Minki/linux
1
0
Fork 1
mirror of https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git synced 2024-12-27 05:11:48 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
596,771 Commits 2 Branches 866 Tags 6.6 GiB
495367c051
Commit Graph

10317 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Chen Yucong
495367c051 mm/memory-failure.c: replace "MCE" with "Memory failure" 
HWPoison was specific to some particular x86 platforms.  And it is often
seen as high level machine check handler.  And therefore, 'MCE' is used
for the format prefix of printk().  However, 'PowerNV' has also used
HWPoison for handling memory errors[1], so 'MCE' is no longer suitable
to memory_failure.c.

Additionally, 'MCE' and 'Memory failure' have different context.  The
former belongs to exception context and the latter belongs to process
context.  Furthermore, HWPoison can also be used for off-lining those
sub-health pages that do not trigger any machine check exception.

This patch aims to replace 'MCE' with a more appropriate prefix.

[1] commit 75eb3d9b60 ("powerpc/powernv: Get FSP memory errors
and plumb into memory poison infrastructure.")

Signed-off-by: Chen Yucong <slaoub@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-20 17:58:30 -07:00
Yang Shi
340a43bed6 mm: thp: simplify the implementation of mk_huge_pmd() 
The implementation of mk_huge_pmd looks verbose, it could be just
simplified to one line code.

Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-20 17:58:30 -07:00
Tetsuo Handa
f44666b046 mm,oom: speed up select_bad_process() loop 
Since commit 3a5dda7a17 ("oom: prevent unnecessary oom kills or kernel
panics"), select_bad_process() is using for_each_process_thread().

Since oom_unkillable_task() scans all threads in the caller's thread
group and oom_task_origin() scans signal_struct of the caller's thread
group, we don't need to call oom_unkillable_task() and oom_task_origin()
on each thread.  Also, since !mm test will be done later at
oom_badness(), we don't need to do !mm test on each thread.  Therefore,
we only need to do TIF_MEMDIE test on each thread.

Although the original code was correct it was quite inefficient because
each thread group was scanned num_threads times which can be a lot
especially with processes with many threads.  Even though the OOM is
extremely cold path it is always good to be as effective as possible
when we are inside rcu_read_lock() - aka unpreemptible context.

If we track number of TIF_MEMDIE threads inside signal_struct, we don't
need to do TIF_MEMDIE test on each thread.  This will allow
select_bad_process() to use for_each_process().

This patch adds a counter to signal_struct for tracking how many
TIF_MEMDIE threads are in a given thread group, and check it at
oom_scan_process_thread() so that select_bad_process() can use
for_each_process() rather than for_each_process_thread().

[mhocko@suse.com: do not blow the signal_struct size]
  Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160520075035.GF19172@dhcp22.suse.cz
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/201605182230.IDC73435.MVSOHLFOQFOJtF@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp
Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-20 17:58:30 -07:00
Michal Hocko
ec8d7c14ea mm, oom_reaper: do not mmput synchronously from the oom reaper context 
Tetsuo has properly noted that mmput slow path might get blocked waiting
for another party (e.g.  exit_aio waits for an IO).  If that happens the
oom_reaper would be put out of the way and will not be able to process
next oom victim.  We should strive for making this context as reliable
and independent on other subsystems as much as possible.

Introduce mmput_async which will perform the slow path from an async
(WQ) context.  This will delay the operation but that shouldn't be a
problem because the oom_reaper has reclaimed the victim's address space
for most cases as much as possible and the remaining context shouldn't
bind too much memory anymore.  The only exception is when mmap_sem
trylock has failed which shouldn't happen too often.

The issue is only theoretical but not impossible.

Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Reported-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-20 17:58:30 -07:00
Michal Hocko
bb8a4b7fd1 mm, oom_reaper: hide oom reaped tasks from OOM killer more carefully 
Commit 36324a990c ("oom: clear TIF_MEMDIE after oom_reaper managed to
unmap the address space") not only clears TIF_MEMDIE for oom reaped task
but also set OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MIN for the target task to hide it from the
oom killer.  This works in simple cases but it is not sufficient for
(unlikely) cases where the mm is shared between independent processes
(as they do not share signal struct).  If the mm had only small amount
of memory which could be reaped then another task sharing the mm could
be selected and that wouldn't help to move out from the oom situation.

Introduce MMF_OOM_REAPED mm flag which is checked in oom_badness (same
as OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MIN) and task is skipped if the flag is set.  Set the
flag after __oom_reap_task is done with a task.  This will force the
select_bad_process() to ignore all already oom reaped tasks as well as
no such task is sacrificed for its parent.

Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-20 17:58:30 -07:00
Michal Hocko
31e49bfda1 mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more for !CONFIG_COMPACTION 
Joonsoo has reported that he is able to trigger OOM for !costly high
order requests (heavy fork() workload close the OOM) with the new oom
detection rework.  This is because we rely only on should_reclaim_retry
when the compaction is disabled and it only checks watermarks for the
requested order and so we might trigger OOM when there is a lot of free
memory.

It is not very clear what are the usual workloads when the compaction is
disabled.  Relying on high order allocations heavily without any
mechanism to create those orders except for unbound amount of reclaim is
certainly not a good idea.

To prevent from potential regressions let's help this configuration
some.  We have to sacrifice the determinsm though because there simply
is none here possible.  should_compact_retry implementation for
!CONFIG_COMPACTION, which was empty so far, will do watermark check for
order-0 on all eligible zones.  This will cause retrying until either
the reclaim cannot make any further progress or all the zones are
depleted even for order-0 pages.  This means that the number of retries
is basically unbounded for !costly orders but that was the case before
the rework as well so this shouldn't regress.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1463051677-29418-3-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org
Reported-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Acked-by: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-20 17:58:30 -07:00
Michal Hocko
86a294a81f mm, oom, compaction: prevent from should_compact_retry looping for ever for costly orders 
"mm: consider compaction feedback also for costly allocation" has
removed the upper bound for the reclaim/compaction retries based on the
number of reclaimed pages for costly orders.  While this is desirable
the patch did miss a mis interaction between reclaim, compaction and the
retry logic.  The direct reclaim tries to get zones over min watermark
while compaction backs off and returns COMPACT_SKIPPED when all zones
are below low watermark + 1<<order gap.  If we are getting really close
to OOM then __compaction_suitable can keep returning COMPACT_SKIPPED a
high order request (e.g.  hugetlb order-9) while the reclaim is not able
to release enough pages to get us over low watermark.  The reclaim is
still able to make some progress (usually trashing over few remaining
pages) so we are not able to break out from the loop.

I have seen this happening with the same test described in "mm: consider
compaction feedback also for costly allocation" on a swapless system.
The original problem got resolved by "vmscan: consider classzone_idx in
compaction_ready" but it shows how things might go wrong when we
approach the oom event horizont.

The reason why compaction requires being over low rather than min
watermark is not clear to me.  This check was there essentially since
56de7263fc ("mm: compaction: direct compact when a high-order
allocation fails").  It is clearly an implementation detail though and
we shouldn't pull it into the generic retry logic while we should be
able to cope with such eventuality.  The only place in
should_compact_retry where we retry without any upper bound is for
compaction_withdrawn() case.

Introduce compaction_zonelist_suitable function which checks the given
zonelist and returns true only if there is at least one zone which would
would unblock __compaction_suitable if more memory got reclaimed.  In
this implementation it checks __compaction_suitable with NR_FREE_PAGES
plus part of the reclaimable memory as the target for the watermark
check.  The reclaimable memory is reduced linearly by the allocation
order.  The idea is that we do not want to reclaim all the remaining
memory for a single allocation request just unblock
__compaction_suitable which doesn't guarantee we will make a further
progress.

The new helper is then used if compaction_withdrawn() feedback was
provided so we do not retry if there is no outlook for a further
progress.  !costly requests shouldn't be affected much - e.g.  order-2
pages would require to have at least 64kB on the reclaimable LRUs while
order-9 would need at least 32M which should be enough to not lock up.

[vbabka@suse.cz: fix classzone_idx vs. high_zoneidx usage in compaction_zonelist_suitable]
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix it for Mel's mm-page_alloc-remove-field-from-alloc_context.patch]
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Acked-by: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-20 17:58:30 -07:00
Michal Hocko
7854ea6c28 mm: consider compaction feedback also for costly allocation 
PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER retry logic is mostly handled inside
should_reclaim_retry currently where we decide to not retry after at
least order worth of pages were reclaimed or the watermark check for at
least one zone would succeed after reclaiming all pages if the reclaim
hasn't made any progress.  Compaction feedback is mostly ignored and we
just try to make sure that the compaction did at least something before
giving up.

The first condition was added by a41f24ea9f ("page allocator: smarter
retry of costly-order allocations) and it assumed that lumpy reclaim
could have created a page of the sufficient order.  Lumpy reclaim, has
been removed quite some time ago so the assumption doesn't hold anymore.
Remove the check for the number of reclaimed pages and rely on the
compaction feedback solely.  should_reclaim_retry now only makes sure
that we keep retrying reclaim for high order pages only if they are
hidden by watermaks so order-0 reclaim makes really sense.

should_compact_retry now keeps retrying even for the costly allocations.
The number of retries is reduced wrt.  !costly requests because they are
less important and harder to grant and so their pressure shouldn't cause
contention for other requests or cause an over reclaim.  We also do not
reset no_progress_loops for costly request to make sure we do not keep
reclaiming too agressively.

This has been tested by running a process which fragments memory:
	- compact memory
	- mmap large portion of the memory (1920M on 2GRAM machine with 2G
	  of swapspace)
	- MADV_DONTNEED single page in PAGE_SIZE*((1UL<<MAX_ORDER)-1)
	  steps until certain amount of memory is freed (250M in my test)
	  and reduce the step to (step / 2) + 1 after reaching the end of
	  the mapping
	- then run a script which populates the page cache 2G (MemTotal)
	  from /dev/zero to a new file
And then tries to allocate
nr_hugepages=$(awk '/MemAvailable/{printf "%d\n", $2/(2*1024)}' /proc/meminfo)
huge pages.

root@test1:~# echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/overcommit_memory;echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/compact_memory; ./fragment-mem-and-run /root/alloc_hugepages.sh 1920M 250M
Node 0, zone      DMA     31     28     31     10      2      0      2      1      2      3      1
Node 0, zone    DMA32    437    319    171     50     28     25     20     16     16     14    437

* This is the /proc/buddyinfo after the compaction

Done fragmenting. size=2013265920 freed=262144000
Node 0, zone      DMA    165     48      3      1      2      0      2      2      2      2      0
Node 0, zone    DMA32  35109  14575    185     51     41     12      6      0      0      0      0

* /proc/buddyinfo after memory got fragmented

Executing "/root/alloc_hugepages.sh"
Eating some pagecache
508623+0 records in
508623+0 records out
2083319808 bytes (2.1 GB) copied, 11.7292 s, 178 MB/s
Node 0, zone      DMA      3      5      3      1      2      0      2      2      2      2      0
Node 0, zone    DMA32    111    344    153     20     24     10      3      0      0      0      0

* /proc/buddyinfo after page cache got eaten

Trying to allocate 129
129

* 129 hugepages requested and all of them granted.

