mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-10 14:11:52 +00:00
selinux: cleanup selinux_xfrm_sock_rcv_skb() and selinux_xfrm_postroute_last()
Some basic simplification and comment reformatting. Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <pmoore@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
96484348ad
commit
eef9b41622
@ -44,10 +44,10 @@ static inline int selinux_xfrm_enabled(void)
|
||||
return (atomic_read(&selinux_xfrm_refcount) > 0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int selinux_xfrm_sock_rcv_skb(u32 sid, struct sk_buff *skb,
|
||||
struct common_audit_data *ad);
|
||||
int selinux_xfrm_postroute_last(u32 isec_sid, struct sk_buff *skb,
|
||||
struct common_audit_data *ad, u8 proto);
|
||||
int selinux_xfrm_sock_rcv_skb(u32 sk_sid, struct sk_buff *skb,
|
||||
struct common_audit_data *ad);
|
||||
int selinux_xfrm_postroute_last(u32 sk_sid, struct sk_buff *skb,
|
||||
struct common_audit_data *ad, u8 proto);
|
||||
int selinux_xfrm_decode_session(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 *sid, int ckall);
|
||||
|
||||
static inline void selinux_xfrm_notify_policyload(void)
|
||||
@ -61,14 +61,15 @@ static inline int selinux_xfrm_enabled(void)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static inline int selinux_xfrm_sock_rcv_skb(u32 isec_sid, struct sk_buff *skb,
|
||||
struct common_audit_data *ad)
|
||||
static inline int selinux_xfrm_sock_rcv_skb(u32 sk_sid, struct sk_buff *skb,
|
||||
struct common_audit_data *ad)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static inline int selinux_xfrm_postroute_last(u32 isec_sid, struct sk_buff *skb,
|
||||
struct common_audit_data *ad, u8 proto)
|
||||
static inline int selinux_xfrm_postroute_last(u32 sk_sid, struct sk_buff *skb,
|
||||
struct common_audit_data *ad,
|
||||
u8 proto)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -367,14 +367,12 @@ int selinux_xfrm_state_delete(struct xfrm_state *x)
|
||||
* we need to check for unlabelled access since this may not have
|
||||
* gone thru the IPSec process.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
int selinux_xfrm_sock_rcv_skb(u32 isec_sid, struct sk_buff *skb,
|
||||
struct common_audit_data *ad)
|
||||
int selinux_xfrm_sock_rcv_skb(u32 sk_sid, struct sk_buff *skb,
|
||||
struct common_audit_data *ad)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int i, rc = 0;
|
||||
struct sec_path *sp;
|
||||
u32 sel_sid = SECINITSID_UNLABELED;
|
||||
|
||||
sp = skb->sp;
|
||||
int i;
|
||||
struct sec_path *sp = skb->sp;
|
||||
u32 peer_sid = SECINITSID_UNLABELED;
|
||||
|
||||
if (sp) {
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < sp->len; i++) {
|
||||
@ -382,23 +380,17 @@ int selinux_xfrm_sock_rcv_skb(u32 isec_sid, struct sk_buff *skb,
|
||||
|
||||
if (x && selinux_authorizable_xfrm(x)) {
|
||||
struct xfrm_sec_ctx *ctx = x->security;
|
||||
sel_sid = ctx->ctx_sid;
|
||||
peer_sid = ctx->ctx_sid;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* This check even when there's no association involved is
|
||||
* intended, according to Trent Jaeger, to make sure a
|
||||
* process can't engage in non-ipsec communication unless
|
||||
* explicitly allowed by policy.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
rc = avc_has_perm(isec_sid, sel_sid, SECCLASS_ASSOCIATION,
|
||||
ASSOCIATION__RECVFROM, ad);
|
||||
|
||||
return rc;
|
||||
/* This check even when there's no association involved is intended,
|
||||
* according to Trent Jaeger, to make sure a process can't engage in
|
||||
* non-IPsec communication unless explicitly allowed by policy. */
|
||||
return avc_has_perm(sk_sid, peer_sid,
|
||||
SECCLASS_ASSOCIATION, ASSOCIATION__RECVFROM, ad);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
@ -408,49 +400,38 @@ int selinux_xfrm_sock_rcv_skb(u32 isec_sid, struct sk_buff *skb,
|
||||
* If we do have a authorizable security association, then it has already been
|
||||
* checked in the selinux_xfrm_state_pol_flow_match hook above.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
int selinux_xfrm_postroute_last(u32 isec_sid, struct sk_buff *skb,
|
||||
struct common_audit_data *ad, u8 proto)
|
||||
int selinux_xfrm_postroute_last(u32 sk_sid, struct sk_buff *skb,
|
||||
struct common_audit_data *ad, u8 proto)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct dst_entry *dst;
|
||||
int rc = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
dst = skb_dst(skb);
|
||||
|
||||
if (dst) {
|
||||
struct dst_entry *dst_test;
|
||||
|
||||
for (dst_test = dst; dst_test != NULL;
|
||||
dst_test = dst_test->child) {
|
||||
struct xfrm_state *x = dst_test->xfrm;
|
||||
|
||||
if (x && selinux_authorizable_xfrm(x))
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
switch (proto) {
|
||||
case IPPROTO_AH:
|
||||
case IPPROTO_ESP:
|
||||
case IPPROTO_COMP:
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We should have already seen this packet once before
|
||||
* it underwent xfrm(s). No need to subject it to the
|
||||
* unlabeled check.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
/* We should have already seen this packet once before it
|
||||
* underwent xfrm(s). No need to subject it to the unlabeled
|
||||
* check. */
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
default:
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* This check even when there's no association involved is
|
||||
* intended, according to Trent Jaeger, to make sure a
|
||||
* process can't engage in non-ipsec communication unless
|
||||
* explicitly allowed by policy.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
dst = skb_dst(skb);
|
||||
if (dst) {
|
||||
struct dst_entry *iter;
|
||||
|
||||
rc = avc_has_perm(isec_sid, SECINITSID_UNLABELED, SECCLASS_ASSOCIATION,
|
||||
ASSOCIATION__SENDTO, ad);
|
||||
out:
|
||||
return rc;
|
||||
for (iter = dst; iter != NULL; iter = iter->child) {
|
||||
struct xfrm_state *x = iter->xfrm;
|
||||
|
||||
if (x && selinux_authorizable_xfrm(x))
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* This check even when there's no association involved is intended,
|
||||
* according to Trent Jaeger, to make sure a process can't engage in
|
||||
* non-IPsec communication unless explicitly allowed by policy. */
|
||||
return avc_has_perm(sk_sid, SECINITSID_UNLABELED,
|
||||
SECCLASS_ASSOCIATION, ASSOCIATION__SENDTO, ad);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user