s32_{min,max}_value bounds are positive, the
__reg_assign_32_into_64() directly propagates them to their 64 bit
counterparts, otherwise it pessimises them into [0,u32_max] universe and
tries to refine them later on by learning through the tnum as per comment
in mentioned function. However, that does not always happen, for example,
in mov32 operation we call zext_32_to_64(dst_reg) which invokes the
__reg_assign_32_into_64() as is without subsequent bounds update as
elsewhere thus no refinement based on tnum takes place.
Thus, not calling into the __update_reg_bounds() / __reg_deduce_bounds() /
__reg_bound_offset() triplet as we do, for example, in case of ALU ops via
adjust_scalar_min_max_vals(), will lead to more pessimistic bounds when
dumping the full register state:
Before fix:
0: (b4) w0 = -1
1: R0_w=invP4294967295
(id=0,imm=ffffffff,
smin_value=4294967295,smax_value=4294967295,
umin_value=4294967295,umax_value=4294967295,
var_off=(0xffffffff; 0x0),
s32_min_value=-1,s32_max_value=-1,
u32_min_value=-1,u32_max_value=-1)
1: (bc) w0 = w0
2: R0_w=invP4294967295
(id=0,imm=ffffffff,
smin_value=0,smax_value=4294967295,
umin_value=4294967295,umax_value=4294967295,
var_off=(0xffffffff; 0x0),
s32_min_value=-1,s32_max_value=-1,
u32_min_value=-1,u32_max_value=-1)
Technically, the smin_value=0 and smax_value=4294967295 bounds are not
incorrect, but given the register is still a constant, they break assumptions
about const scalars that smin_value == smax_value and umin_value == umax_value.
After fix:
0: (b4) w0 = -1
1: R0_w=invP4294967295
(id=0,imm=ffffffff,
smin_value=4294967295,smax_value=4294967295,
umin_value=4294967295,umax_value=4294967295,
var_off=(0xffffffff; 0x0),
s32_min_value=-1,s32_max_value=-1,
u32_min_value=-1,u32_max_value=-1)
1: (bc) w0 = w0
2: R0_w=invP4294967295
(id=0,imm=ffffffff,
smin_value=4294967295,smax_value=4294967295,
umin_value=4294967295,umax_value=4294967295,
var_off=(0xffffffff; 0x0),
s32_min_value=-1,s32_max_value=-1,
u32_min_value=-1,u32_max_value=-1)
Without the smin_value == smax_value and umin_value == umax_value invariant
being intact for const scalars, it is possible to leak out kernel pointers
from unprivileged user space if the latter is enabled. For example, when such
registers are involved in pointer arithmtics, then adjust_ptr_min_max_vals()
will taint the destination register into an unknown scalar, and the latter
can be exported and stored e.g. into a BPF map value.
Fixes: 3f50f132d8 ("bpf: Verifier, do explicit ALU32 bounds tracking")
Reported-by: Kuee K1r0a <liulin063@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
The implementation of BPF_CMPXCHG on a high level has the following parameters:
.-[old-val] .-[new-val]
BPF_R0 = cmpxchg{32,64}(DST_REG + insn->off, BPF_R0, SRC_REG)
`-[mem-loc] `-[old-val]
Given a BPF insn can only have two registers (dst, src), the R0 is fixed and
used as an auxilliary register for input (old value) as well as output (returning
old value from memory location). While the verifier performs a number of safety
checks, it misses to reject unprivileged programs where R0 contains a pointer as
old value.
Through brute-forcing it takes about ~16sec on my machine to leak a kernel pointer
with BPF_CMPXCHG. The PoC is basically probing for kernel addresses by storing the
guessed address into the map slot as a scalar, and using the map value pointer as
R0 while SRC_REG has a canary value to detect a matching address.
Fix it by checking R0 for pointers, and reject if that's the case for unprivileged
programs.
Fixes: 5ffa25502b ("bpf: Add instructions for atomic_[cmp]xchg")
Reported-by: Ryota Shiga (Flatt Security)
Acked-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
The change in commit 37086bfdc7 ("bpf: Propagate stack bounds to registers
in atomics w/ BPF_FETCH") around check_mem_access() handling is buggy since
this would allow for unprivileged users to leak kernel pointers. For example,
an atomic fetch/and with -1 on a stack destination which holds a spilled
pointer will migrate the spilled register type into a scalar, which can then
be exported out of the program (since scalar != pointer) by dumping it into
a map value.
The original implementation of XADD was preventing this situation by using
a double call to check_mem_access() one with BPF_READ and a subsequent one
with BPF_WRITE, in both cases passing -1 as a placeholder value instead of
register as per XADD semantics since it didn't contain a value fetch. The
BPF_READ also included a check in check_stack_read_fixed_off() which rejects
the program if the stack slot is of __is_pointer_value() if dst_regno < 0.
The latter is to distinguish whether we're dealing with a regular stack spill/
fill or some arithmetical operation which is disallowed on non-scalars, see
also 6e7e63cbb0 ("bpf: Forbid XADD on spilled pointers for unprivileged
users") for more context on check_mem_access() and its handling of placeholder
value -1.
One minimally intrusive option to fix the leak is for the BPF_FETCH case to
initially check the BPF_READ case via check_mem_access() with -1 as register,
followed by the actual load case with non-negative load_reg to propagate
stack bounds to registers.
Fixes: 37086bfdc7 ("bpf: Propagate stack bounds to registers in atomics w/ BPF_FETCH")
Reported-by: <n4ke4mry@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Adding following helpers for tracing programs:
Get n-th argument of the traced function:
long bpf_get_func_arg(void *ctx, u32 n, u64 *value)
Get return value of the traced function:
long bpf_get_func_ret(void *ctx, u64 *value)
Get arguments count of the traced function:
long bpf_get_func_arg_cnt(void *ctx)
The trampoline now stores number of arguments on ctx-8
address, so it's easy to verify argument index and find
return value argument's position.
