The pointless WARN_ON() has been removed from i2c_hid_remove(),
so we don't need bug.h any more.
Reported-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
ihid can not be null, so there are no reasons to test it.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
If i2c_hid_get_report fails, exit i2c_hid_init_report.
The printk log is already called by i2c_hid_get_report, so no need
to add some more printks.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
In the case where the hid driver in charge of handling the hid part
of the device (hid-generic for instance) fails at probe, neither
i2c_hid_start nor i2c_hid_stop are called.
Thus, the buffers allocated in i2c_hid_probe are never freed.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Forwards appropriate return values.
As noone use the error returned by i2c_hid_get_input, let's make it
returning void.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
These definitions are not used here, but are defined by the specification.
Keeping some of them for documentation purposes.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
This avoids the problematic case:
if (condition)
i2c_hid_dbg(ihid, "Blah blah %d\n", i);
else
do_something_very_important();
Which looks correct, however with the previous macro definition,
this expands to the unexpected:
if (condition) {
if (debug) \
dev_printk(KERN_DEBUG, &ihid->client->dev,
"Blah blah %d\n", i);
else
do_something_very_important();
}
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
We should not initialize to 0 static declarations.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
The "comment" part can never be displayed, so we can remove it.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
no I2C driver has "i2c" in its name. It makes more sense to call this
i2c driver "hid".
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
In case we are returning from i2c_hid_probe() through the 'err' or
'err_mem_free' labels, there is noone freeing the buffers allocated by
i2c_hid_alloc_buffers().
Reviewed-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Microsoft published the protocol specification of HID over i2c:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/hardware/hh852380.aspx
This patch introduces an implementation of this protocol.
This implementation does not includes the ACPI part of the specification.
This will come when ACPI 5.0 devices enumeration will be available.
Once the ACPI part is done, OEM will not have to declare HID over I2C
devices in their platform specific driver.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
