Commit Graph

10 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Rae Moar
c72a870926 kunit: add ability to run tests after boot using debugfs
Add functionality to run built-in tests after boot by writing to a
debugfs file.

Add a new debugfs file labeled "run" for each test suite to use for
this purpose.

As an example, write to the file using the following:

echo "any string" > /sys/kernel/debugfs/kunit/<testsuite>/run

This will trigger the test suite to run and will print results to the
kernel log.

To guard against running tests concurrently with this feature, add a
mutex lock around running kunit. This supports the current practice of
not allowing tests to be run concurrently on the same kernel.

This new functionality could be used to design a parameter
injection feature in the future.

Fixed up merge conflict duing rebase to Linux 6.7-rc6
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>

Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-12-18 13:25:49 -07:00
Richard Fitzgerald
1557e89d3a kunit: debugfs: Handle errors from alloc_string_stream()
In kunit_debugfs_create_suite() give up and skip creating the debugfs
file if any of the alloc_string_stream() calls return an error or NULL.
Only put a value in the log pointer of kunit_suite and kunit_test if it
is a valid pointer to a log.

This prevents the potential invalid dereference reported by smatch:

 lib/kunit/debugfs.c:115 kunit_debugfs_create_suite() error: 'suite->log'
	dereferencing possible ERR_PTR()
 lib/kunit/debugfs.c:119 kunit_debugfs_create_suite() error: 'test_case->log'
	dereferencing possible ERR_PTR()

Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Fixes: 05e2006ce4 ("kunit: Use string_stream for test log")
Reviewed-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-12-18 13:21:15 -07:00
Richard Fitzgerald
34dfd5bb2e kunit: debugfs: Fix unchecked dereference in debugfs_print_results()
Move the call to kunit_suite_has_succeeded() after the check that
the kunit_suite pointer is valid.

This was found by smatch:

 lib/kunit/debugfs.c:66 debugfs_print_results() warn: variable
 dereferenced before check 'suite' (see line 63)

Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Fixes: 38289a26e1 ("kunit: fix debugfs code to use enum kunit_status, not bool")
Reviewed-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-12-18 13:21:14 -07:00
Richard Fitzgerald
05e2006ce4 kunit: Use string_stream for test log
Replace the fixed-size log buffer with a string_stream so that the
log can grow as lines are added.

The existing kunit log tests have been updated for using a
string_stream as the log. No new test have been added because there
are already tests for the underlying string_stream.

As the log tests now depend on string_stream functions they cannot
build when kunit-test is a module. They have been surrounded by
a #if to replace them with skipping version when the test is
build as a module. Though this isn't pretty, it avoids moving
code to another file while that code is also being changed.

Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-09-18 10:45:53 -06:00
Arnd Bergmann
23108f6aac kunit: include debugfs header file
An extra #include statement is needed to ensure the prototypes for debugfs
interfaces are visible, avoiding this warning:

lib/kunit/debugfs.c:28:6: error: no previous prototype for 'kunit_debugfs_cleanup' [-Werror=missing-prototypes]
lib/kunit/debugfs.c:33:6: error: no previous prototype for 'kunit_debugfs_init' [-Werror=missing-prototypes]
lib/kunit/debugfs.c:102:6: error: no previous prototype for 'kunit_debugfs_create_suite' [-Werror=missing-prototypes]
lib/kunit/debugfs.c:118:6: error: no previous prototype for 'kunit_debugfs_destroy_suite' [-Werror=missing-prototypes]

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230517131102.934196-10-arnd@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>
Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
Cc: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-06-09 17:44:16 -07:00
Rae Moar
f9a301c331 kunit: fix bug in the order of lines in debugfs logs
Fix bug in debugfs logs that causes an incorrect order of lines in the
debugfs log.

Currently, the test counts lines that show the number of tests passed,
failed, and skipped, as well as any suite diagnostic lines,
appear prior to the individual results, which is a bug.

Ensure the order of printing for the debugfs log is correct. Additionally,
add a KTAP header to so the debugfs logs can be valid KTAP.

