Minki/linux
1
0
Fork 1
mirror of https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git synced 2024-12-27 13:22:23 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

PM / QoS: Update Documentation for the pm_qos and dev_pm_qos frameworks

Browse Source 
Update the documentation for the recently updated pm_qos API, kernel
and user space.  Add documentation for the per-device PM QoS
(dev_pm_qos) framework API.

Signed-off-by: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
This commit is contained in:
Jean Pihet 2011-10-04 21:54:45 +02:00 committed by Rafael J. Wysocki
parent 1a9a91525d
commit e3cba3243e
1 changed files with 87 additions and 5 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

92
Documentation/power/pm_qos_interface.txt
View File

@ -4,14 +4,19 @@ This interface provides a kernel and user mode interface for registering
performance expectations by drivers, subsystems and user space applications on
one of the parameters.
Currently we have {cpu_dma_latency, network_latency, network_throughput} as the
initial set of pm_qos parameters.
Two different PM QoS frameworks are available:
1. PM QoS classes for cpu_dma_latency, network_latency, network_throughput.
2. the per-device PM QoS framework provides the API to manage the per-device latency
constraints.
Each parameters have defined units:
* latency: usec
* timeout: usec
* throughput: kbs (kilo bit / sec)
1. PM QoS framework
The infrastructure exposes multiple misc device nodes one per implemented
parameter. The set of parameters implement is defined by pm_qos_power_init()
and pm_qos_params.h. This is done because having the available parameters
@ -23,14 +28,18 @@ an aggregated target value. The aggregated target value is updated with
changes to the request list or elements of the list. Typically the
aggregated target value is simply the max or min of the request values held
in the parameter list elements.
Note: the aggregated target value is implemented as an atomic variable so that
reading the aggregated value does not require any locking mechanism.
From kernel mode the use of this interface is simple:
handle = pm_qos_add_request(param_class, target_value):
Will insert an element into the list for that identified PM_QOS class with the
void pm_qos_add_request(handle, param_class, target_value):
Will insert an element into the list for that identified PM QoS class with the
target value. Upon change to this list the new target is recomputed and any
registered notifiers are called only if the target value is now different.
Clients of pm_qos need to save the returned handle.
Clients of pm_qos need to save the returned handle for future use in other
pm_qos API functions.
void pm_qos_update_request(handle, new_target_value):
Will update the list element pointed to by the handle with the new target value
@ -42,6 +51,20 @@ Will remove the element. After removal it will update the aggregate target and
call the notification tree if the target was changed as a result of removing
the request.
int pm_qos_request(param_class):
Returns the aggregated value for a given PM QoS class.
int pm_qos_request_active(handle):
Returns if the request is still active, i.e. it has not been removed from a
PM QoS class constraints list.
int pm_qos_add_notifier(param_class, notifier):
Adds a notification callback function to the PM QoS class. The callback is
called when the aggregated value for the PM QoS class is changed.
int pm_qos_remove_notifier(int param_class, notifier):
Removes the notification callback function for the PM QoS class.
From user mode:
Only processes can register a pm_qos request. To provide for automatic
@ -63,4 +86,63 @@ To remove the user mode request for a target value simply close the device
node.
2. PM QoS per-device latency framework
For each device a list of performance requests is maintained along with
an aggregated target value. The aggregated target value is updated with
changes to the request list or elements of the list. Typically the
aggregated target value is simply the max or min of the request values held
in the parameter list elements.
Note: the aggregated target value is implemented as an atomic variable so that
reading the aggregated value does not require any locking mechanism.
From kernel mode the use of this interface is the following:
int dev_pm_qos_add_request(device, handle, value):
Will insert an element into the list for that identified device with the
target value. Upon change to this list the new target is recomputed and any
registered notifiers are called only if the target value is now different.
Clients of dev_pm_qos need to save the handle for future use in other
dev_pm_qos API functions.
int dev_pm_qos_update_request(handle, new_value):
Will update the list element pointed to by the handle with the new target value
and recompute the new aggregated target, calling the notification trees if the
target is changed.
int dev_pm_qos_remove_request(handle):
Will remove the element. After removal it will update the aggregate target and
call the notification trees if the target was changed as a result of removing
the request.
s32 dev_pm_qos_read_value(device):
Returns the aggregated value for a given device's constraints list.
Notification mechanisms:
The per-device PM QoS framework has 2 different and distinct notification trees:
a per-device notification tree and a global notification tree.
int dev_pm_qos_add_notifier(device, notifier):
Adds a notification callback function for the device.
The callback is called when the aggregated value of the device constraints list
is changed.
int dev_pm_qos_remove_notifier(device, notifier):
Removes the notification callback function for the device.
int dev_pm_qos_add_global_notifier(notifier):
Adds a notification callback function in the global notification tree of the
framework.
The callback is called when the aggregated value for any device is changed.
int dev_pm_qos_remove_global_notifier(notifier):
Removes the notification callback function from the global notification tree
of the framework.
From user mode:
No API for user space access to the per-device latency constraints is provided
yet - still under discussion.