mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-14 08:02:07 +00:00
iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: Fix selection of ST_LSM6DS3_ID
At the moment, attempting to probe a device with ST_LSM6DS3_ID (e.g. using the st,lsm6ds3 compatible) fails with: st_lsm6dsx_i2c 1-006b: unsupported whoami [69] ... even though 0x69 is the whoami listed for ST_LSM6DS3_ID. This happens because st_lsm6dsx_check_whoami() also attempts to match unspecified (zero-initialized) entries in the "id" array. ST_LSM6DS3_ID = 0 will therefore match any entry in st_lsm6dsx_sensor_settings (here: the first), because none of them actually have all 12 entries listed in the "id" array. Avoid this by additionally checking if "name" is set, which is only set for valid entries in the "id" array. Note: Although the problem was introduced earlier it did not surface until commit52f4b1f196
("iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: add support for accel/gyro unit of lsm9ds1") because ST_LSM6DS3_ID was the first entry in st_lsm6dsx_sensor_settings. Fixes:d068e4a0f9
("iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: add support to multiple devices with the same settings") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.4 Acked-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
d7857e4ee1
commit
fb4fbc8904
@ -1301,7 +1301,8 @@ static int st_lsm6dsx_check_whoami(struct st_lsm6dsx_hw *hw, int id,
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(st_lsm6dsx_sensor_settings); i++) {
|
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(st_lsm6dsx_sensor_settings); i++) {
|
||||||
for (j = 0; j < ST_LSM6DSX_MAX_ID; j++) {
|
for (j = 0; j < ST_LSM6DSX_MAX_ID; j++) {
|
||||||
if (id == st_lsm6dsx_sensor_settings[i].id[j].hw_id)
|
if (st_lsm6dsx_sensor_settings[i].id[j].name &&
|
||||||
|
id == st_lsm6dsx_sensor_settings[i].id[j].hw_id)
|
||||||
break;
|
break;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
if (j < ST_LSM6DSX_MAX_ID)
|
if (j < ST_LSM6DSX_MAX_ID)
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user