mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-11 06:31:49 +00:00
cgroup: update how a newly forked task gets associated with css_set
When a new process is forked, cgroup_fork() associates it with the css_set of its parent but doesn't link it into it. After the new process is linked to tasklist, cgroup_post_fork() does the linking. This is problematic for cgroup_transfer_tasks() as there's no way to tell whether there are tasks which are pointing to a css_set but not linked yet. It is impossible to implement an operation which transfer all tasks of a cgroup to another and the current cgroup_transfer_tasks() can easily be tricked into leaving a newly forked process behind if it gets called between cgroup_fork() and cgroup_post_fork(). Let's make association with a css_set and linking atomic by moving it to cgroup_post_fork(). cgroup_fork() sets child->cgroups to init_css_set as a placeholder and cgroup_post_fork() is updated to perform both the association with the parent's cgroup and linking there. This means that a newly created task will point to init_css_set without holding a ref to it much like what it does on the exit path. Empty cg_list is used to indicate that the task isn't holding a ref to the associated css_set. This fixes an actual bug with cgroup_transfer_tasks(); however, I'm not marking it for -stable. The whole thing is broken in multiple other ways which require invasive updates to fix and I don't think it's worthwhile to bother with backporting this particular one. Fortunately, the only user is cpuset and these bugs don't crash the machine. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Acked-by: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
1958d2d53d
commit
eaf797abc5
@ -1342,8 +1342,12 @@ static void cgroup_enable_task_cg_lists(void)
|
||||
* racing against cgroup_exit().
|
||||
*/
|
||||
spin_lock_irq(&p->sighand->siglock);
|
||||
if (!(p->flags & PF_EXITING))
|
||||
list_add(&p->cg_list, &task_css_set(p)->tasks);
|
||||
if (!(p->flags & PF_EXITING)) {
|
||||
struct css_set *cset = task_css_set(p);
|
||||
|
||||
list_add(&p->cg_list, &cset->tasks);
|
||||
get_css_set(cset);
|
||||
}
|
||||
spin_unlock_irq(&p->sighand->siglock);
|
||||
|
||||
task_unlock(p);
|
||||
@ -1911,6 +1915,10 @@ static int cgroup_migrate(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct task_struct *leader,
|
||||
if (task->flags & PF_EXITING)
|
||||
goto next;
|
||||
|
||||
/* leave @task alone if post_fork() hasn't linked it yet */
|
||||
if (list_empty(&task->cg_list))
|
||||
goto next;
|
||||
|
||||
cset = task_css_set(task);
|
||||
if (!cset->mg_src_cgrp)
|
||||
goto next;
|
||||
@ -2815,6 +2823,12 @@ void css_task_iter_end(struct css_task_iter *it)
|
||||
* cgroup_trasnsfer_tasks - move tasks from one cgroup to another
|
||||
* @to: cgroup to which the tasks will be moved
|
||||
* @from: cgroup in which the tasks currently reside
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Locking rules between cgroup_post_fork() and the migration path
|
||||
* guarantee that, if a task is forking while being migrated, the new child
|
||||
* is guaranteed to be either visible in the source cgroup after the
|
||||
* parent's migration is complete or put into the target cgroup. No task
|
||||
* can slip out of migration through forking.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
int cgroup_transfer_tasks(struct cgroup *to, struct cgroup *from)
|
||||
{
|
||||
@ -4243,27 +4257,16 @@ static const struct file_operations proc_cgroupstats_operations = {
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* cgroup_fork - attach newly forked task to its parents cgroup.
|
||||
* cgroup_fork - initialize cgroup related fields during copy_process()
|
||||
* @child: pointer to task_struct of forking parent process.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Description: A task inherits its parent's cgroup at fork().
|
||||
*
|
||||
* A pointer to the shared css_set was automatically copied in
|
||||
* fork.c by dup_task_struct(). However, we ignore that copy, since
|
||||
* it was not made under the protection of RCU or cgroup_mutex, so
|
||||
* might no longer be a valid cgroup pointer. cgroup_attach_task() might
|
||||
* have already changed current->cgroups, allowing the previously
|
||||
* referenced cgroup group to be removed and freed.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* At the point that cgroup_fork() is called, 'current' is the parent
|
||||
* task, and the passed argument 'child' points to the child task.
