Add the conventional include guards around the content of the
hda_component.h header file. This prevents double-declaration of
struct hda_component if the header gets included multiple times.
This isn't causing any problems with current code, so no need to
backport to older kernels.
Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
Message-ID: <20240307111216.45053-1-rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
There was one overlooked place to be replaced with
snd_ctl_find_id_mixer() for code simplification.
No functional change, only code refactoring.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240304082158.8583-1-tiwai@suse.de
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
HDMI codecs which are present and functional from audio perspective lack
i915 support on drm side what results in -ENODEV during the probing
sequence. There is no reason to perform recovery procedure e.g.: reset
the HDAudio controller if this is the case.
Signed-off-by: Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@intel.com>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240226124432.1203798-4-cezary.rojewski@intel.com
If i915 does not support given platform but the hardware i.e.: HDAudio
codec is still there, the codec-probing procedure will succeed for such
device but the follow up initialization will always end up with -ENODEV.
While bus could filter out address '2' which Intel's HDMI/DP codecs
always enumerate on, more robust approach is to check for i915 presence
before registering display codecs.
Signed-off-by: Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@intel.com>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240226124432.1203798-3-cezary.rojewski@intel.com
Commit 78f613ba1e ("drm/i915: finish removal of CNL") and its friends
removed support for i915 for all CNL-based platforms. HDAudio library,
however, still treats such platforms as valid candidates for i915
binding. Update query mechanism to reflect changes made in drm tree.
At the same time, i915 support for LKF-based platforms has not been
provided so remove them from valid binding candidates.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210728215946.1573015-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com/
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240226124432.1203798-2-cezary.rojewski@intel.com
When building feature controls from a unit without a name, we try to
derive a name first from the feature unit's input, then fall back to the
output terminal.
If a feature unit connects directly to a "USB Streaming" input terminal
rather than a mixer or other virtual type, the control receives the
somewhat meaningless name "PCM", even if the output had a descriptive
type such as "Headset" or "Speaker".
Here is an example of such AudioControl descriptor from a USB headset
which ends up named "PCM Playback" and is therefore not recognized as
headphones by userspace:
AudioControl Interface Descriptor:
bLength 12
bDescriptorType 36
bDescriptorSubtype 2 (INPUT_TERMINAL)
bTerminalID 4
wTerminalType 0x0101 USB Streaming
bAssocTerminal 5
bNrChannels 2
wChannelConfig 0x0003
Left Front (L)
Right Front (R)
iChannelNames 0
iTerminal 0
AudioControl Interface Descriptor:
bLength 9
bDescriptorType 36
bDescriptorSubtype 3 (OUTPUT_TERMINAL)
bTerminalID 5
wTerminalType 0x0402 Headset
bAssocTerminal 4
bSourceID 6
iTerminal 0
AudioControl Interface Descriptor:
bLength 13
bDescriptorType 36
bDescriptorSubtype 6 (FEATURE_UNIT)
bUnitID 6
bSourceID 4
bControlSize 2
bmaControls(0) 0x0002
Volume Control
bmaControls(1) 0x0000
bmaControls(2) 0x0000
iFeature 0
Other headsets and DACs I tried that used their output terminal for
naming only did so due to their input being an unnamed sidetone mixer.
Instead of always starting with the input terminal, check the type of it
first. If it seems uninteresting, invert the order and use the output
terminal first for naming.
This makes userspace recognize headsets with simple controls as
headphones, and leads to more consistent naming of playback devices
based on their outputs irrespective of sidetone mixers.
