Use IS_ERR_PCPU() instead of IS_ERR() for pointers in the percpu address
space. The patch also fixes following sparse warnings:
kmemleak.c:1063:39: warning: cast removes address space '__percpu' of expression
kmemleak.c:1138:37: warning: cast removes address space '__percpu' of expression
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240818210235.33481-2-ubizjak@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Patch series "kmemleak: support for percpu memory leak detect'.
This is a rework of this series:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200921020007.35803-1-chenjun102@huawei.com/
Originally I was investigating a percpu leak on our customer nodes and
having this functionality was a huge help, which lead to this fix [1].
So probably it's a good idea to have it in mainstream too, especially as
after [2] it became much easier to implement (we already have a separate
tree for percpu pointers).
[1] commit 0af8c09c89 ("netfilter: x_tables: fix percpu counter block leak on error path when creating new netns")
[2] commit 39042079a0 ("kmemleak: avoid RCU stalls when freeing metadata for per-CPU pointers")
This patch (of 2):
This basically does:
- Add min_percpu_addr and max_percpu_addr to filter out unrelated data
similar to min_addr and max_addr;
- Set min_count for percpu pointers to 1 to start tracking them;
- Calculate checksum of percpu area as xor of crc32 for each cpu;
- Split pointer lookup and update refs code into separate helper and use
it twice: once as if the pointer is a virtual pointer and once as if
it's percpu.
[ptikhomirov@virtuozzo.com: v2]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240731025526.157529-2-ptikhomirov@virtuozzo.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240725041223.872472-1-ptikhomirov@virtuozzo.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240725041223.872472-2-ptikhomirov@virtuozzo.com
Signed-off-by: Pavel Tikhomirov <ptikhomirov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>
Cc: Chen Jun <chenjun102@huawei.com>
Cc: Alexander Mikhalitsyn <aleksandr.mikhalitsyn@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Patch series "mm: fix nested allocation context filtering".
This patchset is the followup to the comment I made earlier today:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/ZjAyIWUzDipofHFJ@dread.disaster.area/
Tl;dr: Memory allocations that are done inside the public memory
allocation API need to obey the reclaim recursion constraints placed on
the allocation by the original caller, including the "don't track
recursion for this allocation" case defined by __GFP_NOLOCKDEP.
These nested allocations are generally in debug code that is tracking
something about the allocation (kmemleak, KASAN, etc) and so are
allocating private kernel objects that only that debug system will use.
Neither the page-owner code nor the stack depot code get this right. They
also also clear GFP_ZONEMASK as a separate operation, which is completely
redundant because the constraint filter applied immediately after
guarantees that GFP_ZONEMASK bits are cleared.
kmemleak gets this filtering right. It preserves the allocation
constraints for deadlock prevention and clears all other context flags
whilst also ensuring that the nested allocation will fail quickly,
silently and without depleting emergency kernel reserves if there is no
memory available.
This can be made much more robust, immune to whack-a-mole games and the
code greatly simplified by lifting gfp_kmemleak_mask() to
include/linux/gfp.h and using that everywhere. Also document it so that
there is no excuse for not knowing about it when writing new debug code
that nests allocations.
Tested with lockdep, KASAN + page_owner=on and kmemleak=on over multiple
fstests runs with XFS.
This patch (of 3):
Any "internal" nested allocation done from within an allocation context
needs to obey the high level allocation gfp_mask constraints. This is
necessary for debug code like KASAN, kmemleak, lockdep, etc that allocate
memory for saving stack traces and other information during memory
allocation. If they don't obey things like __GFP_NOLOCKDEP or
__GFP_NOWARN, they produce false positive failure detections.
kmemleak gets this right by using gfp_kmemleak_mask() to pass through the
relevant context flags to the nested allocation to ensure that the
allocation follows the constraints of the caller context.
KASAN recently was foudn to be missing __GFP_NOLOCKDEP due to stack depot
allocations, and even more recently the page owner tracking code was also
found to be missing __GFP_NOLOCKDEP support.
We also don't wan't want KASAN or lockdep to drive the system into OOM
kill territory by exhausting emergency reserves. This is something that
kmemleak also gets right by adding (__GFP_NORETRY | __GFP_NOMEMALLOC |
__GFP_NOWARN) to the allocation mask.
Hence it is clear that we need to define a common nested allocation filter
mask for these sorts of third party nested allocations used in debug code.
So to start this process, lift gfp_kmemleak_mask() to gfp.h and rename it
to gfp_nested_mask(), and convert the kmemleak callers to use it.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240430054604.4169568-1-david@fromorbit.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240430054604.4169568-2-david@fromorbit.com
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Patch series "mm/kmemleak: Minor cleanup & performance tuning".
This series contains 2 simple cleanup patches to slightly reduce memory
and performance overhead.
