Add a new registration opcode IORING_REGISTER_CLOCK, which allows the
user to select which clock id it wants to use with CQ waiting timeouts.
It only allows a subset of all posix clocks and currently supports
CLOCK_MONOTONIC and CLOCK_BOOTTIME.
Suggested-by: Lewis Baker <lewissbaker@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/98f2bc8a3c36cdf8f0e6a275245e81e903459703.1723039801.git.asml.silence@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Remove io_napi_adjust_timeout() and move the adjustments out of the
common path into __io_napi_busy_loop(). Now the limit it's calculated
based on struct io_wait_queue::timeout, for which we query current time
another time. The overhead shouldn't be a problem, it's a polling path,
however that can be optimised later by additionally saving the delta
time value in io_cqring_wait().
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/88e14686e245b3b42ff90a3c4d70895d48676206.1723039801.git.asml.silence@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
io_napi_entry() has 2 calling sites. One of them is unlikely to find an
entry and if it does, the timeout should arguable not be updated.
The other io_napi_entry() calling site is overwriting the update made
by io_napi_entry() so the io_napi_entry() timeout value update has no or
little value and therefore is removed.
Signed-off-by: Olivier Langlois <olivier@trillion01.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/145b54ff179f87609e20dffaf5563c07cdbcad1a.1723423275.git.olivier@trillion01.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
doing so avoids the overhead of adding napi ids to all the rings that do
not enable napi.
if no id is added to napi_list because napi is disabled,
__io_napi_busy_loop() will not be called.
Signed-off-by: Olivier Langlois <olivier@trillion01.com>
Fixes: b4ccc4dd13 ("io_uring/napi: enable even with a timeout of 0")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/bd989ccef5fda14f5fd9888faf4fefcf66bd0369.1723400131.git.olivier@trillion01.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
It's more natural to use ktime/ns instead of keeping around usec,
especially since we're comparing it against user provided timers,
so convert napi busy poll internal handling to ktime. It's also nicer
since the type (ktime_t vs unsigned long) now tells the unit of measure.
Keep everything as ktime, which we convert to/from micro seconds for
IORING_[UN]REGISTER_NAPI. The net/ busy polling works seems to work with
usec, however it's not real usec as shift by 10 is used to get it from
nsecs, see busy_loop_current_time(), so it's easy to get truncated nsec
back and we get back better precision.
Note, we can further improve it later by removing the truncation and
maybe convincing net/ to use ktime/ns instead.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/95e7ec8d095069a3ed5d40a4bc6f8b586698bc7e.1722003776.git.asml.silence@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Since the do_div() macro casts the divisor to u32 anyway, remove the
unnecessary s64 cast and fix the following Coccinelle/coccicheck
warning reported by do_div.cocci:
WARNING: do_div() does a 64-by-32 division, please consider using div64_s64 instead
Signed-off-by: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@toblux.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240710010520.384009-2-thorsten.blum@toblux.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Not quite sure what __io_napi_adjust_timeout() was attemping to do, it's
adjusting both the NAPI timeout and the general overall timeout, and
calculating a value that is never used. The overall timeout is a super
set of the NAPI timeout, and doesn't need adjusting. The only thing we
really need to care about is that the NAPI timeout doesn't exceed the
overall timeout. If a user asked for a timeout of eg 5 usec and NAPI
timeout is 10 usec, then we should not spin for 10 usec.
While in there, sanitize the time checking a bit. If we have a negative
value in the passed in timeout, discard it. Round up the value as well,
so we don't end up with a NAPI timeout for the majority of the wait,
with only a tiny sleep value at the end.
Hence the only case we need to care about is if the NAPI timeout is
larger than the overall timeout. If it is, cap the NAPI timeout at what
the overall timeout is.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 8d0c12a80c ("io-uring: add napi busy poll support")
Reported-by: Lewis Baker <lewissbaker@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
1 usec is not as short as it used to be, and it makes sense to allow 0
for a busy poll timeout - this means just do one loop to check if we
have anything available. Add a separate ->napi_enabled to check if napi
has been enabled or not.
While at it, move the writing of the ctx napi values after we've copied
the old values back to userspace. This ensures that if the call fails,
we'll be in the same state as we were before, rather than some
indeterminate state.
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
While testing io_uring NAPI with DEFER_TASKRUN, I ran into slowdowns and
stalls in packet delivery. Turns out that while
io_napi_busy_loop_should_end() aborts appropriately on regular
task_work, it does not abort if we have local task_work pending.
Move io_has_work() into the private io_uring.h header, and gate whether
we should continue polling on that as well. This makes NAPI polling on
send/receive work as designed with IORING_SETUP_DEFER_TASKRUN as well.
Fixes: 8d0c12a80c ("io-uring: add napi busy poll support")
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
This adds an api to register and unregister the napi for io-uring. If
the arg value is specified when unregistering, the current napi setting
for the busy poll timeout is copied into the user structure. If this is
not required, NULL can be passed as the arg value.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Roesch <shr@devkernel.io>
Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230608163839.2891748-7-shr@devkernel.io
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
This adds the sqpoll support to the io-uring napi.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Roesch <shr@devkernel.io>
Suggested-by: Olivier Langlois <olivier@trillion01.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230608163839.2891748-6-shr@devkernel.io
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
This adds the napi busy polling support in io_uring.c. It adds a new
napi_list to the io_ring_ctx structure. This list contains the list of
napi_id's that are currently enabled for busy polling. The list is
synchronized by the new napi_lock spin lock. The current default napi
busy polling time is stored in napi_busy_poll_to. If napi busy polling
is not enabled, the value is 0.
In addition there is also a hash table. The hash table store the napi
id and the pointer to the above list nodes. The hash table is used to
speed up the lookup to the list elements. The hash table is synchronized
with rcu.
The NAPI_TIMEOUT is stored as a timeout to make sure that the time a
napi entry is stored in the napi list is limited.
The busy poll timeout is also stored as part of the io_wait_queue. This
is necessary as for sq polling the poll interval needs to be adjusted
and the napi callback allows only to pass in one value.
This has been tested with two simple programs from the liburing library
repository: the napi client and the napi server program. The client
sends a request, which has a timestamp in its payload and the server
replies with the same payload. The client calculates the roundtrip time
and stores it to calculate the results.
The client is running on host1 and the server is running on host 2 (in
the same rack). The measured times below are roundtrip times. They are
average times over 5 runs each. Each run measures 1 million roundtrips.
no rx coal rx coal: frames=88,usecs=33
Default 57us 56us
client_poll=100us 47us 46us
server_poll=100us 51us 46us
client_poll=100us+ 40us 40us
server_poll=100us
client_poll=100us+ 41us 39us
server_poll=100us+
prefer napi busy poll on client
client_poll=100us+ 41us 39us
server_poll=100us+
prefer napi busy poll on server
client_poll=100us+ 41us 39us
server_poll=100us+
prefer napi busy poll on client + server
Signed-off-by: Stefan Roesch <shr@devkernel.io>
Suggested-by: Olivier Langlois <olivier@trillion01.com>
Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230608163839.2891748-5-shr@devkernel.io
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
