mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-12-28 13:51:44 +00:00
rlimit: Properly call security_task_setrlimit
Modify do_prlimit to call security_task_setrlimit passing the task whose rlimit we are changing not the tsk->group_leader. In general this should not matter as the lsms implementing security_task_setrlimit apparmor and selinux both examine the task->cred to see what should be allowed on the destination task. That task->cred is shared between tasks created with CLONE_THREAD unless thread keyrings are in play, in which case both apparmor and selinux create duplicate security contexts. So the only time when it will matter which thread is passed to security_task_setrlimit is if one of the threads of a process performs an operation that changes only it's credentials. At which point if a thread has done that we don't want to hide that information from the lsms. So fix the call of security_task_setrlimit. With the removal of tsk->group_leader this makes the code slightly faster, more comprehensible and maintainable. Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
d27158c0cf
commit
cad4ea546b
@ -1396,8 +1396,7 @@ int do_prlimit(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned int resource,
|
||||
!capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE))
|
||||
retval = -EPERM;
|
||||
if (!retval)
|
||||
retval = security_task_setrlimit(tsk->group_leader,
|
||||
resource, new_rlim);
|
||||
retval = security_task_setrlimit(tsk, resource, new_rlim);
|
||||
if (resource == RLIMIT_CPU && new_rlim->rlim_cur == 0) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* The caller is asking for an immediate RLIMIT_CPU
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user