This patch (of 2):
With commit 56a61617dd ("mm: use stack_depot for recording kmemleak's
backtrace"), the size of kmemleak_object has been reduced by 128 bytes for
64-bit arches. The replacement "depot_stack_handle_t trace_handle" is
actually just 4 bytes long leaving a hole of 4 bytes. By moving up
trace_handle to another existing 4-byte hold, we can save 8 more bytes
from kmemleak_object reducing its overall size from 248 to 240 bytes.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240307190548.963626-1-longman@redhat.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240307190548.963626-2-longman@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
The system will immediate fill up stack and crash when both
CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK and CONFIG_MEM_ALLOC_PROFILING are enabled. Avoid
allocation tagging of kmemleak caches, otherwise recursive allocation
tracking occurs.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240425205516.work.220-kees@kernel.org
Fixes: 279bb991b4d9 ("mm/slab: add allocation accounting into slab allocation and free paths")
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On systems with large number of CPUs, the following soft lockup splat
might sometimes happen:
[ 2656.001617] watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#364 stuck for 21s! [ksoftirqd/364:2206]
:
[ 2656.141194] RIP: 0010:_raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3d/0x70
:
2656.241214] Call Trace:
[ 2656.243971] <IRQ>
[ 2656.246237] ? show_trace_log_lvl+0x1c4/0x2df
[ 2656.251152] ? show_trace_log_lvl+0x1c4/0x2df
[ 2656.256066] ? kmemleak_free_percpu+0x11f/0x1f0
[ 2656.261173] ? watchdog_timer_fn+0x379/0x470
[ 2656.265984] ? __pfx_watchdog_timer_fn+0x10/0x10
[ 2656.271179] ? __hrtimer_run_queues+0x5f3/0xd00
[ 2656.276283] ? __pfx___hrtimer_run_queues+0x10/0x10
[ 2656.281783] ? ktime_get_update_offsets_now+0x95/0x2c0
[ 2656.287573] ? ktime_get_update_offsets_now+0xdd/0x2c0
[ 2656.293380] ? hrtimer_interrupt+0x2e9/0x780
[ 2656.298221] ? __sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x184/0x640
[ 2656.304211] ? sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x8e/0xc0
[ 2656.309807] </IRQ>
[ 2656.312169] <TASK>
[ 2656.326110] kmemleak_free_percpu+0x11f/0x1f0
[ 2656.331015] free_percpu.part.0+0x1b/0xe70
[ 2656.335635] free_vfsmnt+0xb9/0x100
[ 2656.339567] rcu_do_batch+0x3c8/0xe30
[ 2656.363693] rcu_core+0x3de/0x5a0
[ 2656.367433] __do_softirq+0x2d0/0x9a8
[ 2656.381119] run_ksoftirqd+0x36/0x60
[ 2656.385145] smpboot_thread_fn+0x556/0x910
[ 2656.394971] kthread+0x2a4/0x350
[ 2656.402826] ret_from_fork+0x29/0x50
[ 2656.406861] </TASK>
The issue is caused by kmemleak registering each per_cpu_ptr()
corresponding to the __percpu pointer. This is unnecessary since such
individual per-CPU pointers are not tracked anyway. Create a new
object_percpu_tree_root rbtree that stores a single __percpu pointer
together with an OBJECT_PERCPU flag for the kmemleak metadata. Scanning
needs to be done for all per_cpu_ptr() pointers with a cond_resched()
between each CPU iteration to avoid RCU stalls.
[catalin.marinas@arm.com: update comment]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231206114414.2085824-1-catalin.marinas@arm.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231127194153.289626-1-longman@redhat.comLink: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231201190829.825856-1-catalin.marinas@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Reported-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231127194153.289626-1-longman@redhat.com
Reviewed-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Change /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak report format slightly, adding
"(extra info)" to the backtrace header:
from: " backtrace:"
to: " backtrace (crc <cksum>):"
The <cksum> allows a user to see recurring backtraces without
detailed/careful reading of multiline stacks. So after cycling
kmemleak-test a few times, I know some leaks are repeating.
bash-5.2# grep backtrace /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak | wc
62 186 1792
bash-5.2# grep backtrace /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak | sort -u | wc
37 111 1067
syzkaller parses kmemleak for "unreferenced object" only, so is
unaffected by this change. Other github repos are moribund.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231116224318.124209-3-jim.cromie@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Patch series "tweak kmemleak report format".
These 2 patches make minor changes to the report:
1st strips "age <increasing>" from output. This makes the output
idempotent; unchanging until a new leak is reported.
2nd adds the backtrace.checksum to the "backtrace:" line. This lets a
user see repeats without actually reading the whole backtrace. So now
the backtrace line looks like this:
backtrace (crc 603070071):
I surveyed for un-wanted effects upon users:
Syzkaller parses kmemleak in executor/common_linux.h:
static void check_leaks(char** frames, int nframes)
It just counts occurrences of "unreferenced object", specifically it
does not look for "age", nor would it choke on "crc" being added.
github has 3 repos with "kmemleak" mentioned, all are moribund.
gitlab has 0 hits on "kmemleak".
This patch (of 2):
Displaying age is pretty, but counter-productive; it changes with
current-time, so it surrenders idempotency of the output, which breaks
simple hash-based cataloging of the records by the user.
The trouble: sequential reads, wo new leaks, get new results:
:#> sum /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak
53439 74 /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak
:#> sum /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak
59066 74 /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak
and age is why (nothing else changes):
:#> grep -v age /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak | sum
58894 67
:#> grep -v age /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak | sum
58894 67
Since jiffies is already printed in the "comm" line, age adds nothing.
Notably, syzkaller reads kmemleak only for "unreferenced object", and
won't care about this reform of age-ism. A few moribund github repos
mention it, but don't compile.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231116224318.124209-1-jim.cromie@gmail.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231116224318.124209-2-jim.cromie@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
set_track_prepare() will call __alloc_pages() which attempts to acquire
zone->lock(spinlocks), so move it outside object->lock(raw_spinlocks)
because it's not right to acquire spinlocks while holding raw_spinlocks in
RT mode.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231115082138.2649870-3-liushixin2@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Cc: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Cc: Patrick Wang <patrick.wang.shcn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Patch series "Fix invalid wait context of set_track_prepare()".
Geert reported an invalid wait context[1] which is resulted by moving
set_track_prepare() inside kmemleak_lock. This is not allowed because in
RT mode, the spinlocks can be preempted but raw_spinlocks can not, so it
is not allowd to acquire spinlocks while holding raw_spinlocks. The
second patch fix same problem in kmemleak_update_trace().
This patch (of 2):
Move the initialisation of object back to__alloc_object() because
set_track_prepare() attempt to acquire zone->lock(spinlocks) while
__link_object is holding kmemleak_lock(raw_spinlocks). This is not right
for RT mode.
This reverts commit 245245c2ff ("mm/kmemleak: move the initialisation
of object to __link_object").
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231115082138.2649870-1-liushixin2@huawei.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231115082138.2649870-2-liushixin2@huawei.com
Fixes: 245245c2ff ("mm/kmemleak: move the initialisation of object to __link_object")
Signed-off-by: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com>
Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/CAMuHMdWj0UzwNaxUvcocTfh481qRJpOWwXxsJCTJfu1oCqvgdA@mail.gmail.com/ [1]
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Cc: Patrick Wang <patrick.wang.shcn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
In patch (mm: kmemleak: split __create_object into two functions), the
initialisation of object has been splited in two places. Catalin said it
feels a bit weird and error prone. So leave __alloc_object() to just do
the actual allocation and let __link_object() do the full initialisation.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231023025125.90972-1-liushixin2@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com>
Suggested-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
delete_object_part() can be called by multiple callers in the same time.
