mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-19 02:21:47 +00:00
block: Mark expected switch fall-throughs
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. This patch fixes the following warnings: drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h:1774:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h:1774:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h:1774:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h:1774:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h:1774:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c:3093:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c:3120:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] drivers/block/drbd/drbd_req.c:856:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3 This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanya.kulkarni@wdc.com> Acked-by: Roland Kammerer <roland.kammerer@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
afb33e40d5
commit
e16fb3a8d2
@ -1778,7 +1778,7 @@ static inline void __drbd_chk_io_error_(struct drbd_device *device,
|
||||
_drbd_set_state(_NS(device, disk, D_INCONSISTENT), CS_HARD, NULL);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
/* NOTE fall through for DRBD_META_IO_ERROR or DRBD_FORCE_DETACH */
|
||||
/* fall through - for DRBD_META_IO_ERROR or DRBD_FORCE_DETACH */
|
||||
case EP_DETACH:
|
||||
case EP_CALL_HELPER:
|
||||
/* Remember whether we saw a READ or WRITE error.
|
||||
|
@ -3094,7 +3094,7 @@ static int drbd_asb_recover_0p(struct drbd_peer_device *peer_device) __must_hold
|
||||
rv = 1;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
/* Else fall through to one of the other strategies... */
|
||||
/* Else fall through - to one of the other strategies... */
|
||||
case ASB_DISCARD_OLDER_PRI:
|
||||
if (self == 0 && peer == 1) {
|
||||
rv = 1;
|
||||
@ -3119,7 +3119,7 @@ static int drbd_asb_recover_0p(struct drbd_peer_device *peer_device) __must_hold
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (after_sb_0p == ASB_DISCARD_ZERO_CHG)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
/* else: fall through */
|
||||
/* else, fall through */
|
||||
case ASB_DISCARD_LEAST_CHG:
|
||||
if (ch_self < ch_peer)
|
||||
rv = -1;
|
||||
|
@ -866,7 +866,7 @@ int __req_mod(struct drbd_request *req, enum drbd_req_event what,
|
||||
} /* else: FIXME can this happen? */
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
/* else, fall through to BARRIER_ACKED */
|
||||
/* else, fall through - to BARRIER_ACKED */
|
||||
|
||||
case BARRIER_ACKED:
|
||||
/* barrier ack for READ requests does not make sense */
|
||||
|
@ -439,6 +439,7 @@ static void card_state_change(struct rsxx_cardinfo *card,
|
||||
* Fall through so the DMA devices can be attached and
|
||||
* the user can attempt to pull off their data.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
/* fall through */
|
||||
case CARD_STATE_GOOD:
|
||||
st = rsxx_get_card_size8(card, &card->size8);
|
||||
if (st)
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user