Node 0, zone      DMA      3      5      3      1      2      0      2      2      2      2      0
Node 0, zone    DMA32    127     97     30     99     11      6      2      1      4      0      0

* /proc/buddyinfo after hugetlb allocation.

10 runs will behave as follows:
Trying to allocate 130
130
--
Trying to allocate 129
129
--
Trying to allocate 128
128
--
Trying to allocate 129
129
--
Trying to allocate 128
128
--
Trying to allocate 129
129
--
Trying to allocate 132
132
--
Trying to allocate 129
129
--
Trying to allocate 128
128
--
Trying to allocate 129
129

So basically 100% success for all 10 attempts.
Without the patch numbers looked much worse:
Trying to allocate 128
12
--
Trying to allocate 129
14
--
Trying to allocate 129
7
--
Trying to allocate 129
16
--
Trying to allocate 129
30
--
Trying to allocate 129
38
--
Trying to allocate 129
19
--
Trying to allocate 129
37
--
Trying to allocate 129
28
--
Trying to allocate 129
37

Just for completness the base kernel without oom detection rework looks
as follows:
Trying to allocate 127
30
--
Trying to allocate 129
12
--
Trying to allocate 129
52
--
Trying to allocate 128
32
--
Trying to allocate 129
12
--
Trying to allocate 129
10
--
Trying to allocate 129
32
--
Trying to allocate 128
14
--
Trying to allocate 128
16
--
Trying to allocate 129
8

As we can see the success rate is much more volatile and smaller without
this patch. So the patch not only makes the retry logic for costly
requests more sensible the success rate is even higher.

Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Acked-by: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-20 17:58:30 -07:00
Michal Hocko
33c2d21438 mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more 
should_reclaim_retry will give up retries for higher order allocations
if none of the eligible zones has any requested or higher order pages
available even if we pass the watermak check for order-0.  This is done
because there is no guarantee that the reclaimable and currently free
pages will form the required order.

This can, however, lead to situations where the high-order request (e.g.
order-2 required for the stack allocation during fork) will trigger OOM
too early - e.g.  after the first reclaim/compaction round.  Such a
system would have to be highly fragmented and there is no guarantee
further reclaim/compaction attempts would help but at least make sure
that the compaction was active before we go OOM and keep retrying even
if should_reclaim_retry tells us to oom if

	- the last compaction round backed off or
	- we haven't completed at least MAX_COMPACT_RETRIES active
	  compaction rounds.

The first rule ensures that the very last attempt for compaction was not
ignored while the second guarantees that the compaction has done some
work.  Multiple retries might be needed to prevent occasional pigggy
backing of other contexts to steal the compacted pages before the
current context manages to retry to allocate them.

compaction_failed() is taken as a final word from the compaction that
the retry doesn't make much sense.  We have to be careful though because
the first compaction round is MIGRATE_ASYNC which is rather weak as it
ignores pages under writeback and gives up too easily in other
situations.  We therefore have to make sure that MIGRATE_SYNC_LIGHT mode
has been used before we give up.  With this logic in place we do not
have to increase the migration mode unconditionally and rather do it
only if the compaction failed for the weaker mode.  A nice side effect
is that the stronger migration mode is used only when really needed so
this has a potential of smaller latencies in some cases.

Please note that the compaction doesn't tell us much about how
successful it was when returning compaction_made_progress so we just
have to blindly trust that another retry is worthwhile and cap the
number to something reasonable to guarantee a convergence.

If the given number of successful retries is not sufficient for a
reasonable workloads we should focus on the collected compaction
tracepoints data and try to address the issue in the compaction code.
If this is not feasible we can increase the retries limit.

[mhocko@suse.com: fix warning]
  Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160512061636.GA4200@dhcp22.suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Acked-by: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-20 17:58:30 -07:00
Michal Hocko
ede3771373 mm: throttle on IO only when there are too many dirty and writeback pages 
wait_iff_congested has been used to throttle allocator before it retried
another round of direct reclaim to allow the writeback to make some
progress and prevent reclaim from looping over dirty/writeback pages
without making any progress.

We used to do congestion_wait before commit 0e093d9976 ("writeback: do
not sleep on the congestion queue if there are no congested BDIs or if
significant congestion is not being encountered in the current zone")
but that led to undesirable stalls and sleeping for the full timeout
even when the BDI wasn't congested.  Hence wait_iff_congested was used
instead.

But it seems that even wait_iff_congested doesn't work as expected.  We
might have a small file LRU list with all pages dirty/writeback and yet
the bdi is not congested so this is just a cond_resched in the end and
can end up triggering pre mature OOM.

This patch replaces the unconditional wait_iff_congested by
congestion_wait which is executed only if we _know_ that the last round
of direct reclaim didn't make any progress and dirty+writeback pages are
more than a half of the reclaimable pages on the zone which might be
usable for our target allocation.  This shouldn't reintroduce stalls
fixed by 0e093d9976 because congestion_wait is called only when we are
getting hopeless when sleeping is a better choice than OOM with many
pages under IO.

We have to preserve logic introduced by commit 373ccbe592 ("mm,
vmstat: allow WQ concurrency to discover memory reclaim doesn't make any
progress") into the __alloc_pages_slowpath now that wait_iff_congested
is not used anymore.  As the only remaining user of wait_iff_congested
is shrink_inactive_list we can remove the WQ specific short sleep from
wait_iff_congested because the sleep is needed to be done only once in
the allocation retry cycle.

[mhocko@suse.com: high_zoneidx->ac_classzone_idx to evaluate memory reserves properly]
 Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1463051677-29418-2-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Acked-by: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-20 17:58:30 -07:00
Michal Hocko
0a0337e0d1 mm, oom: rework oom detection 
__alloc_pages_slowpath has traditionally relied on the direct reclaim
and did_some_progress as an indicator that it makes sense to retry
allocation rather than declaring OOM.  shrink_zones had to rely on
zone_reclaimable if shrink_zone didn't make any progress to prevent from
a premature OOM killer invocation - the LRU might be full of dirty or
writeback pages and direct reclaim cannot clean those up.

zone_reclaimable allows to rescan the reclaimable lists several times
and restart if a page is freed.  This is really subtle behavior and it
might lead to a livelock when a single freed page keeps allocator
looping but the current task will not be able to allocate that single
page.  OOM killer would be more appropriate than looping without any
progress for unbounded amount of time.

This patch changes OOM detection logic and pulls it out from shrink_zone
which is too low to be appropriate for any high level decisions such as
OOM which is per zonelist property.  It is __alloc_pages_slowpath which
knows how many attempts have been done and what was the progress so far
therefore it is more appropriate to implement this logic.

The new heuristic is implemented in should_reclaim_retry helper called
from __alloc_pages_slowpath.  It tries to be more deterministic and
easier to follow.  It builds on an assumption that retrying makes sense
only if the currently reclaimable memory + free pages would allow the
current allocation request to succeed (as per __zone_watermark_ok) at
least for one zone in the usable zonelist.

This alone wouldn't be sufficient, though, because the writeback might
get stuck and reclaimable pages might be pinned for a really long time
or even depend on the current allocation context.  Therefore there is a
backoff mechanism implemented which reduces the reclaim target after
each reclaim round without any progress.  This means that we should
eventually converge to only NR_FREE_PAGES as the target and fail on the
wmark check and proceed to OOM.  The backoff is simple and linear with
1/16 of the reclaimable pages for each round without any progress.  We
are optimistic and reset counter for successful reclaim rounds.

Costly high order pages mostly preserve their semantic and those without
__GFP_REPEAT fail right away while those which have the flag set will
back off after the amount of reclaimable pages reaches equivalent of the
requested order.  The only difference is that if there was no progress
during the reclaim we rely on zone watermark check.  This is more
logical thing to do than previous 1<<order attempts which were a result
of zone_reclaimable faking the progress.

[vdavydov@virtuozzo.com: check classzone_idx for shrink_zone]
[hannes@cmpxchg.org: separate the heuristic into should_reclaim_retry]
[rientjes@google.com: use zone_page_state_snapshot for NR_FREE_PAGES]
[rientjes@google.com: shrink_zones doesn't need to return anything]
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Acked-by: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com>
Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-20 17:58:30 -07:00
Michal Hocko
c5d01d0d18 mm, compaction: simplify __alloc_pages_direct_compact feedback interface 
__alloc_pages_direct_compact communicates potential back off by two
variables:
	- deferred_compaction tells that the compaction returned
	  COMPACT_DEFERRED
	- contended_compaction is set when there is a contention on
	  zone->lock resp. zone->lru_lock locks

__alloc_pages_slowpath then backs of for THP allocation requests to
prevent from long stalls. This is rather messy and it would be much
cleaner to return a single compact result value and hide all the nasty
details into __alloc_pages_direct_compact.

This patch shouldn't introduce any functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Acked-by: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-20 17:58:30 -07:00
Michal Hocko
c8f7de0bfa mm, compaction: distinguish between full and partial COMPACT_COMPLETE 
COMPACT_COMPLETE now means that compaction and free scanner met.  This
is not very useful information if somebody just wants to use this
feedback and make any decisions based on that.  The current caller might
be a poor guy who just happened to scan tiny portion of the zone and
that could be the reason no suitable pages were compacted.  Make sure we
distinguish the full and partial zone walks.

Consumers should treat COMPACT_PARTIAL_SKIPPED as a potential success
and be optimistic in retrying.