If an object is found and removed by a caller, and then another caller try
to find it too, it failed and return directly. It still be recorded by
kmemleak even if it has already been freed to buddy. With DEBUG on,
kmemleak will report the following warning,
kmemleak: Partially freeing unknown object at 0xa1af86000 (size 4096)
CPU: 0 PID: 742 Comm: test_huge Not tainted 6.6.0-rc3kmemleak+ #54
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x37/0x50
kmemleak_free_part_phys+0x50/0x60
hugetlb_vmemmap_optimize+0x172/0x290
? __pfx_vmemmap_remap_pte+0x10/0x10
__prep_new_hugetlb_folio+0xe/0x30
prep_new_hugetlb_folio.isra.0+0xe/0x40
alloc_fresh_hugetlb_folio+0xc3/0xd0
alloc_surplus_hugetlb_folio.constprop.0+0x6e/0xd0
hugetlb_acct_memory.part.0+0xe6/0x2a0
hugetlb_reserve_pages+0x110/0x2c0
hugetlbfs_file_mmap+0x11d/0x1b0
mmap_region+0x248/0x9a0
? hugetlb_get_unmapped_area+0x15c/0x2d0
do_mmap+0x38b/0x580
vm_mmap_pgoff+0xe6/0x190
ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x18a/0x1f0
do_syscall_64+0x3f/0x90
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8
Expand __create_object() and move __alloc_object() to the beginning. Then
use kmemleak_lock to protect __find_and_remove_object() and
__link_object() as a whole, which can guarantee all objects are processed
sequentialally.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231018102952.3339837-8-liushixin2@huawei.com
Fixes: 53238a60dd ("kmemleak: Allow partial freeing of memory blocks")
Signed-off-by: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Cc: Patrick Wang <patrick.wang.shcn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Add new __find_and_remove_object() without kmemleak_lock protect, it is in
preparation for the next patch.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231018102952.3339837-7-liushixin2@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Cc: Patrick Wang <patrick.wang.shcn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
The kmemleak object is allocated by mem_pool_alloc(), which could be from
slab or mem_pool[], so it's not suitable using __kmem_cache_free() to free
the object, use __mem_pool_free() instead.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231018102952.3339837-6-liushixin2@huawei.com
Fixes: 0647398a8c ("mm: kmemleak: simple memory allocation pool for kmemleak objects")
Signed-off-by: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Cc: Patrick Wang <patrick.wang.shcn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
__create_object() consists of two part, the first part allocate a kmemleak
object and initialize it, the second part insert it into object tree.
This function need kmemleak_lock but actually only the second part need
lock.
Split it into two functions, the first function __alloc_object only
allocate a kmemleak object, and the second function __link_object() will
initialize the object and insert it into object tree, use the
kmemleak_lock to protect __link_object() only.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style cleanups]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231018102952.3339837-5-liushixin2@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Cc: Patrick Wang <patrick.wang.shcn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
With 0x%p, the pointer will be hashed and print (____ptrval____) instead.
And with 0x%pa, the pointer can be successfully printed but with duplicate
prefixes, which looks like:
kmemleak: kmemleak_free(0x(____ptrval____))
kmemleak: kmemleak_free_percpu(0x(____ptrval____))
kmemleak: kmemleak_free_part_phys(0x0x0000000a1af86000)
Use 0x%px instead of 0x%p or 0x%pa to print the pointer. Then the print
will be like:
kmemleak: kmemleak_free(0xffff9111c145b020)
kmemleak: kmemleak_free_percpu(0x00000000000333b0)
kmemleak: kmemleak_free_part_phys(0x0000000a1af80000)
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231018102952.3339837-4-liushixin2@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Cc: Patrick Wang <patrick.wang.shcn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Commit bde5f6bc68 ("kmemleak: add scheduling point to kmemleak_scan()")
added a cond_resched() call to the struct page scanning loop to prevent
soft lockup from happening. However, soft lockup can still happen in that
loop in some corner cases when the pages that satisfy the "!(pfn & 63)"
check are skipped for some reasons.
Fix this corner case by moving up the cond_resched() check so that it will
be called every 64 pages unconditionally.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230825164947.1317981-1-longman@redhat.com
Fixes: bde5f6bc68 ("kmemleak: add scheduling point to kmemleak_scan()")
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Yisheng Xie <xieyisheng1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
The old name is confusing because it implies the completion of earlier
kmemleak_init(), the new name update to kmemleak_late_initial represents
the completion of kmemleak_late_init().
No functional changes.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230815144128.3623103-3-xiaolei.wang@windriver.com
Signed-off-by: Xiaolei Wang <xiaolei.wang@windriver.com>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Cc: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Zhaoyang Huang <zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Patch series "mm/kmemleak: use object_cache instead of
kmemleak_initialized", v3.
Use object_cache instead of kmemleak_initialized to check in
set_track_prepare(), so that memory leaks after kmemleak_init() can be
recorded and Rename kmemleak_initialized to kmemleak_late_initialized
unreferenced object 0xc674ca80 (size 64):
comm "swapper/0", pid 1, jiffies 4294938337 (age 204.880s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
80 55 75 c6 80 54 75 c6 00 55 75 c6 80 52 75 c6 .Uu..Tu..Uu..Ru.
00 53 75 c6 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 .Su..........
This patch (of 2):
kmemleak_initialized is set in kmemleak_late_init(), which also means that
there is no call trace which object's memory leak is before
kmemleak_late_init(), so use object_cache instead of kmemleak_initialized
to check in set_track_prepare() to avoid no call trace records when there
is a memory leak in the code between kmemleak_init() and
kmemleak_late_init().
unreferenced object 0xc674ca80 (size 64):
comm "swapper/0", pid 1, jiffies 4294938337 (age 204.880s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
80 55 75 c6 80 54 75 c6 00 55 75 c6 80 52 75 c6 .Uu..Tu..Uu..Ru.
00 53 75 c6 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 .Su..........
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230815144128.3623103-1-xiaolei.wang@windriver.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230815144128.3623103-2-xiaolei.wang@windriver.com
Fixes: 56a61617dd ("mm: use stack_depot for recording kmemleak's backtrace")
Signed-off-by: Xiaolei Wang <xiaolei.wang@windriver.com>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Cc: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Zhaoyang Huang <zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Rename stack_depot_want_early_init to stack_depot_request_early_init.
The old name is confusing, as it hints at returning some kind of intention
of stack depot. The new name reflects that this function requests an
action from stack depot instead.
No functional changes.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: update mm/kmemleak.c]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/359f31bf67429a06e630b4395816a967214ef753.1676063693.git.andreyknvl@google.com
Signed-off-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Commit 6edda04ccc ("mm/kmemleak: prevent soft lockup in first object
iteration loop of kmemleak_scan()") fixes soft lockup problem in
kmemleak_scan() by periodically doing a cond_resched(). It does take a
reference of the current object before doing it. Unfortunately, if the
object has been deleted from the object_list, the next object pointed to
by its next pointer may no longer be valid after coming back from
cond_resched(). This can result in use-after-free and other nasty
problem.
