Minki/linux
1
0
Fork 1
mirror of https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git synced 2024-12-25 04:11:49 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

fscache: Fix reference overput in fscache_attach_object() error handling

Browse Source 
When a cookie is allocated that causes fscache_object structs to be
allocated, those objects are initialised with the cookie pointer, but
aren't blessed with a ref on that cookie unless the attachment is
successfully completed in fscache_attach_object().

If attachment fails because the parent object was dying or there was a
collision, fscache_attach_object() returns without incrementing the cookie
counter - but upon failure of this function, the object is released which
then puts the cookie, whether or not a ref was taken on the cookie.

Fix this by taking a ref on the cookie when it is assigned in
fscache_object_init(), even when we're creating a root object.


Analysis from Kiran Kumar:

This bug has been seen in 4.4.0-124-generic #148-Ubuntu kernel

BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1776277

fscache cookie ref count updated incorrectly during fscache object
allocation resulting in following Oops.

kernel BUG at /build/linux-Y09MKI/linux-4.4.0/fs/fscache/internal.h:321!
kernel BUG at /build/linux-Y09MKI/linux-4.4.0/fs/fscache/cookie.c:639!

[Cause]
Two threads are trying to do operate on a cookie and two objects.

(1) One thread tries to unmount the filesystem and in process goes over a
    huge list of objects marking them dead and deleting the objects.
    cookie->usage is also decremented in following path:

      nfs_fscache_release_super_cookie
       -> __fscache_relinquish_cookie
        ->__fscache_cookie_put
        ->BUG_ON(atomic_read(&cookie->usage) <= 0);

(2) A second thread tries to lookup an object for reading data in following
    path:

    fscache_alloc_object
    1) cachefiles_alloc_object
        -> fscache_object_init
           -> assign cookie, but usage not bumped.
    2) fscache_attach_object -> fails in cant_attach_object because the
         cookie's backing object or cookie's->parent object are going away
    3) fscache_put_object
        -> cachefiles_put_object
          ->fscache_object_destroy
            ->fscache_cookie_put
               ->BUG_ON(atomic_read(&cookie->usage) <= 0);

[NOTE from dhowells] It's unclear as to the circumstances in which (2) can
take place, given that thread (1) is in nfs_kill_super(), however a
conflicting NFS mount with slightly different parameters that creates a
different superblock would do it.  A backtrace from Kiran seems to show
that this is a possibility:

    kernel BUG at/build/linux-Y09MKI/linux-4.4.0/fs/fscache/cookie.c:639!
    ...
    RIP: __fscache_cookie_put+0x3a/0x40 [fscache]
    Call Trace:
     __fscache_relinquish_cookie+0x87/0x120 [fscache]
     nfs_fscache_release_super_cookie+0x2d/0xb0 [nfs]
     nfs_kill_super+0x29/0x40 [nfs]
     deactivate_locked_super+0x48/0x80
     deactivate_super+0x5c/0x60
     cleanup_mnt+0x3f/0x90
     __cleanup_mnt+0x12/0x20
     task_work_run+0x86/0xb0
     exit_to_usermode_loop+0xc2/0xd0
     syscall_return_slowpath+0x4e/0x60
     int_ret_from_sys_call+0x25/0x9f

[Fix] Bump up the cookie usage in fscache_object_init, when it is first
being assigned a cookie atomically such that the cookie is added and bumped
up if its refcount is not zero.  Remove the assignment in
fscache_attach_object().

[Testcase]
I have run ~100 hours of NFS stress tests and not seen this bug recur.

[Regression Potential]
 - Limited to fscache/cachefiles.

Fixes: ccc4fc3d11 ("FS-Cache: Implement the cookie management part of the netfs API")
Signed-off-by: Kiran Kumar Modukuri <kiran.modukuri@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
Kiran Kumar Modukuri 2018-06-21 13:31:44 -07:00 committed by David Howells
parent 934140ab02
commit f29507ce66
4 changed files with 8 additions and 5 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

3
fs/cachefiles/bind.c
View File

@ -218,7 +218,8 @@ static int cachefiles_daemon_add_cache(struct cachefiles_cache *cache)
"%s",
fsdef->dentry->d_sb->s_id);
fscache_object_init(&fsdef->fscache, NULL, &cache->cache);
fscache_object_init(&fsdef->fscache, &fscache_fsdef_index,
&cache->cache);
ret = fscache_add_cache(&cache->cache, &fsdef->fscache, cache->tag);
if (ret < 0)

2
fs/fscache/cache.c
View File

@ -220,6 +220,7 @@ int fscache_add_cache(struct fscache_cache *cache,
{
struct fscache_cache_tag *tag;
ASSERTCMP(ifsdef->cookie, ==, &fscache_fsdef_index);
BUG_ON(!cache->ops);
BUG_ON(!ifsdef);
@ -248,7 +249,6 @@ int fscache_add_cache(struct fscache_cache *cache,
if (!cache->kobj)
goto error;
ifsdef->cookie = &fscache_fsdef_index;
ifsdef->cache = cache;
cache->fsdef = ifsdef;

7
fs/fscache/cookie.c
View File

@ -516,6 +516,7 @@ static int fscache_alloc_object(struct fscache_cache *cache,
goto error;
}
ASSERTCMP(object->cookie, ==, cookie);
fscache_stat(&fscache_n_object_alloc);
object->debug_id = atomic_inc_return(&fscache_object_debug_id);
@ -571,6 +572,8 @@ static int fscache_attach_object(struct fscache_cookie *cookie,
_enter("{%s},{OBJ%x}", cookie->def->name, object->debug_id);
ASSERTCMP(object->cookie, ==, cookie);
spin_lock(&cookie->lock);
/* there may be multiple initial creations of this object, but we only
@ -610,9 +613,7 @@ static int fscache_attach_object(struct fscache_cookie *cookie,
spin_unlock(&cache->object_list_lock);
}
/* attach to the cookie */
object->cookie = cookie;
fscache_cookie_get(cookie, fscache_cookie_get_attach_object);
/* Attach to the cookie. The object already has a ref on it. */
hlist_add_head(&object->cookie_link, &cookie->backing_objects);
fscache_objlist_add(object);

1
fs/fscache/object.c
View File

@ -327,6 +327,7 @@ void fscache_object_init(struct fscache_object *object,
object->store_limit_l = 0;
object->cache = cache;
object->cookie = cookie;
fscache_cookie_get(cookie, fscache_cookie_get_attach_object);
object->parent = NULL;
#ifdef CONFIG_FSCACHE_OBJECT_LIST
RB_CLEAR_NODE(&object->objlist_link);