The existing users of COMPACT_COMPLETE are conservatively changed to use
COMPACT_PARTIAL_SKIPPED as well but some of them should be probably
reconsidered and only defer the compaction only for COMPACT_COMPLETE
with the new semantic.

This patch shouldn't introduce any functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Acked-by: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-20 17:58:30 -07:00
Michal Hocko
1d4746d395 mm, compaction: distinguish COMPACT_DEFERRED from COMPACT_SKIPPED 
try_to_compact_pages() can currently return COMPACT_SKIPPED even when
the compaction is defered for some zone just because zone DMA is skipped
in 99% of cases due to watermark checks.  This makes COMPACT_DEFERRED
basically unusable for the page allocator as a feedback mechanism.

Make sure we distinguish those two states properly and switch their
ordering in the enum.  This would mean that the COMPACT_SKIPPED will be
returned only when all eligible zones are skipped.

As a result COMPACT_DEFERRED handling for THP in __alloc_pages_slowpath
will be more precise and we would bail out rather than reclaim.

Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Acked-by: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-20 17:58:30 -07:00
Michal Hocko
c46649deae mm, compaction: cover all compaction mode in compact_zone 
The compiler is complaining after "mm, compaction: change COMPACT_
constants into enum"

  mm/compaction.c: In function `compact_zone':
  mm/compaction.c:1350:2: warning: enumeration value `COMPACT_DEFERRED' not handled in switch [-Wswitch]
    switch (ret) {
    ^
  mm/compaction.c:1350:2: warning: enumeration value `COMPACT_COMPLETE' not handled in switch [-Wswitch]
  mm/compaction.c:1350:2: warning: enumeration value `COMPACT_NO_SUITABLE_PAGE' not handled in switch [-Wswitch]
  mm/compaction.c:1350:2: warning: enumeration value `COMPACT_NOT_SUITABLE_ZONE' not handled in switch [-Wswitch]
  mm/compaction.c:1350:2: warning: enumeration value `COMPACT_CONTENDED' not handled in switch [-Wswitch]

compaction_suitable is allowed to return only COMPACT_PARTIAL,
COMPACT_SKIPPED and COMPACT_CONTINUE so other cases are simply
impossible.  Put a VM_BUG_ON to catch an impossible return value.

Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Acked-by: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-20 17:58:30 -07:00
Michal Hocko
ea7ab982b6 mm, compaction: change COMPACT_ constants into enum 
Compaction code is doing weird dances between COMPACT_FOO -> int ->
unsigned long

But there doesn't seem to be any reason for that.  All functions which
return/use one of those constants are not expecting any other value so it
really makes sense to define an enum for them and make it clear that no
other values are expected.

This is a pure cleanup and shouldn't introduce any functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Acked-by: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-20 17:58:30 -07:00
Michal Hocko
b6459cc154 vmscan: consider classzone_idx in compaction_ready 
Motivation:
As pointed out by Linus [2][3] relying on zone_reclaimable as a way to
communicate the reclaim progress is rater dubious. I tend to agree,
not only it is really obscure, it is not hard to imagine cases where a
single page freed in the loop keeps all the reclaimers looping without
getting any progress because their gfp_mask wouldn't allow to get that
page anyway (e.g. single GFP_ATOMIC alloc and free loop). This is rather
rare so it doesn't happen in the practice but the current logic which we
have is rather obscure and hard to follow a also non-deterministic.

This is an attempt to make the OOM detection more deterministic and
easier to follow because each reclaimer basically tracks its own
progress which is implemented at the page allocator layer rather spread
out between the allocator and the reclaim.  The more on the
implementation is described in the first patch.

I have tested several different scenarios but it should be clear that
testing OOM killer is quite hard to be representative.  There is usually
a tiny gap between almost OOM and full blown OOM which is often time
sensitive.  Anyway, I have tested the following 2 scenarios and I would
appreciate if there are more to test.

Testing environment: a virtual machine with 2G of RAM and 2CPUs without
any swap to make the OOM more deterministic.

1) 2 writers (each doing dd with 4M blocks to an xfs partition with 1G
   file size, removes the files and starts over again) running in
   parallel for 10s to build up a lot of dirty pages when 100 parallel
   mem_eaters (anon private populated mmap which waits until it gets
   signal) with 80M each.

   This causes an OOM flood of course and I have compared both patched
   and unpatched kernels. The test is considered finished after there
   are no OOM conditions detected. This should tell us whether there are
   any excessive kills or some of them premature (e.g. due to dirty pages):

I have performed two runs this time each after a fresh boot.

* base kernel
$ grep "Out of memory:" base-oom-run1.log | wc -l
78
$ grep "Out of memory:" base-oom-run2.log | wc -l
78

$ grep "Kill process" base-oom-run1.log | tail -n1
[   91.391203] Out of memory: Kill process 3061 (mem_eater) score 39 or sacrifice child
$ grep "Kill process" base-oom-run2.log | tail -n1
[   82.141919] Out of memory: Kill process 3086 (mem_eater) score 39 or sacrifice child

$ grep "DMA32 free:" base-oom-run1.log | sed 's@.*free:\([0-9]*\)kB.*@\1@' | calc_min_max.awk
min: 5376.00 max: 6776.00 avg: 5530.75 std: 166.50 nr: 61
$ grep "DMA32 free:" base-oom-run2.log | sed 's@.*free:\([0-9]*\)kB.*@\1@' | calc_min_max.awk
min: 5416.00 max: 5608.00 avg: 5514.15 std: 42.94 nr: 52

$ grep "DMA32.*all_unreclaimable? no" base-oom-run1.log | wc -l
1
$ grep "DMA32.*all_unreclaimable? no" base-oom-run2.log | wc -l
3

* patched kernel
$ grep "Out of memory:" patched-oom-run1.log | wc -l
78
miso@tiehlicka /mnt/share/devel/miso/kvm $ grep "Out of memory:" patched-oom-run2.log | wc -l
77

e grep "Kill process" patched-oom-run1.log | tail -n1
[  497.317732] Out of memory: Kill process 3108 (mem_eater) score 39 or sacrifice child
$ grep "Kill process" patched-oom-run2.log | tail -n1
[  316.169920] Out of memory: Kill process 3093 (mem_eater) score 39 or sacrifice child

$ grep "DMA32 free:" patched-oom-run1.log | sed 's@.*free:\([0-9]*\)kB.*@\1@' | calc_min_max.awk
min: 5420.00 max: 5808.00 avg: 5513.90 std: 60.45 nr: 78
$ grep "DMA32 free:" patched-oom-run2.log | sed 's@.*free:\([0-9]*\)kB.*@\1@' | calc_min_max.awk
min: 5380.00 max: 6384.00 avg: 5520.94 std: 136.84 nr: 77

e grep "DMA32.*all_unreclaimable? no" patched-oom-run1.log | wc -l
2
$ grep "DMA32.*all_unreclaimable? no" patched-oom-run2.log | wc -l
3

The patched kernel run noticeably longer while invoking OOM killer same
number of times. This means that the original implementation is much
more aggressive and triggers the OOM killer sooner. free pages stats
show that neither kernels went OOM too early most of the time, though. I
guess the difference is in the backoff when retries without any progress
do sleep for a while if there is memory under writeback or dirty which
is highly likely considering the parallel IO.
Both kernels have seen races where zone wasn't marked unreclaimable
and we still hit the OOM killer. This is most likely a race where
a task managed to exit between the last allocation attempt and the oom
killer invocation.

2) 2 writers again with 10s of run and then 10 mem_eaters to consume as much
   memory as possible without triggering the OOM killer. This required a lot
   of tuning but I've considered 3 consecutive runs in three different boots
   without OOM as a success.

* base kernel
size=$(awk '/MemFree/{printf "%dK", ($2/10)-(16*1024)}' /proc/meminfo)

* patched kernel
size=$(awk '/MemFree/{printf "%dK", ($2/10)-(12*1024)}' /proc/meminfo)

That means 40M more memory was usable without triggering OOM killer. The
base kernel sometimes managed to handle the same as patched but it
wasn't consistent and failed in at least on of the 3 runs. This seems
like a minor improvement.

I was testing also GPF_REPEAT costly requests (hughetlb) with fragmented
memory and under memory pressure. The results are in patch 11 where the
logic is implemented. In short I can see huge improvement there.

I am certainly interested in other usecases as well as well as any
feedback. Especially those which require higher order requests.

This patch (of 14):

While playing with the oom detection rework [1] I have noticed that my
heavy order-9 (hugetlb) load close to OOM ended up in an endless loop
where the reclaim hasn't made any progress but did_some_progress didn't
reflect that and compaction_suitable was backing off because no zone is
above low wmark + 1 << order.

It turned out that this is in fact an old standing bug in
compaction_ready which ignores the requested_highidx and did the
watermark check for 0 classzone_idx.  This succeeds for zone DMA most
of the time as the zone is mostly unused because of lowmem protection.
As a result costly high order allocatios always report a successfull
progress even when there was none.  This wasn't a problem so far
because these allocations usually fail quite early or retry only few
times with __GFP_REPEAT but this will change after later patch in this
series so make sure to not lie about the progress and propagate
requested_highidx down to compaction_ready and use it for both the
watermak check and compaction_suitable to fix this issue.

[1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1459855533-4600-1-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org
[2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/10/12/808
[3] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/10/13/597

Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Acked-by: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com>
Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-20 17:58:30 -07:00
Rik van Riel
59dc76b0d4 mm: vmscan: reduce size of inactive file list 
The inactive file list should still be large enough to contain readahead
windows and freshly written file data, but it no longer is the only
source for detecting multiple accesses to file pages.  The workingset
refault measurement code causes recently evicted file pages that get
accessed again after a shorter interval to be promoted directly to the
active list.

With that mechanism in place, we can afford to (on a larger system)
dedicate more memory to the active file list, so we can actually cache
more of the frequently used file pages in memory, and not have them
pushed out by streaming writes, once-used streaming file reads, etc.

This can help things like database workloads, where only half the page
cache can currently be used to cache the database working set.  This
patch automatically increases that fraction on larger systems, using the
same ratio that has already been used for anonymous memory.

[hannes@cmpxchg.org: cgroup-awareness]
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Reported-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-20 17:58:30 -07:00
Johannes Weiner
bbddabe2e4 mm: filemap: only do access activations on reads 
Andres observed that his database workload is struggling with the
transaction journal creating pressure on frequently read pages.