Fix this problem by adding a del_state flag into kmemleak_object structure
to synchronize the object deletion process between kmemleak_cond_resched()
and __remove_object() to make sure that the object remained in the
object_list in the duration of the cond_resched() call.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230119040111.350923-3-longman@redhat.com
Fixes: 6edda04ccc ("mm/kmemleak: prevent soft lockup in first object iteration loop of kmemleak_scan()")
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Patch series "mm/kmemleak: Simplify kmemleak_cond_resched() & fix UAF", v2.
It was found that a KASAN use-after-free error was reported in the
kmemleak_scan() function. After further examination, it is believe that
even though a reference is taken from the current object, it does not
prevent the object pointed to by the next pointer from going away after a
cond_resched().
To fix that, additional flags are added to make sure that the current
object won't be removed from the object_list during the duration of the
cond_resched() to ensure the validity of the next pointer.
While making the change, I also simplify the current usage of
kmemleak_cond_resched() to make it easier to understand.
This patch (of 2):
The presence of a pinned argument and the 64k loop count make
kmemleak_cond_resched() a bit more complex to read. The pinned argument
is used only by first kmemleak_scan() loop.
Simplify the usage of kmemleak_cond_resched() by removing the pinned
argument and always do a get_object()/put_object() sequence. In addition,
the 64k loop is removed by using need_resched() to decide if
kmemleak_cond_resched() should be called.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230119040111.350923-1-longman@redhat.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230119040111.350923-2-longman@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Mirsad report the below error which is caused by stack_depot_init()
failure in kvcalloc. Solve this by having stackdepot use
stack_depot_early_init().
On 1/4/23 17:08, Mirsad Goran Todorovac wrote:
I hate to bring bad news again, but there seems to be a problem with the output of /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak:
[root@pc-mtodorov ~]# cat /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak
unreferenced object 0xffff951c118568b0 (size 16):
comm "kworker/u12:2", pid 56, jiffies 4294893952 (age 4356.548s)
hex dump (first 16 bytes):
6d 65 6d 73 74 69 63 6b 30 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 memstick0.......
backtrace:
[root@pc-mtodorov ~]#
Apparently, backtrace of called functions on the stack is no longer
printed with the list of memory leaks. This appeared on Lenovo desktop
10TX000VCR, with AlmaLinux 8.7 and BIOS version M22KT49A (11/10/2022) and
6.2-rc1 and 6.2-rc2 builds. This worked on 6.1 with the same
CONFIG_KMEMLEAK=y and MGLRU enabled on a vanilla mainstream kernel from
Mr. Torvalds' tree. I don't know if this is deliberate feature for some
reason or a bug. Please find attached the config, lshw and kmemleak
output.
[vbabka@suse.cz: remove stack_depot_init() call]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/5272a819-ef74-65ff-be61-4d2d567337de@alu.unizg.hr/
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1674091345-14799-2-git-send-email-zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com
Fixes: 56a61617dd ("mm: use stack_depot for recording kmemleak's backtrace")
Reported-by: Mirsad Todorovac <mirsad.todorovac@alu.unizg.hr>
Suggested-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Zhaoyang Huang <zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com>
Acked-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Tested-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: ke.wang <ke.wang@unisoc.com>
Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Currently, %p is used to display kernel pointers in backtrace which result
in a hashed value that is not usable to correlate the address for debug.
Use %pK which will respect the kptr_restrict configuration value and thus
allow to extract meaningful information from the backtrace.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221108094322.73492-1-clement.leger@bootlin.com
Signed-off-by: Clément Léger <clement.leger@bootlin.com>
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Commit 6edda04ccc ("mm/kmemleak: prevent soft lockup in first object
iteration loop of kmemleak_scan()") adds cond_resched() in the first
object iteration loop of kmemleak_scan(). However, it turns that the 2nd
objection iteration loop can still cause soft lockup to happen in some
cases. So add a cond_resched() call in the 2nd and 3rd loops as well to
prevent that and for completeness.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221020175619.366317-1-longman@redhat.com
Fixes: 6edda04ccc ("mm/kmemleak: prevent soft lockup in first object iteration loop of kmemleak_scan()")
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
No caller cares about the return value of create_object(), so make it
return void.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220901023007.3471887-1-liushixin2@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
The first RCU-based object iteration loop has to modify the object count.
So we cannot skip taking the object lock.
One way to avoid soft lockup is to insert occasional cond_resched() call
into the loop. This cannot be done while holding the RCU read lock which
is to protect objects from being freed. However, taking a reference to
the object will prevent it from being freed. We can then do a
cond_resched() call after every 64k objects safely.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220614220359.59282-4-longman@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
There are 3 RCU-based object iteration loops in kmemleak_scan(). Because
of the need to take RCU read lock, we can't insert cond_resched() into the
loop like other parts of the function. As there can be millions of
objects to be scanned, it takes a while to iterate all of them. The
kmemleak functionality is usually enabled in a debug kernel which is much
slower than a non-debug kernel. With sufficient number of kmemleak
objects, the time to iterate them all may exceed 22s causing soft lockup.
watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#3 stuck for 22s! [kmemleak:625]
In this particular bug report, the soft lockup happen in the 2nd iteration
loop.
In the 2nd and 3rd loops, most of the objects are checked and then skipped
under the object lock. Only a selected fews are modified. Those objects
certainly need lock protection. However, the lock/unlock operation is
slow especially with interrupt disabling and enabling included.
We can actually do some basic check like color_white() without taking the
lock and skip the object accordingly. Of course, this kind of check is
racy and may miss objects that are being modified concurrently. The cost
of missed objects, however, is just that they will be discovered in the
next scan instead. The advantage of doing so is that iteration can be
done much faster especially with LOCKDEP enabled in a debug kernel.
With a debug kernel running on a 2-socket 96-thread x86-64 system
(HZ=1000), the 2nd and 3rd iteration loops speedup with this patch on the
first kmemleak_scan() call after bootup is shown in the table below.
Before patch After patch
Loop # # of objects Elapsed time # of objects Elapsed time
------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
2 2,599,850 2.392s 2,596,364 0.266s
3 2,600,176 2.171s 2,597,061 0.260s
This patch reduces loop iteration times by about 88%. This will greatly
reduce the chance of a soft lockup happening in the 2nd or 3rd iteration
loops.