This is an example of a log prior to these fixes:

     KTAP version 1

     # Subtest: kunit_status
     1..2
 # kunit_status: pass:2 fail:0 skip:0 total:2
 # Totals: pass:2 fail:0 skip:0 total:2
     ok 1 kunit_status_set_failure_test
     ok 2 kunit_status_mark_skipped_test
 ok 1 kunit_status

Note the two lines with stats are out of order. This is the same debugfs
log after the fixes (in combination with the third patch to remove the
extra line):

 KTAP version 1
 1..1
     KTAP version 1
     # Subtest: kunit_status
     1..2
     ok 1 kunit_status_set_failure_test
     ok 2 kunit_status_mark_skipped_test
 # kunit_status: pass:2 fail:0 skip:0 total:2
 # Totals: pass:2 fail:0 skip:0 total:2
 ok 1 kunit_status

Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-03-10 13:59:38 -07:00
Rae Moar
6c738b5231 kunit: improve KTAP compliance of KUnit test output
Change KUnit test output to better comply with KTAP v1 specifications
found here: https://kernel.org/doc/html/latest/dev-tools/ktap.html.
1) Use "KTAP version 1" instead of "TAP version 14" as test output header
2) Remove '-' between test number and test name on test result lines
2) Add KTAP version lines to each subtest header as well

Note that the new KUnit output still includes the “# Subtest” line now
located after the KTAP version line. This does not completely match the
KTAP v1 spec but since it is classified as a diagnostic line, it is not
expected to be disruptive or break any existing parsers. This
“# Subtest” line comes from the TAP 14 spec
(https://testanything.org/tap-version-14-specification.html) and it is
used to define the test name before the results.

Original output:

 TAP version 14
 1..1
   # Subtest: kunit-test-suite
   1..3
   ok 1 - kunit_test_1
   ok 2 - kunit_test_2
   ok 3 - kunit_test_3
 # kunit-test-suite: pass:3 fail:0 skip:0 total:3
 # Totals: pass:3 fail:0 skip:0 total:3
 ok 1 - kunit-test-suite

New output:

 KTAP version 1
 1..1
   KTAP version 1
   # Subtest: kunit-test-suite
   1..3
   ok 1 kunit_test_1
   ok 2 kunit_test_2
   ok 3 kunit_test_3
 # kunit-test-suite: pass:3 fail:0 skip:0 total:3
 # Totals: pass:3 fail:0 skip:0 total:3
 ok 1 kunit-test-suite

Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Tested-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2022-12-12 14:13:47 -07:00
Daniel Latypov
38289a26e1 kunit: fix debugfs code to use enum kunit_status, not bool
Commit 6d2426b2f2 ("kunit: Support skipped tests") switched to using
`enum kunit_status` to track the result of running a test/suite since we
now have more than just pass/fail.

This callsite wasn't updated, silently converting to enum to a bool and
then back.

Fixes: 6d2426b2f2 ("kunit: Support skipped tests")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2022-05-02 12:36:03 -06:00
David Gow
6d2426b2f2 kunit: Support skipped tests
The kunit_mark_skipped() macro marks the current test as "skipped", with
the provided reason. The kunit_skip() macro will mark the test as
skipped, and abort the test.

The TAP specification supports this "SKIP directive" as a comment after
the "ok" / "not ok" for a test. See the "Directives" section of the TAP
spec for details:
https://testanything.org/tap-specification.html#directives

The 'success' field for KUnit tests is replaced with a kunit_status
enum, which can be SUCCESS, FAILURE, or SKIPPED, combined with a
'status_comment' containing information on why a test was skipped.

A new 'kunit_status' test suite is added to test this.

Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Tested-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-06-25 11:31:03 -06:00
Alan Maguire
e2219db280 kunit: add debugfs /sys/kernel/debug/kunit/<suite>/results display
add debugfs support for displaying kunit test suite results; this is
especially useful for module-loaded tests to allow disentangling of
test result display from other dmesg events.  debugfs support is
provided if CONFIG_KUNIT_DEBUGFS=y.

As well as printk()ing messages, we append them to a per-test log.

Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-03-26 14:07:18 -06:00