Access patterns like transaction journals frequently write the same
pages over and over, but in the majority of cases those pages are never
read back.  There are no caching benefits to be had for those pages, so
activating them and having them put pressure on pages that do benefit
from caching is a bad choice.

Leave page activations to read accesses and don't promote pages based on
writes alone.

It could be said that partially written pages do contain cache-worthy
data, because even if *userspace* does not access the unwritten part,
the kernel still has to read it from the filesystem for correctness.
However, a counter argument is that these pages enjoy at least *some*
protection over other inactive file pages through the writeback cache,
in the sense that dirty pages are written back with a delay and cache
reclaim leaves them alone until they have been written back to disk.
Should that turn out to be insufficient and we see increased read IO
from partial writes under memory pressure, we can always go back and
update grab_cache_page_write_begin() to take (pos, len) so that it can
tell partial writes from pages that don't need partial reads.  But for
now, keep it simple.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Reported-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-20 17:58:30 -07:00
Rik van Riel
f0281a00fe mm: workingset: only do workingset activations on reads 
This is a follow-up to

  http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mm/msg101739.html

where Andres reported his database workingset being pushed out by the
minimum size enforcement of the inactive file list - currently 50% of
cache - as well as repeatedly written file pages that are never actually
read.

Two changes fell out of the discussions.  The first change observes that
pages that are only ever written don't benefit from caching beyond what
the writeback cache does for partial page writes, and so we shouldn't
promote them to the active file list where they compete with pages whose
cached data is actually accessed repeatedly.  This change comes in two
patches - one for in-cache write accesses and one for refaults triggered
by writes, neither of which should promote a cache page.

Second, with the refault detection we don't need to set 50% of the cache
aside for used-once cache anymore since we can detect frequently used
pages even when they are evicted between accesses.  We can allow the
active list to be bigger and thus protect a bigger workingset that isn't
challenged by streamers.  Depending on the access patterns, this can
increase major faults during workingset transitions for better
performance during stable phases.

This patch (of 3):

When rewriting a page, the data in that page is replaced with new data.
This means that evicting something else from the active file list, in
order to cache data that will be replaced by something else, is likely
to be a waste of memory.

It is better to save the active list for frequently read pages, because
reads actually use the data that is in the page.

This patch ignores partial writes, because it is unclear whether the
complexity of identifying those is worth any potential performance gain
obtained from better caching pages that see repeated partial writes at
large enough intervals to not get caught by the use-twice promotion code
used for the inactive file list.

Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Reported-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-20 17:58:30 -07:00
Mel Gorman
4741526b83 mm, page_alloc: restore the original nodemask if the fast path allocation failed 
The page allocator fast path uses either the requested nodemask or
cpuset_current_mems_allowed if cpusets are enabled.  If the allocation
context allows watermarks to be ignored then it can also ignore memory
policies.  However, on entering the allocator slowpath the nodemask may
still be cpuset_current_mems_allowed and the policies are enforced.
This patch resets the nodemask appropriately before entering the
slowpath.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160504143628.GU2858@techsingularity.net
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-19 19:12:14 -07:00
Vlastimil Babka
4e6118016e mm, page_alloc: uninline the bad page part of check_new_page() 
Bad pages should be rare so the code handling them doesn't need to be
inline for performance reasons.  Put it to separate function which
returns void.  This also assumes that the initial page_expected_state()
result will match the result of the thorough check, i.e.  the page
doesn't become "good" in the meanwhile.  This matches the same
expectations already in place in free_pages_check().

!DEBUG_VM bloat-o-meter:

  add/remove: 1/0 grow/shrink: 0/1 up/down: 134/-274 (-140)
  function                                     old     new   delta
  check_new_page_bad                             -     134    +134
  get_page_from_freelist                      3468    3194    -274

Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-19 19:12:14 -07:00
Mel Gorman
e2769dbdc5 mm, page_alloc: don't duplicate code in free_pcp_prepare 
The new free_pcp_prepare() function shares a lot of code with
free_pages_prepare(), which makes this a maintenance risk when some
future patch modifies only one of them.  We should be able to achieve
the same effect (skipping free_pages_check() from !DEBUG_VM configs) by
adding a parameter to free_pages_prepare() and making it inline, so the
checks (and the order != 0 parts) are eliminated from the call from
free_pcp_prepare().

!DEBUG_VM: bloat-o-meter reports no difference, as my gcc was already
inlining free_pages_prepare() and the elimination seems to work as
expected

DEBUG_VM bloat-o-meter:

  add/remove: 0/1 grow/shrink: 2/0 up/down: 1035/-778 (257)
  function                                     old     new   delta
  __free_pages_ok                              297    1060    +763
  free_hot_cold_page                           480     752    +272
  free_pages_prepare                           778       -    -778

Here inlining didn't occur before, and added some code, but it's ok for
a debug option.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix build]
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-19 19:12:14 -07:00
Mel Gorman
479f854a20 mm, page_alloc: defer debugging checks of pages allocated from the PCP 
Every page allocated checks a number of page fields for validity.  This
catches corruption bugs of pages that are already freed but it is
expensive.  This patch weakens the debugging check by checking PCP pages
only when the PCP lists are being refilled.  All compound pages are
checked.  This potentially avoids debugging checks entirely if the PCP
lists are never emptied and refilled so some corruption issues may be
missed.  Full checking requires DEBUG_VM.

With the two deferred debugging patches applied, the impact to a page
allocator microbenchmark is

                                             4.6.0-rc3                  4.6.0-rc3
                                           inline-v3r6            deferalloc-v3r7
  Min      alloc-odr0-1               344.00 (  0.00%)           317.00 (  7.85%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2               248.00 (  0.00%)           231.00 (  6.85%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4               209.00 (  0.00%)           192.00 (  8.13%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8               181.00 (  0.00%)           166.00 (  8.29%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16              168.00 (  0.00%)           154.00 (  8.33%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-32              161.00 (  0.00%)           148.00 (  8.07%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-64              158.00 (  0.00%)           145.00 (  8.23%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-128             156.00 (  0.00%)           143.00 (  8.33%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-256             168.00 (  0.00%)           154.00 (  8.33%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-512             178.00 (  0.00%)           167.00 (  6.18%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-1024            186.00 (  0.00%)           174.00 (  6.45%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2048            192.00 (  0.00%)           180.00 (  6.25%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4096            198.00 (  0.00%)           184.00 (  7.07%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8192            200.00 (  0.00%)           188.00 (  6.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16384           201.00 (  0.00%)           188.00 (  6.47%)
  Min      free-odr0-1                189.00 (  0.00%)           180.00 (  4.76%)
  Min      free-odr0-2                132.00 (  0.00%)           126.00 (  4.55%)
  Min      free-odr0-4                104.00 (  0.00%)            99.00 (  4.81%)
  Min      free-odr0-8                 90.00 (  0.00%)            85.00 (  5.56%)
  Min      free-odr0-16                84.00 (  0.00%)            80.00 (  4.76%)
  Min      free-odr0-32                80.00 (  0.00%)            76.00 (  5.00%)
  Min      free-odr0-64                78.00 (  0.00%)            74.00 (  5.13%)
  Min      free-odr0-128               77.00 (  0.00%)            73.00 (  5.19%)
  Min      free-odr0-256               94.00 (  0.00%)            91.00 (  3.19%)
  Min      free-odr0-512              108.00 (  0.00%)           112.00 ( -3.70%)
  Min      free-odr0-1024             115.00 (  0.00%)           118.00 ( -2.61%)
  Min      free-odr0-2048             120.00 (  0.00%)           125.00 ( -4.17%)
  Min      free-odr0-4096             123.00 (  0.00%)           129.00 ( -4.88%)
  Min      free-odr0-8192             126.00 (  0.00%)           130.00 ( -3.17%)
  Min      free-odr0-16384            126.00 (  0.00%)           131.00 ( -3.97%)

Note that the free paths for large numbers of pages is impacted as the
debugging cost gets shifted into that path when the page data is no
longer necessarily cache-hot.

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-19 19:12:14 -07:00
Mel Gorman
4db7548ccb mm, page_alloc: defer debugging checks of freed pages until a PCP drain 
Every page free checks a number of page fields for validity.  This
catches premature frees and corruptions but it is also expensive.  This
patch weakens the debugging check by checking PCP pages at the time they
are drained from the PCP list.  This will trigger the bug but the site
that freed the corrupt page will be lost.  To get the full context, a
kernel rebuild with DEBUG_VM is necessary.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix build]
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-19 19:12:14 -07:00
Vlastimil Babka
002f290627 cpuset: use static key better and convert to new API 
An important function for cpusets is cpuset_node_allowed(), which
optimizes on the fact if there's a single root CPU set, it must be
trivially allowed.  But the check "nr_cpusets() <= 1" doesn't use the
cpusets_enabled_key static key the right way where static keys eliminate
branching overhead with jump labels.

This patch converts it so that static key is used properly.  It's also
switched to the new static key API and the checking functions are
converted to return bool instead of int.  We also provide a new variant
__cpuset_zone_allowed() which expects that the static key check was
already done and they key was enabled.  This is needed for
get_page_from_freelist() where we want to also avoid the relatively
slower check when ALLOC_CPUSET is not set in alloc_flags.

The impact on the page allocator microbenchmark is less than expected
but the cleanup in itself is worthwhile.

                                             4.6.0-rc2                  4.6.0-rc2
                                       multcheck-v1r20               cpuset-v1r20
  Min      alloc-odr0-1               348.00 (  0.00%)           348.00 (  0.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2               254.00 (  0.00%)           254.00 (  0.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4               213.00 (  0.00%)           213.00 (  0.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8               186.00 (  0.00%)           183.00 (  1.61%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16              173.00 (  0.00%)           171.00 (  1.16%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-32              166.00 (  0.00%)           163.00 (  1.81%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-64              162.00 (  0.00%)           159.00 (  1.85%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-128             160.00 (  0.00%)           157.00 (  1.88%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-256             169.00 (  0.00%)           166.00 (  1.78%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-512             180.00 (  0.00%)           180.00 (  0.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-1024            188.00 (  0.00%)           187.00 (  0.53%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2048            194.00 (  0.00%)           193.00 (  0.52%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4096            199.00 (  0.00%)           198.00 (  0.50%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8192            202.00 (  0.00%)           201.00 (  0.50%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16384           203.00 (  0.00%)           202.00 (  0.49%)

Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: Zefan Li <lizefan@huawei.com>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-19 19:12:14 -07:00
Mel Gorman
0b423ca22f mm, page_alloc: inline pageblock lookup in page free fast paths 
The function call overhead of get_pfnblock_flags_mask() is measurable in
the page free paths.  This patch uses an inlined version that is faster.