Even though the first loop runs a little bit faster, it can still be
problematic if many kmemleak objects are there. As the object count has
to be modified in every object, we cannot avoid taking the object lock.
So other way to prevent soft lockup will be needed.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220614220359.59282-3-longman@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Patch series "mm/kmemleak: Avoid soft lockup in kmemleak_scan()", v2.
There are 3 RCU-based object iteration loops in kmemleak_scan(). Because
of the need to take RCU read lock, we can't insert cond_resched() into the
loop like other parts of the function. As there can be millions of
objects to be scanned, it takes a while to iterate all of them. The
kmemleak functionality is usually enabled in a debug kernel which is much
slower than a non-debug kernel. With sufficient number of kmemleak
objects, the time to iterate them all may exceed 22s causing soft lockup.
watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#3 stuck for 22s! [kmemleak:625]
This patch series make changes to the 3 object iteration loops in
kmemleak_scan() to prevent them from causing soft lockup.
This patch (of 3):
kmemleak_scan() is called only from the kmemleak scan thread or from write
to the kmemleak debugfs file. Both are in task context and so we can
directly use the simpler _irq() lock/unlock calls instead of the more
complex _irqsave/_irqrestore variants.
Similarly, kmemleak_clear() is called only from write to the kmemleak
debugfs file. The same change can be applied.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220614220359.59282-1-longman@redhat.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220614220359.59282-2-longman@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Check the physical address of objects for its boundary when scan instead
of in kmemleak_*_phys().
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220611035551.1823303-5-patrick.wang.shcn@gmail.com
Fixes: 23c2d497de ("mm: kmemleak: take a full lowmem check in kmemleak_*_phys()")
Signed-off-by: Patrick Wang <patrick.wang.shcn@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Yee Lee <yee.lee@mediatek.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Add object_phys_tree_root to store the objects allocated with physical
address. Distinguish it from object_tree_root by OBJECT_PHYS flag or
function argument. The physical address is stored directly in those
objects.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220611035551.1823303-4-patrick.wang.shcn@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Patrick Wang <patrick.wang.shcn@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Yee Lee <yee.lee@mediatek.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Add OBJECT_PHYS flag for object. This flag is used to identify the
objects allocated with physical address. The create_object_phys()
function is added as well to set that flag and is used by
kmemleak_alloc_phys().
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220611035551.1823303-3-patrick.wang.shcn@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Patrick Wang <patrick.wang.shcn@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Yee Lee <yee.lee@mediatek.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
When we use HW-tag based kasan and enable vmalloc support, we hit the
following bug. It is due to comparison between tagged object and
non-tagged pointer.
We need to reset the kasan tag when we need to compare tagged object and
non-tagged pointer.
kmemleak: [name:kmemleak&]Scan area larger than object 0xffffffe77076f440
CPU: 4 PID: 1 Comm: init Tainted: G S W 5.15.25-android13-0-g5cacf919c2bc #1
Hardware name: MT6983(ENG) (DT)
Call trace:
add_scan_area+0xc4/0x244
kmemleak_scan_area+0x40/0x9c
layout_and_allocate+0x1e8/0x288
load_module+0x2c8/0xf00
__se_sys_finit_module+0x190/0x1d0
__arm64_sys_finit_module+0x20/0x30
invoke_syscall+0x60/0x170
el0_svc_common+0xc8/0x114
do_el0_svc+0x28/0xa0
el0_svc+0x60/0xf8
el0t_64_sync_handler+0x88/0xec
el0t_64_sync+0x1b4/0x1b8
kmemleak: [name:kmemleak&]Object 0xf5ffffe77076b000 (size 32768):
kmemleak: [name:kmemleak&] comm "init", pid 1, jiffies 4294894197
kmemleak: [name:kmemleak&] min_count = 0
kmemleak: [name:kmemleak&] count = 0
kmemleak: [name:kmemleak&] flags = 0x1
kmemleak: [name:kmemleak&] checksum = 0
kmemleak: [name:kmemleak&] backtrace:
module_alloc+0x9c/0x120
move_module+0x34/0x19c
layout_and_allocate+0x1c4/0x288
load_module+0x2c8/0xf00
__se_sys_finit_module+0x190/0x1d0
__arm64_sys_finit_module+0x20/0x30
invoke_syscall+0x60/0x170
el0_svc_common+0xc8/0x114
do_el0_svc+0x28/0xa0
el0_svc+0x60/0xf8
el0t_64_sync_handler+0x88/0xec
el0t_64_sync+0x1b4/0x1b8
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220318034051.30687-1-Kuan-Ying.Lee@mediatek.com
Signed-off-by: Kuan-Ying Lee <Kuan-Ying.Lee@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
Cc: Chinwen Chang <chinwen.chang@mediatek.com>
Cc: Nicholas Tang <nicholas.tang@mediatek.com>
Cc: Yee Lee <yee.lee@mediatek.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
When using devm_request_free_mem_region() and devm_memremap_pages() to
add ZONE_DEVICE memory, if requested free mem region's end pfn were
huge(e.g., 0x400000000), the node_end_pfn() will be also huge (see
move_pfn_range_to_zone()). Thus it creates a huge hole between
node_start_pfn() and node_end_pfn().
We found on some AMD APUs, amdkfd requested such a free mem region and
created a huge hole. In such a case, following code snippet was just
doing busy test_bit() looping on the huge hole.
for (pfn = start_pfn; pfn < end_pfn; pfn++) {
struct page *page = pfn_to_online_page(pfn);
if (!page)
continue;
...
}
So we got a soft lockup:
watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#6 stuck for 26s! [bash:1221]
CPU: 6 PID: 1221 Comm: bash Not tainted 5.15.0-custom #1
RIP: 0010:pfn_to_online_page+0x5/0xd0
Call Trace:
? kmemleak_scan+0x16a/0x440
kmemleak_write+0x306/0x3a0
? common_file_perm+0x72/0x170
full_proxy_write+0x5c/0x90
vfs_write+0xb9/0x260
ksys_write+0x67/0xe0
__x64_sys_write+0x1a/0x20
do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
I did some tests with the patch.