Signed-off-by: Kenny Levinsen <kl@kl.wtf>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240301231107.42679-1-kl@kl.wtf
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Clang prior to 17.0.0 has a bug in its asm goto jump scope analysis to
determine that no variables with the cleanup attribute are skipped by an
indirect jump. Instead of only checking the scope of each label that is
a possible target of each asm goto statement, it checks the scope of
every label, which can cause an error when a variable with the cleanup
attribute is used between two asm goto statements with different scopes,
even if they have completely different label targets:
sound/core/hwdep.c:273:8: error: cannot jump from this asm goto statement to one of its possible targets
if (get_user(device, (int __user *)arg))
^
arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h:295:5: note: expanded from macro 'get_user'
__get_user(x, _gu_addr) : \
^
arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h:283:2: note: expanded from macro '__get_user'
__get_user_size_allowed(__gu_val, __gu_addr, __gu_size, __gu_err); \
^
arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h:199:3: note: expanded from macro '__get_user_size_allowed'
__get_user_size_goto(x, ptr, size, __gus_failed); \
^
arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h:187:10: note: expanded from macro '__get_user_size_goto'
case 1: __get_user_asm_goto(x, (u8 __user *)ptr, label, "lbz"); break; \
^
arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h:158:2: note: expanded from macro '__get_user_asm_goto'
asm_volatile_goto( \
^
include/linux/compiler_types.h:366:33: note: expanded from macro 'asm_volatile_goto'
#define asm_volatile_goto(x...) asm goto(x)
^
sound/core/hwdep.c:291:9: note: possible target of asm goto statement
if (put_user(device, (int __user *)arg))
^
arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h:66:5: note: expanded from macro 'put_user'
__put_user(x, _pu_addr) : -EFAULT; \
^
arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h:52:9: note: expanded from macro '__put_user'
\
^
sound/core/hwdep.c:276:4: note: jump bypasses initialization of variable with __attribute__((cleanup))
scoped_guard(mutex, ®ister_mutex) {
^
include/linux/cleanup.h:169:20: note: expanded from macro 'scoped_guard'
for (CLASS(_name, scope)(args), \
To avoid this issue, move the put_user() call out of the scoped_guard()
scope, which allows the asm goto scope analysis to see that the variable
with the cleanup attribute will never be skipped by the asm goto
statements.
There should be no functional change because prior to the refactoring,
put_user() was not called under register_mutex, so this call does not
even need to be in the scoped_guard() in the first place.
Fixes: e6684d08cc ("ALSA: hwdep: Use guard() for locking")
Closes: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/2003
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240301-fix-snd-hwdep-guard-v1-1-6aab033f3f83@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
We can simplify the code gracefully with new guard() macro and co for
automatic cleanup of locks.
A couple of functions that use snd_card_ref() and *_unref() are also
cleaned up with a defined class, too.
Only the code refactoring, and no functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240227085306.9764-25-tiwai@suse.de
The setup_mutex in PCM oss code can be simplified with guard().
(params_lock is tough and not trivial to covert, though.)
Only the code refactoring, and no functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240227085306.9764-24-tiwai@suse.de
Define guard() usage for PCM stream locking and use it in appropriate
places.
The pair of snd_pcm_stream_lock() and snd_pcm_stream_unlock() can be
presented with guard(pcm_stream_lock) now.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240227085306.9764-23-tiwai@suse.de
We can simplify the code gracefully with new guard() macro and co for
automatic cleanup of locks.
Only the code refactoring, and no functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240227085306.9764-22-tiwai@suse.de
We can simplify the code gracefully with new guard() macro and co for
automatic cleanup of locks.
Only the code refactoring, and no functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240227085306.9764-21-tiwai@suse.de
We can simplify the code gracefully with new guard() macro and co for
automatic cleanup of locks.
Only the code refactoring, and no functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240227085306.9764-20-tiwai@suse.de
We can simplify the code gracefully with new guard() macro and co for
automatic cleanup of locks.
Only the code refactoring, and no functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240227085306.9764-19-tiwai@suse.de
We can simplify the code gracefully with new guard() macro and co for
automatic cleanup of locks.
Only the code refactoring, and no functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240227085306.9764-18-tiwai@suse.de
We can simplify the code gracefully with new guard() macro and co for
automatic cleanup of locks.