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-19 19:12:14 -07:00
Mel Gorman
e5b31ac2ca mm, page_alloc: remove unnecessary variable from free_pcppages_bulk 
The original count is never reused so it can be removed.

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-19 19:12:14 -07:00
Mel Gorman
da838d4fcb mm, page_alloc: pull out side effects from free_pages_check 
Check without side-effects should be easier to maintain.  It also
removes the duplicated cpupid and flags reset done in !DEBUG_VM variant
of both free_pcp_prepare() and then bulkfree_pcp_prepare().  Finally, it
enables the next patch.

It shouldn't result in new branches, thanks to inlining of the check.

!DEBUG_VM bloat-o-meter:

  add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 0/2 up/down: 0/-27 (-27)
  function                                     old     new   delta
  __free_pages_ok                              748     739      -9
  free_pcppages_bulk                          1403    1385     -18

DEBUG_VM:

  add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 0/1 up/down: 0/-28 (-28)
  function                                     old     new   delta
  free_pages_prepare                           806     778     -28

This is also slightly faster because cpupid information is not set on
tail pages so we can avoid resets there.

Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-19 19:12:14 -07:00
Mel Gorman
bb552ac6c6 mm, page_alloc: un-inline the bad part of free_pages_check 
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>

!DEBUG_VM size and bloat-o-meter:

  add/remove: 1/0 grow/shrink: 0/2 up/down: 124/-370 (-246)
  function                                     old     new   delta
  free_pages_check_bad                           -     124    +124
  free_pcppages_bulk                          1288    1171    -117
  __free_pages_ok                              948     695    -253

DEBUG_VM:

  add/remove: 1/0 grow/shrink: 0/1 up/down: 124/-214 (-90)
  function                                     old     new   delta
  free_pages_check_bad                           -     124    +124
  free_pages_prepare                          1112     898    -214

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix whitespace]
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-19 19:12:14 -07:00
Mel Gorman
7bfec6f47b mm, page_alloc: check multiple page fields with a single branch 
Every page allocated or freed is checked for sanity to avoid corruptions
that are difficult to detect later.  A bad page could be due to a number
of fields.  Instead of using multiple branches, this patch combines
multiple fields into a single branch.  A detailed check is only
necessary if that check fails.

                                             4.6.0-rc2                  4.6.0-rc2
                                        initonce-v1r20            multcheck-v1r20
  Min      alloc-odr0-1               359.00 (  0.00%)           348.00 (  3.06%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2               260.00 (  0.00%)           254.00 (  2.31%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4               214.00 (  0.00%)           213.00 (  0.47%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8               186.00 (  0.00%)           186.00 (  0.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16              173.00 (  0.00%)           173.00 (  0.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-32              165.00 (  0.00%)           166.00 ( -0.61%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-64              162.00 (  0.00%)           162.00 (  0.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-128             161.00 (  0.00%)           160.00 (  0.62%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-256             170.00 (  0.00%)           169.00 (  0.59%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-512             181.00 (  0.00%)           180.00 (  0.55%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-1024            190.00 (  0.00%)           188.00 (  1.05%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2048            196.00 (  0.00%)           194.00 (  1.02%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4096            202.00 (  0.00%)           199.00 (  1.49%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8192            205.00 (  0.00%)           202.00 (  1.46%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16384           205.00 (  0.00%)           203.00 (  0.98%)

Again, the benefit is marginal but avoiding excessive branches is
important.  Ideally the paths would not have to check these conditions
at all but regrettably abandoning the tests would make use-after-free
bugs much harder to detect.

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-19 19:12:14 -07:00
Mel Gorman
93ea9964d1 mm, page_alloc: remove field from alloc_context 
The classzone_idx can be inferred from preferred_zoneref so remove the
unnecessary field and save stack space.

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-19 19:12:14 -07:00
Mel Gorman
c33d6c06f6 mm, page_alloc: avoid looking up the first zone in a zonelist twice 
The allocator fast path looks up the first usable zone in a zonelist and
then get_page_from_freelist does the same job in the zonelist iterator.
This patch preserves the necessary information.

                                             4.6.0-rc2                  4.6.0-rc2
                                        fastmark-v1r20             initonce-v1r20
  Min      alloc-odr0-1               364.00 (  0.00%)           359.00 (  1.37%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2               262.00 (  0.00%)           260.00 (  0.76%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4               214.00 (  0.00%)           214.00 (  0.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8               186.00 (  0.00%)           186.00 (  0.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16              173.00 (  0.00%)           173.00 (  0.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-32              165.00 (  0.00%)           165.00 (  0.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-64              161.00 (  0.00%)           162.00 ( -0.62%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-128             159.00 (  0.00%)           161.00 ( -1.26%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-256             168.00 (  0.00%)           170.00 ( -1.19%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-512             180.00 (  0.00%)           181.00 ( -0.56%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-1024            190.00 (  0.00%)           190.00 (  0.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2048            196.00 (  0.00%)           196.00 (  0.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4096            202.00 (  0.00%)           202.00 (  0.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8192            206.00 (  0.00%)           205.00 (  0.49%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16384           206.00 (  0.00%)           205.00 (  0.49%)

The benefit is negligible and the results are within the noise but each
cycle counts.

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-19 19:12:14 -07:00
Mel Gorman
48ee5f3696 mm, page_alloc: shortcut watermark checks for order-0 pages 
Watermarks have to be checked on every allocation including the number
of pages being allocated and whether reserves can be accessed.  The
reserves only matter if memory is limited and the free_pages adjustment
only applies to high-order pages.  This patch adds a shortcut for
order-0 pages that avoids numerous calculations if there is plenty of
free memory yielding the following performance difference in a page
allocator microbenchmark;

                                             4.6.0-rc2                  4.6.0-rc2
                                         optfair-v1r20             fastmark-v1r20
  Min      alloc-odr0-1               380.00 (  0.00%)           364.00 (  4.21%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2               273.00 (  0.00%)           262.00 (  4.03%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4               227.00 (  0.00%)           214.00 (  5.73%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8               196.00 (  0.00%)           186.00 (  5.10%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16              183.00 (  0.00%)           173.00 (  5.46%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-32              173.00 (  0.00%)           165.00 (  4.62%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-64              169.00 (  0.00%)           161.00 (  4.73%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-128             169.00 (  0.00%)           159.00 (  5.92%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-256             180.00 (  0.00%)           168.00 (  6.67%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-512             190.00 (  0.00%)           180.00 (  5.26%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-1024            198.00 (  0.00%)           190.00 (  4.04%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2048            204.00 (  0.00%)           196.00 (  3.92%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4096            209.00 (  0.00%)           202.00 (  3.35%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8192            213.00 (  0.00%)           206.00 (  3.29%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16384           214.00 (  0.00%)           206.00 (  3.74%)

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-19 19:12:14 -07:00
Mel Gorman
305347550b mm, page_alloc: reduce cost of fair zone allocation policy retry 
The fair zone allocation policy is not without cost but it can be
reduced slightly.  This patch removes an unnecessary local variable,
checks the likely conditions of the fair zone policy first, uses a bool
instead of a flags check and falls through when a remote node is
encountered instead of doing a full restart.  The benefit is marginal
but it's there

                                             4.6.0-rc2                  4.6.0-rc2
                                         decstat-v1r20              optfair-v1r20
  Min      alloc-odr0-1               377.00 (  0.00%)           380.00 ( -0.80%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2               273.00 (  0.00%)           273.00 (  0.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4               226.00 (  0.00%)           227.00 ( -0.44%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8               196.00 (  0.00%)           196.00 (  0.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16              183.00 (  0.00%)           183.00 (  0.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-32              175.00 (  0.00%)           173.00 (  1.14%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-64              172.00 (  0.00%)           169.00 (  1.74%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-128             170.00 (  0.00%)           169.00 (  0.59%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-256             183.00 (  0.00%)           180.00 (  1.64%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-512             191.00 (  0.00%)           190.00 (  0.52%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-1024            199.00 (  0.00%)           198.00 (  0.50%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2048            204.00 (  0.00%)           204.00 (  0.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4096            210.00 (  0.00%)           209.00 (  0.48%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8192            213.00 (  0.00%)           213.00 (  0.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16384           214.00 (  0.00%)           214.00 (  0.00%)

The benefit is marginal at best but one of the most important benefits,
avoiding a second search when falling back to another node is not
triggered by this particular test so the benefit for some corner cases
is understated.

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-19 19:12:14 -07:00
Mel Gorman
4fcb097117 mm, page_alloc: shorten the page allocator fast path 
The page allocator fast path checks page multiple times unnecessarily.
This patch avoids all the slowpath checks if the first allocation
attempt succeeds.

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-19 19:12:14 -07:00
Mel Gorman
3777999dd4 mm, page_alloc: check once if a zone has isolated pageblocks 
When bulk freeing pages from the per-cpu lists the zone is checked for
isolated pageblocks on every release.  This patch checks it once per
drain.

[mgorman@techsingularity.net: fix locking radce, per Vlastimil]
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-19 19:12:14 -07:00
Mel Gorman
83d4ca8148 mm, page_alloc: move __GFP_HARDWALL modifications out of the fastpath 
__GFP_HARDWALL only has meaning in the context of cpusets but the fast
path always applies the flag on the first attempt.  Move the
manipulations into the cpuset paths where they will be masked by a
static branch in the common case.