Moving function ip address on the trampoline stack behind
the number of functions arguments, so it's now stored on
ctx-16 address if it's needed.
All helpers above are inlined by verifier.
Also bit unrelated small change - using newly added function
bpf_prog_has_trampoline in check_get_func_ip.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211208193245.172141-5-jolsa@kernel.org
Andrii Nakryiko says:
====================
bpf-next 2021-12-10 v2
We've added 115 non-merge commits during the last 26 day(s) which contain
a total of 182 files changed, 5747 insertions(+), 2564 deletions(-).
The main changes are:
1) Various samples fixes, from Alexander Lobakin.
2) BPF CO-RE support in kernel and light skeleton, from Alexei Starovoitov.
3) A batch of new unified APIs for libbpf, logging improvements, version
querying, etc. Also a batch of old deprecations for old APIs and various
bug fixes, in preparation for libbpf 1.0, from Andrii Nakryiko.
4) BPF documentation reorganization and improvements, from Christoph Hellwig
and Dave Tucker.
5) Support for declarative initialization of BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY in
libbpf, from Hengqi Chen.
6) Verifier log fixes, from Hou Tao.
7) Runtime-bounded loops support with bpf_loop() helper, from Joanne Koong.
8) Extend branch record capturing to all platforms that support it,
from Kajol Jain.
9) Light skeleton codegen improvements, from Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi.
10) bpftool doc-generating script improvements, from Quentin Monnet.
11) Two libbpf v0.6 bug fixes, from Shuyi Cheng and Vincent Minet.
12) Deprecation warning fix for perf/bpf_counter, from Song Liu.
13) MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT unification and MIPS build fix for libbpf,
from Tiezhu Yang.
14) BTF_KING_TYPE_TAG follow-up fixes, from Yonghong Song.
15) Selftests fixes and improvements, from Ilya Leoshkevich, Jean-Philippe
Brucker, Jiri Olsa, Maxim Mikityanskiy, Tirthendu Sarkar, Yucong Sun,
and others.
* https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next: (115 commits)
libbpf: Add "bool skipped" to struct bpf_map
libbpf: Fix typo in btf__dedup@LIBBPF_0.0.2 definition
bpftool: Switch bpf_object__load_xattr() to bpf_object__load()
selftests/bpf: Remove the only use of deprecated bpf_object__load_xattr()
selftests/bpf: Add test for libbpf's custom log_buf behavior
selftests/bpf: Replace all uses of bpf_load_btf() with bpf_btf_load()
libbpf: Deprecate bpf_object__load_xattr()
libbpf: Add per-program log buffer setter and getter
libbpf: Preserve kernel error code and remove kprobe prog type guessing
libbpf: Improve logging around BPF program loading
libbpf: Allow passing user log setting through bpf_object_open_opts
libbpf: Allow passing preallocated log_buf when loading BTF into kernel
libbpf: Add OPTS-based bpf_btf_load() API
libbpf: Fix bpf_prog_load() log_buf logic for log_level 0
samples/bpf: Remove unneeded variable
bpf: Remove redundant assignment to pointer t
selftests/bpf: Fix a compilation warning
perf/bpf_counter: Use bpf_map_create instead of bpf_create_map
samples: bpf: Fix 'unknown warning group' build warning on Clang
samples: bpf: Fix xdp_sample_user.o linking with Clang
...
====================
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210234746.2100561-1-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Commit 354e8f1970 ("bpf: Support <8-byte scalar spill and refill")
introduced support in the verifier to track <8B spill/fills of scalars.
The backtracking logic for the precision bit was however skipping
spill/fills of less than 8B. That could cause state pruning to consider
two states equivalent when they shouldn't be.
As an example, consider the following bytecode snippet:
0: r7 = r1
1: call bpf_get_prandom_u32
2: r6 = 2
3: if r0 == 0 goto pc+1
4: r6 = 3
...
8: [state pruning point]
...
/* u32 spill/fill */
10: *(u32 *)(r10 - 8) = r6
11: r8 = *(u32 *)(r10 - 8)
12: r0 = 0
13: if r8 == 3 goto pc+1
14: r0 = 1
15: exit
The verifier first walks the path with R6=3. Given the support for <8B
spill/fills, at instruction 13, it knows the condition is true and skips
instruction 14. At that point, the backtracking logic kicks in but stops
at the fill instruction since it only propagates the precision bit for
8B spill/fill. When the verifier then walks the path with R6=2, it will
consider it safe at instruction 8 because R6 is not marked as needing
precision. Instruction 14 is thus never walked and is then incorrectly
removed as 'dead code'.
It's also possible to lead the verifier to accept e.g. an out-of-bound
memory access instead of causing an incorrect dead code elimination.
This regression was found via Cilium's bpf-next CI where it was causing
a conntrack map update to be silently skipped because the code had been
removed by the verifier.
This commit fixes it by enabling support for <8B spill/fills in the
bactracking logic. In case of a <8B spill/fill, the full 8B stack slot
will be marked as needing precision. Then, in __mark_chain_precision,
any tracked register spilled in a marked slot will itself be marked as
needing precision, regardless of the spill size. This logic makes two
assumptions: (1) only 8B-aligned spill/fill are tracked and (2) spilled
registers are only tracked if the spill and fill sizes are equal. Commit
ef979017b8 ("bpf: selftest: Add verifier tests for <8-byte scalar
spill and refill") covers the first assumption and the next commit in
this patchset covers the second.
Fixes: 354e8f1970 ("bpf: Support <8-byte scalar spill and refill")
Signed-off-by: Paul Chaignon <paul@isovalent.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
