mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-19 02:21:47 +00:00
powerpc/xics: Make sure we have a sensible default distribution server
Even when nothing is specified in the device tree, and despite the fact that we don't setup links properly yet, we still need a reasonable value in there or some interrupts won't be setup properly to point to an existing processor. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
50fb8ebe7c
commit
f6e17f9b0b
@ -57,7 +57,9 @@ void xics_update_irq_servers(void)
|
||||
BUG_ON(!np);
|
||||
|
||||
hcpuid = get_hard_smp_processor_id(boot_cpuid);
|
||||
xics_default_server = hcpuid;
|
||||
xics_default_server = xics_default_distrib_server = hcpuid;
|
||||
|
||||
pr_devel("xics: xics_default_server = 0x%x\n", xics_default_server);
|
||||
|
||||
ireg = of_get_property(np, "ibm,ppc-interrupt-gserver#s", &ilen);
|
||||
if (!ireg) {
|
||||
@ -75,9 +77,11 @@ void xics_update_irq_servers(void)
|
||||
for (j = 0; j < i; j += 2) {
|
||||
if (ireg[j] == hcpuid) {
|
||||
xics_default_distrib_server = ireg[j+1];
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pr_devel("xics: xics_default_distrib_server = 0x%x\n",
|
||||
xics_default_distrib_server);
|
||||
of_node_put(np);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -113,7 +117,7 @@ void xics_mask_unknown_vec(unsigned int vec)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct ics *ics;
|
||||
|
||||
pr_err("Interrupt %u (real) is invalid, disabling it.\n", vec);
|
||||
pr_err("Interrupt 0x%x (real) is invalid, disabling it.\n", vec);
|
||||
|
||||
list_for_each_entry(ics, &ics_list, link)
|
||||
ics->mask_unknown(ics, vec);
|
||||
@ -293,6 +297,8 @@ unlock:
|
||||
* If not we set it to the first cpu in the mask, even if multiple cpus
|
||||
* are set. This is so things like irqbalance (which set core and package
|
||||
* wide affinities) do the right thing.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* We need to fix this to implement support for the links
|
||||
*/
|
||||
int xics_get_irq_server(unsigned int virq, const struct cpumask *cpumask,
|
||||
unsigned int strict_check)
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user