(1) amdgpu module unloaded
before the patch:
real 0m0.976s
user 0m0.000s
sys 0m0.968s
after the patch:
real 0m0.981s
user 0m0.000s
sys 0m0.973s
(2) amdgpu module loaded
before the patch:
real 0m35.365s
user 0m0.000s
sys 0m35.354s
after the patch:
real 0m1.049s
user 0m0.000s
sys 0m1.042s
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211108140029.721144-1-lang.yu@amd.com
Signed-off-by: Lang Yu <lang.yu@amd.com>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
With HW tag-based kasan enable, We will get the warning when we free
object whose address starts with 0xFF.
It is because kmemleak rbtree stores tagged object and this freeing
object's tag does not match with rbtree object.
In the example below, kmemleak rbtree stores the tagged object in the
kmalloc(), and kfree() gets the pointer with 0xFF tag.
Call sequence:
ptr = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
page = virt_to_page(ptr);
offset = offset_in_page(ptr);
kfree(page_address(page) + offset);
ptr = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
A sequence like that may cause the warning as following:
1) Freeing unknown object:
In kfree(), we will get free unknown object warning in
kmemleak_free(). Because object(0xFx) in kmemleak rbtree and
pointer(0xFF) in kfree() have different tag.
2) Overlap existing:
When we allocate that object with the same hw-tag again, we will
find the overlap in the kmemleak rbtree and kmemleak thread will be
killed.
kmemleak: Freeing unknown object at 0xffff000003f88000
CPU: 5 PID: 177 Comm: cat Not tainted 5.16.0-rc1-dirty #21
Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
Call trace:
dump_backtrace+0x0/0x1ac
show_stack+0x1c/0x30
dump_stack_lvl+0x68/0x84
dump_stack+0x1c/0x38
kmemleak_free+0x6c/0x70
slab_free_freelist_hook+0x104/0x200
kmem_cache_free+0xa8/0x3d4
test_version_show+0x270/0x3a0
module_attr_show+0x28/0x40
sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xb0/0x130
kernfs_seq_show+0x30/0x40
seq_read_iter+0x1bc/0x4b0
seq_read_iter+0x1bc/0x4b0
kernfs_fop_read_iter+0x144/0x1c0
generic_file_splice_read+0xd0/0x184
do_splice_to+0x90/0xe0
splice_direct_to_actor+0xb8/0x250
do_splice_direct+0x88/0xd4
do_sendfile+0x2b0/0x344
__arm64_sys_sendfile64+0x164/0x16c
invoke_syscall+0x48/0x114
el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x44/0xec
do_el0_svc+0x74/0x90
el0_svc+0x20/0x80
el0t_64_sync_handler+0x1a8/0x1b0
el0t_64_sync+0x1ac/0x1b0
...
kmemleak: Cannot insert 0xf2ff000003f88000 into the object search tree (overlaps existing)
CPU: 5 PID: 178 Comm: cat Not tainted 5.16.0-rc1-dirty #21
Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
Call trace:
dump_backtrace+0x0/0x1ac
show_stack+0x1c/0x30
dump_stack_lvl+0x68/0x84
dump_stack+0x1c/0x38
create_object.isra.0+0x2d8/0x2fc
kmemleak_alloc+0x34/0x40
kmem_cache_alloc+0x23c/0x2f0
test_version_show+0x1fc/0x3a0
module_attr_show+0x28/0x40
sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xb0/0x130
kernfs_seq_show+0x30/0x40
seq_read_iter+0x1bc/0x4b0
kernfs_fop_read_iter+0x144/0x1c0
generic_file_splice_read+0xd0/0x184
do_splice_to+0x90/0xe0
splice_direct_to_actor+0xb8/0x250
do_splice_direct+0x88/0xd4
do_sendfile+0x2b0/0x344
__arm64_sys_sendfile64+0x164/0x16c
invoke_syscall+0x48/0x114
el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x44/0xec
do_el0_svc+0x74/0x90
el0_svc+0x20/0x80
el0t_64_sync_handler+0x1a8/0x1b0
el0t_64_sync+0x1ac/0x1b0
kmemleak: Kernel memory leak detector disabled
kmemleak: Object 0xf2ff000003f88000 (size 128):
kmemleak: comm "cat", pid 177, jiffies 4294921177
kmemleak: min_count = 1
kmemleak: count = 0
kmemleak: flags = 0x1
kmemleak: checksum = 0
kmemleak: backtrace:
kmem_cache_alloc+0x23c/0x2f0
test_version_show+0x1fc/0x3a0
module_attr_show+0x28/0x40
sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xb0/0x130
kernfs_seq_show+0x30/0x40
seq_read_iter+0x1bc/0x4b0
kernfs_fop_read_iter+0x144/0x1c0
generic_file_splice_read+0xd0/0x184
do_splice_to+0x90/0xe0
splice_direct_to_actor+0xb8/0x250
do_splice_direct+0x88/0xd4
do_sendfile+0x2b0/0x344
__arm64_sys_sendfile64+0x164/0x16c
invoke_syscall+0x48/0x114
el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x44/0xec
do_el0_svc+0x74/0x90
kmemleak: Automatic memory scanning thread ended
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: whitespace tweak]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211118054426.4123-1-Kuan-Ying.Lee@mediatek.com
Signed-off-by: Kuan-Ying Lee <Kuan-Ying.Lee@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
In a memory pressure situation, I'm seeing the lockdep WARNING below.
Actually, this is similar to a known false positive which is already
addressed by commit 6dcde60efd ("xfs: more lockdep whackamole with
kmem_alloc*").
This warning still persists because it's not from kmalloc() itself but
from an allocation for kmemleak object. While kmalloc() itself suppress
the warning with __GFP_NOLOCKDEP, gfp_kmemleak_mask() is dropping the
flag for the kmemleak's allocation.
Allow __GFP_NOLOCKDEP to be passed to kmemleak's allocation, so that the
warning for it is also suppressed.
