block: Mark expected switch fall-throughs

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.

This patch fixes the following warnings:

drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h:1774:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h:1774:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h:1774:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h:1774:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h:1774:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c:3093:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c:3120:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
drivers/block/drbd/drbd_req.c:856:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]

Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3

This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enable
-Wimplicit-fallthrough

Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanya.kulkarni@wdc.com>
Acked-by: Roland Kammerer <roland.kammerer@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
This commit is contained in:
Gustavo A. R. Silva 2019-01-23 00:33:09 -06:00
parent afb33e40d5
commit e16fb3a8d2
4 changed files with 5 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@ -1778,7 +1778,7 @@ static inline void __drbd_chk_io_error_(struct drbd_device *device,
_drbd_set_state(_NS(device, disk, D_INCONSISTENT), CS_HARD, NULL);
break;
}
/* NOTE fall through for DRBD_META_IO_ERROR or DRBD_FORCE_DETACH */
/* fall through - for DRBD_META_IO_ERROR or DRBD_FORCE_DETACH */
case EP_DETACH:
case EP_CALL_HELPER:
/* Remember whether we saw a READ or WRITE error.

View File

@ -3094,7 +3094,7 @@ static int drbd_asb_recover_0p(struct drbd_peer_device *peer_device) __must_hold
rv = 1;
break;
}
/* Else fall through to one of the other strategies... */
/* Else fall through - to one of the other strategies... */
case ASB_DISCARD_OLDER_PRI:
if (self == 0 && peer == 1) {
rv = 1;
@ -3119,7 +3119,7 @@ static int drbd_asb_recover_0p(struct drbd_peer_device *peer_device) __must_hold
}
if (after_sb_0p == ASB_DISCARD_ZERO_CHG)
break;
/* else: fall through */
/* else, fall through */
case ASB_DISCARD_LEAST_CHG:
if (ch_self < ch_peer)
rv = -1;

View File

@ -866,7 +866,7 @@ int __req_mod(struct drbd_request *req, enum drbd_req_event what,
} /* else: FIXME can this happen? */
break;
}
/* else, fall through to BARRIER_ACKED */
/* else, fall through - to BARRIER_ACKED */
case BARRIER_ACKED:
/* barrier ack for READ requests does not make sense */

View File

@ -439,6 +439,7 @@ static void card_state_change(struct rsxx_cardinfo *card,
* Fall through so the DMA devices can be attached and
* the user can attempt to pull off their data.
*/
/* fall through */
case CARD_STATE_GOOD:
st = rsxx_get_card_size8(card, &card->size8);
if (st)