|
||||
* A task is associated with the init_css_set until cgroup_post_fork()
|
||||
* attaches it to the parent's css_set. Empty cg_list indicates that
|
||||
* @child isn't holding reference to its css_set.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
void cgroup_fork(struct task_struct *child)
|
||||
{
|
||||
task_lock(current);
|
||||
get_css_set(task_css_set(current));
|
||||
child->cgroups = current->cgroups;
|
||||
task_unlock(current);
|
||||
RCU_INIT_POINTER(child->cgroups, &init_css_set);
|
||||
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&child->cg_list);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -4283,21 +4286,38 @@ void cgroup_post_fork(struct task_struct *child)
|
||||
int i;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* use_task_css_set_links is set to 1 before we walk the tasklist
|
||||
* under the tasklist_lock and we read it here after we added the child
|
||||
* to the tasklist under the tasklist_lock as well. If the child wasn't
|
||||
* yet in the tasklist when we walked through it from
|
||||
* cgroup_enable_task_cg_lists(), then use_task_css_set_links value
|
||||
* should be visible now due to the paired locking and barriers implied
|
||||
* by LOCK/UNLOCK: it is written before the tasklist_lock unlock
|
||||
* in cgroup_enable_task_cg_lists() and read here after the tasklist_lock
|
||||
* lock on fork.
|
||||
* This may race against cgroup_enable_task_cg_links(). As that
|
||||
* function sets use_task_css_set_links before grabbing
|
||||
* tasklist_lock and we just went through tasklist_lock to add
|
||||
* @child, it's guaranteed that either we see the set
|
||||
* use_task_css_set_links or cgroup_enable_task_cg_lists() sees
|
||||
* @child during its iteration.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* If we won the race, @child is associated with %current's
|
||||
* css_set. Grabbing css_set_rwsem guarantees both that the
|
||||
* association is stable, and, on completion of the parent's
|
||||
* migration, @child is visible in the source of migration or
|
||||
* already in the destination cgroup. This guarantee is necessary
|
||||
* when implementing operations which need to migrate all tasks of
|
||||
* a cgroup to another.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Note that if we lose to cgroup_enable_task_cg_links(), @child
|
||||
* will remain in init_css_set. This is safe because all tasks are
|
||||
* in the init_css_set before cg_links is enabled and there's no
|
||||
* operation which transfers all tasks out of init_css_set.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (use_task_css_set_links) {
|
||||
struct css_set *cset;
|
||||
|
||||
down_write(&css_set_rwsem);
|
||||
cset = task_css_set_check(current,
|
||||
lockdep_is_held(&css_set_rwsem));
|
||||
task_lock(child);
|
||||
if (list_empty(&child->cg_list))
|
||||
list_add(&child->cg_list, &task_css_set(child)->tasks);
|
||||
if (list_empty(&child->cg_list)) {
|
||||
rcu_assign_pointer(child->cgroups, cset);
|
||||
list_add(&child->cg_list, &cset->tasks);
|
||||
get_css_set(cset);
|
||||
}
|
||||
task_unlock(child);
|
||||
up_write(&css_set_rwsem);
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -4353,6 +4373,7 @@ void cgroup_exit(struct task_struct *tsk, int run_callbacks)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct cgroup_subsys *ss;
|
||||
struct css_set *cset;
|
||||
bool put_cset = false;
|
||||
int i;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
@ -4361,8 +4382,10 @@ void cgroup_exit(struct task_struct *tsk, int run_callbacks)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!list_empty(&tsk->cg_list)) {
|
||||
down_write(&css_set_rwsem);
|
||||
if (!list_empty(&tsk->cg_list))
|
||||
if (!list_empty(&tsk->cg_list)) {
|
||||
list_del_init(&tsk->cg_list);
|
||||
put_cset = true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
up_write(&css_set_rwsem);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -4384,7 +4407,8 @@ void cgroup_exit(struct task_struct *tsk, int run_callbacks)
|
||||
}
|
||||
task_unlock(tsk);
|
||||
|
||||
put_css_set(cset, true);
|
||||
if (put_cset)
|
||||
put_css_set(cset, true);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void check_for_release(struct cgroup *cgrp)
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user