Minki/linux
1
0
Fork 1
mirror of https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git synced 2024-11-10 14:11:52 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

bpf: Protect against int overflow for stack access size

Browse Source 
This patch re-introduces protection against the size of access to stack
memory being negative; the access size can appear negative as a result
of overflowing its signed int representation. This should not actually
happen, as there are other protections along the way, but we should
protect against it anyway. One code path was missing such protections
(fixed in the previous patch in the series), causing out-of-bounds array
accesses in check_stack_range_initialized(). This patch causes the
verification of a program with such a non-sensical access size to fail.

This check used to exist in a more indirect way, but was inadvertendly
removed in a833a17aea.

Fixes: a833a17aea ("bpf: Fix verification of indirect var-off stack access")
Reported-by: syzbot+33f4297b5f927648741a@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+aafd0513053a1cbf52ef@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAADnVQLORV5PT0iTAhRER+iLBTkByCYNBYyvBSgjN1T31K+gOw@mail.gmail.com/
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrei Matei <andreimatei1@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240327024245.318299-3-andreimatei1@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Andrei Matei 2024-03-26 22:42:45 -04:00 committed by Alexei Starovoitov
parent a8d89feba7
commit ecc6a21018
1 changed files with 5 additions and 0 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

5
kernel/bpf/verifier.c
View File

@ -6701,6 +6701,11 @@ static int check_stack_access_within_bounds(
err = check_stack_slot_within_bounds(env, min_off, state, type);
if (!err && max_off > 0)
err = -EINVAL; /* out of stack access into non-negative offsets */
if (!err && access_size < 0)
/* access_size should not be negative (or overflow an int); others checks
* along the way should have prevented such an access.
*/
err = -EFAULT; /* invalid negative access size; integer overflow? */
if (err) {
if (tnum_is_const(reg->var_off)) {