Minki/linux
1
0
Fork 1
mirror of https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git synced 2024-09-21 07:23:06 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

fs: do not drop inode_lock in dispose_list

Browse Source 
Despite the comment above it we can not safely drop the lock here.
invalidate_list is called from many other places that just umount.
Also switch to proper list macros now that we never drop the lock.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
This commit is contained in:
Christoph Hellwig 2010-10-24 19:40:24 +02:00 committed by Al Viro
parent 7ccf19a804
commit d895a1c96a
1 changed files with 2 additions and 18 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

20
fs/inode.c
View File

@ -482,26 +482,10 @@ static void dispose_list(struct list_head *head)
*/
static int invalidate_list(struct list_head *head, struct list_head *dispose)
{
struct list_head *next;
struct inode *inode, *next;
int busy = 0;
next = head->next;
for (;;) {
struct list_head *tmp = next;
struct inode *inode;
/*
* We can reschedule here without worrying about the list's
* consistency because the per-sb list of inodes must not
* change during umount anymore, and because iprune_sem keeps
* shrink_icache_memory() away.
*/
cond_resched_lock(&inode_lock);
next = next->next;
if (tmp == head)
break;
inode = list_entry(tmp, struct inode, i_sb_list);
list_for_each_entry_safe(inode, next, head, i_sb_list) {
if (inode->i_state & I_NEW)
continue;
if (atomic_read(&inode->i_count)) {