mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-10 14:11:52 +00:00
ksm: distribute remove_mm_from_lists
Do some housekeeping in ksm.c, to help make the next patch easier to understand: remove the function remove_mm_from_lists, distributing its code to its callsites scan_get_next_rmap_item and __ksm_exit. That turns out to be a win in scan_get_next_rmap_item: move its remove_trailing_rmap_items and cursor advancement up, and it becomes simpler than before. __ksm_exit becomes messier, but will change again; and moving its remove_trailing_rmap_items up lets us strengthen the unstable tree item's age condition in remove_rmap_item_from_tree. Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk> Acked-by: Izik Eidus <ieidus@redhat.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
d952b79136
commit
cd551f9751
97
mm/ksm.c
97
mm/ksm.c
@ -444,14 +444,9 @@ static void remove_rmap_item_from_tree(struct rmap_item *rmap_item)
|
||||
* But __ksm_exit has to be careful: do the rb_erase
|
||||
* if it's interrupting a scan, and this rmap_item was
|
||||
* inserted by this scan rather than left from before.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Because of the case in which remove_mm_from_lists
|
||||
* increments seqnr before removing rmaps, unstable_nr
|
||||
* may even be 2 behind seqnr, but should never be
|
||||
* further behind. Yes, I did have trouble with this!
|
||||
*/
|
||||
age = (unsigned char)(ksm_scan.seqnr - rmap_item->address);
|
||||
BUG_ON(age > 2);
|
||||
BUG_ON(age > 1);
|
||||
if (!age)
|
||||
rb_erase(&rmap_item->node, &root_unstable_tree);
|
||||
ksm_pages_unshared--;
|
||||
@ -546,37 +541,6 @@ out:
|
||||
return err;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void remove_mm_from_lists(struct mm_struct *mm)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct mm_slot *mm_slot;
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock(&ksm_mmlist_lock);
|
||||
mm_slot = get_mm_slot(mm);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* This mm_slot is always at the scanning cursor when we're
|
||||
* called from scan_get_next_rmap_item; but it's a special
|
||||
* case when we're called from __ksm_exit.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (ksm_scan.mm_slot == mm_slot) {
|
||||
ksm_scan.mm_slot = list_entry(
|
||||
mm_slot->mm_list.next, struct mm_slot, mm_list);
|
||||
ksm_scan.address = 0;
|
||||
ksm_scan.rmap_item = list_entry(
|
||||
&ksm_scan.mm_slot->rmap_list, struct rmap_item, link);
|
||||
if (ksm_scan.mm_slot == &ksm_mm_head)
|
||||
ksm_scan.seqnr++;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
hlist_del(&mm_slot->link);
|
||||
list_del(&mm_slot->mm_list);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&ksm_mmlist_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
remove_trailing_rmap_items(mm_slot, mm_slot->rmap_list.next);
|
||||
free_mm_slot(mm_slot);
|
||||
clear_bit(MMF_VM_MERGEABLE, &mm->flags);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static u32 calc_checksum(struct page *page)
|
||||
{
|
||||
u32 checksum;
|
||||
@ -1241,33 +1205,31 @@ next_mm:
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (!ksm_scan.address) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We've completed a full scan of all vmas, holding mmap_sem
|
||||
* throughout, and found no VM_MERGEABLE: so do the same as
|
||||
* __ksm_exit does to remove this mm from all our lists now.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
remove_mm_from_lists(mm);
|
||||
up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
|
||||
slot = ksm_scan.mm_slot;
|
||||
if (slot != &ksm_mm_head)
|
||||
goto next_mm;
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Nuke all the rmap_items that are above this current rmap:
|
||||
* because there were no VM_MERGEABLE vmas with such addresses.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
remove_trailing_rmap_items(slot, ksm_scan.rmap_item->link.next);
|
||||
up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock(&ksm_mmlist_lock);
|
||||
slot = list_entry(slot->mm_list.next, struct mm_slot, mm_list);
|
||||
ksm_scan.mm_slot = slot;
|
||||
ksm_scan.mm_slot = list_entry(slot->mm_list.next,
|
||||
struct mm_slot, mm_list);
|
||||
if (ksm_scan.address == 0) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We've completed a full scan of all vmas, holding mmap_sem
|
||||
* throughout, and found no VM_MERGEABLE: so do the same as
|
||||
* __ksm_exit does to remove this mm from all our lists now.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
hlist_del(&slot->link);
|
||||
list_del(&slot->mm_list);
|
||||
free_mm_slot(slot);
|
||||
clear_bit(MMF_VM_MERGEABLE, &mm->flags);
|
||||
}
|
||||
spin_unlock(&ksm_mmlist_lock);
|
||||
up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Repeat until we've completed scanning the whole list */
|
||||
slot = ksm_scan.mm_slot;
|
||||
if (slot != &ksm_mm_head)
|
||||
goto next_mm;
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1408,13 +1370,38 @@ int __ksm_enter(struct mm_struct *mm)
|
||||
|
||||
void __ksm_exit(struct mm_struct *mm)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct mm_slot *mm_slot;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* This process is exiting: doesn't hold and doesn't need mmap_sem;
|
||||
* but we do need to exclude ksmd and other exiters while we modify
|
||||
* the various lists and trees.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
mutex_lock(&ksm_thread_mutex);
|
||||
remove_mm_from_lists(mm);
|
||||
spin_lock(&ksm_mmlist_lock);
|
||||
mm_slot = get_mm_slot(mm);
|
||||
if (!list_empty(&mm_slot->rmap_list)) {
|
||||
spin_unlock(&ksm_mmlist_lock);
|
||||
remove_trailing_rmap_items(mm_slot, mm_slot->rmap_list.next);
|
||||
spin_lock(&ksm_mmlist_lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (ksm_scan.mm_slot == mm_slot) {
|
||||
ksm_scan.mm_slot = list_entry(
|
||||
mm_slot->mm_list.next, struct mm_slot, mm_list);
|
||||
ksm_scan.address = 0;
|
||||
ksm_scan.rmap_item = list_entry(
|
||||
&ksm_scan.mm_slot->rmap_list, struct rmap_item, link);
|
||||
if (ksm_scan.mm_slot == &ksm_mm_head)
|
||||
ksm_scan.seqnr++;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
hlist_del(&mm_slot->link);
|
||||
list_del(&mm_slot->mm_list);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&ksm_mmlist_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
free_mm_slot(mm_slot);
|
||||
clear_bit(MMF_VM_MERGEABLE, &mm->flags);
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&ksm_thread_mutex);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user