Only the code refactoring, and no functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240227085306.9764-17-tiwai@suse.de
We can simplify the code gracefully with new guard() macro and co for
automatic cleanup of locks.
Only the code refactoring, and no functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240227085306.9764-16-tiwai@suse.de
We can simplify the code gracefully with new guard() macro and co for
automatic cleanup of locks.
Only the code refactoring, and no functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240227085306.9764-15-tiwai@suse.de
We can simplify the code gracefully with new guard() macro and co for
automatic cleanup of locks.
Only the code refactoring, and no functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240227085306.9764-14-tiwai@suse.de
We can simplify the code gracefully with new guard() macro and co for
automatic cleanup of locks.
Only the code refactoring, and no functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240227085306.9764-13-tiwai@suse.de
We can simplify the code gracefully with new guard() macro and co for
automatic cleanup of locks.
Only the code refactoring, and no functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240227085306.9764-12-tiwai@suse.de
We can simplify the code gracefully with new guard() macro and co for
automatic cleanup of locks.
Only the code refactoring, and no functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240227085306.9764-11-tiwai@suse.de
We can simplify the code gracefully with new guard() macro and co for
automatic cleanup of locks.
There are a few remaining explicit mutex and spinlock calls, and those
are the places where the temporary unlock/relocking happens -- which
guard() doens't cover well yet.
Only the code refactoring, and no functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240227085306.9764-10-tiwai@suse.de
We can simplify the code gracefully with new guard() macro and co for
automatic cleanup of locks.
The lops calls under multiple rwsems are factored out as a simple
macro, so that it can be called easily from snd_ctl_dev_register()
and snd_ctl_dev_disconnect().
There are a few remaining explicit rwsem and spinlock calls, and those
are the places where the lock downgrade happens or where the temporary
unlock/relocking happens -- which guard() doens't cover well yet.
Only the code refactoring, and no functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240227085306.9764-9-tiwai@suse.de
We can simplify the code gracefully with new guard() macro and co for
automatic cleanup of locks.
Only the code refactoring, and no functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240227085306.9764-8-tiwai@suse.de
We can simplify the code gracefully with new guard() macro and co for
automatic cleanup of locks.
Only the code refactoring, and no functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240227085306.9764-7-tiwai@suse.de
We can simplify the code gracefully with new guard() macro and co for
automatic cleanup of locks.
There are still a few remaining explicit mutex_lock/unlock calls, and
those are for the places where we do temporary unlock/relock, which
doesn't fit well with the guard(), so far.
Only the code refactoring, and no functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240227085306.9764-6-tiwai@suse.de
We can simplify the code gracefully with new guard() macro and co for
automatic cleanup of locks.
Only the code refactoring, and no functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240227085306.9764-5-tiwai@suse.de
We can simplify the code gracefully with new guard() macro and co for
automatic cleanup of locks.
For making changes easier, some functions widen the application of
register_mutex, but those shouldn't influence on any actual
performance.
Also, one code block was factored out as a function so that guard()
can be applied cleanly without much indentation.
There are still a few remaining explicit spin_lock/unlock calls, and
those are for the places where we do temporary unlock/relock, which
doesn't fit well with the guard(), so far.
Only the code refactoring, and no functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240227085306.9764-4-tiwai@suse.de
We can simplify the code gracefully with new guard() macro and co for
automatic cleanup of locks.
The explicit mutex_lock/unlock are still seen only in
snd_compress_wait_for_drain() which does temporary unlock/relocking.
Only the code refactoring, and no functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240227085306.9764-3-tiwai@suse.de
We can simplify the code gracefully with new guard() macro and co for
automatic cleanup of locks.
Only the code refactoring, and no functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240227085306.9764-2-tiwai@suse.de
There are common patterns where a temporary buffer is allocated and
freed at the exit, and those can be simplified with the recent cleanup
mechanism via __free(kfree).