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.14.0-rc7-BTRFS-ZNS+ #37 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
kswapd0/288 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff88825ab45df0 (&xfs_nondir_ilock_class){++++}-{3:3}, at: xfs_ilock+0x8a/0x250
but task is already holding lock:
ffffffff848cc1e0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #1 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}:
fs_reclaim_acquire+0x112/0x160
kmem_cache_alloc+0x48/0x400
create_object.isra.0+0x42/0xb10
kmemleak_alloc+0x48/0x80
__kmalloc+0x228/0x440
kmem_alloc+0xd3/0x2b0
kmem_alloc_large+0x5a/0x1c0
xfs_attr_copy_value+0x112/0x190
xfs_attr_shortform_getvalue+0x1fc/0x300
xfs_attr_get_ilocked+0x125/0x170
xfs_attr_get+0x329/0x450
xfs_get_acl+0x18d/0x430
get_acl.part.0+0xb6/0x1e0
posix_acl_xattr_get+0x13a/0x230
vfs_getxattr+0x21d/0x270
getxattr+0x126/0x310
__x64_sys_fgetxattr+0x1a6/0x2a0
do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
-> #0 (&xfs_nondir_ilock_class){++++}-{3:3}:
__lock_acquire+0x2c0f/0x5a00
lock_acquire+0x1a1/0x4b0
down_read_nested+0x50/0x90
xfs_ilock+0x8a/0x250
xfs_can_free_eofblocks+0x34f/0x570
xfs_inactive+0x411/0x520
xfs_fs_destroy_inode+0x2c8/0x710
destroy_inode+0xc5/0x1a0
evict+0x444/0x620
dispose_list+0xfe/0x1c0
prune_icache_sb+0xdc/0x160
super_cache_scan+0x31e/0x510
do_shrink_slab+0x337/0x8e0
shrink_slab+0x362/0x5c0
shrink_node+0x7a7/0x1a40
balance_pgdat+0x64e/0xfe0
kswapd+0x590/0xa80
kthread+0x38c/0x460
ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(fs_reclaim);
lock(&xfs_nondir_ilock_class);
lock(fs_reclaim);
lock(&xfs_nondir_ilock_class);
*** DEADLOCK ***
3 locks held by kswapd0/288:
#0: ffffffff848cc1e0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30
#1: ffffffff848a08d8 (shrinker_rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: shrink_slab+0x269/0x5c0
#2: ffff8881a7a820e8 (&type->s_umount_key#60){++++}-{3:3}, at: super_cache_scan+0x5a/0x510
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210907055659.3182992-1-naohiro.aota@wdc.com
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: "Darrick J . Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Replace the obsolete and ambiguos macro in_irq() with new macro
in_hardirq().
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210813145245.86070-1-changbin.du@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> [kmemleak]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Patch series "kasan, slub: reset tag when printing address", v3.
With hardware tag-based kasan enabled, we reset the tag when we access
metadata to avoid from false alarm.
This patch (of 2):
Kmemleak needs to scan kernel memory to check memory leak. With hardware
tag-based kasan enabled, when it scans on the invalid slab and
dereference, the issue will occur as below.
Hardware tag-based KASAN doesn't use compiler instrumentation, we can not
use kasan_disable_current() to ignore tag check.
Based on the below report, there are 11 0xf7 granules, which amounts to
176 bytes, and the object is allocated from the kmalloc-256 cache. So
when kmemleak accesses the last 256-176 bytes, it causes faults, as those
are marked with KASAN_KMALLOC_REDZONE == KASAN_TAG_INVALID == 0xfe.
Thus, we reset tags before accessing metadata to avoid from false positives.
BUG: KASAN: out-of-bounds in scan_block+0x58/0x170
Read at addr f7ff0000c0074eb0 by task kmemleak/138
Pointer tag: [f7], memory tag: [fe]
CPU: 7 PID: 138 Comm: kmemleak Not tainted 5.14.0-rc2-00001-g8cae8cd89f05-dirty #134
Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
Call trace:
dump_backtrace+0x0/0x1b0
show_stack+0x1c/0x30
dump_stack_lvl+0x68/0x84
print_address_description+0x7c/0x2b4
kasan_report+0x138/0x38c
__do_kernel_fault+0x190/0x1c4
do_tag_check_fault+0x78/0x90
do_mem_abort+0x44/0xb4
el1_abort+0x40/0x60
el1h_64_sync_handler+0xb4/0xd0
el1h_64_sync+0x78/0x7c
scan_block+0x58/0x170
scan_gray_list+0xdc/0x1a0
kmemleak_scan+0x2ac/0x560
kmemleak_scan_thread+0xb0/0xe0
kthread+0x154/0x160
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18
Allocated by task 0:
kasan_save_stack+0x2c/0x60
__kasan_kmalloc+0xec/0x104
__kmalloc+0x224/0x3c4
__register_sysctl_paths+0x200/0x290
register_sysctl_table+0x2c/0x40
sysctl_init+0x20/0x34
proc_sys_init+0x3c/0x48
proc_root_init+0x80/0x9c
start_kernel+0x648/0x6a4
__primary_switched+0xc0/0xc8
Freed by task 0:
kasan_save_stack+0x2c/0x60
kasan_set_track+0x2c/0x40
kasan_set_free_info+0x44/0x54
____kasan_slab_free.constprop.0+0x150/0x1b0
__kasan_slab_free+0x14/0x20
slab_free_freelist_hook+0xa4/0x1fc
kfree+0x1e8/0x30c
put_fs_context+0x124/0x220
vfs_kern_mount.part.0+0x60/0xd4
kern_mount+0x24/0x4c
bdev_cache_init+0x70/0x9c
vfs_caches_init+0xdc/0xf4
start_kernel+0x638/0x6a4
__primary_switched+0xc0/0xc8
The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff0000c0074e00
which belongs to the cache kmalloc-256 of size 256
The buggy address is located 176 bytes inside of
256-byte region [ffff0000c0074e00, ffff0000c0074f00)
The buggy address belongs to the page:
page:(____ptrval____) refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x100074
head:(____ptrval____) order:2 compound_mapcount:0 compound_pincount:0
flags: 0xbfffc0000010200(slab|head|node=0|zone=2|lastcpupid=0xffff|kasantag=0x0)
raw: 0bfffc0000010200 0000000000000000 dead000000000122 f5ff0000c0002300
raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000200020 00000001ffffffff 0000000000000000
page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected
Memory state around the buggy address:
ffff0000c0074c00: f0 f0 f0 f0 f0 f0 f0 f0 f0 fe fe fe fe fe fe fe
ffff0000c0074d00: fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe
>ffff0000c0074e00: f7 f7 f7 f7 f7 f7 f7 f7 f7 f7 f7 fe fe fe fe fe
^
ffff0000c0074f00: fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe
ffff0000c0075000: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
==================================================================
Disabling lock debugging due to kernel taint
kmemleak: 181 new suspected memory leaks (see /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak)
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210804090957.12393-1-Kuan-Ying.Lee@mediatek.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210804090957.12393-2-Kuan-Ying.Lee@mediatek.com
Signed-off-by: Kuan-Ying Lee <Kuan-Ying.Lee@mediatek.com>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>
Cc: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Cc: Nicholas Tang <nicholas.tang@mediatek.com>
Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Cc: Chinwen Chang <chinwen.chang@mediatek.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit contains 3 modifications:
1. Convert the type of jiffies_scan_wait to "unsigned long".
2. Use READ/WRITE_ONCE() for accessing "jiffies_scan_wait".
3. Fix the possible wrong memory scanning period. If you set a large
memory scanning period like blow, then the "secs" variable will be
non-zero, however the value of "jiffies_scan_wait" will be zero.