With the other micro-optimisations in this series combined, the impact
on a page allocator microbenchmark is

                                             4.6.0-rc2                  4.6.0-rc2
                                         decstat-v1r20                micro-v1r20
  Min      alloc-odr0-1               381.00 (  0.00%)           377.00 (  1.05%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2               275.00 (  0.00%)           273.00 (  0.73%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4               229.00 (  0.00%)           226.00 (  1.31%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8               199.00 (  0.00%)           196.00 (  1.51%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16              186.00 (  0.00%)           183.00 (  1.61%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-32              179.00 (  0.00%)           175.00 (  2.23%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-64              174.00 (  0.00%)           172.00 (  1.15%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-128             172.00 (  0.00%)           170.00 (  1.16%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-256             181.00 (  0.00%)           183.00 ( -1.10%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-512             193.00 (  0.00%)           191.00 (  1.04%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-1024            201.00 (  0.00%)           199.00 (  1.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2048            206.00 (  0.00%)           204.00 (  0.97%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4096            212.00 (  0.00%)           210.00 (  0.94%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8192            215.00 (  0.00%)           213.00 (  0.93%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16384           216.00 (  0.00%)           214.00 (  0.93%)

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-19 19:12:14 -07:00
Mel Gorman
5bb1b16975 mm, page_alloc: remove unnecessary initialisation from __alloc_pages_nodemask() 
page is guaranteed to be set before it is read with or without the
initialisation.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix warning]
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-19 19:12:14 -07:00
Mel Gorman
be06af002f mm, page_alloc: remove unnecessary initialisation in get_page_from_freelist 
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-19 19:12:14 -07:00
Mel Gorman
4dfa6cd8fd mm, page_alloc: remove unnecessary local variable in get_page_from_freelist 
zonelist here is a copy of a struct field that is used once.  Ditch it.

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-19 19:12:14 -07:00
Mel Gorman
fa379b9586 mm, page_alloc: convert nr_fair_skipped to bool 
The number of zones skipped to a zone expiring its fair zone allocation
quota is irrelevant.  Convert to bool.

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-19 19:12:14 -07:00
Mel Gorman
c603844bdc mm, page_alloc: convert alloc_flags to unsigned 
alloc_flags is a bitmask of flags but it is signed which does not
necessarily generate the best code depending on the compiler.  Even
without an impact, it makes more sense that this be unsigned.

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-19 19:12:14 -07:00
Mel Gorman
f75fb889d1 mm, page_alloc: avoid unnecessary zone lookups during pageblock operations 
Pageblocks have an associated bitmap to store migrate types and whether
the pageblock should be skipped during compaction.  The bitmap may be
associated with a memory section or a zone but the zone is looked up
unconditionally.  The compiler should optimise this away automatically
so this is a cosmetic patch only in many cases.

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-19 19:12:14 -07:00
Mel Gorman
754078eb45 mm, page_alloc: use __dec_zone_state for order-0 page allocation 
__dec_zone_state is cheaper to use for removing an order-0 page as it
has fewer conditions to check.

The performance difference on a page allocator microbenchmark is;

                                             4.6.0-rc2                  4.6.0-rc2
                                         optiter-v1r20              decstat-v1r20
  Min      alloc-odr0-1               382.00 (  0.00%)           381.00 (  0.26%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2               282.00 (  0.00%)           275.00 (  2.48%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4               233.00 (  0.00%)           229.00 (  1.72%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8               203.00 (  0.00%)           199.00 (  1.97%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16              188.00 (  0.00%)           186.00 (  1.06%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-32              182.00 (  0.00%)           179.00 (  1.65%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-64              177.00 (  0.00%)           174.00 (  1.69%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-128             175.00 (  0.00%)           172.00 (  1.71%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-256             184.00 (  0.00%)           181.00 (  1.63%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-512             197.00 (  0.00%)           193.00 (  2.03%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-1024            203.00 (  0.00%)           201.00 (  0.99%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2048            209.00 (  0.00%)           206.00 (  1.44%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4096            214.00 (  0.00%)           212.00 (  0.93%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8192            218.00 (  0.00%)           215.00 (  1.38%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16384           219.00 (  0.00%)           216.00 (  1.37%)

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-19 19:12:14 -07:00
Mel Gorman
682a3385e7 mm, page_alloc: inline the fast path of the zonelist iterator 
The page allocator iterates through a zonelist for zones that match the
addressing limitations and nodemask of the caller but many allocations
will not be restricted.  Despite this, there is always functional call
overhead which builds up.

This patch inlines the optimistic basic case and only calls the iterator
function for the complex case.  A hindrance was the fact that
cpuset_current_mems_allowed is used in the fastpath as the allowed
nodemask even though all nodes are allowed on most systems.  The patch
handles this by only considering cpuset_current_mems_allowed if a cpuset
exists.  As well as being faster in the fast-path, this removes some
junk in the slowpath.

The performance difference on a page allocator microbenchmark is;

                                             4.6.0-rc2                  4.6.0-rc2
                                      statinline-v1r20              optiter-v1r20
  Min      alloc-odr0-1               412.00 (  0.00%)           382.00 (  7.28%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2               301.00 (  0.00%)           282.00 (  6.31%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4               247.00 (  0.00%)           233.00 (  5.67%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8               215.00 (  0.00%)           203.00 (  5.58%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16              199.00 (  0.00%)           188.00 (  5.53%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-32              191.00 (  0.00%)           182.00 (  4.71%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-64              187.00 (  0.00%)           177.00 (  5.35%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-128             185.00 (  0.00%)           175.00 (  5.41%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-256             193.00 (  0.00%)           184.00 (  4.66%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-512             207.00 (  0.00%)           197.00 (  4.83%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-1024            213.00 (  0.00%)           203.00 (  4.69%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2048            220.00 (  0.00%)           209.00 (  5.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4096            226.00 (  0.00%)           214.00 (  5.31%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8192            229.00 (  0.00%)           218.00 (  4.80%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16384           229.00 (  0.00%)           219.00 (  4.37%)

perf indicated that next_zones_zonelist disappeared in the profile and
__next_zones_zonelist did not appear.  This is expected as the
micro-benchmark would hit the inlined fast-path every time.

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-19 19:12:14 -07:00
Mel Gorman
060e74173f mm, page_alloc: inline zone_statistics 
zone_statistics has one call-site but it's a public function.  Make it
static and inline.

The performance difference on a page allocator microbenchmark is;

                                             4.6.0-rc2                  4.6.0-rc2
                                      statbranch-v1r20           statinline-v1r20
  Min      alloc-odr0-1               419.00 (  0.00%)           412.00 (  1.67%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2               305.00 (  0.00%)           301.00 (  1.31%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4               250.00 (  0.00%)           247.00 (  1.20%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8               219.00 (  0.00%)           215.00 (  1.83%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16              203.00 (  0.00%)           199.00 (  1.97%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-32              195.00 (  0.00%)           191.00 (  2.05%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-64              191.00 (  0.00%)           187.00 (  2.09%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-128             189.00 (  0.00%)           185.00 (  2.12%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-256             198.00 (  0.00%)           193.00 (  2.53%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-512             210.00 (  0.00%)           207.00 (  1.43%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-1024            216.00 (  0.00%)           213.00 (  1.39%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2048            221.00 (  0.00%)           220.00 (  0.45%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4096            227.00 (  0.00%)           226.00 (  0.44%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8192            232.00 (  0.00%)           229.00 (  1.29%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16384           232.00 (  0.00%)           229.00 (  1.29%)

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-19 19:12:14 -07:00
Mel Gorman
b9f00e147f mm, page_alloc: reduce branches in zone_statistics 
zone_statistics has more branches than it really needs to take an
unlikely GFP flag into account.  Reduce the number and annotate the
unlikely flag.

The performance difference on a page allocator microbenchmark is;

                                             4.6.0-rc2                  4.6.0-rc2
                                      nocompound-v1r10           statbranch-v1r10
  Min      alloc-odr0-1               417.00 (  0.00%)           419.00 ( -0.48%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2               308.00 (  0.00%)           305.00 (  0.97%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4               253.00 (  0.00%)           250.00 (  1.19%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8               221.00 (  0.00%)           219.00 (  0.90%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16              205.00 (  0.00%)           203.00 (  0.98%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-32              199.00 (  0.00%)           195.00 (  2.01%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-64              193.00 (  0.00%)           191.00 (  1.04%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-128             191.00 (  0.00%)           189.00 (  1.05%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-256             200.00 (  0.00%)           198.00 (  1.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-512             212.00 (  0.00%)           210.00 (  0.94%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-1024            219.00 (  0.00%)           216.00 (  1.37%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2048            225.00 (  0.00%)           221.00 (  1.78%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4096            231.00 (  0.00%)           227.00 (  1.73%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8192            234.00 (  0.00%)           232.00 (  0.85%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16384           234.00 (  0.00%)           232.00 (  0.85%)

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-19 19:12:14 -07:00
Mel Gorman
175145748d mm, page_alloc: use new PageAnonHead helper in the free page fast path 
The PageAnon check always checks for compound_head but this is a
relatively expensive check if the caller already knows the page is a
head page.  This patch creates a helper and uses it in the page free
path which only operates on head pages.

With this patch and "Only check PageCompound for high-order pages", the
performance difference on a page allocator microbenchmark is;

                                             4.6.0-rc2                  4.6.0-rc2
                                               vanilla           nocompound-v1r20
  Min      alloc-odr0-1               425.00 (  0.00%)           417.00 (  1.88%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2               313.00 (  0.00%)           308.00 (  1.60%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4               257.00 (  0.00%)           253.00 (  1.56%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8               224.00 (  0.00%)           221.00 (  1.34%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16              208.00 (  0.00%)           205.00 (  1.44%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-32              199.00 (  0.00%)           199.00 (  0.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-64              195.00 (  0.00%)           193.00 (  1.03%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-128             192.00 (  0.00%)           191.00 (  0.52%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-256             204.00 (  0.00%)           200.00 (  1.96%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-512             213.00 (  0.00%)           212.00 (  0.47%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-1024            219.00 (  0.00%)           219.00 (  0.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2048            225.00 (  0.00%)           225.00 (  0.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4096            230.00 (  0.00%)           231.00 ( -0.43%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8192            235.00 (  0.00%)           234.00 (  0.43%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16384           235.00 (  0.00%)           234.00 (  0.43%)
  Min      free-odr0-1                215.00 (  0.00%)           191.00 ( 11.16%)
  Min      free-odr0-2                152.00 (  0.00%)           136.00 ( 10.53%)
  Min      free-odr0-4                119.00 (  0.00%)           107.00 ( 10.08%)
  Min      free-odr0-8                106.00 (  0.00%)            96.00 (  9.43%)
  Min      free-odr0-16                97.00 (  0.00%)            87.00 ( 10.31%)
  Min      free-odr0-32                91.00 (  0.00%)            83.00 (  8.79%)
  Min      free-odr0-64                89.00 (  0.00%)            81.00 (  8.99%)
  Min      free-odr0-128               88.00 (  0.00%)            80.00 (  9.09%)
  Min      free-odr0-256              106.00 (  0.00%)            95.00 ( 10.38%)
  Min      free-odr0-512              116.00 (  0.00%)           111.00 (  4.31%)
  Min      free-odr0-1024             125.00 (  0.00%)           118.00 (  5.60%)
  Min      free-odr0-2048             133.00 (  0.00%)           126.00 (  5.26%)
  Min      free-odr0-4096             136.00 (  0.00%)           130.00 (  4.41%)
  Min      free-odr0-8192             138.00 (  0.00%)           130.00 (  5.80%)
  Min      free-odr0-16384            137.00 (  0.00%)           130.00 (  5.11%)

There is a sizable boost to the free allocator performance.  While there
is an apparent boost on the allocation side, it's likely a co-incidence
or due to the patches slightly reducing cache footprint.