No functional changes, only code refactoring.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240223084241.3361-5-tiwai@suse.de
There are common patterns where a temporary buffer is allocated and
freed at the exit, and those can be simplified with the recent cleanup
mechanism via __free(kfree).
No functional changes, only code refactoring.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240223084241.3361-4-tiwai@suse.de
Now we have a nice definition of CLASS(fd) that can be applied as a
clean up for the fdget/fdput pairs in snd_pcm_link().
No functional changes, only code refactoring.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240223084241.3361-2-tiwai@suse.de
There are common patterns where a temporary buffer is allocated and
freed at the exit, and those can be simplified with the recent cleanup
mechanism via __free(kfree).
No functional changes, only code refactoring.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240222111509.28390-10-tiwai@suse.de
There are common patterns where a temporary buffer is allocated and
freed at the exit, and those can be simplified with the recent cleanup
mechanism via __free(kfree).
No functional changes, only code refactoring.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240222111509.28390-9-tiwai@suse.de
There are common patterns where a temporary buffer is allocated and
freed at the exit, and those can be simplified with the recent cleanup
mechanism via __free(kfree).
No functional changes, only code refactoring.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240222111509.28390-8-tiwai@suse.de
There are common patterns where a temporary buffer is allocated and
freed at the exit, and those can be simplified with the recent cleanup
mechanism via __free(kfree).
No functional changes, only code refactoring.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240222111509.28390-7-tiwai@suse.de
There are common patterns where a temporary buffer is allocated and
freed at the exit, and those can be simplified with the recent cleanup
mechanism via __free(kfree).
No functional changes, only code refactoring.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240222111509.28390-6-tiwai@suse.de
There are common patterns where a temporary buffer is allocated and
freed at the exit, and those can be simplified with the recent cleanup
mechanism via __free(kfree).
No functional changes, only code refactoring.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240222111509.28390-5-tiwai@suse.de
There are common patterns where a temporary buffer is allocated and
freed at the exit, and those can be simplified with the recent cleanup
mechanism via __free(kfree).
A caveat is that some allocations are memdup_user() and they return an
error pointer instead of NULL. Those need special cares and the value
has to be cleared with no_free_ptr() at the allocation error path.
Other than that, the conversions are straightforward.
No functional changes, only code refactoring.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240222111509.28390-4-tiwai@suse.de
There are common patterns where a temporary buffer is allocated and
freed at the exit, and those can be simplified with the recent cleanup
mechanism via __free(kfree).
A caveat is that some allocations are memdup_user() and they return an
error pointer instead of NULL. Those need special cares and the value
has to be cleared with no_free_ptr() at the allocation error path.
Other than that, the conversions are straightforward.
No functional changes, only code refactoring.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240222111509.28390-3-tiwai@suse.de
There are common patterns where a temporary buffer is allocated and
freed at the exit, and those can be simplified with the recent cleanup
mechanism via __free(kfree).
A caveat is that some allocations are memdup_user() and they return an
error pointer instead of NULL. Those need special cares and the value
has to be cleared with no_free_ptr() at the allocation error path.
Other than that, the conversions are straightforward.
No functional changes, only code refactoring.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240222111509.28390-2-tiwai@suse.de
Both snd_seq_prioq_remove_events() and snd_seq_prioq_leave() have a
very similar loop for removing events. Unify them with a callback for
code simplification.
Only the code refactoring, and no functional changes.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240222132152.29063-1-tiwai@suse.de
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
The variable clock is being assigned a value that is never read,
it is being re-assigned a new value in every case in the following
switch statement. The assignment is redundant and can be removed.
Cleans up clang scan build warning:
sound/pci/echoaudio/echoaudio_3g.c:277:2: warning: Value stored
to 'clock' is never read [deadcode.DeadStores]
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240221113809.3410109-1-colin.i.king@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
