btrfs: use btrfs_next_item() at scrub.c:find_first_extent_item()

There's no reason to open code what btrfs_next_item() does when searching
for extent items at scrub.c:scrub.c:find_first_extent_item(), so remove
the logic to find the next item and use btrfs_next_item() instead, making
the code shorter and less nested code blocks. While at it also fix the
comment to the plural "items" instead of "item" and end it with proper
punctuation.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This commit is contained in:
Filipe Manana 2023-11-21 13:38:37 +00:00 committed by David Sterba
parent 2ecec0d6a5
commit ebb0beca6c

View File

@ -1408,14 +1408,11 @@ search_forward:
if (ret > 0)
break;
next:
path->slots[0]++;
if (path->slots[0] >= btrfs_header_nritems(path->nodes[0])) {
ret = btrfs_next_leaf(extent_root, path);
if (ret) {
/* Either no more item or fatal error */
btrfs_release_path(path);
return ret;
}
ret = btrfs_next_item(extent_root, path);
if (ret) {
/* Either no more items or a fatal error. */
btrfs_release_path(path);
return ret;
}
}
btrfs_release_path(path);