mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-15 00:21:59 +00:00
btrfs: comment the rest of implicit barriers before waitqueue_active
There are atomic operations that imply the barrier for waitqueue_active mixed in an if-condition. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
779adf0f64
commit
ee86395458
@ -463,6 +463,10 @@ static int __btrfs_add_delayed_deletion_item(struct btrfs_delayed_node *node,
|
||||
static void finish_one_item(struct btrfs_delayed_root *delayed_root)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int seq = atomic_inc_return(&delayed_root->items_seq);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* atomic_dec_return implies a barrier for waitqueue_active
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if ((atomic_dec_return(&delayed_root->items) <
|
||||
BTRFS_DELAYED_BACKGROUND || seq % BTRFS_DELAYED_BATCH == 0) &&
|
||||
waitqueue_active(&delayed_root->wait))
|
||||
|
@ -802,6 +802,9 @@ static void run_one_async_done(struct btrfs_work *work)
|
||||
limit = btrfs_async_submit_limit(fs_info);
|
||||
limit = limit * 2 / 3;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* atomic_dec_return implies a barrier for waitqueue_active
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (atomic_dec_return(&fs_info->nr_async_submits) < limit &&
|
||||
waitqueue_active(&fs_info->async_submit_wait))
|
||||
wake_up(&fs_info->async_submit_wait);
|
||||
|
@ -1096,6 +1096,9 @@ static noinline void async_cow_submit(struct btrfs_work *work)
|
||||
nr_pages = (async_cow->end - async_cow->start + PAGE_CACHE_SIZE) >>
|
||||
PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* atomic_sub_return implies a barrier for waitqueue_active
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (atomic_sub_return(nr_pages, &root->fs_info->async_delalloc_pages) <
|
||||
5 * 1024 * 1024 &&
|
||||
waitqueue_active(&root->fs_info->async_submit_wait))
|
||||
|
@ -79,6 +79,9 @@ void btrfs_clear_lock_blocking_rw(struct extent_buffer *eb, int rw)
|
||||
write_lock(&eb->lock);
|
||||
WARN_ON(atomic_read(&eb->spinning_writers));
|
||||
atomic_inc(&eb->spinning_writers);
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* atomic_dec_and_test implies a barrier for waitqueue_active
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&eb->blocking_writers) &&
|
||||
waitqueue_active(&eb->write_lock_wq))
|
||||
wake_up(&eb->write_lock_wq);
|
||||
@ -86,6 +89,9 @@ void btrfs_clear_lock_blocking_rw(struct extent_buffer *eb, int rw)
|
||||
BUG_ON(atomic_read(&eb->blocking_readers) == 0);
|
||||
read_lock(&eb->lock);
|
||||
atomic_inc(&eb->spinning_readers);
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* atomic_dec_and_test implies a barrier for waitqueue_active
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&eb->blocking_readers) &&
|
||||
waitqueue_active(&eb->read_lock_wq))
|
||||
wake_up(&eb->read_lock_wq);
|
||||
@ -229,6 +235,9 @@ void btrfs_tree_read_unlock_blocking(struct extent_buffer *eb)
|
||||
}
|
||||
btrfs_assert_tree_read_locked(eb);
|
||||
WARN_ON(atomic_read(&eb->blocking_readers) == 0);
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* atomic_dec_and_test implies a barrier for waitqueue_active
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&eb->blocking_readers) &&
|
||||
waitqueue_active(&eb->read_lock_wq))
|
||||
wake_up(&eb->read_lock_wq);
|
||||
|
@ -345,6 +345,9 @@ loop_lock:
|
||||
pending = pending->bi_next;
|
||||
cur->bi_next = NULL;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* atomic_dec_return implies a barrier for waitqueue_active
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (atomic_dec_return(&fs_info->nr_async_bios) < limit &&
|
||||
waitqueue_active(&fs_info->async_submit_wait))
|
||||
wake_up(&fs_info->async_submit_wait);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user