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-19 19:12:14 -07:00
Mel Gorman
d61f859039 mm, page_alloc: only check PageCompound for high-order pages 
Another year, another round of page allocator optimisations focusing
this time on the alloc and free fast paths.  This should be of help to
workloads that are allocator-intensive from kernel space where the cost
of zeroing is not nceessraily incurred.

The series is motivated by the observation that page alloc
microbenchmarks on multiple machines regressed between 3.12.44 and 4.4.
Second, there is discussions before LSF/MM considering the possibility
of adding another page allocator which is potentially hazardous but a
patch series improving performance is better than whining.

After the series is applied, there are still hazards.  In the free
paths, the debugging checking and page zone/pageblock lookups dominate
but there was not an obvious solution to that.  In the alloc path, the
major contributers are dealing with zonelists, new page preperation, the
fair zone allocation and numerous statistic updates.  The fair zone
allocator is removed by the per-node LRU series if that gets merged so
it's nor a major concern at the moment.

On normal userspace benchmarks, there is little impact as the zeroing
cost is significant but it's visible

  aim9
                                 4.6.0-rc3             4.6.0-rc3
                                   vanilla         deferalloc-v3
  Min      page_test   828693.33 (  0.00%)   887060.00 (  7.04%)
  Min      brk_test   4847266.67 (  0.00%)  4966266.67 (  2.45%)
  Min      exec_test     1271.00 (  0.00%)     1275.67 (  0.37%)
  Min      fork_test    12371.75 (  0.00%)    12380.00 (  0.07%)

The overall impact on a page allocator microbenchmark for a range of orders
and number of pages allocated in a batch is

