mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-11 06:31:49 +00:00
um: line: Don't free winch (with IRQ) under spinlock
Lockdep correctly complains that one shouldn't call um_free_irq() with free_irq() inside under a spinlock since that will attempt to acquire a mutex. Rearrange the code to keep the list manipulations under the lock while moving the actual freeing outside of it, to avoid this. In particular, this removes the lockdep complaint at shutdown that I was seeing with lockdep enabled. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Acked-By: anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
This commit is contained in:
parent
fc6b6a872d
commit
f4ab7818ef
@ -608,7 +608,6 @@ static void free_winch(struct winch *winch)
|
||||
winch->fd = -1;
|
||||
if (fd != -1)
|
||||
os_close_file(fd);
|
||||
list_del(&winch->list);
|
||||
__free_winch(&winch->work);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -709,6 +708,8 @@ static void unregister_winch(struct tty_struct *tty)
|
||||
winch = list_entry(ele, struct winch, list);
|
||||
wtty = tty_port_tty_get(winch->port);
|
||||
if (wtty == tty) {
|
||||
list_del(&winch->list);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&winch_handler_lock);
|
||||
free_winch(winch);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -719,14 +720,17 @@ static void unregister_winch(struct tty_struct *tty)
|
||||
|
||||
static void winch_cleanup(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct list_head *ele, *next;
|
||||
struct winch *winch;
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock(&winch_handler_lock);
|
||||
while ((winch = list_first_entry_or_null(&winch_handlers,
|
||||
struct winch, list))) {
|
||||
list_del(&winch->list);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&winch_handler_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
list_for_each_safe(ele, next, &winch_handlers) {
|
||||
winch = list_entry(ele, struct winch, list);
|
||||
free_winch(winch);
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock(&winch_handler_lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
spin_unlock(&winch_handler_lock);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user