mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-11 14:42:24 +00:00
dm stripe: optimize sector division
Optimize sector division: If the number of stripes is a power of two, we can do shift and mask instead of division. Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
65988525ab
commit
c96053b767
@ -25,6 +25,8 @@ struct stripe {
|
||||
|
||||
struct stripe_c {
|
||||
uint32_t stripes;
|
||||
int stripes_shift;
|
||||
sector_t stripes_mask;
|
||||
|
||||
/* The size of this target / num. stripes */
|
||||
sector_t stripe_width;
|
||||
@ -162,16 +164,21 @@ static int stripe_ctr(struct dm_target *ti, unsigned int argc, char **argv)
|
||||
|
||||
/* Set pointer to dm target; used in trigger_event */
|
||||
sc->ti = ti;
|
||||
|
||||
sc->stripes = stripes;
|
||||
sc->stripe_width = width;
|
||||
|
||||
if (stripes & (stripes - 1))
|
||||
sc->stripes_shift = -1;
|
||||
else {
|
||||
sc->stripes_shift = ffs(stripes) - 1;
|
||||
sc->stripes_mask = ((sector_t) stripes) - 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ti->split_io = chunk_size;
|
||||
ti->num_flush_requests = stripes;
|
||||
|
||||
sc->chunk_shift = ffs(chunk_size) - 1;
|
||||
sc->chunk_mask = ((sector_t) chunk_size) - 1;
|
||||
for (sc->chunk_shift = 0; chunk_size; sc->chunk_shift++)
|
||||
chunk_size >>= 1;
|
||||
sc->chunk_shift--;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Get the stripe destinations.
|
||||
@ -213,7 +220,13 @@ static void stripe_map_sector(struct stripe_c *sc, sector_t sector,
|
||||
sector_t offset = dm_target_offset(sc->ti, sector);
|
||||
sector_t chunk = offset >> sc->chunk_shift;
|
||||
|
||||
*stripe = sector_div(chunk, sc->stripes);
|
||||
if (sc->stripes_shift < 0)
|
||||
*stripe = sector_div(chunk, sc->stripes);
|
||||
else {
|
||||
*stripe = chunk & sc->stripes_mask;
|
||||
chunk >>= sc->stripes_shift;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
*result = (chunk << sc->chunk_shift) | (offset & sc->chunk_mask);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user