echo "scan=0x10000000" > /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak
It is because the type of the msecs_to_jiffies()'s parameter is "unsigned
int", and the "secs * 1000" is larger than its max value. This in turn
leads a unexpected jiffies_scan_wait, maybe zero. We corret it by
replacing kstrtoul() with kstrtouint(), and check the msecs to prevent it
larger than UINT_MAX.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210613174022.23044-1-yanfei.xu@windriver.com
Signed-off-by: Yanfei Xu <yanfei.xu@windriver.com>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Because memblock allocations are registered with kmemleak, the KFENCE
pool was seen by kmemleak as one large object. Later allocations
through kfence_alloc() that were registered with kmemleak via
slab_post_alloc_hook() would then overlap and trigger a warning.
Therefore, once the pool is initialized, we can remove (free) it from
kmemleak again, since it should be treated as allocator-internal and be
seen as "free memory".
The second problem is that kmemleak is passed the rounded size, and not
the originally requested size, which is also the size of KFENCE objects.
To avoid kmemleak scanning past the end of an object and trigger a
KFENCE out-of-bounds error, fix the size if it is a KFENCE object.
For simplicity, to avoid a call to kfence_ksize() in
slab_post_alloc_hook() (and avoid new IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK)
guard), just call kfence_ksize() in mm/kmemleak.c:create_object().
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210317084740.3099921-1-elver@google.com
Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Reported-by: Luis Henriques <lhenriques@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Tested-by: Luis Henriques <lhenriques@suse.de>
Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>
Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
kmemleak_scan() currently relies on the big tasklist_lock hammer to
stabilize iterating through the tasklist. Instead, this patch proposes
simply using rcu along with the rcu-safe for_each_process_thread flavor
(without changing scan semantics), which doesn't make use of
next_thread/p->thread_group and thus cannot race with exit. Furthermore,
any races with fork() and not seeing the new child should be benign as
it's not running yet and can also be detected by the next scan.
Avoiding the tasklist_lock could prove beneficial for performance
considering the scan operation is done periodically. I have seen
improvements of 30%-ish when doing similar replacements on very
pathological microbenchmarks (ie stressing get/setpriority(2)).
However my main motivation is that it's one less user of the global
lock, something that Linus has long time wanted to see gone eventually
(if ever) even if the traditional fairness issues has been dealt with
now with qrwlocks. Of course this is a very long ways ahead. This
patch also kills another user of the deprecated tsk->thread_group.
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200820203902.11308-1-dave@stgolabs.net
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Even if KCSAN is disabled for kmemleak, update_checksum() could still call
crc32() (which is outside of kmemleak.c) to dereference object->pointer.
Thus, the value of object->pointer could be accessed concurrently as
noticed by KCSAN,
BUG: KCSAN: data-race in crc32_le_base / do_raw_spin_lock
write to 0xffffb0ea683a7d50 of 4 bytes by task 23575 on cpu 12:
do_raw_spin_lock+0x114/0x200
debug_spin_lock_after at kernel/locking/spinlock_debug.c:91
(inlined by) do_raw_spin_lock at kernel/locking/spinlock_debug.c:115
_raw_spin_lock+0x40/0x50
__handle_mm_fault+0xa9e/0xd00
handle_mm_fault+0xfc/0x2f0
do_page_fault+0x263/0x6f9
page_fault+0x34/0x40
read to 0xffffb0ea683a7d50 of 4 bytes by task 839 on cpu 60:
crc32_le_base+0x67/0x350
crc32_le_base+0x67/0x350:
crc32_body at lib/crc32.c:106
(inlined by) crc32_le_generic at lib/crc32.c:179
(inlined by) crc32_le at lib/crc32.c:197
kmemleak_scan+0x528/0xd90
update_checksum at mm/kmemleak.c:1172
(inlined by) kmemleak_scan at mm/kmemleak.c:1497
kmemleak_scan_thread+0xcc/0xfa
kthread+0x1e0/0x200
ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50
If a shattered value was returned due to a data race, it will be corrected
in the next scan. Thus, let KCSAN ignore all reads in the region to
silence KCSAN in case the write side is non-atomic.
Suggested-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200317182754.2180-1-cai@lca.pw
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Clang warns:
mm/kmemleak.c:1955:28: warning: array comparison always evaluates to a constant [-Wtautological-compare]
if (__start_ro_after_init < _sdata || __end_ro_after_init > _edata)
^
mm/kmemleak.c:1955:60: warning: array comparison always evaluates to a constant [-Wtautological-compare]
if (__start_ro_after_init < _sdata || __end_ro_after_init > _edata)
These are not true arrays, they are linker defined symbols, which are just
addresses. Using the address of operator silences the warning and does
not change the resulting assembly with either clang/ld.lld or gcc/ld
(tested with diff + objdump -Dr).
Suggested-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/895
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200220051551.44000-1-natechancellor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
kmemleak_lock as a rwlock on RT can possibly be acquired in atomic
context which does work.
Since the kmemleak operation is performed in atomic context make it a
raw_spinlock_t so it can also be acquired on RT. This is used for
debugging and is not enabled by default in a production like environment
(where performance/latency matters) so it makes sense to make it a
raw_spinlock_t instead trying to get rid of the atomic context. Turn
also the kmemleak_object->lock into raw_spinlock_t which is acquired
(nested) while the kmemleak_lock is held.
The time spent in "echo scan > kmemleak" slightly improved on 64core box
with this patch applied after boot.
[bigeasy@linutronix.de: redo the description, update comments. Merge the individual bits: He Zhe did the kmemleak_lock, Liu Haitao the ->lock and Yongxin Liu forwarded Liu's patch.]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191219170834.4tah3prf2gdothz4@linutronix.de
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181218150744.GB20197@arrakis.emea.arm.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1542877459-144382-1-git-send-email-zhe.he@windriver.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190927082230.34152-1-yongxin.liu@windriver.com
Signed-off-by: He Zhe <zhe.he@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Liu Haitao <haitao.liu@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Yongxin Liu <yongxin.liu@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