                                            4.6.0-rc3                  4.6.0-rc3
                                               vanilla            deferalloc-v3r7
  Min      alloc-odr0-1               428.00 (  0.00%)           316.00 ( 26.17%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2               314.00 (  0.00%)           231.00 ( 26.43%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4               256.00 (  0.00%)           192.00 ( 25.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8               222.00 (  0.00%)           166.00 ( 25.23%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16              207.00 (  0.00%)           154.00 ( 25.60%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-32              197.00 (  0.00%)           148.00 ( 24.87%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-64              193.00 (  0.00%)           144.00 ( 25.39%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-128             191.00 (  0.00%)           143.00 ( 25.13%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-256             203.00 (  0.00%)           153.00 ( 24.63%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-512             212.00 (  0.00%)           165.00 ( 22.17%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-1024            221.00 (  0.00%)           172.00 ( 22.17%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-2048            225.00 (  0.00%)           179.00 ( 20.44%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-4096            232.00 (  0.00%)           185.00 ( 20.26%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-8192            235.00 (  0.00%)           187.00 ( 20.43%)
  Min      alloc-odr0-16384           236.00 (  0.00%)           188.00 ( 20.34%)
  Min      alloc-odr1-1               519.00 (  0.00%)           450.00 ( 13.29%)
  Min      alloc-odr1-2               391.00 (  0.00%)           336.00 ( 14.07%)
  Min      alloc-odr1-4               313.00 (  0.00%)           268.00 ( 14.38%)
  Min      alloc-odr1-8               277.00 (  0.00%)           235.00 ( 15.16%)
  Min      alloc-odr1-16              256.00 (  0.00%)           218.00 ( 14.84%)
  Min      alloc-odr1-32              252.00 (  0.00%)           212.00 ( 15.87%)
  Min      alloc-odr1-64              244.00 (  0.00%)           206.00 ( 15.57%)
  Min      alloc-odr1-128             244.00 (  0.00%)           207.00 ( 15.16%)
  Min      alloc-odr1-256             243.00 (  0.00%)           207.00 ( 14.81%)
  Min      alloc-odr1-512             245.00 (  0.00%)           209.00 ( 14.69%)
  Min      alloc-odr1-1024            248.00 (  0.00%)           214.00 ( 13.71%)
  Min      alloc-odr1-2048            253.00 (  0.00%)           220.00 ( 13.04%)
  Min      alloc-odr1-4096            258.00 (  0.00%)           224.00 ( 13.18%)
  Min      alloc-odr1-8192            261.00 (  0.00%)           229.00 ( 12.26%)
  Min      alloc-odr2-1               560.00 (  0.00%)           753.00 (-34.46%)
  Min      alloc-odr2-2               424.00 (  0.00%)           351.00 ( 17.22%)
  Min      alloc-odr2-4               339.00 (  0.00%)           393.00 (-15.93%)
  Min      alloc-odr2-8               298.00 (  0.00%)           246.00 ( 17.45%)
  Min      alloc-odr2-16              276.00 (  0.00%)           227.00 ( 17.75%)
  Min      alloc-odr2-32              271.00 (  0.00%)           221.00 ( 18.45%)
  Min      alloc-odr2-64              264.00 (  0.00%)           217.00 ( 17.80%)
  Min      alloc-odr2-128             264.00 (  0.00%)           217.00 ( 17.80%)
  Min      alloc-odr2-256             264.00 (  0.00%)           218.00 ( 17.42%)
  Min      alloc-odr2-512             269.00 (  0.00%)           223.00 ( 17.10%)
  Min      alloc-odr2-1024            279.00 (  0.00%)           230.00 ( 17.56%)
  Min      alloc-odr2-2048            283.00 (  0.00%)           235.00 ( 16.96%)
  Min      alloc-odr2-4096            285.00 (  0.00%)           239.00 ( 16.14%)
  Min      alloc-odr3-1               629.00 (  0.00%)           505.00 ( 19.71%)
  Min      alloc-odr3-2               472.00 (  0.00%)           374.00 ( 20.76%)
  Min      alloc-odr3-4               383.00 (  0.00%)           301.00 ( 21.41%)
  Min      alloc-odr3-8               341.00 (  0.00%)           266.00 ( 21.99%)
  Min      alloc-odr3-16              316.00 (  0.00%)           248.00 ( 21.52%)
  Min      alloc-odr3-32              308.00 (  0.00%)           241.00 ( 21.75%)
  Min      alloc-odr3-64              305.00 (  0.00%)           241.00 ( 20.98%)
  Min      alloc-odr3-128             308.00 (  0.00%)           244.00 ( 20.78%)
  Min      alloc-odr3-256             317.00 (  0.00%)           249.00 ( 21.45%)
  Min      alloc-odr3-512             327.00 (  0.00%)           256.00 ( 21.71%)
  Min      alloc-odr3-1024            331.00 (  0.00%)           261.00 ( 21.15%)
  Min      alloc-odr3-2048            333.00 (  0.00%)           266.00 ( 20.12%)
  Min      alloc-odr4-1               767.00 (  0.00%)           572.00 ( 25.42%)
  Min      alloc-odr4-2               578.00 (  0.00%)           429.00 ( 25.78%)
  Min      alloc-odr4-4               474.00 (  0.00%)           346.00 ( 27.00%)
  Min      alloc-odr4-8               422.00 (  0.00%)           310.00 ( 26.54%)
  Min      alloc-odr4-16              399.00 (  0.00%)           295.00 ( 26.07%)
  Min      alloc-odr4-32              392.00 (  0.00%)           293.00 ( 25.26%)
  Min      alloc-odr4-64              394.00 (  0.00%)           293.00 ( 25.63%)
  Min      alloc-odr4-128             405.00 (  0.00%)           305.00 ( 24.69%)
  Min      alloc-odr4-256             417.00 (  0.00%)           319.00 ( 23.50%)
  Min      alloc-odr4-512             425.00 (  0.00%)           326.00 ( 23.29%)
  Min      alloc-odr4-1024            426.00 (  0.00%)           329.00 ( 22.77%)
  Min      free-odr0-1                216.00 (  0.00%)           178.00 ( 17.59%)
  Min      free-odr0-2                152.00 (  0.00%)           125.00 ( 17.76%)
  Min      free-odr0-4                120.00 (  0.00%)            99.00 ( 17.50%)
  Min      free-odr0-8                106.00 (  0.00%)            85.00 ( 19.81%)
  Min      free-odr0-16                97.00 (  0.00%)            80.00 ( 17.53%)
  Min      free-odr0-32                92.00 (  0.00%)            76.00 ( 17.39%)
  Min      free-odr0-64                89.00 (  0.00%)            74.00 ( 16.85%)
  Min      free-odr0-128               89.00 (  0.00%)            73.00 ( 17.98%)
  Min      free-odr0-256              107.00 (  0.00%)            90.00 ( 15.89%)
  Min      free-odr0-512              117.00 (  0.00%)           108.00 (  7.69%)
  Min      free-odr0-1024             125.00 (  0.00%)           118.00 (  5.60%)
  Min      free-odr0-2048             132.00 (  0.00%)           125.00 (  5.30%)
  Min      free-odr0-4096             135.00 (  0.00%)           130.00 (  3.70%)
  Min      free-odr0-8192             137.00 (  0.00%)           130.00 (  5.11%)
  Min      free-odr0-16384            137.00 (  0.00%)           131.00 (  4.38%)
  Min      free-odr1-1                318.00 (  0.00%)           289.00 (  9.12%)
  Min      free-odr1-2                228.00 (  0.00%)           207.00 (  9.21%)
  Min      free-odr1-4                182.00 (  0.00%)           165.00 (  9.34%)
  Min      free-odr1-8                163.00 (  0.00%)           146.00 ( 10.43%)
  Min      free-odr1-16               151.00 (  0.00%)           135.00 ( 10.60%)
  Min      free-odr1-32               146.00 (  0.00%)           129.00 ( 11.64%)
  Min      free-odr1-64               145.00 (  0.00%)           130.00 ( 10.34%)
  Min      free-odr1-128              148.00 (  0.00%)           134.00 (  9.46%)
  Min      free-odr1-256              148.00 (  0.00%)           137.00 (  7.43%)
  Min      free-odr1-512              151.00 (  0.00%)           140.00 (  7.28%)
  Min      free-odr1-1024             154.00 (  0.00%)           143.00 (  7.14%)
  Min      free-odr1-2048             156.00 (  0.00%)           144.00 (  7.69%)
  Min      free-odr1-4096             156.00 (  0.00%)           142.00 (  8.97%)
  Min      free-odr1-8192             156.00 (  0.00%)           140.00 ( 10.26%)
  Min      free-odr2-1                361.00 (  0.00%)           457.00 (-26.59%)
  Min      free-odr2-2                258.00 (  0.00%)           224.00 ( 13.18%)
  Min      free-odr2-4                208.00 (  0.00%)           223.00 ( -7.21%)
  Min      free-odr2-8                185.00 (  0.00%)           160.00 ( 13.51%)
  Min      free-odr2-16               173.00 (  0.00%)           149.00 ( 13.87%)
  Min      free-odr2-32               166.00 (  0.00%)           145.00 ( 12.65%)
  Min      free-odr2-64               166.00 (  0.00%)           146.00 ( 12.05%)
  Min      free-odr2-128              169.00 (  0.00%)           148.00 ( 12.43%)
  Min      free-odr2-256              170.00 (  0.00%)           152.00 ( 10.59%)
  Min      free-odr2-512              177.00 (  0.00%)           156.00 ( 11.86%)
  Min      free-odr2-1024             182.00 (  0.00%)           162.00 ( 10.99%)
  Min      free-odr2-2048             181.00 (  0.00%)           160.00 ( 11.60%)
  Min      free-odr2-4096             180.00 (  0.00%)           159.00 ( 11.67%)
  Min      free-odr3-1                431.00 (  0.00%)           367.00 ( 14.85%)
  Min      free-odr3-2                306.00 (  0.00%)           259.00 ( 15.36%)
  Min      free-odr3-4                249.00 (  0.00%)           208.00 ( 16.47%)
  Min      free-odr3-8                224.00 (  0.00%)           186.00 ( 16.96%)
  Min      free-odr3-16               208.00 (  0.00%)           176.00 ( 15.38%)
  Min      free-odr3-32               206.00 (  0.00%)           174.00 ( 15.53%)
  Min      free-odr3-64               210.00 (  0.00%)           178.00 ( 15.24%)
  Min      free-odr3-128              215.00 (  0.00%)           182.00 ( 15.35%)
  Min      free-odr3-256              224.00 (  0.00%)           189.00 ( 15.62%)
  Min      free-odr3-512              232.00 (  0.00%)           195.00 ( 15.95%)
  Min      free-odr3-1024             230.00 (  0.00%)           195.00 ( 15.22%)
  Min      free-odr3-2048             229.00 (  0.00%)           193.00 ( 15.72%)
  Min      free-odr4-1                561.00 (  0.00%)           439.00 ( 21.75%)
  Min      free-odr4-2                418.00 (  0.00%)           318.00 ( 23.92%)
  Min      free-odr4-4                339.00 (  0.00%)           269.00 ( 20.65%)
  Min      free-odr4-8                299.00 (  0.00%)           239.00 ( 20.07%)
  Min      free-odr4-16               289.00 (  0.00%)           234.00 ( 19.03%)
  Min      free-odr4-32               291.00 (  0.00%)           235.00 ( 19.24%)
  Min      free-odr4-64               298.00 (  0.00%)           238.00 ( 20.13%)
  Min      free-odr4-128              308.00 (  0.00%)           251.00 ( 18.51%)
  Min      free-odr4-256              321.00 (  0.00%)           267.00 ( 16.82%)
  Min      free-odr4-512              327.00 (  0.00%)           269.00 ( 17.74%)
  Min      free-odr4-1024             326.00 (  0.00%)           271.00 ( 16.87%)
  Min      total-odr0-1               644.00 (  0.00%)           494.00 ( 23.29%)
  Min      total-odr0-2               466.00 (  0.00%)           356.00 ( 23.61%)
  Min      total-odr0-4               376.00 (  0.00%)           291.00 ( 22.61%)
  Min      total-odr0-8               328.00 (  0.00%)           251.00 ( 23.48%)
  Min      total-odr0-16              304.00 (  0.00%)           234.00 ( 23.03%)
  Min      total-odr0-32              289.00 (  0.00%)           224.00 ( 22.49%)
  Min      total-odr0-64              282.00 (  0.00%)           218.00 ( 22.70%)
  Min      total-odr0-128             280.00 (  0.00%)           216.00 ( 22.86%)
  Min      total-odr0-256             310.00 (  0.00%)           243.00 ( 21.61%)
  Min      total-odr0-512             329.00 (  0.00%)           273.00 ( 17.02%)
  Min      total-odr0-1024            346.00 (  0.00%)           290.00 ( 16.18%)
  Min      total-odr0-2048            357.00 (  0.00%)           304.00 ( 14.85%)
  Min      total-odr0-4096            367.00 (  0.00%)           315.00 ( 14.17%)
  Min      total-odr0-8192            372.00 (  0.00%)           317.00 ( 14.78%)
  Min      total-odr0-16384           373.00 (  0.00%)           319.00 ( 14.48%)
  Min      total-odr1-1               838.00 (  0.00%)           739.00 ( 11.81%)
  Min      total-odr1-2               619.00 (  0.00%)           543.00 ( 12.28%)
  Min      total-odr1-4               495.00 (  0.00%)           433.00 ( 12.53%)
  Min      total-odr1-8               440.00 (  0.00%)           382.00 ( 13.18%)
  Min      total-odr1-16              407.00 (  0.00%)           353.00 ( 13.27%)
  Min      total-odr1-32              398.00 (  0.00%)           341.00 ( 14.32%)
  Min      total-odr1-64              389.00 (  0.00%)           336.00 ( 13.62%)
  Min      total-odr1-128             392.00 (  0.00%)           341.00 ( 13.01%)
  Min      total-odr1-256             391.00 (  0.00%)           344.00 ( 12.02%)
  Min      total-odr1-512             396.00 (  0.00%)           349.00 ( 11.87%)
  Min      total-odr1-1024            402.00 (  0.00%)           357.00 ( 11.19%)
  Min      total-odr1-2048            409.00 (  0.00%)           364.00 ( 11.00%)
  Min      total-odr1-4096            414.00 (  0.00%)           366.00 ( 11.59%)
  Min      total-odr1-8192            417.00 (  0.00%)           369.00 ( 11.51%)
  Min      total-odr2-1               921.00 (  0.00%)          1210.00 (-31.38%)
  Min      total-odr2-2               682.00 (  0.00%)           576.00 ( 15.54%)
  Min      total-odr2-4               547.00 (  0.00%)           616.00 (-12.61%)
  Min      total-odr2-8               483.00 (  0.00%)           406.00 ( 15.94%)
  Min      total-odr2-16              449.00 (  0.00%)           376.00 ( 16.26%)
  Min      total-odr2-32              437.00 (  0.00%)           366.00 ( 16.25%)
  Min      total-odr2-64              431.00 (  0.00%)           363.00 ( 15.78%)
  Min      total-odr2-128             433.00 (  0.00%)           365.00 ( 15.70%)
  Min      total-odr2-256             434.00 (  0.00%)           371.00 ( 14.52%)
  Min      total-odr2-512             446.00 (  0.00%)           379.00 ( 15.02%)
  Min      total-odr2-1024            461.00 (  0.00%)           392.00 ( 14.97%)
  Min      total-odr2-2048            464.00 (  0.00%)           395.00 ( 14.87%)
  Min      total-odr2-4096            465.00 (  0.00%)           398.00 ( 14.41%)
  Min      total-odr3-1              1060.00 (  0.00%)           872.00 ( 17.74%)
  Min      total-odr3-2               778.00 (  0.00%)           633.00 ( 18.64%)
  Min      total-odr3-4               632.00 (  0.00%)           510.00 ( 19.30%)
  Min      total-odr3-8               565.00 (  0.00%)           452.00 ( 20.00%)
  Min      total-odr3-16              524.00 (  0.00%)           424.00 ( 19.08%)
  Min      total-odr3-32              514.00 (  0.00%)           415.00 ( 19.26%)
  Min      total-odr3-64              515.00 (  0.00%)           419.00 ( 18.64%)
  Min      total-odr3-128             523.00 (  0.00%)           426.00 ( 18.55%)
  Min      total-odr3-256             541.00 (  0.00%)           438.00 ( 19.04%)
  Min      total-odr3-512             559.00 (  0.00%)           451.00 ( 19.32%)
  Min      total-odr3-1024            561.00 (  0.00%)           456.00 ( 18.72%)
  Min      total-odr3-2048            562.00 (  0.00%)           459.00 ( 18.33%)
  Min      total-odr4-1              1328.00 (  0.00%)          1011.00 ( 23.87%)
  Min      total-odr4-2               997.00 (  0.00%)           747.00 ( 25.08%)
  Min      total-odr4-4               813.00 (  0.00%)           615.00 ( 24.35%)
  Min      total-odr4-8               721.00 (  0.00%)           550.00 ( 23.72%)
  Min      total-odr4-16              689.00 (  0.00%)           529.00 ( 23.22%)
  Min      total-odr4-32              683.00 (  0.00%)           528.00 ( 22.69%)
  Min      total-odr4-64              692.00 (  0.00%)           531.00 ( 23.27%)
  Min      total-odr4-128             713.00 (  0.00%)           556.00 ( 22.02%)
  Min      total-odr4-256             738.00 (  0.00%)           586.00 ( 20.60%)
  Min      total-odr4-512             753.00 (  0.00%)           595.00 ( 20.98%)
  Min      total-odr4-1024            752.00 (  0.00%)           600.00 ( 20.21%)

This patch (of 27):

order-0 pages by definition cannot be compound so avoid the check in the
fast path for those pages.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: use unlikely(order) in free_pages_prepare(), per Vlastimil]
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
 2016-05-19 19:12:14 -07:00